<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
Hi Morten,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Yes, this is a disadvantage of the way mr_rosetta runs for now. It tries everything, then picks the best. I can think of two options:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. Try out phenix.MRage which is optimized to try many things in parallel in MR. Then take the best one and run mr_rosetta with it.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2. Run separate mr_rosetta jobs for each search model, and when you see one that is working, trash the others.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>All the best,</div>
<div>Tom T</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>On Jul 9, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Morten Gr�ftehauge wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Dear Phenixbb,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I was wondering if there was any way of getting Rosetta to give up easily and move on to another search model?</div>
<div>Say I have 20 or more equally awful search models. I think there's a possibility that one of them will knock it out of the park (i.e. TFZ > 8). But even if I have Phaser set to fast search I will end up with an exhaustive search because the search models
are so bad.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<pre style="color:rgb(0,0,0)"> fast_search_mode= <span style="color:rgb(204,0,0)">True</span> <span style="color:blue">Run phaser with selection_criteria_rot_value and
then if no obvious solution, repeat with cutoff
lowered by search_down_percent</span>
<a name="anch144" id="search_down_percent"></a> search_down_percent= <span style="color:rgb(204,0,0)">25</span> <span style="color:blue">Used if fast_search_mode=True. Run phaser with
selection_criteria_rot_value and then if no obvious
solution, repeat with cutoff lowered by </span><span style="font-family:arial;color:blue">search_down_percent</span><span style="font-family:arial;color:rgb(34,34,34)"> </span></pre>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="">If I set search_down_percent to 75 does this mean that Phaser will give up easily and move on to the next model? Is this a terrible strategy CPU-time-wise?</div>
<div style="">I am of course aware that search_down_percent is much more likely to give me the right solution for a given model but in this case there are just so many possible search models.</div>
<div style=""><br>
</div>
<div style="">Cheers,</div>
<div style="">Morten</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
Morten K Gr�ftehauge, PhD
<div>Pohl Group</div>
<div>Durham University</div>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>