- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Hardware migration
by Billy Poon 19 Jun '24

19 Jun '24

Hi everyone, We are in the process of migrating these bulletin boards to new hardware over the next few weeks. I will make another post once the migration is completed. Nothing will be changed until then. Thanks! -- Billy K. Poon Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720 Fax: (510) 486-5909 Web: https://phenix-online.org

1 2

Test post
by Billy Poon 19 Jun '24

19 Jun '24

This is a test message using the new hardware. -- Billy K. Poon Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720 Fax: (510) 486-5909 Web: https://phenix-online.org

1 0

C-beta outliers
by Andrea Smith 15 Jun '24

15 Jun '24

Hi all, I am running Phenix v. 1.20.1-4487 on Windows and I keep on getting C-beta outliers of methionine residues after phenix.refine (happened in different data from two different proteins). Even if I correct the methionines in Coot (and they fit perfectly in the density), I get the outliers at the end of refinement again (while these outliers don't fit the density and I can see a green difference map where the C-beta is). Why is this? Is there a way to tell phenix.refine not to move a specific amino acid during refinement? Thanks, Andrea

2 1

Help with Phenix/Rosetta Interface Installation
by Lucas Souza 14 Jun '24

14 Jun '24

Dear all, I have been trying to install rosetta (both release 371 and 20221.16.61629)/phenix (1.21.1-5286) interface in Ubuntu 24.04, but with no success at all. Both Rosetta installation and "rosetta.build_phenix_interface" ends up with no erros. But, when I run "rosetta.run_tests" or try to "phenix.rosetta_refine" I always get the error below: ------- /Generating 2 models on 1 processors... / /DEBUG dumping error message ERROR: Rosetta exited with status 139 stderr output: AN INTERNAL ERROR HAS OCCURED. PLEASE SEE THE CONTENTS OF ROSETTA_CRASH.log FOR DETAILS. Segmentation fault (core dumped) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/lucas/pckg/phenix-1.21.1-5286/build/../modules/phenix/phenix/command_line/rosetta_refine.py", line 315, in <module> run(sys.argv[1:], create_dir=True) File "/home/lucas/pckg/phenix-1.21.1-5286/build/../modules/phenix/phenix/command_line/rosetta_refine.py", line 198, in run debug=params.output.debug) File "/home/lucas/pckg/phenix-1.21.1-5286/modules/phenix/phenix/rosetta/refine.py", line 329, in __init__ self.run_jobs() File "/home/lucas/pckg/phenix-1.21.1-5286/modules/phenix/phenix/rosetta/refine.py", line 403, in run_jobs check_result(result) File "/home/lucas/pckg/phenix-1.21.1-5286/modules/phenix/phenix/rosetta/refine.py", line 394, in check_result raise RuntimeError("Aborted due to error in job %d." % result.job_id) RuntimeError: Aborted due to error in job 1./ /Something tells me this is related to the drop of support to Python2 in the new Ubuntu release, but I could not figure out what exactly is the issue. I uploaded both stdout and ROSETTA_CRASH.log in this email./ ------- If anyone can help me with this issue, I would be very happy. Thank you all! Lucas

1 0

(IUCr) The evolution of raw data archiving and the growth of its importance in crystallography
by John R Helliwell 13 Jun '24

13 Jun '24

Dear Colleagues, Our article on this topic, which I imagine will be of keen interest, published this afternoon, is available open access from this weblink:- https://journals.iucr.org/m/issues/2024/04/00/lt5067/index.html Best wishes, John Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell DSc

1 0

ADP-BEF-link.cif
by Heidi Schubert 11 Jun '24

11 Jun '24

Hi AAA ATPase modelers Could anyone send me the .cif file to define the link between ADP and a BeFx ion? I’m hoping this has not only the revised angle/bond info between O3B and Be but also the new angle between the Be and Fs different from the planar simple ion. AND, for my hexamer I assume the apply_link.def file then just reads with repetitive 5-line groups: refinement.pdb_interpretation.apply_cif_link { data_link = ADP-BEF residue_selection_1 = chain A and resname ADP and resseq 901 residue_selection_2 = chain A and resname BEF and resseq 902 } Where I change out the chain name but keep calling them residues_selection1 and 2? Many thanks Heidi Heidi Schubert Research Professor Department of Biochemistry University of Utah Rm 116 BPRB 20 S 2030 E Salt Lake City, UT 84112 heidi(a)biochem.utah.edu<mailto:[email protected]> 801-585-9776

1 0

high and low resolution in Phenix 1.21.1-5286-000
by Dominik Oberthuer 30 May '24

30 May '24

Hi, because of an update to Sonoma, I also had to update to Phenix 1.21.1-5286-000. When I'm running phenix.refine from the GUI, use an MTZ with resolution e.g. from 1.65 - 51A, use "High resolution" and "Low resolution" to refine against a specific range of data, phenix.refine does not cut off the data beyond the limits set there, but instead takes all of the data. For sure, I cut the MTZ before, but many times it is about trying out which data to include and not include and this is not really how it should be... Is this known? Is there any way to solve this issue? Thanks! Dominik -- Dr. Dominik Oberthür CFEL - Center for Free-Electron Laser Science - DESY Coherent Imaging Division Notkestrasse 85 22607 Hamburg Germany phone: +49 (0)40 8998 6394 dominik.oberthuer(a)cfel.de

2 2

NIGMS Mature Synchrotron Program Evaluation
by Paul Adams 21 May '24

21 May '24

Dear Colleagues, Apologies for the US-centric posting, but I think this is of interest to many of the bulletin board subscribers who make use of synchrotron facilities in the US. NIH is seeking feedback on the Mature Synchrotron Program: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-GM-24-019.html This program supports synchrotron-based user resources where the technologies are at an advanced level, including Macromolecular Crystallography, Small-Angle and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering, fiber diffraction, and other synchrotron-based techniques that generate important data, with an emphasis on structural biology. Responses to the RFI will be accepted through 6/17/2024. All comments will be anonymous and should be submitted electronically via a web form at: https://www.research.net/r/P30_RFI As the Director of one of the resources it has been suggested that I help make the community aware of the RFI, so there is the opportunity to provide feedback in a timely manner. Feel free to pass this on to any of your colleagues who may be interested. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Adams (he/him/his) Associate Laboratory Director for Biosciences, LBL (https://biosciences.lbl.gov) Principal Investigator, Computational Crystallography Initiative, LBL (http://cci.lbl.gov) Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute (http://www.jbei.org) Principal Investigator, ALS-ENABLE, Advanced Light Source (http://als-enable.lbl.gov) Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area (http://enigma.lbl.gov) Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, UC Berkeley (http://bioeng.berkeley.edu) Member of the Graduate Group in Comparative Biochemistry, UC Berkeley (http://compbiochem.berkeley.edu) Building 91, Room 410 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul ORCID: 0000-0001-9333-8219 Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 91R0183 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Michael Espinosa [ MEEspinosa(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-333-6788 ] Phenix Consortium: Ashley Dawn [ AshleyDawn(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-486-5455 ] --

1 0

"<" symbol in reflection mmcif status column
by Kreitler, Dale 17 May '24

17 May '24

Looking at some output reflection cif files from phenix.refine I'm wondering what does "<" mean in the status column and why would F_calc_with_sovlent structure factors also be missing for these reflections? In some cases I can see it coincides with unobserved reflections, but this doesn't seem consistent. Any insight or links to documentation that describe these values would be much appreciated. Thank you, Dale loop_ _refln.index_h _refln.index_k _refln.index_l _refln.F_meas_au _refln.F_meas_sigma_au _refln.pdbx_FWT _refln.pdbx_PHWT _refln.pdbx_DELFWT _refln.pdbx_DELPHWT _refln.pdbx_r_free_flag _refln.status _refln.pdbx_F_calc_with_solvent _refln.pdbx_phase_calc_with_solvent ... 30 0 48 65.2227 18.9183 72.4766 0 5.77152 -2.25565e-14 3 o 77.6435 1.95165e-15 30 0 49 206.068 7.45891 200.645 120 ? ? 19 < ? ? 30 0 50 33.324 17.5773 1.10423 -120 0.328059 -120 10 o 0.916822 -120 30 0 51 23.7705 14.8724 10.7438 180 2.40893 1.88332e-14 6 o 16.3173 180 ... 32 7 2 ? ? 11.4163 118.276 ? ? 5 < ? ? 32 7 3 ? ? 52.373 -121.74 ? ? 10 < ? ? 32 7 4 ? ? 33.1269 -26.1149 ? ? 3 < ? ? 32 7 5 ? ? 106.054 -86.2146 ? ? 19 < ? ? ============================= Dale Kreitler AMX Beamline Scientist National Synchrotron Light Source II Building 745, Rm. 5L143 Upton, NY 11973 631-344-7318

2 2

ADP refinement in phenix.real _space_refine
by Luca Pellegrini 17 May '24

17 May '24

While refining a protein-DNA complex in a cryoEM map (~2.5-7A), I have noticed the following behaviour of ADP refinement: - If NCS is on for the protein chains, no ADP refinement of the DNA takes place. - If NCS is off, ADP refinement behaves oddly: one strand of dsDNA is refined with atomic ADPs, the other strand with group ADPs (one per nucleotide). The group ADPs take up unphysical values (lower ADPs in poor map regions), whereas the atomic ADPs look sensible. - To get the ADP refinement of DNA to behave normally, I need to both leave NCS out and set nproc=1 explicitly (haven’t tried other values). I wonder if any of this has been seen before or am I not doing this correctly? Phenix-dev-5330 iMac, Catalina 10.15.7, 8-core Intel i9 Best wishes, Luca Luca Pellegrini, PhD Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1GA UK

2 1