- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

SA omit map
by Tjaard Pijning 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

Hi, I would like to generate an SA-omit Fo-Fc map for a ligand bound to protein. Using the GUI I selected the AutoBuild-Create Omit Map module and set the following : - data.mtz - protein.pdb (no ligand, no solvent) = start model - ligand.pdb (just ligand) = omit map atoms - omit map type = simulated annealing - omit region = omit around pdb The resulting map (/OMIT/resolve_composite_map.mtz) shows density for both the protein and the ligand. When I feed this into the CCP4 module FFT to generate an nF1-mF2 map (with n=1 and m=1) I still get density for both the protein and ligand. However I need only the ligand Fo-Fc density. What is the right way to do this ? Thanks, Tjaard Ing. Tjaard Pijning Research Assistant Protein Crystallography Group Nijenborgh 7 9747 AG Groningen The Netherlands (31)(0)50 363 43 85

4 6

Re: [phenixbb] phenix.mr_rosetta: Inconsistent query numbering
by Thomas C. Terwilliger 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

Hi Pietro, There is something that phenix.mr_model_preparation cannot read in Japanin.hhr (attached): phenix.mr_model_preparation Japanin.hhr gives the same error. I'll copy Gabor Bunkoczi and see if he can help with this. All the best, Tom T >> Dear all, >> >> my run of phenix.mr_rosetta stops with: >> >> ******************* ERROR ENDING *************** >> Inconsistent query numbering >> >> ******************* ERROR ENDING *************** >> >> I attach script and logfiles. >> >> Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks >> >> Pietro >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >>

3 2

Validation question: R-factor (all) and # of unique reflections (all)
by Young-Jin Cho 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Hi everyone, While I am trying to deposit, I am faced with several things that I am not sure: FYI. I am in the <Refinement Statistics> section (Auto Dep Input Tool) in the PDB bank. Most values are came from pdb file that was made from phenix.refine but it asks me "R-factor (all)" that satisfy the limits established by high & low resolution cut off and "number of unique reflections (all)". My simple question is if phenix has those kind of information, if so where I can find them. Another question is if I changed water (deletion or changed occupancy) based on 'precheck', should I run phenix.refine again to get R/Rfree values in correct? I am not sure if these are captured by PDB automatically or not. (seemingly they do like that at this point but not 100% sure yet.) With many thanks~ Young-Jin

4 3

Re: [phenixbb] Validation question: R-factor (all) and # of unique reflections (all)
by Pavel Afonine 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Hi Young-Jin, > I feel like I should calculate R(all). As mtz file is usually big, > how can I extract Fobs and Fmodel from phenix generated mtz file? If you feel you want it, then go ahead, and this command might be of help here: phenix.mtz.dump data.mtz --column-data-format=spreadsheet -c Yet another (easier) alternative is to run a dummy phenix.refine run like this: phenix.refine data.mtz model.pdb xray_data.r_free_flags.ignore_r_free_flags=true main.number_of_mac=1 strategy=none output.prefix=junk then take the reported R-factor (Rwork will be equal to Rfree, so take any of them), and discard the files. All the best! Pavel.

1 0

phenix.mr_rosetta: Inconsistent query numbering
by Pietro Roversi 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Dear all, my run of phenix.mr_rosetta stops with: ******************* ERROR ENDING *************** Inconsistent query numbering ******************* ERROR ENDING *************** I attach script and logfiles. Any suggestions? Thanks Pietro

1 0

Ligand woes
by José Trincão 05 Jul '11

05 Jul '11

Hello all, I have been having very weird problems refining a structure with several ligands. The weirdest problem is that if I try to run ligand fit giving just the name of the ligands, no problem - it finds the ligands (FAD and MTE). I save the pdb with all the ligands in and phenix.refine complains that MTE is not recognised, I have to run ready-set. I do it. Run phenix.refine again, and now it complains with the following: Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 116 "HETATM18439 C1' MTE A3003 .*. C " "HETATM18441 C2' MTE A3003 .*. C " "HETATM18443 C3' MTE A3003 .*. C " "HETATM18444 O3' MTE A3003 .*. O " "HETATM18474 N9A FAD A3005 .*. N " "HETATM18475 C8A FAD A3005 .*. C " "HETATM18476 N7A FAD A3005 .*. N " "HETATM18477 C5A FAD A3005 .*. C " "HETATM18478 C6A FAD A3005 .*. C " "HETATM18480 N1A FAD A3005 .*. N " ... (remaining 106 not shown) Any help will be greatly appreciated. Jose José Trincão, PhD CQFB@FCT-UNL 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal "It's very hard to make predictions... especially about the future" - Niels Bohr

3 2

NCS Restraints
by Yuri 01 Jul '11

01 Jul '11

Hi Pavel, >It's rather packing.. Say, if more than one copy packs in the > asymmetric >unit then you have NCS, roughly speaking.. So is it correct to say that in cases where you have 1 molecule per ASU, there will be no NCS only crystallographic symmetry?? > In other words, if for the same enzyme one crystal goes to 3.1 and > another 1.5 A could one have significant NCS but not the other? >I'm not sure I understood this... May some one else did? I was trying to understand if this phenomenon would be noticeable depending on the resolution only... You and Nathaniel pretty much answered this now... -- Yuri Pompeu

2 1

NCS restraints
by Yuri 30 Jun '11

30 Jun '11

Hello, I have some fundamental questions about NCS: 1- I think its somewhat of a consensus that at higher res. it should not be used to avoid missing out "real" detailed discrepancy. Is this true? 2- Should one try to use it in lower res data (3 A and worse)? 3- Is the presence of NCS macromolecule specific, or crystal specific? In other words, if for the same enzyme one crystal goes to 3.1 and another 1.5 A could one have significant NCS but not the other? Thanks or any clarification -- Yuri Pompeu

3 3

phenix.ligand_identification problem
by Andrzej 29 Jun '11

29 Jun '11

Dear All, I'm having problem with running ligand_identification script. All well up to the point where the ligand library is created and then for each ligand following error is displayed: Running job sequence 13, ligand 14, in /share/scratch/an... Sorry, resolve was not able to finish on the first cycle I suspect it has something to do with resolve size but there is no keyword like resolve_size for ligand_identification. I've tested my input files with 1.7.1-743 and dev-738 release - same results. Thanks in advance for the support! Regards, Andrzej -- Dr. Andrzej Lyskowski (andrzej[.]lyskowski[(a)]acib[.]at) ACIB Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology GmbH Petersgasse 14, A-8010 Graz, Austria http://acib.at/ c/o IMB Institute of Molecular Biosciences, University of Graz Humboldtstraße 50,III/194, A-8010 Graz, Austria http://strubi.uni-graz.at/ +43 316 380 1993 tel +43 316 380 9897 fax

2 1

Phenix.refine and Unusual residues
by Haytham Wahba 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Version: 1.7 Release tag: 650 Platform: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 linux User: haytham why phenix does not recognise ACT, PO4 Sn and Br (unusual residue) as you see in this part in the Log file.. (see below) Chain: "C" Number of atoms: 4 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 4 Unusual residues: {'ACT': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "C" Number of atoms: 4 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 4 Unusual residues: {'ACT': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "E" Number of atoms: 1 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 1 Unusual residues: {' SN': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "E" Number of atoms: 1 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 1 Unusual residues: {' SN': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "F" Number of atoms: 1 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 1 Unusual residues: {' SN': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "G" Number of atoms: 5 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 5 Unusual residues: {'PO4': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "G" Number of atoms: 5 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 5 Unusual residues: {'PO4': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Chain: "H" Number of atoms: 1 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 1, 1 Unusual residues: {' BR': 1} Classifications: {'undetermined': 1} Residues with excluded nonbonded symmetry interactions: 2 residue: pdb=" SN SN E 1 " occ=0.70 residue: pdb=" SN SN E 2 " occ=0.20 --------------------------------------------------------- when i try to refine specially the Tin atom (not other, ACT,...) in coot after phenix.refine. coot display ((no restraints Found,...lablabla)) ----------------------------------------------------------- this is the PDB (what is the wrong with that) HETATM 3552 O HOH S 361 11.670 -4.327 9.559 1.00 34.14 O TER 3553 HOH S 361 HETATM 3554 OXT ACT C 1 10.133 -3.417 7.937 1.00 20.00 O HETATM 3555 C ACT C 1 9.911 -2.331 7.357 1.00 20.00 C HETATM 3556 O ACT C 1 10.897 -1.607 7.183 1.00 20.00 O HETATM 3557 CH3 ACT C 1 8.550 -1.912 6.905 1.00 20.00 C TER 3558 ACT C 1 HETATM 3559 OXT ACT C 2 10.700 -2.628 9.985 1.00 20.00 O HETATM 3560 C ACT C 2 10.962 -1.952 11.000 1.00 20.00 C HETATM 3561 O ACT C 2 11.756 -2.461 11.809 1.00 20.00 O HETATM 3562 CH3 ACT C 2 10.364 -0.601 11.240 1.00 20.00 C TER 3563 ACT C 2 HETATM 3564 SN SN E 1 6.346 -4.396 -16.894 0.70 20.00 SN TER 3565 SN E 1 HETATM 3566 SN SN E 2 6.492 -2.146 -14.779 0.20 20.00 SN TER 3567 SN E 2 HETATM 3568 SN SN F 1 10.186 0.632 6.366 1.00 30.00 SN TER 3569 SN F 1 HETATM 3570 P PO4 G 1 5.763 10.047 -3.974 1.00 30.00 P HETATM 3571 O1 PO4 G 1 6.960 10.924 -4.190 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3572 O2 PO4 G 1 4.531 10.872 -4.101 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3573 O3 PO4 G 1 5.758 8.978 -5.017 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3574 O4 PO4 G 1 5.835 9.456 -2.607 1.00 30.00 O TER 3575 PO4 G 1 HETATM 3576 P PO4 G 2 9.060 -4.976 -17.812 1.00 30.00 P HETATM 3577 O1 PO4 G 2 10.418 -5.179 -18.415 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3578 O2 PO4 G 2 8.223 -4.116 -18.710 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3579 O3 PO4 G 2 8.412 -6.316 -17.597 1.00 30.00 O HETATM 3580 O4 PO4 G 2 9.172 -4.280 -16.485 1.00 30.00 O TER 3581 PO4 G 2 HETATM 3582 BR BR H 1 9.484 11.317 -29.959 1.00 20.00 BR TER 3583 BR H 1 END

3 2

Difference Map positive peaks in release dev-798
by Yuri 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

I was wondering if anything changed (weights or something) in the way the difference maps are calculated? I just ran refinement on a 1.3 structure and a hexacoordinated Mg2+ ion has significant positive density peak even at occupancy 1.0. I had not noticed that before. My ligand also does have positive peaks, but refine gives it a .91 occupancy. I wonder if I am missing some parameter cif file or some definition that would make the positive peaks decrease? Thank you -- Yuri Pompeu

3 4

NCS error in Phenix 1.7.1-743
by Ngan Nguyen Bich 26 Jun '11

26 Jun '11

Dear, Thank Nat for your quick reply, I will try the new nightly build and see what happen. I hope it will fix my problem. Ngan

1 0

Difference Map positive peaks in release dev-798
by Yuri 25 Jun '11

25 Jun '11

Pavel, I just ran the same job using the last official release (743). Some differences: >When the change occurred (between which version numbers)? Some where in between 743 and dev-798. >Does the peak disappear if you do the same calculation using an older > version? Yes, I see no positive or negative peaks for the Mg ion (nor my ligand). >There is no general remedy - it's all case-dependent. >Does its B-factor differ significantly from surrounding atoms? Yes, the B-factor for the ligand is 20 on average. The surrounding residues and cofactor are 10 or below. But, as I mentioned above, I see no positive peak density this time around. -- Yuri Pompeu

2 1

NCS error in Phenix 1.7.1-743
by Ngan Nguyen Bich 24 Jun '11

24 Jun '11

Dear all, I've got a problem when rerunning the same job of my project in the new laptop. I've found that it's because of the NCS restraint groups set-up In the old computer I set two NCS restraints groups as: First group: Reference group: chain A and sidechain and resid 3:216 and not (resid 63 or resid 66 or resid 81 or resid 93 or resid 133 or resid 135 or resid 181 or resid 184 or resid 193 or resid 194 or resid 212) Second group: Reference group: chain A and backbone and resid 3:217 and not (resid 63 or resid 133 or resid 135 or resid 184) And the refine_phenix run well in the old computer, but the new laptop with the error in the end of this letter. I've found that if I delete the backbone in the second group, it runs again. So I wonder that how I could refine NCS restraint of backbone now? Thank you in advance. Ngan RuntimeError : mean() argument is an empty array Traceback: File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/libtbx/thread_utils.py", line 223, in run return_value = self._target(self._args, self._kwargs, self._c) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/libtbx/runtime_utils.py", line 58, in __call__ result = self.target() File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/phenix/phenix/refinement/runtime.py", line 68, in __call__ call_back_handler=callback) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/phenix/phenix/refinement/command_line.py", line 89, in run call_back_handler=call_back_handler) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/phenix/phenix/refinement/driver.py", line 1278, in run reference_model_manager = self.reference_model_manager) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/phenix/phenix/refinement/strategies.py", line 322, in refinement_machine monitors.collect(step = "0 :", model = model, fmodels = fmodels) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/refinement/__init__.py", line 51, in collect rigid_body_shift_accumulator = rigid_body_shift_accumulator) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/refinement/print_statistics.py", line 263, in collect ignore_side_chain = True, File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/model.py", line 971, in geometry_statistics restraints_manager = self.restraints_manager) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/model_statistics.py", line 38, in __init__ compute_gradients = True) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/restraints.py", line 66, in energies_sites normalization=False) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/ncs/restraints.py", line 686, in energies_sites self.compute_operators(sites_cart=sites_cart) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/ncs/restraints.py", line 679, in compute_operators self.operators.append(group.operators(sites_cart=sites_cart)) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/ncs/restraints.py", line 336, in operators return _operators(group=self, sites_cart=sites_cart) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/mmtbx/ncs/restraints.py", line 442, in __init__ other_sites=sites_cart.select(pair[1])) File "/Applications/PHENIX-1.7.1-743/Contents/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/scitbx/math/superpose.py", line 58, in __init__ self.reference_shift = reference_sites.mean() Platform info: __FILE__ = /net/patchnose/scratch1/phenix/phenix-1.7.1-743/cctbx_project/boost_adaptbx/meta_ext.cpp __DATE__ = Apr 28 2011 __TIME__ = 02:15:10 __i386__ __APPLE_CC__ = 5367 __GNUC__ = 4 __GNUC_MINOR__ = 0 __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ = 1 boost::python::cxxabi_cxa_demangle_is_broken(): false __GXX_WEAK__ = 1 __VERSION__ = 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5367) FE_INEXACT = 32 FE_DIVBYZERO = 4 FE_UNDERFLOW = 16 FE_OVERFLOW = 8 FE_INVALID = 1 FE_ALL_EXCEPT = 61 __SSE2__ = 1 BOOST_LIB_VERSION = 1_47 PY_VERSION = 2.7.1 PYTHON_API_VERSION = 1013 sizeof(bool) = 1 sizeof(short) = 2 sizeof(int) = 4 sizeof(long) = 4 sizeof(std::size_t) = 4 sizeof(void*) = 4 sizeof(long long) = 8 sizeof(float) = 4 sizeof(double) = 8 sizeof(long double) = 16 sizeof(boost::int32_t) = 4 sizeof(boost::uint32_t) = 4 sizeof(wchar_t) = 4 __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ Py_USING_UNICODE sizeof(PY_UNICODE_TYPE) = 2 BOOST_ADAPTBX_TYPE_ID_SIZE_T_EQ_UNSIGNED_LONG os.name<http://os.name>: posix sys.platform: darwin sys.byteorder: little platform.platform(): Darwin-10.7.4-x86_64-i386-32bit platform.architecture(): ('32bit', '') floating_point_exceptions.division_by_zero_trapped: False floating_point_exceptions.invalid_trapped: False floating_point_exceptions.overflow_trapped: False number of processors: 4 Memory total: 4,294,967,296 Memory free: unknown import thread: OK "hello" = ['h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o'] u"hello" = ['h', '\x00', 'e', '\x00', 'l', '\x00', 'l', '\x00', 'o', '\x00'] u"\u00C5" = ['\xc5', '\x00'] as utf-8 = ['\xc3', '\x85'] LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE = √Ö

2 1

B-factor and phenix.refine+Occ+charge
by Haytham Wahba 23 Jun '11

23 Jun '11

June 23, 2011, 9:30 AM Dear all dimer in AU average B factor 21 resolution: 1.78 each subunit shows 2 Tin atoms in the active site B factor for 2 tin in chain A 15 and 19 but B factor for other 2 tin in chain B 30 and 41 41 for tin which is between the 2 cysteine (photo attached) (occ: 0.25) this one which i am worry about ((because the average B factor for the surrounding amino acid is 20)) and 30 of the other one near phoshate (occ: 0.70) 1- i tried to change the occupancy or refine the occupancy for tin trying to reduce B factor (41) it works (reduced to 30) but it gives me a +ve peak what could i do to solve this problem?? 2- other trial to define charge for that tin HETATM 3241 SN SN C 3 6.543 -2.139 -14.821 0.25 41.55 SN4+ but it was the same result. --- is this definetion for that charge is OK or it is not enough in PDB file --- is this way is understandable by phenix.refine? i mean does phenix differentiate in refinment between SN, SN2+ and SN4+?? N.B: protein soaked in DimethylTindiBromide Haytham Wahba Biochemistry UdeM Canada

3 2

Re: [phenixbb] rosetta fragment files (Thomas C. Terwilliger)
by Leonid Sazanov 21 Jun '11

21 Jun '11

Hi Tom, Thanks for that! Native support for several large chains would be very useful. Leonid > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:24:55 -0600 (MDT) > From: "Thomas C. Terwilliger"<terwilliger(a)lanl.gov> > To: "PHENIX user mailing list"<phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] rosetta fragment files -- adjusting residue > numbers to combine them > Message-ID:<50912.128.165.72.7.1308252295.squirrel(a)webmail.lanl.gov> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > Hi Leonid and others wanting to use phenix.mr_rosetta with large chains, > > After looking at the Rosetta code and conferring with Frank DiMaio from > the Baker laboratory... > > You can paste several fragment files together to represent your entire > chain, but you need to edit all but the first one to set the position in > the sequence file that each set of fragments goes with. > > Here is a little script that will take a fragments file that you have > created that started with residue 651 and edit it in a way that you can > just add to the end of your fragments file for residues 1-650. Run it > with: > > phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py \ > fragments_in fragments_adjusted 651 > > -------------------------------- > # adjust_robetta_resid.py > # use: phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py fragments_in > fragments_adjusted 651 > # to adjust the first residue of fragments_in to be 651 > > import sys > args=sys.argv[1:] > if len(args) != 3: > print "USE: phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py fragments_in > fragments_adjusted<start_resno>" > sys.exit() > file_in=args[0] > file_out=args[1] > start_resno=int(args[2]) > > print "Copying %s to %s offsetting start residue number to %d" %( > file_in,file_out,start_resno) > > f=open(file_out,'w') > new_resno=0 > for line in open(file_in).readlines(): > if line.find('position:')> -1 and line.find('neighbors:')>-1: > spl=line.split() > current_resno=int(spl[1]) > new_resno=current_resno+start_resno > print "Residue %d changed to %d" %(current_resno,new_resno) > spl[1]=" %d " %(new_resno) > new_line=" ".join(spl) > else: > new_line=line > print>>f, new_line.rstrip() > > f.close() > -------------------------------- > > I will add this to phenix as "phenix.adjust_robetta_resid" as well. > > > However...there still is a problem if you have multiple chains...as > mr_rosetta has only one set of fragments files the same fragments files > are being applied to all your chains. I will add a way to specify which > fragments files go with which chains. > > All the best, > Tom T >

2 1

scattering factors
by Goragot Wisedchaisri 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

Hi, I am new to Phenix but I have used Solve/Resolve in the past. I am currently using Phenix 1.6.2 and I have electron diffraction data to ~2A from a 300kV electron microscope that I would like to use Autobuild and phenix.refine to iteratively rebuild and refine my partial structure. I have a file containing electron scattering factors for 300kV EM that has been used successfully for refinement with CNS before for electron diffraction data. How can I tell Phenix to use electron scattering factors during refinement? I think currently Phenix has 4 choices for X-ray and neutron scattering factors but not for electron scattering. Is there a good way to implement electron scattering factors into phenix library? Any suggestions are welcome. George Wisedchaisri

5 12

phenix.validate ? Or RSCC from command line?
by Francis E Reyes 20 Jun '11

20 Jun '11

Phenixers Is there a great phenix cmd line utility that computes a real space correlation for each residue given model and data? I'll take a .py if necessary. Thanks! --------------------------------------------- Francis E. Reyes M.Sc. 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder

2 1

Errors in latest build dev-790
by Yuri 19 Jun '11

19 Jun '11

Dear phenixers, I ran into some errors after my last upgrade. First, I noticed that all of the data plots are gone in the GUI, instead I get a message that says :plotting disabled due to missing library. Second I was running phenix.refine and got the following message, they may be related I am not positive: AttributeError : 'RefinementStatsPlot' object has no attribute 'null_fmt' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/local/UFAD/yuri.pompeu/Desktop/PHENIX_installation/phenix-installer-dev-790/phenix-dev-790/phenix/wxGUI2/Runtime.py", line 172, in OnUpdate self.propagate_event(event, "OnUpdate") File "/home/local/UFAD/yuri.pompeu/Desktop/PHENIX_installation/phenix-installer-dev-790/phenix-dev-790/phenix/wxGUI2/Runtime.py", line 228, in propagate_event fn(event) File "/home/local/UFAD/yuri.pompeu/Desktop/PHENIX_installation/phenix-installer-dev-790/phenix-dev-790/phenix/wxGUI2/Programs/Refine/Output.py", line 536, in OnUpdate self.stats_plot.update_stats(callback.data) File "/home/local/UFAD/yuri.pompeu/Desktop/PHENIX_installation/phenix-installer-dev-790/phenix-dev-790/phenix/wxGUI2/Programs/Refine/Output.py", line 796, in update_stats stats.bs_ave) File "/home/local/UFAD/yuri.pompeu/Desktop/PHENIX_installation/phenix-installer-dev-790/phenix-dev-790/phenix/wxGUI2/Programs/Refine/Output.py", line 809, in set_plots ax1().xaxis.set_major_formatter(self.null_fmt) AttributeError: 'RefinementStatsPlot' object has no attribute 'null_fmt' Platform info: __FILE__ = /net/anaconda/scratch1/phenix/phenix-dev-790/cctbx_project/boost_adaptbx/meta_ext.cpp __DATE__ = Jun 17 2011 __TIME__ = 04:12:36 __x86_64__ __linux __GNUC__ = 3 __GNUC_MINOR__ = 4 __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ = 2 boost::python::cxxabi_cxa_demangle_is_broken(): false __GXX_WEAK__ = 1 __LP64__ = 1 __VERSION__ = 3.4.2 20041017 (Red Hat 3.4.2-6.fc3) FE_INEXACT = 32 FE_DIVBYZERO = 4 FE_UNDERFLOW = 16 FE_OVERFLOW = 8 FE_INVALID = 1 FE_ALL_EXCEPT = 61 __SSE2__ = 1 BOOST_LIB_VERSION = 1_47 PY_VERSION = 2.7.2 PYTHON_API_VERSION = 1013 sizeof(bool) = 1 sizeof(short) = 2 sizeof(int) = 4 sizeof(long) = 8 sizeof(std::size_t) = 8 sizeof(void*) = 8 sizeof(long long) = 8 sizeof(float) = 4 sizeof(double) = 8 sizeof(long double) = 16 sizeof(boost::int32_t) = 4 sizeof(boost::uint32_t) = 4 sizeof(wchar_t) = 4 __PTRDIFF_TYPE__ Py_USING_UNICODE sizeof(PY_UNICODE_TYPE) = 2 gnu libc version: 2.5 BOOST_ADAPTBX_TYPE_ID_SIZE_T_EQ_UNSIGNED_LONG os.name: posix sys.platform: linux2 sys.byteorder: little platform.platform(): Linux-2.6.18-238.12.1.el5-x86_64-with-redhat-5.6-Tikanga platform.architecture(): ('64bit', 'ELF') floating_point_exceptions.division_by_zero_trapped: False floating_point_exceptions.invalid_trapped: False floating_point_exceptions.overflow_trapped: False number of processors: 2 Memory total: 3,692,077,056 Memory free: 16,236,544 import thread: OK "hello" = ['h', 'e', 'l', 'l', 'o'] u"hello" = ['h', '\x00', 'e', '\x00', 'l', '\x00', 'l', '\x00', 'o', '\x00'] u"\u00C5" = ['\xc5', '\x00'] as utf-8 = ['\xc3', '\x85'] LATIN CAPITAL LETTER A WITH RING ABOVE = Å -- Yuri Pompeu

2 1

phenix.model_vs_data
by Yuri 17 Jun '11

17 Jun '11

I just realized it is under Comprehensive Validation! -- Yuri Pompeu

1 0

phenix.model_vs_data
by Yuri 17 Jun '11

17 Jun '11

> I would refine in parallel with and without the twin law and check > the > resulting maps and R-factors. > I had a case where the twin fraction was 0.06, which I expected to be > negotiable. When I included the twin law in refinement, my R-factors > dropped dramatically. >This is what phenix.model_vs_data does: it runs Xtriage internally and >tries all suggested twin laws, scores the results by R-factor and > prints >out the verdict: >phenix.model_vs_data model.pdb data.mtz >phenix.model_vs_data: >http://phenix-online.org/documentation/model_vs_data.htm >Pavel. Is this accomplished in polygon in the GUI? -- Yuri Pompeu

1 0

General Questions about Joint x-ray/neutron refinement
by Louis Lazar 17 Jun '11

17 Jun '11

Developers/all: I have been running some Joint X/N jobs, and I have some questions that perhaps you can help me with. First, doing joint refinement gave a total of 53 waters (thanks to ordered_solvent=true), yet the electron density seems to show that there are several more waters that are actually present (however it should be noted that there is no nuclear density associated with those waters, and in some cases no nuclear density associated with the 53 that were chosen by ordered_solvent=true). Should I add in manually to the electron density what I believe are these extra waters, or simply ignore them? Second, when I try to real space refine any of the residues, I get an error message telling me about exploding atoms. What is the cause of this message, and is it possible to real space refine any of these residues and specifically the hydrogen atoms associated with them. Third, during the joint refinement run, I chose to refine occupancies of all atoms. This breaks down into several questions: A) Should I be refining occupancies at 2.0 A resolution (of the neutron structure; 1.05A for the X-ray)? B) How does Phenix go about refining occupancies of hydrogen/deuterium sites? C) If the resulting occupancies result in values of, for example, 60% deuterium and 40% hydrogen, am I to presume that deuterium presence is significant if the nuclear density looks "good". At what point of deuterium occupation (while examining the nuclear density), would I say that there is likely no deuterium present (or that it is insignificant)? Hopefully all of these questions make sense, and if I need to clarify anything, please let me know. Thanks so much in advance for the help, I appreciate it as always. Regards, Louis

4 5

tls group and anisotropic
by ChenTiantian 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Dear Phenixers, I refined my structure with TLS, I did not mean to refine it with anisotropic strategy, but I got ANISOU record. As the manual metioned, when doing TLS refinement, It always happens like this. What does this ANISOU record mean ? Does that mean TLS is a grouped anisotropic refinement? Tiantian -- Drug Discovery and Design Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences Address: Room 101, 646 Songtao Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New Area, Shanghai, 201203, P.R. China

2 1

no density on the anchored proteins
by zhangh1＠umbc.edu 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Hi, I am using phenix.refine to calculate the map of the 50S RNA (1FFK). It is weird that there is no density on the anchored proteins even for the Fc map. Following is the code I am using: phenix.refine ${f}.pdb ${f}.mtz main.number_of_macro_cycles=0 xray_data.high_resolution=${res} xray_data.r_free_flags.generate=True export_final_f_model=mtz Thanks for any advice! Hailiang

3 3

Re: [phenixbb] rosetta fragment files -- adjusting residue numbers to combine them
by Thomas C. Terwilliger 16 Jun '11

16 Jun '11

Hi Leonid and others wanting to use phenix.mr_rosetta with large chains, After looking at the Rosetta code and conferring with Frank DiMaio from the Baker laboratory... You can paste several fragment files together to represent your entire chain, but you need to edit all but the first one to set the position in the sequence file that each set of fragments goes with. Here is a little script that will take a fragments file that you have created that started with residue 651 and edit it in a way that you can just add to the end of your fragments file for residues 1-650. Run it with: phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py \ fragments_in fragments_adjusted 651 -------------------------------- # adjust_robetta_resid.py # use: phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py fragments_in fragments_adjusted 651 # to adjust the first residue of fragments_in to be 651 import sys args=sys.argv[1:] if len(args) != 3: print "USE: phenix.python adjust_robetta_resid.py fragments_in fragments_adjusted <start_resno>" sys.exit() file_in=args[0] file_out=args[1] start_resno=int(args[2]) print "Copying %s to %s offsetting start residue number to %d" %( file_in,file_out,start_resno) f=open(file_out,'w') new_resno=0 for line in open(file_in).readlines(): if line.find('position:') > -1 and line.find('neighbors:')>-1: spl=line.split() current_resno=int(spl[1]) new_resno=current_resno+start_resno print "Residue %d changed to %d" %(current_resno,new_resno) spl[1]=" %d " %(new_resno) new_line=" ".join(spl) else: new_line=line print >>f, new_line.rstrip() f.close() -------------------------------- I will add this to phenix as "phenix.adjust_robetta_resid" as well. However...there still is a problem if you have multiple chains...as mr_rosetta has only one set of fragments files the same fragments files are being applied to all your chains. I will add a way to specify which fragments files go with which chains. All the best, Tom T >> [phenixbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org] On Behalf Of Leonid Sazanov [sazanov(a)mrc-mbu.cam.ac.uk] >> Sent: 16 June 2011 13:11 >> To: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> Subject: [phenixbb] rosetta fragment files >> >> Hi, I am trying to use mr_rosetta with phenix-1.7.1-743 and rosetta 3.2.1. All rosetta tests passed OK. >> I have several large protein chains in the starting model (already placed). >> So I had to get several pairs of fragment files from robetta server and list all of them in the script. >> Then mr_rosetta fails at the REBUILD_1 stage with the message: >> could not open file (fragment file), although file is definitely there. Is the reason that one can have only two input fragment files (3/9)? Can several fragment files be combined into two 3/9 ones? >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Dr. Leonid A. Sazanov >> Research group leader >> Medical Research Council >> Mitochondrial Biology Unit >> Wellcome Trust / MRC Building >> Hills Road >> Cambridge >> CB2 0XY >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >>

1 0