<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Mads,<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:C7FF02C3-C45E-4AAF-AF0E-30F62E986473@irbbarcelona.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
I've been using the feature enhanced maps for a 2.1Å dataset, and
it really helped for building those tricky loop-regions.</blockquote>
<br>
oh good!<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:C7FF02C3-C45E-4AAF-AF0E-30F62E986473@irbbarcelona.org"
type="cite">
<div>I also experience the waters to stand out clear in this type
of map.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, they should (especially those that are real, as opposed to
noise!).<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:C7FF02C3-C45E-4AAF-AF0E-30F62E986473@irbbarcelona.org"
type="cite">
<div>And btw., does it make any sense to calculate a FEM based on
a composite omit map?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Conceptually yes, though currently the procedure requires model and
Fobs data and it computes the 2mFo-DFc map internally and then
applies FEM protocol.<br>
<br>
I may extent it to other map types in future.<br>
<br>
Pavel<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>