November 2014 - phenixbb - phenix-online.org

labelit distl_minimum_number_spots_for_indexing
by Christian Roth 22 Sep '15

22 Sep '15

Dear Phenix-Team I installed the latest nightly build 1.8-1069. I tried to index some diffraction images and to overwrite the minimum usable spots for indesing I tried the suggested command. However If I try this command, it seems that it does not exist. At least in the list of the possible distl commands it does not show up. Do I have to install some additional stuff or change some preferences to get this command? Best Regards Christian

6 8

Refinement with new mtz.file
by Aleksandar Bijelic 14 Jul '15

14 Jul '15

Dear CCP4 user and experts, I refined (with PHENIX) a 3.0 A dataset obtaining Rfree of about 0.24 (with good geometry according to Ramachandran, Beta Outliers, etc.) .... Everything seems to be ok (especially in relation to the resolution) .... because the mtz.file I used was quite old and I cannot find my xscale.hkl file, I processed the data set again (this time with optimizng and polishing) and received a "better" file according to almost everything (resolution limit, I/sigma, CC(1/2), Rmeas), thus I used this new mtz.file and put it in my last refinement step (the refinement which led to the above mentioned Rfree = 0.24). Suprisingly, the refinement starts at Rwork = 0.18 and Rfree = 0.19 but ending up with 0.20 and 0.22, respectively. So I wanted to know if this is usual? I was expecting my data to become slightlly better but what is irritating me is the starting R-values of the refinement and that it get worse during refinement. Maybe I did something wrong? Is it reasonable to replace the mtz.file with a new one in the last refinement step or should I start the refinement from the scratch? In the sake of completeness, I deleted the header of the used pdb.file because of the R-flag error which occurs, since Phenix reconizes that the pdb.file was already used with other Rflags. Sorry, but I am still a beginner in this field, so I would be very grateful if somebody could explain me this situation and my mistake and if I need to start refinement from the beginning. Thank you in advance! Best Regards. Aleksandar -- ------------------------------------------- Aleksandar Bijelic, MSc. Institut für Biophysikalische Chemie Universität Wien Althanstrasse 14 A-1090 Wien Tel: +43 1 4277 52536 e-Mail: aleksandar.bijelic(a)univie.ac.at --------------------------------------------

7 10

Phenix.ensemble_refinment questions
by Joseph Brock 04 Dec '14

04 Dec '14

Dear Phenix community, I was hoping that some of you may be able to clarify some questions about Phenix.ensemble_refinement: 1. In the associated publication (Burnley et al. eLife 2012;), the ensemble refinement is validated by comparing the correlation of the ensemble generated map, with the map generated from the experimental phases for PDB entry 1YTT ("The overall correlation coefficient between the electron-density map from the ensemble model (obtained without experimental phases) and the experimentally phased electron-density map was 0.903, compared with 0.873 and 0.895 for the published and re-refined single structures. These seemingly small improvements in over- all quality indicators allow for significant local improvements."). I am confused how one computes an experimentally phased from structure factors deposited in the PDB that contain only anomalous intensities/amplitudes and not Hendrickson-Lattman coefficients. Is there a program within the phenix package that can do this? In addition, the phenix.ensemble_refinement keywords include: * experimental_phases * file_name = None * labels = None * Is it possible to include experimental phases during the rolling average refinement process and could this be beneficial (if the phases were of a sufficient quality)? 2. Is the correct procedure in parameter optimisation to optimise pTLS, then temperature offest and then tx? Or is it possible that the best ensemble may be generated from any (non-directional) combination of the above parameters? 3. What is the function of the "nproc" keyword? If this is the number of CPU cores that can be used in parallel, what is the most efficient way of using phenix.ensemble_refinement on a cluster? 4. Can anybody suggest a good way to compare the ensembles generated by phenix.ensemble_refinement with the trajectories of traditional MD simulations (for e.g. produced by NAMD? ;) Finally, I noticed that I cannot run phenix.ensemble_refinement using a "my_parameters.eff" file, it is necessary to type on the command line. Alternatively, the queueing system for the supercomputer I use is managed by SLURM, however, I cannot submit batch jobs via the appropriate command sbatch with anything other than default parameters (keywords in a parameters.eff or that are typed explicitly following the mycoords.pdb mydata.mtz myrestraints.cif files are not incorporated into the resulting parameters of the .log file). Could these issues be due to my local environment setup? I am running Phenix 1.9-1692 Platform: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 redhat-e6.5. Sorry for the long email and many thanks in advance for you help! Best regards, Joseph. Joseph Brock | PhD Division of Physiological Chemistry II Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics Karolinska Institutet Scheeles väg 2 SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

6 9

Generate table 1-error message
by Lau Sze Yi (SIgN) 30 Nov '14

30 Nov '14

Hi, I got an error message when I tried to run the generate table 1 utility: Crystal symmetry mismatch between different files. My input files for pdb, mtz and cif were generated from my ccp4 refmac run. The unmerged data is the mtz output of ccp4 aimless. Did I upload the wrong file? Regards, Sze Yi Research Fellow Singapore Immunology Network (SigN) 8A Biomedical Grove, #03-06 Immunos, Singapore 138648 DID: +65 6407 0640 Fax: +65 6407 0640

2 1

Not a suitable array of R-free flags:
by Yamei Yu 27 Nov '14

27 Nov '14

Dear all, I use phenix.refine to refine a structure. Firstly, I used --dryrun to generate an .eff file. The command is "phenix.refine --dry_run 7_44.mtz 7_44.pdb refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.generate=True refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.max_free=1000” Then I use run the program by typing “phenix.refine 7_44_refine_001.eff” It runs correct! After that I use coot to modulate some parts of the structure, then I want to refine the structure again. I type “ phenix.refine 7_44_refine_002.def” This time I got the following error message: Not a suitable array of R-free flags: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.label=R-free-flags Sorry_Not_a_suitable_array: Not a suitable array of R-free flags: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.label=R-free-flags To override the suitability test define: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.disable_suitability_test=True I checked the generated file by phenix “7_44_refine_data.mtz” I does contain a column labeled as R-free-flags. I paste part if it below. * Space group = 'P1' (number 1) OVERALL FILE STATISTICS for resolution range 0.000 - 0.277 ======================= Col Sort Min Max Num % Mean Mean Resolution Type Column num order Missing complete abs. Low High label 1 ASC -32 31 0 100.00 -2.2 11.9 49.44 1.90 H H 2 NONE -46 45 0 100.00 -2.5 17.8 49.44 1.90 H K 3 NONE 0 49 0 100.00 18.8 18.8 49.44 1.90 H L 4 NONE 0.9 271.3 0 100.00 26.52 26.52 49.44 1.90 F F-obs 5 NONE 0.2 5.1 0 100.00 1.25 1.25 49.44 1.90 Q SIGF-obs 6 NONE 0.0 1.0 0 100.00 0.01 0.01 49.44 1.90 I R-free-flags No. of reflections used in FILE STATISTICS 143215 Then I regenerate a new mtz file with FreeRflag by XDSCONT, then I revise the .def file accordingly and rerun the program. I got same error message:Not a suitable array of R-free flags: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.label=FreeRflag Sorry_Not_a_suitable_array: Not a suitable array of R-free flags: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.label=FreeRflag To override the suitability test define: refinement.input.xray_data.r_free_flags.disable_suitability_test=True I checked my new mtz file, it dose contain a column labeled as FreeRflag Why there is an error message? How to solve it? Thank you so much!! Best wishes! yamei ************************************************ Yamei Yu State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy／Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University,Chengdu,610041, P.R.China Tel: 15882013485 Email: ymyuxtal(a)gmail.com ymyuxtal(a)163.com yamei_yu(a)scu.edu.cn

3 2

error messages running phenix.mr_rosetta
by Ursula Schulze-Gahmen 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

I am running mr_rosetta on a 64bit Linux computer. The model optimization worked without a problem, but now in the molecular replacement step I am receiving error messages, and I am not sure what the problem is. Could anyone provide a suggestion? Thanks Ursula /usr/share/themes/Slider/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:80: error: unexpected identifier `colorize_scrollbar', expected character `}' Fontconfig warning: no <cachedir> elements found. Check configuration. Fontconfig warning: adding <cachedir>/var/cache/fontconfig</cachedir> Fontconfig warning: adding <cachedir>~/.fontconfig</cachedir> (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): Pango-WARNING **: Failed to load Pango module '/programs/x86_64-linux/phenix/dev-1819/phenix-dev-1819/build/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/base/lib/pango/1.6.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so' for id 'BasicScriptEngineFc' (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: Two different plugins tried to register 'BasicEngineFc'. (gedit:20211): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_new: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (object_type)' failed (gedit:20211): Gtk-WARNING **: Could not find the icon 'system-file-manager'. The 'hicolor' theme was not found either, perhaps you need to install it. You can get a copy from: http://icon-theme.freedesktop.org/releases -- Ursula Schulze-Gahmen, Ph.D. Project Scientist UC Berkeley, QB3 360 Stanley Hall #3220 Berkeley, CA 94720-3220 (510) 643 9491

1 0

residue selection for rsrl?
by Kevin Jude 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

I am refining a structure at 2.9 Å resolution and have two side chains that keep moving out of density during reciprocal space refinement; both side chains should fit the resulting Fo-Fc density in favored rotamers. Turning on real-space refinement fixes this problem but leads to higher Rfree and poorer geometry overall. Can I select a subset of residues for real space refinement while still performing reciprocal space refinement on the whole asymmetric unit? Thanks for any help Kevin

2 2

phenix rosetta refine
by Andreas Förster 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

Dear all, I'm trying to get phenix.rosetta_refine to run. I think it's all set up properly, with Rosetta 3.5 and Phenix 1810 on RHEL 6.3 64bit. However phenix.rosetta_refine model.pdb data.mtz nproc=48 protocol=full > log& fails with the following error in log: End of input processing Sorry: The RosettaScripts executable could not be located. Please add the appropriate directory to your PATH environment variable, or set the variable ROSETTA_BIN to point to it. To me it seems things are defined correctly: andreas@csbstereo in phenix: echo $ROSETTA_BIN /csb/soft/Linux64/share/rosetta3.5/rosetta_source/bin andreas@csbstereo in phenix: ls $ROSETTA_BIN | grep scripts rosetta_scripts.linuxgccrelease@ rosetta_scripts.default.linuxgccrelease@ andreas@csbstereo in phenix: ll $ROSETTA_BIN/rosetta_scripts.linuxgccrelease lrwxrwxrwx 1 csbadmin csb 93 Oct 9 2013 /csb/soft/Linux64/share/rosetta3.5/rosetta_source/bin/rosetta_scripts.linuxgccrelease -> ../build/src/release/linux/2.6/64/x86/gcc/4.4/default/rosetta_scripts.default.linuxgccrelease Any idea of what's wrong would be greatly appreciated. Andreas -- Andreas Förster X-ray Crystallography Facility Manager Centre for Structural Biology Imperial College London

3 2

Alternative conformation of ligand with near zero occupancy
by Singh, Bishal 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

Hello everybody, I thank you for clarifying my previous doubts. Your suggestions matter a lot to me. Here I have another doubt. I have structure of a protein in complex with triglycan (fucose-galactose-galactose). The terminal galactose of this triglycan possesses two conformations with occupancies 0.4 and 0.6. In order to satisfy the geometric parameters of this triglycan, I derived the alternative conformation of fucose and the central galactose as well. Then I performed occupancy refinement. The occupancy of alternative central galactose is 0.06 and that of alternative fucose is 0.00. Now the question is, should I delete this fucose of zero occupancy or keep it to maintain the geometric parameters of triglycan? I am looking forward for your opinion. If you like I can provide a snapshot of ligand with electron density. With regards, Bishal Singh PhD student DKFZ, University of Heidelberg, Germany

2 1

input for specifying labin in phenix.find_ncs
by Arka Chakraborty 26 Nov '14

26 Nov '14

Dear Phenix BBers, I have a seemingly trivial problem in specifying column labels in phenix.find_ncs. Following the manual, on entering labels as : phenix.find_ncs xx.pdb yy.mtz params.ncs.labin = "labin FP=F PHIB=PHI FOM=FOM" , phenix returns the error : 'Sorry, cannot interpret the keyword: params.ncs.labin=labin FP=F PHIB=PHI FOM=FOM'. Any clues on what mistake I might be making will be greatly appreciated. Thanks a lot, Regards, Arko -- *Arka Chakraborty* *ibmb (Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona)* *BARCELONA, SPAIN*

3 4