[phenixbb] Map quality

[Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV]

Dear Mohamed,

I second Pavel's mail :

the metrics described in Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 2593-2606 "Metrics for comparison of crystallographic maps" can be applied using the stand-alone GUI python-based program (test version) which I can send you off-list if you want.

Best wishes,

Sacha Urzhumtsev
________________________________________
De : phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org <phenixbb-bounces at phenix-online.org> de la part de Pavel Afonine <pafonine at lbl.gov>
Envoyé : vendredi 15 mai 2015 18:37
À : mohamed noor; phenixbb at phenix-online.org
Objet : Re: [phenixbb] Map quality

Hi Mohamed,

this is not a simple topic.. Two texts I suggest to have a look at are
listed below I'm sure there are more). They may not give you a quick
solution but perhaps will explain the issues.

Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 2593-2606
Metrics for comparison of crystallographic maps

...

All the best,
Pavel

On 5/15/15 9:10 AM, mohamed noor wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Is there a single (or a few) metrics that can be used to
> quantitatively assess map quality instead of looking at each one in
> Coot? For example, I want to compare the effect of having low
> completeness in the low resolution shells.
>
> Thanks.

_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb at phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave at phenix-online.org