<div dir="ltr">Hi,<div><br></div><div>I recommend polder maps for final stages of model building. </div><div>But they are computed quickly, so you can nonetheless try and see what appears in the map.</div><div><br></div><div>Best wishes,</div><div><br></div><div>Dorothee</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Murpholino Peligro <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:murpholinox@gmail.com" target="_blank">murpholinox@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">So I got a MR solution and maybe a dozen residues are not clearly defined (most of them in the surface) I used to compute the feature enhanced map but now I can see there are a lot of options in phenix->maps. Which one is better for me? (~130 residues, 1.5 A resolution, ~ 90% complete)<br>Probably I should try them all, and compare them visually in coot with appropiate sigmas (taken from maps-> map comparison) (is that a good workflow? what you guys do?) ...but some of the maps take a lot of time to compute. So any help will be appreciated. <br><br>Thanks<br><br><br></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="mailto:phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org">phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.<wbr>org</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>