August 2016 - phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Scale and merge multiple data sets
by Sam Tang 05 Feb '17

05 Feb '17

Dear colleagues Hello again. I would like to scale and merge two different native datasets for a same protein complex (which semed to die off gradually in the beam) using the scale_and_merge tool. The error message was received "Multiple intensity arrays - please specify one: data_labels=I,SIGI data_labels=IPR,SIGPR" However I looked into the log file and I have actually included "data_labels = "IPR,SIGIPR,merged" . Perhaps I have missed something else in the setting? Regards Sam Sam Tang Biochemistry Programme, School of Life Sciences, CUHK

4 5

Realspace refinement
by Reza Khayat 23 Nov '16

23 Nov '16

Hi, Does realspace refinement consider temperature factors during refinement? Thanks. Best wishes, Reza Reza Khayat, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Chemistry City College of New York 85 Saint Nicholas Terrace, CDI 2.318 New York, NY 10031 http://www.khayatlab.org/ 212-650-6070

6 15

Failed to refine B factors of some residues and ligands
by Zhou, Tongqing (NIH/VRC) [E] 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

Dear All, I am refining a structure with diffraction to 2.2A resolution and 95 % overall completeness. Now the Rs are at 18% and 23%, respectively. But the program failed to refine B factors for several ligands, atoms had high B factors while showing positive Fo-Fc map around them. Occupancy was set to 1 and I also tried to reset B to mean B of the whole PDB. Any of you seeing this phenomenon? Thanks! Shown below is HEPES that has high B factor and positive density around it after refinement: [cid:[email protected]] Best regards, Tongqing Tongqing Zhou, Ph.D. Co-head and Staff Scientist Structural Biology Section Vaccine Research Center, NIAID/NIH Building 40, Room 4609B 40 Convent Drive, MSC3027 Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 761-7068 (Tel) (301) 793-0794 (Cell) (301) 480-2658 (Fax) ****************************************************************************** The information in this e-mail and any of its attachments is confidential and may contain sensitive information. It should not be used by anyone who is not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage devices. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases shall not accept liability for any statements made that are sender's own and not expressly made on behalf of the NIAID by one of its representatives. ******************************************************************

4 8

Computational Crystallography Newsletter, Volume 7, Number 2
by Nigel Moriarty 30 Aug '16

30 Aug '16

I am pleased to announce the publication of the latest issue of the Computational Crystallography Newsletter: http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/ A listing of the articles and short communications is given below. Please note that the newsletter accepts articles of a general nature of interest to all crystallographers. Please send any articles to me at NWMoriarty(a)lbl.gov noting that there is a Word Template on the website to streamline production. July 2016 <http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_07.pdf> Articles - Working with EIGER data <http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_07.pdf#page=11> - Processing XFEL data with cctbx.xfel and DIALS <http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_07.pdf#page=18> Short Communications - Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Enrich the Water Structure in Biomolecular Crystals <http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_07.pdf#page=7> Fitting tips #12 – Twist Tells: better β strands at >3.5Å in x-ray or cryoEM <http://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2016_07.pdf#page=2> Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

polder map
by Kaziaa 29 Aug '16

29 Aug '16

Dear Phenix users, i am wondering if anyone has used phenix polder in Windows machine. Any kind of help would me appreciated !! Regards Kazi

3 2

Meaning of "resolution" keyword for phenix.real_space_refine with mrc/ccp4 map input?
by Oliver Clarke 28 Aug '16

28 Aug '16

Hi, What exactly does phenix.real_space_refine do with the mandatory "resolution=" keyword when refining a model against a ccp4/mrc formatted map? Is this purely for adjusting restraints etc, or does phenix internally low-pass filter or resample the map based on this parameter? This seems like a basic question, so I apologize if the answer is staring me in the face, but I couldn't see it in the online documentation or in the output of phenix.real_space_refine --help. Cheers Oliver.

6 11

discrepancies between completeness stats
by Kendall Nettles 23 Aug '16

23 Aug '16

Dear PHENIX developers, We are getting a group of structures ready for publication and noticed that the table 1 description of the completeness is showing higher completeness in the last shell than overall. See Table 1, attached, for one example, with completeness at 81.73 (96.75). This table was calculated from the last major release of PHENIX, and was the same on the latest nightly build. The data was highly anisotropic so we truncated it with the UCLA diffraction anisotropy server. Validation program suggests completeness is 13% in highest res shell, which makes more sense with anisotropic data. I also noticed that the refinement log lists the overall completeness at 85% while the validation and table 1 programs give 82%. Thanks for you advice! Kendall

1 0

Merged data for "Table 1"
by Yufan Wu 10 Aug '16

10 Aug '16

Dear all, I am going to generate “Table 1” by Phenix. However, my data.mtz file was merged from 2 HKL file (2 different datasets). What should I input in “unmerged data"? Thank you in advance! Best, Yufan Regards, Yufan Wu The Plueckthun Lab www.bioc.uzh.ch/plueckthun <http://www.bioc.uzh.ch/plueckthun>Phone: +41 44 635 5574

2 1

Mg is driving me crazy
by Almudena Ponce Salvatierra 09 Aug '16

09 Aug '16

Dear all, I am refining a structure that showed two positive peaks larger than 8 sigma. I assigned them as Mg ions, since I have them in the crystallization condition and also because it make sense, according to where they are located. However when I refine there's still all this green blob around the already properly placed Mg ions. I don't know why, they don't show large thermal factors or anything suspicious... I'm refining individual sites, individual adps, and TLS groups. The resolution I am talking about is 2.5 A. Any thoughts on this? Thank you very much Best wishes, Almudena -- Almudena Ponce-Salvatierra Macromolecular crystallography and Nucleic acid chemistry Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Fassberg 11 37077 Göttingen Germany

3 2