[phenixbb] Two ions at same position

Nathaniel Echols nechols at lbl.gov
Mon Aug 4 08:56:48 PDT 2014


On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Alastair Fyfe <afyfe at soe.ucsc.edu> wrote:

>  I also ran into this recently and was puzzled about the correct PDB
> encoding. Using the same residue number with differing altloc, atom name
> and  element fields seems straightforward but what should the residue name
> be ? In my experience not all PDB-processing software is happy with
> different residue names  for the same residue number. Is there definitive
> PDB  documentation for this case?
>

This does appear to be permitted by the PDB (in addition to Phenix, of
course) - a good example is crambin (1CBN), which has a naturally occurring
polymorphism:

ATOM    352  N  ASER A  22       4.909  12.659  -3.127  0.20  3.03           N
ATOM    353  N  BSER A  22       4.909  12.659  -3.127  0.20  3.03           N
ATOM    354  CA ASER A  22       6.035  13.459  -2.622  0.20  3.04           C
ATOM    355  CA BSER A  22       6.035  13.459  -2.622  0.20  3.04           C
ATOM    372  N  CPRO A  22       4.909  12.659  -3.127  0.60  3.03           N
ATOM    373  CA CPRO A  22       6.035  13.459  -2.622  0.60  3.04           C

There are other examples of crambin that are numbered differently but
this is presumably due to the preferences of the investigator and/or
the limitations of the refinement software used.  A counter-example is
3QXB, which has mixed metal sites:


HETATM 9585 FE  A FE A 301      -6.546  23.487  57.436  0.66 26.72          FE
HETATM 9586 MN  B MN A 302      -6.549  23.490  57.439  0.34 25.22          MN

I would say that if software can't handle the first case (same residue
number, different residue name) that is a bug, but there doesn't
appear to be consensus on the "correct" way to do things.  My
preference would be to keep the numbering the same but the PDB will
accept either convention.


-Nat
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20140804/f717069e/attachment.htm>


More information about the phenixbb mailing list