Hi All,<br><br> Thanks for Phenix! Anyway quick question, I tried out the "generate Table1" utility for fun and noticed that my I/SigI and completeness do not match what is found in my XSCALE file.<br><br> From Table 1 <br>
<div style="text-align:left"> </div><div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> Completeness (%) 98.62 (90.57)</font></div>
<div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> Mean I/sigma(I) 7.39 (1.59)</font></div><div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> Wilson B-factor 59.78</font></div>
<div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> R-sym </font></div><div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> R-factor 0.2006 (0.3275)</font></div>
<div style="text-align:left"><font size="1" face="courier new, monospace"> R-free 0.2241 (0.3739)</font></div><div style="text-align:left"> </div><div style="text-align:left"><br></div>
<div style="text-align:left"> From XSCALE</div><div style="text-align:left"><br></div><font face="courier new, monospace" size="1"> SUBSET OF INTENSITY DATA WITH SIGNAL/NOISE >= -3.0 AS FUNCTION OF RESOLUTION<br> RESOLUTION NUMBER OF REFLECTIONS COMPLETENESS R-FACTOR R-FACTOR COMPARED I/SIGMA R-meas CC(1/2) Anomal SigAno Nano<br>
LIMIT OBSERVED UNIQUE POSSIBLE OF DATA observed expected Corr<br><br> 20.00 313 69 72 95.8% 3.6% 4.6% 313 30.88 4.3% 99.9* 8 0.725 54<br>
10.00 2174 471 471 100.0% 3.9% 4.8% 2174 28.71 4.4% 99.8* 34* 0.972 382<br> 6.00 8195 1983 1992 99.5% 4.7% 5.3% 8160 20.70 5.4% 99.8* 12* 0.913 1299<br>
5.00 8055 1818 1820 99.9% 7.0% 6.9% 8051 17.73 7.9% 99.5* 7 0.892 1337<br> 4.50 7207 1634 1636 99.9% 6.0% 6.2% 7207 20.06 6.8% 99.6* -1 0.824 1163<br>
4.00 9603 2479 2521 98.3% 6.8% 6.7% 9536 17.05 7.9% 99.4* -2 0.819 1369<br> 3.60 13641 3141 3156 99.5% 9.6% 9.5% 13621 13.71 11.0% 99.1* -2 0.799 2073<br>
3.20 22112 4948 4951 99.9% 16.5% 16.6% 22083 8.82 18.8% 98.1* 4 0.810 3383<br> 3.00 14155 3550 3579 99.2% 27.8% 27.7% 14058 5.45 32.1% 94.6* -1 0.742 1875<br>
2.80 19676 4584 4611 99.4% 44.9% 46.2% 19604 3.71 51.2% 88.5* 3 0.740 2750<br> 2.60 26749 6192 6202 99.8% 76.3% 78.4% 26686 2.20 87.2% 71.8* 1 0.717 3598<br>
2.40 33999 8339 8388 99.4% 130.9% 132.7% 33810 1.26 150.6% 48.5* 1 0.671 4170<br> 2.30 22347 5332 5348 99.7% 198.4% 206.4% 22276 0.85 227.7% 31.5* 0 0.623 2685<br>
total 188226 44540 44747 99.5% 9.0% 9.4% 187579 7.09 10.3% 99.8* 2 0.755 26138</font><div><font face="courier new, monospace" size="1"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">How does Phenix compute these parameters? Obviously my I/sigI has gotten much better (1.59 versus 0.85) but the scaling statistics should be the correct ones.</font></div>
<div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Thanks,</font></div><div>
<font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"> Drew</font></div>