[phenixbb] dev-1261 wizard.test fail

[Morten Groftehauge]

Or you could have the test specify what version of Rosetta the results were
compiled with. It's a bit opaque right now.

Cheers,
Morten


On 7 January 2013 17:43, Terwilliger, Thomas C <terwilliger at lanl.gov> wrote:

> Hi Morten,
>
> Yes, you've guessed correctly that the regression tests do check the
> numbers in the output compared to a standard run. In some cases (as the two
> that you show) some minor change in the algorithms can give "failures" that
> are just due to small changes in algorithms.  I think you can probably
> ignore these two errors. I'll be checking these here and I'll just have it
> ignore these differences if they are uninteresting.
>
> All the best,
> Tom T
>
> On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:35 AM, Morten Groftehauge wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I just updated Rosetta to 3.4 and it seems to have compiled correctly
> (at least no error interruptions). I've done this enough to not be
> satisfied by that and ran
> > > phenix_regression.wizards.test_command_line_rosetta_quick
> > which goes past the Rosetta tests correctly but fails at
> > =================================================================
> > Running test_prerefine
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601
> > r {{ 0.87799   0.06946  -0.47362}
> >    {-0.02049   0.99396   0.10779}
> >    { 0.47825  -0.08494   0.87411}}
> > ---
> > r {{ 0.84375   0.06393  -0.53291}
> >    {-0.02789   0.99676   0.07541}
> >    { 0.53601  -0.04877   0.84280}}
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > FAILED
> > See log files test_prerefine/test_prerefine.log
>  test_prerefine/test_prerefine_current.log
> > =================================================================
> > Running test_prerefine_double
> > OK
> > =================================================================
> > Running test_prerefine_no_data
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Numbers do not match: 0.47825 0.53601
> > r {{ 0.87799   0.06946  -0.47362}
> >    {-0.02049   0.99396   0.10779}
> >    { 0.47825  -0.08494   0.87411}}
> > ---
> > r {{ 0.84375   0.06393  -0.53291}
> >    {-0.02789   0.99676   0.07541}
> >    { 0.53601  -0.04877   0.84280}}
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > FAILED
> > See log files test_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data.log
>  test_prerefine_no_data/test_prerefine_no_data_current.log
> > =================================================================
> > When I look in the log there are no error messages. I don't need to
> prerefine so I'm good but I still find it weird.
> > I tried again with Rosetta 3.3 and got no error flags.
> >
> > Is it because the quick tests are checking the result against the
> results that you got earlier and the algorithm has been changed between 3.3
> and 3.4?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Morten
> >
> > PS Really enjoyed the talks at the CCP4 study weekend.
> >
> > --
> > Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD
> > Pohl Group
> > Durham University
> > _______________________________________________
> > phenixbb mailing list
> > phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>



-- 
Morten K Grøftehauge, PhD
Pohl Group
Durham University
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20130108/7d05a9c4/attachment-0001.htm>