- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

occupancy refinement when alternate conformers clash
by Kendall Nettles 13 Apr '11

13 Apr '11

Hi, I am refining an RNA structure where on set of base pairs has alternate conformers, and the B alternates from the paired bases clash. That is, the structure should be viewed as A alternate in one base paired with B alternate in the other base. The refinement blew both B alts out of the density to prevent their clash. How can I fix this? Thanks for your help, Kendall Nettles

2 1

O-linked glycosylation refinement in Phenix
by Qiang Chen 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

Dear all, I'm refining a structure which has both N-linked and O-linked glycosylation. I use Phenix to do the refinement. It works well for the N-linked NAG. I defined the link as the following: apply_cif_link { data_link = "NAG-ASN" residue_selection_1 = "chain A and resname NAG and resid 701" residue_selection_2 = "chain A and resname ASN and resid 518" } But it doesn't work when I defined the fucose-threonine link as the similar way: apply_cif_link { data_link = "FUC-THR" residue_selection_1 = "chain A and resname FUC and resid 801" residue_selection_2 = "chain A and resname THR and resid 596" } The error message is "missing CIF link: data_link_FUC-THR". Does anyone have the cif link file of FUC-THR? Thanks a lot! Qiang The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.

4 5

(Anisotropic ADP vs. isotropic ADP) coupling with occupancy refinement
by Young-Jin Cho 12 Apr '11

12 Apr '11

Dear phenix developer and users, I am just wondering while I was taking a small molecule X-ray course. I used to run refinement with anisotropic ADP when it is high resolution about better than 1.5 or 1.6 A. My question is when you do this with occupancy refinement, does phenix.refine take care the alternative conformations with aniostropic ADP (I guess so) even at low occupancy? Due to lack of electrons (scattering factor), I experienced that small molecule refinement applies Anisotropic ADP for the atoms (about more than 2 e- in occupancy) while applying isotropic ADP for the less occupied atoms (in an alternative conformation). Would it help if we apply this method to our macro molecular system when you have residues that have low occupied alternative residues? Is so, could we have something like script or else either to modify a pdb file or to make this in consideration during refinement? Any information or comments are welcome. Thanks in advance, Young-Jin

2 1

help me to install phenix on ubuntu10.4
by 王瑞 11 Apr '11

11 Apr '11

Excuse me,I'm a freshman ,could anyone tell me how to install phenix on ubuntu10.4? I have download phenix-installer-1.7-650- intel-linux-2.6-x86_64-fc12.tar.gz. when I install it in terminal,there was a error notice:"./install:no such file or directory"!Could anyone help me? Many thanks!

2 1

phenix don't start
by albert 10 Apr '11

10 Apr '11

Dear: I installed Phenix-1.7-650 in my SUSE Linux Enterprise 10 SP3 X64 system from source code. When I source /soft/phenix-1.7/phenix-1.7-650/phenix_env and try to run it by typing phenix in terminal, it is said: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/soft/phenix-1.7/phenix-1.7-650/phenix/wxGUI2/command_line/main.py", line 13, in <module> run(sys.argv[1:]) File "/soft/phenix-1.7/phenix-1.7-650/phenix/wxGUI2/command_line/main.py", line 7, in run from wxGUI2 import App File "/soft/phenix-1.7/phenix-1.7-650/phenix/wxGUI2/App.py", line 11, in <module> import wx ImportError: No module named wx The python in my OS is 2.4 with wxpython installed. I don't know why it cannot start. could you please give me some advices? THX

2 1

secondary structure restraints
by Panne Daniel 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

I am having problems with the secondary structure restraints in phenix.refine (1.6.4-486). I wrote a ss restraints file and use this as an input file. In the log file I can see that the file is read but the atom selections used by phenix.refine do not correspond to those set in the restraints file. I have turned off automatic ss detection. Any advice? Thanks, Daniel

3 3

difficulties with the refinement of a Cadmium containing pdb file
by Vellieux Frederic 08 Apr '11

08 Apr '11

Hi all, I have some difficulties refining (what happens is an error status, i.e. no refinement taking place) of a coordinate file that contains Cadmium ions. The person here who has already refined a structure containing Cd ions using Phenix is not here at the moment (otherwise I would have asked him). In case you wonder: the CD is shifted 1 position to the left as is required for metal ions in a PDB. Phenix choked. So I ran ReadySet on the input pdb file and gave the output file to Phenix for the next attempt. Still failed, and the error message I get is: Fatal problems interpreting PDB file: Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 2 Please edit the PDB file to resolve the problem and/or supply a Cif file with matching restraints definitions, along with apply_cif_modification and apply_cif_link parameter definitions if necessary. Also note that phenix_ready_set and phenix.elbow are available for creating restraints definitions (CIF files). Running phenix.elbow (phenix.elbow input_file.pdb --do-all) does not seem to do anything - no output file seems to be generated. Hence I am quite at loss here. Ready Set (from the gui) generated a file called name_of_the_coordinate_file.metal.edits , which is used by phenix for the next attempt but which does not seem to solve the problem. Thanks for any advice, Fred.

2 3

Re: [phenixbb] How to define link in phenix (rna3p) ?
by Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

> Hi. I came across with the following post when I was dealing with a > similar issue (adding a modified nucleotide to RNA). I could create > .cif using elbow/reel as well, but I was wondering where to define > the link type between residues in phenix. You can use the apply_cif_link parameters. > For RNA, I typically see "rna3p', but with my newly created residue > linked to normal oligo, the link is formed, but recognized as Link ID > 'p'. Also, the newly created molecule is recognized as 'peptide', > although I defined _chem_comp.group in .cif file as RNA. The _chem_comp.group value is ignored by phenix.refine. The classifications are obtained via analysis of the atom names and the bonding in the monomer definitions. >------------------------------------------ >Chain: "Q1" > Number of atoms: 74 > Number of conformers: 1 > Conformer: "" > Number of residues, atoms: 3, 74 > Classifications: {'RNA': 2, 'peptide': 1} > Modifications used: {'5*END': 1, 'rna3p': 2} > Link IDs: {'p': 1, 'rna3p': 1} >------------------------------------------ It is strange that it thinks there is a peptide but still applies two rna/dna links. Could you send me (not the list) the part from the pdb file with the Q1 chain? Ralf

1 0

CUA Ligand issue
by Bradley Hintze 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

Hello, I am trying to refine PDB 1YEW using the default phenix settings. $phenix.refine 1yew.pdb 1yew.mtz yields: ''' Sorry: Fatal problems interpreting PDB file: Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 6 Please edit the PDB file to resolve the problems and/or supply a CIF file with matching restraint definitions, along with apply_cif_modification and apply_cif_link parameter definitions if necessary. ''' $ phenix.ready_set 1YEW_H.pdb yields: ''' Sorry: Atoms in the input are supposed to be bound CU1(CUA) - CU2(CUA) = 2.58 Fix the input file and retry ''' I assume this means that the Cu atoms in CUA are at an inappropriate distance. Is there an easy way to find out what the appropriate distance is? Can I fix this in coot? Thanks, Bradley

2 1

How to define link in phenix (rna3p) ?
by Maehigashi, Tatsuya 07 Apr '11

07 Apr '11

Hi. I came across with the following post when I was dealing with a similar issue (adding a modified nucleotide to RNA). I could create .cif using elbow/reel as well, but I was wondering where to define the link type between residues in phenix. For RNA, I typically see "rna3p', but with my newly created residue linked to normal oligo, the link is formed, but recognized as Link ID 'p'. Also, the newly created molecule is recognized as 'peptide', although I defined _chem_comp.group in .cif file as RNA. ------------------------------------------ Chain: "Q1" Number of atoms: 74 Number of conformers: 1 Conformer: "" Number of residues, atoms: 3, 74 Classifications: {'RNA': 2, 'peptide': 1} Modifications used: {'5*END': 1, 'rna3p': 2} Link IDs: {'p': 1, 'rna3p': 1} ------------------------------------------ Any input will be appreciated. Sincerely, "T" On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Gerwald Jogl <Gerwald_Jogl at brown.edu<http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb>> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am refining several modified nucleotides in ribosomal RNA > (N2-methyl-guanosine and similar). While the restraints generation with > phenix.reel work quite well, I am unable to get the phosphate oxygen > restraints applied properly. Phenix.refine recognizes the links but for some > reason the phosphate groups come out quite distorted... > > For example, angles after refinement: > O3 (1) - P (2, modified) - OP2 (2) = 80 deg and > O3 (1) - P (2, modified) - OP1 (2) = 127 deg > > > Here is part of the phenix.refine log on reading the coordinates: > > Chain: "A" > Number of atoms: 32526 > Number of conformers: 1 > Conformer: "" > Number of residues, atoms: 1513, 32526 > Unusual residues: {'MA6%rna3p': 2, '5MC%rna3p': 3, '5MC%rna2p': 1, > '7M > G%rna3p': 1, '2MG%rna3p': 1, 'UR3%rna2p': 1, 'M2G%rna3p': 1, '4OC%rna3p': 1} > Classifications: {'undetermined': 11, 'RNA': 1502} > Modifications used: {'5*END': 1, 'rna3p': 1318, 'rna2p': 195} > Link IDs: {'rna3p': 1318, 'rna2p': 194} > Chain breaks: 1 > > I am at a loss about how to fix this as all links and restraints seem to be > in place. > > Many thanks for advice, > Gerwald ________________________________ This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments).

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] B-factors vs resolution
by miket＠chem.ucla.edu 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Usually one will describe ordered parts of a protein vs disordered parts based on B factors. Is the higher resolution protein more ordered and that may have contributed to its stronger diffraction? -- Are the two crystals with different max resolution isomorphous? B-factors contain contributions from both dynamic and static disorder. Your difference in b-factors and resolution are both likely due to the fact that your higher-resolution data comes from a more ordered crystal, not a less dynamic protein. More ordered crystals diffract better, but if the two crystals were grown in the same conditions and the crystals are isomorphous I doubt that there is any difference in the dynamics of the molecules. If you are interested in which parts of your protein are more dynamically disordered you may want to consider (within a single dataset) which atoms have high b-factors relative to the average b-factor for all the atoms in that dataset. Mike -- Michael C. Thompson Graduate Student Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Division Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry University of California, Los Angeles miket(a)chem.ucla.edu

2 1

tools to obtain ADP?
by Jason 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi, Is there a convenient tool to obtain ADP for each chain or ligand or a selective group? phenix.model_vs_data only gives an averaged ADP for everything and it takes really long. Thanks. ====================== Jason Structural Biology Department University of Pittsburgh ======================

2 3

Question about anisotropic refinement
by Louis Lazar 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

I have several structures that I am refining (~1.05A), and I have a question about anisotropic refinement. I have read a couple things about whether or not to refine waters anisotropically, as opposed to hydrogen, which I never refine anisotropoically. I am wondering what the general consensus is on it, and if anyone has anything from the archives (I'm having trouble searching through) or papers that I should read, please don't hesitate to let me see them. Thanks very much in advance Regards, Louis

1 0

Ligand conformations.
by Yuri 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Has anyone ever reported seeing 2 different binding confromations for a ligand that was soaked vs. the same ligand co-crystallized? -- Yuri Pompeu

2 1

How to fix c-beta deviation?
by Jason 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

Hi, I have tried to regularize my protein structure in coot and use ramachandran restrain to improve statistics (and then release them). However, I can not make the c-beta deviation be zero. Is there some special way to improve c-beta deviation? Thanks. ====================== Jason Structural Biology Department University of Pittsburgh ======================

4 3

B-factors vs resolution
by Yuri 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

I am refining a 1.3 A structure the maps look great and I notice the main chain B factors are all around 7~12. I have refined the same enzyme at resolution 2.2 A and the B factors here were around 25~30. The question that comes to mind is: Usually one will describe ordered parts of a protein vs disordered parts based on B factors. Is the higher resolution protein more ordered and that may have contributed to its stronger diffraction? Or are the B factors values artifacts of refinement? -- Yuri Pompeu

2 1

why are my B factors being "refined"
by Scott Classen 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

Hello Phenix community, I'm currently using nightly build 718, but this behavior is exhibited since sometime in the 1.6.xx releases too. I've turned off ADP refinement (only doing rigid_body refinement) and set the b_iso specifically as such: modify_start_model { selection = None adp { atom_selection = None randomize = None set_b_iso = 55 convert_to_isotropic = None convert_to_anisotropic = None shift_b_iso = None scale_adp = None } Yet the output PDB file has all b-factors in the 100s. Whazzup with that? Thanks, Scott ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Scott Classen, Ph.D. SIBYLS Beamline 12.3.1 sibyls.als.lbl.gov Advanced Light Source Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Rd MS6R2100 Berkeley, CA 94720 C) 510.206.4418 O) 510.495.2697 Beamline) 510.495.2134 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2 1

Modeling Disordered Domains
by Damian Ekiert 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

Perhaps inspired by the fierce debate on this BB and elsewhere about how to model disordered side chains, I would like to present the following scenario (my current refinement project): The structure was solved by molecular replacement, is 3.25Å resolution, and ~70% solvent. I have 6 copies of a large complex in the AU (~100kDa per protomer). Only one copy is fully ordered. In the other 5 copies, a entire domain (~25kDa) is largely disordered (some have patchy residual density, but not readily interpretable). Altogether, this means that I am missing ~20% of the total protein in the AU. It seems that how you model this much "missing" material could have a significant effect on the final refined model. This is something we have observed a number of times, so I am wondering if anyone can suggest ways to deal with this aside from just leaving the domains out entirely. In this case, the missing domain is connected by two short hinges that restrict the rotational degrees of freedom considerably (you can think of the missing domains as a door--it can only pivot about the hinge, can't be flipped upside-down or sideways, etc., and is anchored close to the door frame). Additionally, crystal packing and steric constraints restrict the "sweep" of the missing domains to further pinpoint their location. Is it worth trying to model this? My impression from some earlier posts was that most people were content for disordered regions to be modeled as bulk solvent (rather than fiddling with masks to also cover the expected location of protein, etc.), but I wonder if you may actually substantially improve the model when this much protein is disordered. I guess I am imagining something analogous to a rigid body fit to the mean position of the disordered domains and a TLS-like ADP description of the motion (with a very large magnitude to account for the large displacement), but I am open to suggestions. On a final note, regarding those pesky missing side chains: any thoughts on trying to employ a "Ringer"-like approach to model some of these (Fraser, et al., Nature 2009, 462(7273):669-673)? Is this practical (maybe this would add to many additional parameters)? Best, Damian Ekiert

4 5

Re: [phenixbb] occupancy on a special position
by Maia Cherney 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

Hi, I have a water on a two fold axis, I gave it occupancy 0.50, but the program makes it 1.0. I know this was discussed before, but we have to abide by the PDB rules, that is to have this occupancy =0.5. Could you please, fix this problem. Maia

3 2

Question about structure quality
by Jason 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

Hi, I have a refined structure with phenix. The resolution=3.8 angstrom. Molprobity analysis shows following. Can anyone tell me if the structure is acceptable or I need to do something to improve it before going to publication? Thanks. Poor rotamers20.95%Goal: <1%Ramachandran outliers6.15%Goal: <0.2%Ramachandran favored80.13%Goal: >98%Cβ deviations >0.25Å23Goal: 0Residues with bad bonds: 0.00%Goal: 0%Residues with bad angles:0.75% -- ====================== Jason Structural Biology Department University of Pittsburgh ======================

4 6

download Phenix in Windows vista platform
by Bhuiya, Mohammad 05 Apr '11

05 Apr '11

-------- WARNING: At least one of the links in the message below goes to an .exe file, which could be malicious. To learn how to protect yourself, please go here: http://www.lbl.gov/cyber/services/suspicious-links.html -------- Hi I am a new user in Phenix mailing list. I want to download Phenix in Windows Vista platform to refine structure. I selected 32-bit (Windows XP or newer) [download .exe <https://www.phenix-online.org/download/phenix/nightly/send_octet_stream.cgi…> ] and run it (Phenix version 1.7). I got a new windows with command line (c:/.) UnZipSFX 5.50 of 17 february, by Info-ZIP (ZIP-Bugs(a)list.wku.edu <mailto:[email protected]> ). Replace cci_apps_sources/antlr3/antlrconfig.h.in? [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll------------ I don't know what I should do to install the program, though I used yes/all but it doesn't work. I will appreciate if you help me to install Phenix in Windows Vista platform. Thank you. Wadud

2 1

ICSG 2011 May 10-14, 2011, Toronto
by Thomas C. Terwilliger 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

Dear Colleagues, We hope that you are planning to join us in Toronto, Canada for the International Conference on Structural Genomics 2011 which will be held on May 10-14, 2011. We have an excellent scientific program prepared which includes both oral and poster presentations (please see: http://www.icsg2011.org/scientific_program.php ). Participants will also enjoy the fabulous view of the city of Toronto during the banquet to be held at the revolving 360 Restaurant at the top of the CN tower. An optional post-conference tour to Niagara Falls will also be available. We invite you to register on line by April 15, 2011 at 11:59 pm EST. A limited number of late poster abstracts will be accepted until April 12, 2011 at 11:59 pm EST In addition to the main ICSG meeting, there will be a whole day of concurrent satellite workshops (May 10, 2011) that are free for ICSG 2011 registrants, including: Small Molecule Screening Workshop- This hands-on workshop will allow participants to screen a protein of their choice for binding of selected compounds, using thermal shift assays. iSee: Interactive 3D Documents for the Dissemination of Structural Biology - This hands-on workshop will familiarize participants with the iSEE 3D graphical software which allows interactive viewing of 3 dimensional molecular structures and is currently used by journals such as Nature Structural & Molecular Biology and PLoS Biology and PLoS ONE Eukaryotic Gene Expression Systems Workshop - This workshop will provide participants with a detailed understanding of the state-of-the-art for production of eukaryotic proteins destined for biochemical, biophysical, and structural analyses.. Workshop on NMR Methods for Structural Biology- This workshop will survey technologies for structure/function investigations of proteins, developed in (or in collaboration with) structural genomics projects, that are ready for widespread use by the wider biological community. Phenix Crystallography Software Workshop - This workshop will introduce the PHENIX software for macromolecular structure determination and the core algorithms that it uses. It will provide hands-on tutorials for crystallographers of all levels. The workshop registration deadline is Monday April 11, 2011 at 11:59 pm EST Please visit http://www.icsg2011.org <http://www.icsg2011.org/> for ICSG 2011 meeting and workshop registration details and to submit your poster abstract. We hope to see you there! Best regards, Cheryl Arrowsmith ICSG 2011 Organizer Ted Baker Stephen Burley Dino Moras Joel Sussman Shigeyuki Yokoyama Tom Terwilliger ISGO Executive Committee

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] why are my B factors being "refined"
by Scott Classen 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Phil Jeffrey wrote: > Average coordinate B of 100++ might suggest worse than 3.5 Angstrom data. aha! …. Yes, you are correct. : ) I'm struggling with some low res. data. Mainly doing rigid body refinement of various pieces and individual xyz for a few select loops, but NOT refining ADP. Yes, The B-factors are all exactly the same. So I guess this represents the overall B correction. Thanks, Scott

1 0

Mac 64-bit kernel
by Joseph Noel 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

Nope. I've set up to always run the 64-bit kernel. I am a bit of a Mac lover so go pretty in depth with the operating system. I think Nat fixed things. For the last many latest builds, I have always installed from the source files for linux/mac to ensure I am running at maximum memory capacity. ___________________________________________________________ Joseph P. Noel, Ph.D. Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor, The Jack H. Skirball Center for Chemical Biology and Proteomics The Salk Institute for Biological Studies 10010 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, CA 92037 USA Phone: (858) 453-4100 extension 1442 Cell: (858) 349-4700 Fax: (858) 597-0855 E-mail: noel(a)salk.edu Web Site (Salk): http://www.salk.edu/faculty/noel.html Web Site (HHMI): http://hhmi.org/research/investigators/noel.html ___________________________________________________________ On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:27 AM, phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org wrote: > Send phenixbb mailing list submissions to > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > phenixbb-owner(a)phenix-online.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of phenixbb digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: nqh_flips (Pavel Afonine) > 2. latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? (Joseph Noel) > 3. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Engin ?zkan) > 4. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Nathaniel Echols) > 5. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Ben Eisenbraun) > 6. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Nathaniel Echols) > 7. Minor map-definition bug in 1.7 GUI (Joe Krahn) > 8. bug report- gui freezed (Kendall Nettles) > 9. Re: bug report- gui freezed (Nathaniel Echols) > 10. Re: Minor map-definition bug in 1.7 GUI (Nathaniel Echols) > 11. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Nathaniel Echols) > 12. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Ben Eisenbraun) > 13. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Ben Eisenbraun) > 14. Modeling Disordered Domains (Damian Ekiert) > 15. Re: latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7? > (Nathaniel Echols) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 19:27:24 -0700 > From: Pavel Afonine <pafonine(a)lbl.gov> > To: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] nqh_flips > Message-ID: <4D97DB0C.9020706(a)lbl.gov> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Hi Maia, > > is the affected residue(s) listed within warning message in .log file > saying that both original and flipped version do not solve the clash? If > so, you may need to have a closer look at that residue to see what's > wrong. Otherwise, we would be interested to see the details... > > Pavel. > > > On 4/2/11 6:08 PM, Maia Cherney wrote: >> Hi, >> I just noticed that the nqh flips did not happen, even though the .def >> file has nqh_flips = True. >> >> Maia > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 10:57:35 -0700 > From: Joseph Noel <noel(a)salk.edu> > To: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: [phenixbb] latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX > 10.6.7? > Message-ID: <D7EFB995-80A8-4995-973B-8FFFCC07DFB4(a)salk.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi, > > I was trying to install the latest nightly build but get error (shown after my salutation) when using the recommended procedure: > > ./install --prefix=/Applications/ > > Previously, I always installed from source so I could run the 64-bit version on Mac since I have some structures that require as much memory as possible. Should I just go back to that? It does take about an hour to install on my laptop. I assume this latest 64-bit option would significantly reduce the time for installation since I wouldn't be compiling from the source. > > Cheers! > > Joe > > ========================================================================== > PHENIX Installation > > version: dev > release tag: 718 > machine type: mac-intel-osx-x86_64 > source machine type: mac-intel-osx > OS version: osx-10.6.7 > user shell: /bin/bash > destination: /Applications/ > ========================================================================= > No binary bundles found for mac-intel-osx > bundles directory contents: > bundle-dev-718-mac-intel-osx-x86_64.tar.gz > expected one of the following: > /Users/sandiegonoels/Downloads/2011-04-03/phenix-installer-dev-718/bundles/bundle-dev-718-mac-intel-osx.tar.gz > > =============================== ERROR =================================== > No binary installer found for mac-intel-osx, installation aborted > =============================== ERROR =================================== > ___________________________________________________________ > Joseph P. Noel, Ph.D. > Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute > Professor, The Jack H. Skirball Center for Chemical Biology and Proteomics > The Salk Institute for Biological Studies > 10010 North Torrey Pines Road > La Jolla, CA 92037 USA > > Phone: (858) 453-4100 extension 1442 > Cell: (858) 349-4700 > Fax: (858) 597-0855 > E-mail: noel(a)salk.edu > > Web Site (Salk): http://www.salk.edu/faculty/noel.html > Web Site (HHMI): http://hhmi.org/research/investigators/noel.html > ___________________________________________________________ > >

1 0

latest 64-bit command line build for Mac OSX 10.6.7?
by Joseph Noel 04 Apr '11

04 Apr '11

Hi, I was trying to install the latest nightly build but get error (shown after my salutation) when using the recommended procedure: ./install --prefix=/Applications/ Previously, I always installed from source so I could run the 64-bit version on Mac since I have some structures that require as much memory as possible. Should I just go back to that? It does take about an hour to install on my laptop. I assume this latest 64-bit option would significantly reduce the time for installation since I wouldn't be compiling from the source. Cheers! Joe ========================================================================== PHENIX Installation version: dev release tag: 718 machine type: mac-intel-osx-x86_64 source machine type: mac-intel-osx OS version: osx-10.6.7 user shell: /bin/bash destination: /Applications/ ========================================================================= No binary bundles found for mac-intel-osx bundles directory contents: bundle-dev-718-mac-intel-osx-x86_64.tar.gz expected one of the following: /Users/sandiegonoels/Downloads/2011-04-03/phenix-installer-dev-718/bundles/bundle-dev-718-mac-intel-osx.tar.gz =============================== ERROR =================================== No binary installer found for mac-intel-osx, installation aborted =============================== ERROR =================================== ___________________________________________________________ Joseph P. Noel, Ph.D. Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor, The Jack H. Skirball Center for Chemical Biology and Proteomics The Salk Institute for Biological Studies 10010 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, CA 92037 USA Phone: (858) 453-4100 extension 1442 Cell: (858) 349-4700 Fax: (858) 597-0855 E-mail: noel(a)salk.edu Web Site (Salk): http://www.salk.edu/faculty/noel.html Web Site (HHMI): http://hhmi.org/research/investigators/noel.html ___________________________________________________________

4 8