[phenixbb] Is this a Phaser bug or am I misinterpreting ?
Phil Jeffrey
pjeffrey at princeton.edu
Tue Dec 4 16:17:30 PST 2012
Phaser from CCP4 6.3.0 built via fink running on OSX 10.6.8 in 64-bit mode.
This is a snippet from a much larger run, ongoing. In multiple
instances the order of the LLG and the Z-score in the translation
function are not in sync: (42.16, 40.23, 40.18 vs 5.14, 5.24, 4.82) and
looks like the Z-scores are still shown in the peak rank order before
rescoring, while the LLGs are after rescoring.
SET #5 of 6 TRIAL #60 of 115
----------------------------
Search Euler = 263.0 82.1 85.7, Ensemble = ensemb3
ANNOTATION: RFZ=3.6 TFZ=3.8 PAK=0 LLG=26 LLG=30
Known MR solutions
SOLU SPAC C 1 2 1
SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemb3 EULER 30.6 65.7 246.9 FRAC 0.90 0.00 0.17
BFAC -5.14
Grid sampling: 0.825029 Angstroms
Select peaks over 67.5% of top (i.e. 0.675*(top-mean)+mean)
Top 360 translations before clustering will be rescored
Calculating Likelihood for TF SET #5 of 6 TRIAL #60 of 115
0%
100%
|=========================================================================|
DONE
Scoring 1 randomly sampled translations
Generating Statistics for TF SET #5 of 6 TRIAL #60 of 115
0% 100%
|==| DONE
Top Peaks With Clustering
-------------------------
# Rank of the peak after rescoring search points
(#) Rank of the peak before rescoring search points
LLG Log-Likelihood Gain
Z-Score Number of standard deviations of LLG above the mean
FSS Fast Search Score
Select all peaks
There were 159 peaks
# (#) Frac X Frac Y Frac Z LLG Z-score Split #Group
raw/top
1 6 0.842 0.923 0.779 +42.16 5.14 0 2
52.58/ 52.58
2 3 0.369 0.865 0.553 +40.23 5.24 37 2
53.18/ 53.18
3 10 0.743 0.937 0.261 +40.18 4.82 48 2
50.69/ 50.69
#SITES = 159: OUTPUT TRUNCATED TO 3 SITES
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list