[phenixbb] FOM in table 1
Nathaniel Echols
nechols at lbl.gov
Mon Apr 30 11:04:55 PDT 2012
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Johan Hattne <jhattne at lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> On 29 Apr 2012, at 23:55, Dialing Pretty wrote:
>
>> In some table 1 of the crystallography paper, there is an item called "FOM". Will you please explain the meaning of it? Do we have a server to get it or some other route to get this value?
>
> I'm guessing this is the "figure of merit", defined as the cosine of the phase error. Since the correct phase is generally unknown it's an estimate, which may be calculated during density modification (phase improvement).
It will probably appear somewhat in the phenix.refine log file as
well, in one of the tables at the end:
stage <pher> fom alpha beta
0 : 55.378 0.4528 0.8776 905662.442
1_bss: 49.163 0.5316 1.2928 650255.977
1_xyz: 46.167 0.5687 1.3802 559471.522
1_adp: 40.720 0.6353 1.4942 483440.556
2_bss: 41.137 0.6303 1.4612 505402.815
2_xyz: 36.144 0.6885 1.5241 412562.858
2_adp: 33.622 0.7173 1.4769 378709.335
3_bss: 33.992 0.7133 1.4808 392255.409
3_xyz: 33.219 0.7213 1.5110 375299.213
3_adp: 32.144 0.7339 1.3212 366007.489
3_bss: 32.351 0.7318 1.3162 372771.223
But like Johan says, it's an estimate, and not a very useful number
for evaluating the final model quality - however, the FOM for
experiment phasing is a relatively good estimate of the quality of the
initial map, and I suspect most papers which include it may be
referring to this, not the value for the refined model. If you didn't
use experimental phasing for your structure, I wouldn't bother
reporting the FOM unless the journal (or a reviewer) requires it.
-Nat
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list