<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Alex,<br>
      <br>
      please try recent (1.8.2-1309 or later) version of Phenix and I
      hope that should eliminate the discrepancy. If not please let us
      know.<br>
      <br>
      Pavel<br>
      <br>
      On 4/24/13 8:38 PM, Alex Theodossis wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAKUw-L66SMxPdznpdFeaE+F2Wste-=EnFxn=eBAgG3aBaNyGYQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">Dear phenixbb,</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Have refined a 1.05A structure with
          riding hydrogen model in phenix v1.8.1-1168 and doing final
          validation.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">The molprobity statistics output by
          phenix include:</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">all atom clashscore = 4.12</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Rotamer outliers = 0.71%</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Overall score = 1.2</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Put through the molprobity server I am
          given the option of analysing with existing hydrogen model, or
          replacing with the 'electron-cloud parameters' they recommend
          for X-ray crystal structures. The results end up being very
          different:</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
          &nbsp;existing H model: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;electron-cloud model:</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">All atom clash score: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;4.66
          (78th percentile) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 3.72 (85th percentile) &nbsp;&nbsp;</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Poor rotamers: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
          &nbsp;1.14% &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1.14%</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Overall score: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
          &nbsp;1.28 (88th percentile) &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;1.20 (92nd percentile)</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">While all three scenarios give
          acceptable statistics, I am surprised by the inconsistency in
          the results given by molprobity, even when using the same
          hydrogen model.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">I am also wondering whether I am using
          a suboptimal riding model in my refinement (generated using
          phenix ready-set).</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Can anyone advise on the reason for
          these inconsistencies (is it just due to differences in the
          version of molprobity being run in each case). Is there
          anything I should be doing differently?</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra">Thanks in advance.</div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">On 18 November 2012 12:36, Alex
            Theodossis <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:alex.theodossis@monash.edu" target="_blank">alex.theodossis@monash.edu</a>&gt;</span>
            wrote:<br>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I'm attempting to install the latest version of
                phenix on mac 10.5.8, using the command line installer.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Installation proceeds well until towards the end,
                where it hangs on:</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>precompiling .py files</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>I can leave it for up to an hour without any further
                progress, but upon typing:</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>ctrl+c</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>The installation comes back to life and proceeds to
                completion.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Can anyone advise as to what might be causing this
                and on how reliable this installation is going to be?</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Thanks in advance.</div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>