[phenixbb] REMARK 3 NCS
Jeff Headd
jjheadd at lbl.gov
Thu Oct 3 07:11:41 PDT 2013
Hi Luca,
Thanks for pointing this out. It looks like I introduced a bug when I
refactored some of the torsion NCS code. I'll work up a fix today which
will be available in the next nightly release.
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Luca Pellegrini <lp212 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Yes, I am using torsion angle NCS in phenix.refine. I don't mean the NCS
> matrices, but the torsion NCS details. Here's an example of the REMARK 3
> NCS that Phenix 1.8.2-1309 used to write in the PDB header and that have
> disappeared from the PDB header with Phenix 1.8.3-1479 and 1.8.4-1496:
>
> REMARK 3 TORSION NCS DETAILS.
> REMARK 3 NUMBER OF NCS GROUPS : 1
> REMARK 3 NCS GROUP : 1
> REMARK 3 SELECTION : chain 'A'
> REMARK 3 SELECTION : chain 'B'
> REMARK 3 RESTRAINED TORSIONS: 4042
> REMARK 3 BELOW LIMIT RMSD : 0.620
> REMARK 3 ALL RESTRAINT RMSD : 4.081
> REMARK 3 Histogram of differences under limit:
> REMARK 3 0.000 - 1.500: 3932
> REMARK 3 1.500 - 3.000: 87
> REMARK 3 3.000 - 4.500: 5
> REMARK 3 4.500 - 6.000: 4
> REMARK 3 6.000 - 7.500: 1
> REMARK 3 7.500 - 9.000: 0
> REMARK 3 9.000 - 10.500: 0
> REMARK 3 10.500 - 12.000: 0
> REMARK 3 12.000 - 13.500: 1
> REMARK 3 13.500 - 15.000: 0
> REMARK 3 Histogram of differences over limit:
> REMARK 3 15.000 - 22.400: 0
> REMARK 3 22.400 - 29.800: 0
> REMARK 3 29.800 - 37.200: 0
> REMARK 3 37.200 - 44.600: 0
> REMARK 3 44.600 - 52.000: 1
> REMARK 3 52.000 - 59.400: 3
> REMARK 3 59.400 - 66.800: 0
> REMARK 3 66.800 - 74.200: 0
> REMARK 3 74.200 - 81.600: 4
> REMARK 3 81.600 - 89.000: 4
>
> Luca
>
> On 3 Oct 2013, at 00:39, Pavel Afonine wrote:
>
> > Hi Luca,
> >
> > when NCS is enabled phenix.refine uses torsion angle NCS by default..
> This may explain why you don't get NCS matrices in your PDB file. Is that
> the case?
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> > On 10/2/13 1:26 AM, Luca Pellegrini wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have noticed that Phenix 1.8.4-1496 (as well as 1.8.3-1479) appears
> to have stopped writing the REMARK 3 NCS in the PDB header. Is this so? It
> is useful to have that info when it comes to depositing the coordinates.
> >>
> >> Many thanks,
> >> Luca
> >>
> >> Luca Pellegrini
> >> Department of Biochemistry
> >> University of Cambridge
> >> 80 Tennis Court Road
> >> Cambridge CB2 1GA - UK
> >>
> >> Email: lp212 at cam.ac.uk
> >> Tel: 0044-1223-760469
> >> Fax: 0044-1223-766002
> >> Sanger building, room 3.59
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > phenixbb mailing list
> > phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
> Luca Pellegrini
> Department of Biochemistry
> University of Cambridge
> 80 Tennis Court Road
> Cambridge CB2 1GA - UK
>
> Email: lp212 at cam.ac.uk
> Tel: 0044-1223-760469
> Fax: 0044-1223-766002
> Sanger building, room 3.59
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20131003/1624cb3f/attachment.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list