February 2010 - phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Can PHENIX write the peak list to a PDB file?
by Joe Krahn 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

PHENIX has an option to find positive and negative peaks, but only lists them in the log file along with the residue they are closest to. Is it possible to write out the actual peak coordinates, such as to a PDB file? Thanks, Joe Krahn

5 7

Bad ligand parameters
by Joe Krahn 21 Oct '10

21 Oct '10

I found that residue TRS has different dihedral target angles for the three hydroxyl oxygens, which are actually all equivalent. They have a periodicity of 1, but should have a periodicity of 3. What is the best way to handle such discrepancies? Most ligand parameters are probably auto-generated based on a reference structure, and there is probably a lot of conformation bias. In this case, it seems that parameterization should have been able to detect symmetry. It would be nice if parameters could include information about whether a human has done any validation. Actually, a ligand Wiki might be nice, where people can easily put comments, even if they are not sure about how to improve the parameters. Joe Krahn

9 13

Re: [phenixbb] phenix.automr ensemble/component question
by Thomas C. Terwilliger 24 Jul '10

24 Jul '10

Hi Scott, Your first command looks good to me. It is saying that the composition of the crystal is 2 copies of each chain: component_1.component_copies=2 component_2.component_copies=2 and you want to search for 2 copies of each of your search models: ensemble_1.copies_to_find=2 ensemble_2.copies_to_find=2 All the best, Tom T > Hi Phenixers, > > I'm a bit confused about the proper syntax for my phenix.automr job. > This is probably a simple concept, but I'm running on 3 hours of sleep > as my kid was up all night, and my synapses aren't working so good. > > I expect 2 copies of my protein per AU > > My protein is composed of two domains > > I have a single PDB search model for each domain > > is either of these commands correct? > > phenix.automr data=mydata.sca \ > ensemble_1.coords=domain1.pdb \ > ensemble_1.identity=95 \ > ensemble_1.copies_to_find=2 \ > component_1.mass=40579 \ > component_1.component_copies=2 \ > ensemble_2.coords=domain2.pdb \ > ensemble_2.identity=95 \ > ensemble_2.copies_to_find=2 \ > component_2.mass=13410 \ > component_2.component_copies=2 > > > or > > > phenix.automr data=mydata.sca \ > ensemble_1.coords=domain1.pdb \ > ensemble_1.identity=95 \ > ensemble_1.copies_to_find=1 \ > component_1.mass=40579 \ > component_1.component_copies=2 \ > ensemble_2.coords=domain2.pdb \ > ensemble_2.identity=95 \ > ensemble_2.copies_to_find=1 \ > component_2.mass=13410 \ > component_2.component_copies=2 > > > essentially I'm not really using an ensemble of search models, I only > have a single PDB for each domain. So should ensemble_1.copies_to_find > and ensemble_2.copies_to_find be set to 1 or 2? > > > Thanks, > Scott > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Scott Classen, Ph.D. > SIBYLS Beamline 12.3.1 > http://bl1231.als.lbl.gov > Advanced Light Source > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > 1 Cyclotron Rd > MS6R2100 > Berkeley, CA 94720 > C) 510.206.4418 > O) 510.495.2697 > Beamline) 510.495.2134 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >

2 2

Gap between R and Rfree
by Young-Jin Cho 14 Mar '10

14 Mar '10

Hi everyone, I recently got a diffraction data and am trying to refine it. The question is whatever I did the gap between R and Rfree stay far away: .2140/.2982 around 2.5 A resolution. (water added and isotropic(individual_adp) and so on). Although I am redoing with many different approaches, if anyone can give me any comments or suggestions, it would be helpful. Thanks in advance, Young-Jin

13 26

Custom ligand - confirming the correct scattering definition
by George Phillips 13 Mar '10

13 Mar '10

Pavel, I am following up on this question of the oxidation state of metals. It is important to deal with this properly to get the most out of the data and to able to show difference maps in papers that make sense. Where are the scattering factors stored (it1992's for example)? One could hack an oxidation state in for the standard numbers to get it right (ugly but effective). Alternatively, maybe the scattering factor tables and element id's could be expanded? Is this all hard coded or are there libraries or tables that are parsed? THanks for any comments, as always. George N. Phillips, Jr., Ph.D. Professor of Biochemistry and of Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison 433 Babcock Dr. Madison, Wi 53706 Phone/FAX (608) 263-6140 Hi Andy, currently phenix.refine will not make difference between say "Fe" and "Fe+2". So if you see some artifacts at mFo-DFc map around your Fe, that might be explained by not taking "+2" into account. Refining occupancy of Fe would fix the map appearance (most likely), but I would not do that, since it will rather hide the problem than properly address it (and of course it would be misleading too). Regarding "n_gaussian table": it is just a dynamic approximation to the standard scattering factor table (mostly done to optimize runtime; the accuracy is not compromised). For more details see: Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Sauter NK, Adams PD: cctbx news Newsletter of the IUCr Commission on Crystallographic Computing 2004, 3:22-31. Pavel. On 11/25/09 12:37 PM, Andy Torelli wrote: > To the Phenix group: > > I've created a .cif file for a ligand that includes metal atoms. The > metal atoms are defined in the .cif file with their element name, but in > actuality, they should be defined according to their oxidation state so > that the correct scattering parameters are used during refinement. > > In CNS, this meant choosing an "atom type" that would be parsed to > match the correct scattering definition listed in the scatter.lib file. > I see that phenix uses the n_gaussian table for scattering values. > Where can I view this and the other scattering table options? Like CNS, > do I just need to use the name of the element with the correct > oxidation state from the table (e.g. "Fe+2") in my .cif file to ensure > that the correct scattering definition is used during refinement and map > calculation? > > Thanks, > -Andy Torelli > > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > phenixbb at phenix-online.org > http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > Previous message: [phenixbb] Custom ligand - confirming the correct scattering definition Next message: [phenixbb] Confused by the output from Phenix autobuild jobs Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] More information about the phenixbb mailing list George N. Phillips, Jr., Ph.D. Professor of Biochemistry and of Computer Sciences University of Wisconsin-Madison 433 Babcock Dr. Madison, Wi 53706 Phone/FAX (608) 263-6142

3 3

NCS restraints
by Mirek Cygler 01 Mar '10

01 Mar '10

Hi, I have NCS symmetry in my crystal and wouldlike to use it during the refinement. What is the strength of the restraints for the backbone, for the sidechains? How can I control these restraints? Thanks, Mirek

3 2

Clarification on ADPs in PDB files for TLS refinement ?
by Phil Jeffrey 28 Feb '10

28 Feb '10

Hi, Having a discussion with a colleague yesterday on differences in Phenix and Refmac representations of TLS B-factors in the PDB file I came across two different definitions for what the PDB ANISOU U's correspond to as written by Phenix: 1. From necat.chem.cornell.edu/workshops/.../WK04_PavelAfonine.pdf on p.20 U(TOTAL)= U(ATOM) + U(TLS) + U(CRYST) and only U(atom) + U(tls) is stored in the PDB ANISOU card. 2. From http://proteincrystallography.org/ccp4bb/message8948.html "Utotal = Utls + Ulocal + Ucryst. So, the ANISOU records always contain Utotal and ATOM records contain isotropic equivalent of Utotal" Which is not the same thing. I suspect it's #1. Am I right ? I would think that U(cryst) is potentially a non-zero contribution to atomic ANISOU values but is actually applied before the TLS/Anisotropic B-factors are refined. As a tie-breaker between #1 and #2 the program documentation suggest that it is just U(tls)+U(atom) but the paragraph that nominally explains it is not short of of inconsistencies, referring to the ANISOU record as having the "the total B-factor (B_tls + B_individual)" whereas they're not only not B's (they are U's) but it's also not the *total* U or B by its own definitions. IMHO it would warrant a rewrite for clarity since B and U are used interchangeably and "total" has variable usage. Phil Jeffrey Princeton

5 5

Re: [phenixbb] Map after refinement
by Xuewu Zhang 27 Feb '10

27 Feb '10

To Paul, No, I used the mtz format map file in coot. TO Pavel, I will send you the files tomorrow. The command I used is the simplest one: phenix.refine input.pdb input.mtz. By the way, the same thing happened to one of my colleagues here a while ago. She solved the problem by updating to the then new 1.5 version. Thanks you guys for the quick replies. Xuewu Zhang UT Southwestern Medical Center On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:29 PM, <phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org> wrote: > Send phenixbb mailing list submissions to > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > phenixbb-owner(a)phenix-online.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of phenixbb digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Int'l Workshop on Macromolecular Crystallography - South > America (Alejandro Buschiazzo) > 2. Re: Gap between R and Rfree (Felix Frolow) > 3. Re: Map after refinement (Xuewu Zhang) > 4. Re: Map after refinement (Paul Adams) > 5. Re: Map after refinement (Pavel Afonine) > 6. weaker density in maps (David Garboczi) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:17:06 -0200 > From: Alejandro Buschiazzo <alebus(a)pasteur.edu.uy> > To: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: [phenixbb] Int'l Workshop on Macromolecular Crystallography - > South America > Message-ID: <4B882C42.9080701(a)pasteur.edu.uy> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > Dear colleagues, > > just a reminder, we're close to the deadline for applications. Details > below. > > Thank you! > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *International Workshop ?Macromolecular Crystallography : Introduction > and Applications"* > > *April 26 - May 7, 2010* > > *Institut Pasteur de Montevideo* > > *Uruguay* > > The principal aim of this course, is to give intense hands-on training > in all main aspects of macromolecular 3D structure determination by X > ray diffraction. > > The course will include lectures delivered by a number of > international experts in the discipline, linked to hands-on > experimental work and demonstrations. > > Special emphasis will be given to : > > * Experiment design : manual and robotic crystallogenesis of > macromolecules, X ray diffraction of single crystals, data collection > * Diffraction data processing > * Model refinement and structural analysis > > > *ACTIVITY INTENDED FOR* > > * Graduate Students (MSc and PhD) > * Postdocs > * Young Research Scientists > > > *APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS* > > Candidates should send the following information : > > 1. -Short CV (including age, current position, scientific interests, > publications) > 2. -Letter of motivation (the applicant should stress how > Macromolecular Crystallography is included in her/his ongoing > scientific project) > 3. -Reference letter from the apllicant's supervisor > > > *SCHOLARSHIPS* > > Inscription fees are fully covered for all accepted students. > Applicants from abroad with no financial support, are welcome to apply > for a lodging and per diem expenses scholarship. This should be > inlcuded as a separate document at the time of application. A limited > number of traveling aids will be available: arguments backing this > request should be duly explained, to be evaluated on a case by case > basis. > > *APPLICATION DEADLINE* > > All applications should be received until March 7 2010. They should be > sent as a single pdf document to : crystallography(a)pasteur.edu.uy > > *ORGANIZERS* > > Dr. Alejandro Buschiazzo > Unidad de Cristalograf?a de Prote?nas > Institut Pasteur de Montevideo > > Dr. Pedro Alzari > Departamento de Biolog?a Estructural y Qu?mica > Institut Pasteur de Paris > > Dr. William Shepard > Proxima 2 > Synchrotron Soleil > > For further information, please E-mail to crystallography(a)pasteur.edu.uy > > The official language of the course will be english. > > Detailed information is available at: > http://www.pasteur.edu.uy/mxcourse Please check for regular updates of > the program. > > *FUNDING* > > RIIP, AMSUD/PASTEUR, IP MONTEVIDEO (URUGUAY INNOVA), CeBEM > > This International Workshop is part of the activities of the Center of > Structural Biology of Mercosur (Centro de Biolog?a Estructural del > Mercosur - CeBEM) > > > > > -- > Alejandro Buschiazzo, PhD > Research Scientist > Laboratory of Protein Crystallography > Pasteur Institute of Montevideo > Mataojo 2020 > Montevideo 11400 > URUGUAY > > Phone: +5982 5220910 int. 120 > Fax: +5982 5224185 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:18:33 +0200 > From: Felix Frolow <mbfrolow(a)post.tau.ac.il> > To: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] Gap between R and Rfree > Message-ID: <F52C4FE8-AE34-4C23-B74E-A923995E5831(a)post.tau.ac.il> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Yea Phil, You have got them > I was accused several years ago for over-fitting Rfree !!!!!!! > The bad thing is that to publish you have to avoid arguing with these > post-crystallography era referees. > Today they ask meaningless question " I am novice to crystallography, teach > me how to minimize Rfree" > Tomorrow they referee you papers and make meaningless remarks about gap > between R and Rfree > " Your R factor is 17% and Rfree is 24%, it rase question" > geeeeek!!!!!! what question????? > Dr Felix Frolow > Professor of Structural Biology and Biotechnology > Department of Molecular Microbiology > and Biotechnology > Tel Aviv University 69978, Israel > > Acta Crystallographica D, co-editor > > e-mail: mbfrolow(a)post.tau.ac.il > Tel: ++972 3640 8723 > Fax: ++972 3640 9407 > Cellular: ++972 547 459 608 > > On Feb 26, 2010, at 11:30 , Phil Evans wrote: > > > > > I do worry a bit about the fetishisation of R-factors, to the point where > I get the impression that some people think that the object of refinement is > minimisation of Rfree. The aim is to produce the "best" model consistent > with the data, and the most important tool is looking at the maps on the > graphics, in conjunction with validation tools analysing consistency with > what we know about stereochemistry (Ramachandran, rotamers, bumps etc). Also > is your model consistent with your initial experimental phased map, if > available? The Rfree is a useful guide, but no more than that. > > > > My (admittedly superficial) experience of changing weights, freeR > selection, resolution limits, NCS, etc in refinement is that often you can > spend some time doing this, maybe improve the R-factors a bit, but end up > with a model which is indistinguishable from the previous model when > superimposed on it. > > > > I'm fed up with referees telling me my structure must be wrong because > the Rfree is "too high" (and I haven't followed their particular pet > protocol), when I know that it is essentially correct, and as good as I can > make it. > > > > Phil > > > > > > On 26 Feb 2010, at 01:49, Pavel Afonine wrote: > > > >> Hi Simon, > >> > >> the next available PHENIX nightly build will have this command: > >> > >> phenix.r_factor_statistics > >> > >> This will output a plain text histograms for Rwork, Rfree and > Rfree-Rwork. For example: > >> > >> *** > >> phenix.r_factor_statistics 2.5 left_offset=0.2 right_offset=0.2 n_bins=5 > >> Command used: > >> > >> phenix.r_factor_statistics 2.500 left_offset=0.200 right_offset=0.200 > n_bins=5 > >> > >> > >> Histogram of Rwork for models in PDB at resolution 2.30-2.70 A: > >> 0.115 - 0.168 : 149 > >> 0.168 - 0.220 : 2998 > >> 0.220 - 0.273 : 1879 > >> 0.273 - 0.325 : 67 > >> 0.325 - 0.378 : 2 > >> Histogram of Rfree for models in PDB at resolution 2.30-2.70 A: > >> 0.146 - 0.210 : 116 > >> 0.210 - 0.274 : 3288 > >> 0.274 - 0.337 : 1664 > >> 0.337 - 0.401 : 26 > >> 0.401 - 0.465 : 1 > >> Histogram of Rfree-Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution 2.30-2.70 A: > >> 0.001 - 0.021 : 233 > >> 0.021 - 0.041 : 1412 > >> 0.041 - 0.060 : 2180 > >> 0.060 - 0.080 : 1045 > >> 0.080 - 0.100 : 225 > >> Number of structures considered: 5095 > >> *** > >> > >> and running it without arguments will take all structures. > >> > >> Pavel. > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/25/10 2:01 PM, Simon Kolstoe wrote: > >>> oh yes please Pavel (command line polygon/statistics overview) - could > the output be a pdf or ps rather than just starting up the GUI? > >>> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 25 Feb 2010, at 19:39, Pavel Afonine wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Francis, > >>>> > >>>> in PHENIX GUI: "Validation" -> "PDB Statistics Overview" > >>>> > >>>> or: > >>>> > >>>> in PHENIX GUI: "Validation" -> "POLYGON" > >>>> > >>>> The underlying idea is published here: > >>>> > >>>> Crystallographic model quality at a glance. L. Urzhumtseva, P. V. > Afonine, P. D. Adams, A. Urzhumtsev Acta Cryst. D65, 297-300 (2009) > >>>> > >>>> I can add a command line version if anyone is interested. > >>>> > >>>> Pavel. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 2/25/10 9:45 AM, Francis E Reyes wrote: > >>>>> Pavel > >>>>> > >>>>> What phenix utility produces such information? > >>>>> Thx > >>>>> > >>>>> FR > >>>>> > >>>>> On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Pavel Afonine <PAfonine(a)lbl.gov> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Young-Jin, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> the distribution of R-factors for all structures in PDB refined at > resolutions between 2.4 and 2.6 A is following: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Histogram of Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution 2.40-2.60: > >>>>>> 0.115 - 0.141 : 5 > >>>>>> 0.141 - 0.168 : 69 > >>>>>> 0.168 - 0.194 : 414 > >>>>>> 0.194 - 0.220 : 955 <<<<< your structure > >>>>>> 0.220 - 0.246 : 695 > >>>>>> 0.246 - 0.273 : 153 > >>>>>> 0.273 - 0.299 : 25 > >>>>>> 0.299 - 0.325 : 5 > >>>>>> 0.325 - 0.352 : 0 > >>>>>> 0.352 - 0.378 : 1 > >>>>>> Histogram of Rfree for all model in PDB at resolution 2.40-2.60: > >>>>>> 0.146 - 0.178 : 3 > >>>>>> 0.178 - 0.210 : 41 > >>>>>> 0.210 - 0.242 : 404 > >>>>>> 0.242 - 0.274 : 1104 > >>>>>> 0.274 - 0.305 : 653 <<<<< your structure > >>>>>> 0.305 - 0.337 : 108 > >>>>>> 0.337 - 0.369 : 8 > >>>>>> 0.369 - 0.401 : 0 > >>>>>> 0.401 - 0.433 : 0 > >>>>>> 0.433 - 0.465 : 1 > >>>>>> Histogram of Rfree-Rwork for all model in PDB at resolution > 2.40-2.60: > >>>>>> 0.002 - 0.012 : 28 > >>>>>> 0.012 - 0.022 : 83 > >>>>>> 0.022 - 0.031 : 232 > >>>>>> 0.031 - 0.041 : 430 > >>>>>> 0.041 - 0.051 : 458 > >>>>>> 0.051 - 0.061 : 493 > >>>>>> 0.061 - 0.071 : 298 > >>>>>> 0.071 - 0.080 : 186 > >>>>>> 0.080 - 0.090 : 85 <<<<< your structure > >>>>>> 0.090 - 0.100 : 29 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> which I interpret as your Rwork is most likely good as well as > Rfree, but the gap Rfree-Rwork is too large meaning possible overfitting. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> A few tips: > >>>>>> - if you have NCS - use it in refinement; > >>>>>> - optimize refinement target weights: a) automatically: > "optimize_wxc=true optimize_wxu=true", or b) manually using wxc_scale and > wxu_scale parameters; > >>>>>> - make sure you use the latest PHENIX version. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let me now if you have any questions. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Pavel. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2/25/10 9:17 AM, Young-Jin Cho wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>> I recently got a diffraction data and am trying to refine it. The > question is whatever I did the gap between R and Rfree stay far away: > .2140/.2982 around 2.5 A resolution. (water added and > isotropic(individual_adp) and so on). > >>>>>>> Although I am redoing with many different approaches, if anyone can > give me any comments or suggestions, it would be helpful. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks in advance, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Young-Jin > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> phenixbb mailing list > >>>>>>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >>>>>>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> phenixbb mailing list > >>>>>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >>>>>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> phenixbb mailing list > >>>>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >>>>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> phenixbb mailing list > >>>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >>>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> phenixbb mailing list > >>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > >> _______________________________________________ > >> phenixbb mailing list > >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > > > > _______________________________________________ > > phenixbb mailing list > > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:31:26 -0600 > From: Xuewu Zhang <xuewu.zhang(a)gmail.com> > To: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] Map after refinement > Message-ID: > <926abad51002261231g71b81d30o48b7ab63f41ba820(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Phenix developers/gurus, > I got a SAD structure, the experimental map (overall_best_denmod..mtz) from > Autosol looks great. I then built the model and used phenix.refine to > refine > the model using the "exptl_fobs....mtz", which worked well as shown by the > lowered Rfree. However, the map from the refinement makes no sense at all, > totally featureless. Using the same refined model and mtz, > phenix.model_vs_data did make the right map. I have tried both phenix 1.5 > and 1.6. Any clue? > Thanks, > Xuewu Zhang > UT Southwestern Medical Center >

2 1

Re: [phenixbb] Map after refinement
by Xuewu Zhang 27 Feb '10

27 Feb '10

Hi Phenix developers/gurus, I got a SAD structure, the experimental map (overall_best_denmod..mtz) from Autosol looks great. I then built the model and used phenix.refine to refine the model using the "exptl_fobs....mtz", which worked well as shown by the lowered Rfree. However, the map from the refinement makes no sense at all, totally featureless. Using the same refined model and mtz, phenix.model_vs_data did make the right map. I have tried both phenix 1.5 and 1.6. Any clue? Thanks, Xuewu Zhang UT Southwestern Medical Center

3 2

Int'l Workshop on Macromolecular Crystallography - South America
by Alejandro Buschiazzo 27 Feb '10

27 Feb '10

Dear colleagues, just a reminder, we're close to the deadline for applications. Details below. Thank you! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *International Workshop “Macromolecular Crystallography : Introduction and Applications"* *April 26 - May 7, 2010* *Institut Pasteur de Montevideo* *Uruguay* The principal aim of this course, is to give intense hands-on training in all main aspects of macromolecular 3D structure determination by X ray diffraction. The course will include lectures delivered by a number of international experts in the discipline, linked to hands-on experimental work and demonstrations. Special emphasis will be given to : * Experiment design : manual and robotic crystallogenesis of macromolecules, X ray diffraction of single crystals, data collection * Diffraction data processing * Model refinement and structural analysis *ACTIVITY INTENDED FOR* * Graduate Students (MSc and PhD) * Postdocs * Young Research Scientists *APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS* Candidates should send the following information : 1. -Short CV (including age, current position, scientific interests, publications) 2. -Letter of motivation (the applicant should stress how Macromolecular Crystallography is included in her/his ongoing scientific project) 3. -Reference letter from the apllicant's supervisor *SCHOLARSHIPS* Inscription fees are fully covered for all accepted students. Applicants from abroad with no financial support, are welcome to apply for a lodging and per diem expenses scholarship. This should be inlcuded as a separate document at the time of application. A limited number of traveling aids will be available: arguments backing this request should be duly explained, to be evaluated on a case by case basis. *APPLICATION DEADLINE* All applications should be received until March 7 2010. They should be sent as a single pdf document to : crystallography(a)pasteur.edu.uy *ORGANIZERS* Dr. Alejandro Buschiazzo Unidad de Cristalografía de Proteínas Institut Pasteur de Montevideo Dr. Pedro Alzari Departamento de Biología Estructural y Química Institut Pasteur de Paris Dr. William Shepard Proxima 2 Synchrotron Soleil For further information, please E-mail to crystallography(a)pasteur.edu.uy The official language of the course will be english. Detailed information is available at: http://www.pasteur.edu.uy/mxcourse Please check for regular updates of the program. *FUNDING* RIIP, AMSUD/PASTEUR, IP MONTEVIDEO (URUGUAY INNOVA), CeBEM This International Workshop is part of the activities of the Center of Structural Biology of Mercosur (Centro de Biología Estructural del Mercosur - CeBEM) -- Alejandro Buschiazzo, PhD Research Scientist Laboratory of Protein Crystallography Pasteur Institute of Montevideo Mataojo 2020 Montevideo 11400 URUGUAY Phone: +5982 5220910 int. 120 Fax: +5982 5224185

1 0