[phenixbb] Tracing and refining b-strands at 3.3A resolution
Phil Jeffrey
pjeffrey at Princeton.EDU
Wed Aug 26 08:43:33 PDT 2009
Ralf et al.
My question with this approach is that is there any potential to have a
negative effect on refining the structure, given that one is introducing
a number of bonds with relatively high average deviations from the mean
? The rest of the bonded (covalent) geometry has an rms in the range
0.004 - 0.015 (-ish) but this is one to two orders of magnitude tighter
than a hydrogen bond. Is the target function sophisticated enough to
handle this or is there a problem with treating hbonds and covalent
bonds as peers ?
Phil Jeffrey
Princeton
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> Hi Gino,
>
>> So my question is, is there a way in Phenix to use a 'reference model'
>> during refinement to force a given stretch of polypeptide chain to
>> 'stay' b-stranded during refinement?
>
> Nope. But you could use the custom bond definitions to restrain hydrogen
> bonds. The syntax is explained in the phenix.refine documentation;
> an example is below.
> The main trouble is that we don't have an automatic tool to generate
> the bond restraints for you. Maybe others have suggestions how to
> use external programs?
>
> Ralf
>
>
> refinement.geometry_restraints.edits {
> bond {
> action = *add delete change
> atom_selection_1 = "chain G and resname ASP and resid 20 and name N"
> atom_selection_2 = "chain G and resname GLY and resid 33 and name O"
> symmetry_operation = None
> distance_ideal = 2.8
> sigma = 0.1
> slack = 0.3
> }
> bond {
> action = *add delete change
> atom_selection_1 = "chain G and resname GLY and resid 33 and name N"
> atom_selection_2 = "chain G and resname SER and resid 21 and name O"
> symmetry_operation = None
> distance_ideal = 2.8
> sigma = 0.1
> slack = 0.4
> }
> }
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list