[cctbxbb] Documentation .... again

[David Waterman]

Agreed. LaTeX is reasonably straightforward for simple use and not much
more verbose than rST, that is, once someone has kindly provided a template
with all the preamble boilerplate and some useful examples. Looks like Nat
has just done that ;-)

-- David



On 12 December 2012 11:35, Luc Bourhis <luc_j_bourhis at mac.com> wrote:

> Hi Graeme,
>
>
> I think it is fair to say, if you want to add just text / code to the
> example you could just add it in and someone else could add the
> \begin{verbatim} etc. needed to make it nicely typeset.
>
>
> Definitively. Especially considering that reST can be translated to LaTeX
> using Sphinx at least, therefore removing most of the drudgery. I would be
> more than happy to give a hand anyway. So, please Pavel, feel free to
> submit contributions following reST if that makes your life easier.
> Eventually, comparing the same text of yours in reST and in LaTeX, you may
> feel like you could do it in LaTeX in the first place!!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Luc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cctbxbb mailing list
> cctbxbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/cctbxbb/attachments/20121212/66d3529f/attachment.htm>