Hello Marcin,

as you know, extended CCD codes arrive this year. I'm looking into examples
https://github.com/wwPDB/extended-wwPDB-identifier-examples
and thinking what's the best way to convert such files to PDB. 
Do you plan anything in this matter, like it was done with
https://cci.lbl.gov/hybrid_36/ in the past?

Presently we don't plan to be able to convert files with extended CCD to PDB format.
I wonder why this may be necessary or useful? 
 
Tentatively, I'm thinking about mapping residue names in the HETNAM record.
For example, BB87Q would be mapped to a "3 letter code" that code
would have a special character to make it different from normal
3-letter codes (let's say '%', or maybe '+' or '_' - I don't have a
strong preference), and the original CCD code would be given in
columns 72-79 of HETNAM that are currently unused:

HETNAM     BB% PHOSPHOSERINE     [...]     BB87Q

This idea looks fine to me if one actually needs to have new models in PDB format.

I think that mmCIF format is mature enough so we don't have to be able to produce PDB for every mmCIF. wwPDB already deprecated models saved in multiple files (http://www.wwpdb.org/news/news?year=2014#10-December-2014).
Another challenge is long chain ids:
https://www.wwpdb.org/news/news?year=2022#62559153c8eabd0c4864f208

We'll have to draw a line somewhere.

Best regards,
Oleg Sobolev. 


_______________________________________________
cctbxbb mailing list
cctbxbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/cctbxbb