[phenixbb] keep torsion restraint on ligand
Pavel Afonine
pafonine at lbl.gov
Wed Jun 17 08:55:53 PDT 2015
Hi Charles,
you are right: setting very low esd is not good, and setting it to zero
will disable the restraint completely.
Pavel
On 6/17/15 07:45, CPMAS Chen wrote:
> Thanks, Oleg.
>
> 1 or 2 degrees work. Actually, it is in the FAQ of phenix refinement.
> Here is the page in case anyone else like to do similar restraint.
>
> http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/faqs/refine.html#targets-and-restraints
>
> *I want my ligand geometry to be absolutely perfect with no deviation
> from the target value(s). Can I just set the sigmas to zero or an
> extremely low value?*
>
> You cannot set the sigma to zero because the weight on the restraints
> is equal to 1/sigma^2. A very low value will not crash, but it will
> almost certainly confuse the minimizer and result in a sub-optimal
> structure, because those restraints will dominate the target and
> gradients, forcing the minimizer to take inappropriately large steps.
>
>
> Charles
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Oleg Sobolev <osobolev at lbl.gov
> <mailto:osobolev at lbl.gov>> wrote:
>
> Dear Charles,
>
> First of all, I would recommend to change value_angle_esd from 0
> to something like 1 or 2 degrees if you want it to be tight.
> Next, make sure that your restraint is actually applied by
> inspecting the resulting .geo file and locating respective
> "dihedral" restraint.
>
> Best regards,
> Oleg Sobolev.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:28 AM, CPMAS Chen <cpmasmit at gmail.com
> <mailto:cpmasmit at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi, All Phenix Users,
>
> I am fitting 2-bromoethanol to the density map. I want to keep
> its gauche conformation, so I edited the cif for this ligand
> to restrain the torsion angle,
>
> loop_
> _chem_comp_tor.comp_id
> _chem_comp_tor.id <http://chem_comp_tor.id>
> _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_1
> _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_2
> _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_3
> _chem_comp_tor.atom_id_4
> _chem_comp_tor.value_angle
> _chem_comp_tor.value_angle_esd
> _chem_comp_tor.period
> BRJ Var_01 BR1 CB CB1 OB1 -60.00 0.0 3
>
>
> But, after refinement, this angle can be close to 90 or even
> 120. Even worse is that the fitting at such angles are not
> better than at -60/60 angle.
>
> How could I fix/restrain the angle during refinement?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Charles
>
> ***************************************************
>
> Charles Chen
>
> Research Associate
>
> University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
>
> Department of Anesthesiology
>
> ******************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org <mailto:phenixbb at phenix-online.org>
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org
> <mailto:phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ***************************************************
>
> Charles Chen
>
> Research Associate
>
> University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
>
> Department of Anesthesiology
>
> ******************************************************
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> phenixbb mailing list
> phenixbb at phenix-online.org
> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://phenix-online.org/pipermail/phenixbb/attachments/20150617/f818369c/attachment.htm>
More information about the phenixbb
mailing list