- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

amazing good statistics add
by Christian Roth 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

In general the Rvalues of course fit very well Rmerge. A good sign that it should be fine, as far as I remember correctly about the theoretical limits for the Rvalues after refinement compared to the experiment. Best Regards Christian

1 0

Creating dictionary restraints for a LINK
by Mario Sanches 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

I have a question regarding link dictionary generation. Nigel helped me with a molecule dictionary last week (thank you Nigel) so the molecule is refining well now. This molecule is covalently bound to on of the residues. I tried generating a dictionary that describes both the molecule and the link but so far phenix.refine is ignoring it. Again, the molecule itself refines very well but the link is not there. What is the best way to define it? Thank you very much. -- Mario Sanches Postdoctoral Researcher Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute Mount Sinai Hospital 600 University Ave Toronto - Ontario Canada M5G 1X5 http://ca.linkedin.com/in/mariosanches

3 5

DEN refinement is crashing
by Mario Sanches 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

I am running phenix.refine using the graphical interface. Under "global refinement paramerters..." I am selecting "DEN". The problem is that Python crashes all the time, always at the same point (see portion of the log output below). Is it a known bug? Is DEN incompatible with some of the options in refinement? My resolution is 2.9A by the way. Thank you for your inputs. Mario Sanches ___________________________ Log output final portion: tardy dynamics: number of bodies: 3678 number of degrees of freedom: 3713 number of atoms * 3: 38220 ratio: 0.097 = 1/10.29 temperature degrees of freedom: cartesian (38220) kinetic energy sensitivity to generalized velocities: n: 3713 min: 3.61771e-06 max: 0.0300001 mean: 0.00410663 time step: 0.00100 pico seconds velocity scaling: True suppressing allowed origin shifts: False new target temperature: 2500.00 K step= 1 temperature= 2500.0 rmsd=0.0446 r_work=0.3010 r_free=0.3214 -- Mario Sanches Postdoctoral Researcher Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute Mount Sinai Hospital 600 University Ave Toronto - Ontario Canada M5G 1X5 http://ca.linkedin.com/in/mariosanches

4 7

labelit.index is too precise not to allow 0.000001 deg difference
by fukamitka＠chugai-pharm.co.jp 02 Apr '12

02 Apr '12

Dear Phenix developers, I had a problem in indexing by labelit.index in phenix-1.7.3-928, getting the error below: InputFileError: Input error: All images must have same oscillation range (delta phi). My dataset was collected by inhouse R-axis with 0.8 deg oscillation. Image header values of oscillation range fluctuate between 0.799999 - 0.800004 degrees. When I specified two images whose delta phi angles were different, say 0.799999 and 0.800003, labelit.index stopped with the error above. I don't think a goniometer have such a precision, therefore I think line 249 in /phenix-1.7.3-928/labelit/command_line/imagefiles.py should be modified not to use == instead of similar_delta_phi() or something. 246 if False in [similar_wavelength(self.images[0],self.images[x]) for x in xrange(1,Nimages)]: 247 raise InputFileError("""All images must have similar wavelength.""") 248 249 if False in [self.images[0].deltaphi==self.images[x].deltaphi for x in xrange(1,Nimages)]: 250 raise InputFileError("""All images must have same oscillation range (delta phi).""") Best regards, Takaaki Fukami ----- Dr. Takaaki Fukami (mailto:[email protected]) Discovery Research Dept. (Biostructure Gr.) Roche Group: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd.

2 2

very informative - Trends in Data Fabrication
by Bosch, Juergen 31 Mar '12

31 Mar '12

really fascinating, bringing back the discussion for a repository for your collected frames. Jürgen Acta Cryst. (2012). F68, 366-376 doi:10.1107/S1744309112008421<http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1744309112008421> Detection and analysis of unusual features in the structural model and structure-factor data of a birch pollen allergen B. Rupp<http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/citedin?search_on=name&author_name=Rupp,%20B.> Abstract: Physically improbable features in the model of the birch pollen structure Bet v 1d (PDB entry 3k78<http://pdb.pdb.bnl.gov/pdb-bin/opdbshort?3k78>) are faithfully reproduced in electron density generated with the deposited structure factors, but these structure factors themselves exhibit properties that are characteristic of data calculated from a simple model and are inconsistent with the data and error model obtained through experimental measurements. The refinement of the 3k78<http://pdb.pdb.bnl.gov/pdb-bin/opdbshort?3k78>model against these structure factors leads to an isomorphous structure different from the deposited model with an implausibly small R value (0.019). The abnormal refinement is compared with normal refinement of an isomorphous variant structure of Bet v 1l (PDB entry 1fm4<http://pdb.pdb.bnl.gov/pdb-bin/opdbshort?1fm4>). A variety of analytical tools, including the application of Diederichs plots, R plots and bulk-solvent analysis are discussed as promising aids in validation. The examination of the Bet v 1d structure also cautions against the practice of indicating poorly defined protein chain residues through zero occupancies. The recommendation to preserve diffraction images is amplified. ...................... Jürgen Bosch Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute 615 North Wolfe Street, W8708 Baltimore, MD 21205 Office: +1-410-614-4742 Lab: +1-410-614-4894 Fax: +1-410-955-2926 http://web.mac.com/bosch_lab/

1 0

Problems fitting NADH
by Phillip Steindel 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

Dear all, I'm trying to fit a NADH into a 1.7 Å structure. LigandFit worked with just the three-letter code (NAI), however phenix.refine won't work with just the model. If I use eLBOW to create restraints, meanwhile, the ligand gets distorted during refinement (non-tetrahedral phosphates, mainly). I'm not sure exactly how I'm supposed to be generating these restraints- any help is appreciated. Thank you, Phillip Steindel Theobald Lab Department of Biochemistry Brandeis University

4 3

Re: [phenixbb] [ccp4bb] a small trick for protein and organic compound cocrystallization.
by Bryan Lepore 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Jacob Keller <j-keller2(a)fsm.northwestern.edu> wrote: > What's the harm? have you seen usenet/Google groups? -Bryan

1 0

a small trick for protein and organic compound cocrystallization.
by Kevin Jin 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

Dear All, Here is way I have used for protein and hydrophobic organic compound cocrystallization. Via this method, less amount of DMSO will be used to aviod protein ppt. I hope you can use for your research. http://www.jinkai.org/Xtal.html Regards, -- Kevin Jin Sharing knowledge each other is always very joyful...... Website: http://www.jinkai.org/

2 1

Re: [phenixbb] need help for crystallization
by Kevin Jin 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

My pleasure ! Since this may be help for other people, I also cc it to CCP4BBS. According to your email, I guess the buffer is phosphate buffer at pH 7.4. You can do a quick buffer exchange before crystallization. Since PO4 is a competitor in this case, I will also avoid PO4 and Cocodylate buffer from screen kits. Here is what you can do, 1. concentrate your protein using an amicro centrocon with 3KD cutoff. 2. Measure how much buffer has been spin down, then add equal amount of Tris with same pH back to the top. 3. Then, spin down again. 4. Repeat several times, 5 times may be good enough. 5. Most of Phosphate buffer should be removed. That's what I used before. Let me know if it works. Best, Kevin Jin On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Afshan Begum <afshan490(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > Dear Kevin > > I have seen your website and come to you to discuss my problem actually i > want to co-crystallized my enzyme with inhibitor but problem is that the > phosphate ion come to the active site and occupied the cavity and my > inhibitor not bind to the active center i purchase this enzyme from a > commercial source and they purify with phosphate buffer that's why also > phosphate is occupied the cavity how can i get ride of it from the active > center could you kindly help me regarding this i would be really thankful to > you. > > > Best Regards > > AFSHAN > =========================================== > Dr. Afshan Begum > University of Hamburg > Institute of Biochemistry and Molecularbiology > Laboratory for Structural Biology of Infection and Imflammation > c/o DESY, Build. 22a > Notkestr. 85 > 22603 Hamburg > Germany > Home phone: +49 40 22888618 > Fax: +49 40 8998-4747 > E-mail: afshan490(a)yahoo.com > -- Kevin Jin Sharing knowledge each other is always very joyful...... Website: http://www.jinkai.org/

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] phaser_ep
by Airlie McCoy 30 Mar '12

30 Mar '12

Dear Kay, You can control the distance for the atom separation/anisotropy in Phaser with the llgcomplete.clash input parameter. By default llgcomplete.clash is zero, which means Phaser will calculate a value based on the resolution. If a value is set this will override the default. Apologies, this was not explained in the wiki, but is now! Airlie

1 0