<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi James,<br>
<br>
Thanks for you question!<br>
With the most recent phenix.refine (available through CCI APPS) you can
refine atomic displacement parameters (ADP) as:<br>
<br>
1) individual isotropic;<br>
2) combination: TLS + individual isotropic ADP;<br>
3) grouped (1 ADP per group);<br>
4) any mix of "1)-3)"<br>
<br>
for any selected part of you structure. <br>
<br>
Technically you can refine individual anisotropic ADP as well; however
we don't have restraints for them. This is in my to-do list and will be
implemented in future.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid898966860612161549n32a0a714k42da5841a6a82a11@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""><!---->
In my .def file I can set:
adp {
individual {
isotropic = None
anisotropic = chain a
force_all_to_be_refined_isotropically = True
}
and get ANISO lines in my output pdb. But I'm confused as to whether
this is actually refining with individual anisotropic b's for chain a
(analagous to refining with anisotropic temperature factors in
refmac). Should I be resetting the force_all... to false?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
The lines above are correct. You also need to set
force_all_to_be_refined_isotropically=False<br>
Note that, depending on resolution of your data, unrestrained
individual anisotropic ADP refinement can potentially result in
unphysical ADPs for some atoms or increase in Rfree. If this is not the
case for your model, you're fine then.<br>
<br>
Let me know if you have any questions / problems!<br>
Cheers,<br>
Pavel.<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>