I meant that initially I did not have H in the refinement, sorry for the confusion.<br>By the way - should I still include "not (element H)" into the NCS parameters or it is done automatically. I used this line, but I am not sure if it is needed.<br>
<br><br>I will try the new built and report the results.<br><br>Thank you,<br>Tanya<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Ed Pozharski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:epozh001@umaryland.edu">epozh001@umaryland.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 15:18 -0400, Tatyana Sysoeva wrote:<br>
> when one includes hydrogens into a refinement of a model build with<br>
> data at ~3.6A<br>
<br>
</div>Not sure what you mean by "including into refinement", but if it means<br>
that hydrogen positions are actually refined... well, you shouldn't do<br>
that at 3.6A.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
"Hurry up before we all come back to our senses!"<br>
� � � � � � � � � � � � � Julian, King of Lemurs<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>