June 2012 - cctbxbb - phenix-online.org

Invert hand of shelxd res file from cctbx
by Graeme.Winter＠diamond.ac.uk 23 Jul '12

23 Jul '12

Hi Folks, This should be easy but I can't find anything! I have a .res file: [gw56@ws050 fast_ep]$ cat sad_fa.res REM Best SHELXD solution: CC 41.11 CC(weak) 23.51 CFOM 64.62 REM TITL sad_fa.ins SAD in P422 CELL 0.98000 78.17 78.17 37.87 90.00 90.00 90.00 LATT -1 SYMM -Y+1/2,X+1/2,Z+1/4 SYMM -X,-Y,Z+1/2 SYMM Y+1/2,-X+1/2,Z+3/4 SYMM X+1/2,-Y+1/2,-Z+3/4 SYMM Y,X,-Z SYMM -X+1/2,Y+1/2,-Z+1/4 SYMM -Y,-X,-Z+1/2 SFAC SE UNIT 256 SE01 1 0.600227 0.892868 0.042187 1.0000 0.2 SE02 1 0.627518 0.852661 0.427392 0.8667 0.2 SE03 1 0.867409 0.911667 0.394418 0.8420 0.2 SE04 1 0.489761 0.805634 0.391009 0.7279 0.2 SE05 1 0.642792 0.649048 0.369694 0.7172 0.2 SE06 1 0.678879 0.535027 0.477918 0.4571 0.2 SE07 1 0.609207 0.572754 0.421746 0.4212 0.2 SE08 1 0.584526 0.536499 0.322047 0.4154 0.2 SE09 1 0.843063 0.846794 0.480296 0.3831 0.2 SE10 1 0.622429 0.743332 0.157899 0.3604 0.2 SE11 1 0.626114 0.528595 0.644789 0.3590 0.2 HKLF 3 END which I would like to read, invert the hand of and write as a pdb file. I got stuck trying to work through the example / test code. Can someone point me in the right direction? Thanks, Graeme -- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail. Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd. Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message. Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

4 4

Fast way to enable/disable individual scatterers in structure factor calculation
by Jan Marten Simons 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

Hi, I'm looking for a simple and fast way to set individual scatterers to be either included or excluded from structure factor calculation. As I see from the source (structure_factors_direct.h) the selection toggle does not seem to be evaluated for this. Of course an additional check for the selection flag would harm performance in most standard cases, so I'd rather like to have a separate c++ function for this, which could be swapped in for the normal f_calc calculation by a boolean toggle in the python part of f_calc. As I'm not that much into the c++ part of cctbx, I'd really appreciate if somebody more knowledgeable could monkey patch this. Cheers, Jan

2 5

angle derivative of rotation matrix
by David Waterman 28 Jun '12

28 Jun '12

Hi, I'm using the axis_and_angle_as_r3_rotation_matrix method of scitbx.matrix.col in some Python code. Now I need to calculate the first derivative of the rotation matrix with respect to the rotation angle. Is there a function to do that somewhere in scitbx (or elsewhere in cctbx)? I had a brief look around but couldn't find anything that looked hopeful. If there isn't something there already I have some Fortran code from David Thomas that I could adapt to do this. Of course it wouldn't be very efficient in pure Python, and calculating the matrix and its derivative separately, but that's okay for now as the code is just for testing out some ideas. By the way, links to http://skal.planet-d.net/demo/matrixfaq.htm in the documentation (e.g. here<http://cctbx.sourceforge.net/current/c_plus_plus/namespacescitbx_1_1math_1_…>) are broken. I found a document with the same name here: http://vamos.sourceforge.net/matrixfaq.htm, but I have no idea if this has the same content as the original. Cheers -- David

3 4

Problem with direct_space_asu
by Jan Marten Simons 26 Jun '12

26 Jun '12

Hi, as there seems to be no documentation on the direct_space_asu module I just tried to use it like I thought the function names imply. The task I want to accomplish is checking whether a point in direct space is inside the asymmetric unit of a given unit cell. A small testcase I wrote reveals that apparently .is_inside(point) only uses fractional coordinates instead of cartesian coordinates. Is there a nice/easy way to get the desired behaviour? # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- from __future__ import division from cctbx import xray from cctbx import crystal from cctbx.array_family import flex import numpy as np asu = xray.structure( crystal_symmetry=crystal.symmetry( unit_cell=(5.01,5.01,5.47,95,85,90), space_group_symbol="P 1")).direct_space_asu() print(asu.show_comprehensive_summary()) print(asu.is_inside((0.0, 0.0, 0.0))) #should be True OK print(asu.is_inside((0.5, 0.5, 0.5))) #should be True OK print(asu.is_inside((0.9, 0.9, 0.9))) #should be True OK print(asu.is_inside((1.0, 0.9, 0.9))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((1.0, 1.0, 1.0))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((2.0, 2.0, 2.0))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((3.0, 3.0, 3.0))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((4.0, 4.0, 4.0))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((5.0, 5.0, 5.0))) #should be True is False! print(asu.is_inside((5.0, 5.0, 6.0))) #should be False OK print(asu.is_inside((6.0, 6.0, 6.0))) #should be False OK Cheers, Jan

2 1

compilation errors under gcc-4.7
by Justin Lecher 19 Jun '12

19 Jun '12

Hi, when compiling cctbx with gcc-4.7 I see following errors which I am not able to fix: cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:112:59: required from here cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:83:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:86:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:90:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:91:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:92:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp: In instantiation of 'static void scitbx::math::{anonymous}::non_member_function_wrappers<FloatType, Distribution>::wrap() [with FloatType = double; Distribution = boost::math::students_t_distribution<double>]': cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:116:63: required from here cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:83:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:85:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:90:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:91:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information cctbx_sources/scitbx/math/boost_python/distributions.cpp:92:7: error: overloaded function with no contextual type information Any suggestions to fix? Thanks, justin -- Justin Lecher Institute of Complex Systems ICS-6 Structural Biochemistry Research Centre Juelich 52425 Juelich, Germany phone: +49 2461 61 2117

5 8

Re: [cctbxbb] compilation errors under gcc-4.7
by Luc Bourhis 19 Jun '12

19 Jun '12

> I take it you're interested in fixing this? Yes. I've got a Fedora 17 virtual machine. Luc

1 0

proposal to remove iotbx.shelx.from_ins
by Mirko Scholz 12 Jun '12

12 Jun '12

Hello, since I am new here it seems an odd proposal, but could you not remove iotbx.shelx.from_ins.from_ins since its functionality is covered much better by xray.structure.from_shelx (at least it seems to me). The following is roughly identical with the first statement being inaccurate (anisotropic vs isotropic displacements parameters) and wrong (structures containing disorder) xs0 = iotbx.shelx.from_ins.from_ins(file_name='foo.ins') fc0 = xs0.structure_factors(d_min=0.7, algorithm='direct').f_calc() xs1 = cctbx.xray.structure.from_shelx(file=open('foo.ins')) fc1 = xs1.structure_factors(d_min=0.7, algorithm='direct').f_calc() As someone who (seldom) uses cctbx I stumbled first over iotbx.shelx.from_ins and only noticed after a while that it does not handle disorder properly (problem is in ins_record.if_10_added). from_ins is used only here ./iotbx/command_line/emma.py ./cctbx/adp_restraints/tst_ext.py Where it should be possible to substitute it though I have not tested it. Cordially Mirko Scholz

4 4