<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
At present it uses actual map given at input, not map coefficients.
Several people requested to add a functionality so that it can use
map coefficients too, I will add this once I get a chance.<br>
<br>
Pavel<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/19/15 5:27 AM, Smith Liu wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:616a1e7b.11303.14d6c24e60f.Coremail.smith_liu123@163.com"
type="cite">
<div
style="line-height:1.7;color:#000000;font-size:14px;font-family:Arial">
<div>Dear Pavel,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Can phenix.map_comparison be used to compare CCP4 map and
mtz map? How to input map files in order to use this command?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Smith</div>
<div><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
At 2015-05-19 13:25:28, "Pavel Afonine" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:pafonine@lbl.gov"><pafonine@lbl.gov></a>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;
border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-width: 1px;
border-left-style: solid;" id="isReplyContent"> Yes:
phenix.map_comparison .<br>
<br>
Pavel<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/16/15 12:28 PM, Murpholino
Peligro wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAMdBu0WEuXgc+yGmJn=cABpkHgLbfAZyHJkr60efy1zAhRQx4Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">So...Is there a tool/program/formula to get
equivalent sigma levels between maps so they can be
compared?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-05-15 11:37 GMT-05:00 Pavel
Afonine <span dir="ltr"><<a
href="mailto:pafonine@lbl.gov" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">pafonine@lbl.gov</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;
padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204,
204); border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style:
solid;" class="gmail_quote">Hi Mohamed,<br>
<br>
this is not a simple topic.. Two texts I suggest to
have a look at are listed below I'm sure there are
more). They may not give you a quick solution but
perhaps will explain the issues.<br>
<br>
Acta Cryst. (2014). D70, 2593-2606<br>
Metrics for comparison of crystallographic maps<br>
<br>
Acta Cryst. (2015). D71, 646-666.<br>
FEM: feature-enhanced map<br>
<br>
In a very nutshell,<br>
<br>
- "1 sigma (or any other x sigma) level for one map
may not be the same as 1 sigma (or any other x sigma)
level for another map";<br>
- Think of "global vs local". Somehow you need to
quantify map quality locally.<br>
- Map correlation (RSCC or map CC, for alternative
names) may be a misleading metric is used without
care: for example, two poor but similar map may give
you high CC.<br>
<br>
All the best,<br>
Pavel
<div>
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 5/15/15 9:10 AM, mohamed noor wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;
padding-left: 1ex; border-left-color: rgb(204,
204, 204); border-left-width: 1px;
border-left-style: solid;" class="gmail_quote">
Dear all<br>
<br>
Is there a single (or a few) metrics that can be
used to quantitatively assess map quality
instead of looking at each one in Coot? For
example, I want to compare the effect of having
low completeness in the low resolution shells.<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a
href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a
href="mailto:phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br>
<span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>