<div dir="ltr"><div>Ahh I see. Yes I think you are better off letting the Asn be an amino acid and have the ligand on its own. with an appropriate link record.</div><div><br></div><div>Good luck!</div><div>Christian</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:52 PM Schulz, Eike-Christian <<a href="mailto:eike.schulz@mpsd.mpg.de">eike.schulz@mpsd.mpg.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="DE" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="m_-6621897163455127915WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Hi Christian, <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">the Asn side chain is to which the ligand attaches has only 1 conformation – hence the occupancy for all these atoms is 1.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">… but using a LINK might be a good option.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Thanks, <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US">Eike<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #b5c4df 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Christian Roth <<a href="mailto:christianroth034@gmail.com" target="_blank">christianroth034@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 17. July 2018 at 15:25<br>
<b>To: </b>Eike-Christian Schulz <eike.schu</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><a href="mailto:lz@mpsd.mpg.de" target="_blank">lz@mpsd.mpg.de</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>PHENIX user mailing list <<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org" target="_blank">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [phenixbb] FW: Occupancy / alternate conformation Refinement<u></u><u></u></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Hi Eike, <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">why have some of your ligand atoms have occupancy of 1 and some 0.5.? I have had thought all atoms of the ligand are 0.5 for the two states and you create a link for one of them to which is the intermediate.
You might have to add a constrained group as well, though nowadays phenix might handle that automatically.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Cheers<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">Christian<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:15 PM Schulz, Eike-Christian <<a href="mailto:eike.schulz@mpsd.mpg.de" target="_blank">eike.schulz@mpsd.mpg.de</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt"> Dear all, <br>
<br>
In one of my structures I appear to have a mixed state between a covalently bound intermediate and the free substrate occupying _almost_ the same position. I can model the states nicely in coot, but during refinement the molecules “fly” apart - although
the occupancy was limited to 0.5 for their overlapping atoms. <br>
<br>
I have tried to model the free ligand as an alternate conformation of the covalent intermediate:
<br>
<br>
HETATM 852 N ASB A 110 10.523 15.702 10.022 1.00 14.48 N
<br>
HETATM 853 CA ASB A 110 9.974 15.713 8.664 1.00 15.11 C
<br>
HETATM 854 C ASB A 110 8.635 16.385 8.683 1.00 14.31 C
<br>
HETATM 855 O ASB A 110 8.563 17.443 9.233 1.00 13.03 O
<br>
HETATM 856 CB ASB A 110 10.053 14.307 8.091 1.00 11.72 C
<br>
HETATM 857 CG ASB A 110 9.774 14.157 6.621 1.00 15.26 C
<br>
HETATM 858 OD1 ASB A 110 10.688 14.485 5.644 1.00 19.29 O
<br>
HETATM 859 OD2 ASB A 110 8.693 13.880 6.340 1.00 13.36 O
<br>
HETATM 860 C1 AASB A 110 10.637 15.649 3.353 0.50 27.61 C
<br>
HETATM 861 C2 AASB A 110 10.231 14.480 4.266 0.50 32.98 C
<br>
HETATM 862 O1 AASB A 110 11.505 16.454 3.690 0.50 31.63 O
<br>
HETATM 863 O2 AASB A 110 10.085 15.787 2.280 0.50 21.80 O
<br>
HETATM 4742 O2 BASB A 110 10.072 15.815 2.191 0.50 24.78 O
<br>
HETATM 4743 C1 BASB A 110 10.573 15.717 3.221 0.50 28.20 C
<br>
HETATM 4744 O1 BASB A 110 11.449 16.458 3.619 0.50 22.71 O
<br>
HETATM 4745 C2 BASB A 110 10.107 14.567 4.152 0.50 19.02 C
<br>
HETATM 4746 F BASB A 110 9.287 13.735 3.610 0.50 34.13 F<br>
<br>
Although I have provided a new CIF file for the ligand named according to the alternate conformation this causes phenix to crash.
<br>
<br>
How can I correctly refine these overlapping atoms ?<br>
<br>
Thanks for your advice, <br>
<br>
Eike<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
phenixbb mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:phenixbb@phenix-online.org" target="_blank">phenixbb@phenix-online.org</a><br>
<a href="http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb" target="_blank">http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb</a><br>
Unsubscribe: <a href="mailto:phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org" target="_blank">phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>