[phenixbb] How should we estimate the "uncertainty" of the occupancy of an atom?
Pavel Afonine
pafonine at lbl.gov
Wed Feb 11 21:56:18 PST 2015
Hi Peter,
you suggest to calculate "the (free) likelihood".. May I ask:
specifically likelihood of what you are suggesting to calculate and what
is "free" in this context? I guess I'm just lost in jargon, sorry!
Thanks,
Pavel
On 2/11/15 8:08 PM, Peter Zwart wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> How meaningful are the second derivative based estimates obtained via
> full matrix inversion when the gradient is not 0 (i.e. when not in the
> minimum)? I can understand that when you are working with
> high-resolution data and your R-value is close to 0, things could
> work, but what happens when around a more challenging 2A?
>
> If you are interested in the uncertainty of the occupancy, I recommend
> not doing any refinement, but just generate a list of occupancies and
> B-values for the atom of interest and compute the (free) likelihood
> for each model. Subsequent normalisation of the neg-exponent of these
> values, should provide you with an answer that could be just as
> believable as any other method around. A little bit of python
> scripting should do the trick quite easily.
>
> Both the full matrix inversion and the suggestion above probe the
> steepness of the data-agreement hole the structure is sitting in.
> Pavels suggestion explores the spread of local minima around the
> starting configuration. I am not sure what method is more appropriate,
> perhaps it is instructive to know what problem you are trying to solve.
>
> HTH
> P
>
>
>
>
> On 11 February 2015 at 16:13, Masaki UNNO <unno19 at mx.ibaraki.ac.jp
> <mailto:unno19 at mx.ibaraki.ac.jp>> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> Thank you very much for your suggestions.
> I will try making a number of models in which the atom has different
> occupancies (e.g. 0.1-1.0). Then, I will refine them by
> restraining the
> B-factors.
> Actually, our structure contains some reaction intermediates not
> only the
> substrate. So I would like to estimate the ratio.
>
> Best regards
>
> Masaki
> -----Original Message-----
> From: phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org
> <mailto:phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org>
> [mailto:phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org
> <mailto:phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org>] On Behalf Of Pavel
> Afonine
> Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 6:36 AM
> To: Dale Tronrud; phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
> Subject: Re: [phenixbb] How should we estimate the "uncertainty"
> of the
> occupancy of an atom?
>
> Hi Dale,
>
> > P.S. I'll look up the paper you reference but my university does not
> > subscribe to acta Cryst and getting those papers takes time.
>
> it is open access:
>
> http://phenix-online.org/papers/wd5073_reprint.pdf
>
> All the best,
> Pavel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> P.H. Zwart
> Staff Scientist
> Berkeley Center for Structural Biology, Science lead
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories
> 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA-94703, USA
> Cell: 510 289 9246
> SASTBX: http://sastbx.als.lbl.gov
> BCSB: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov
> PHENIX: http://www.phenix-online.org
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20150211/26bcf0a1/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list