- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

How to use the STIR command in phenix.refine?
by nick＠silvaggi.com 13 Mar '08

13 Mar '08

Hello, I am refining a high-resolution X-ray structure and I would like to gradually increase the resolution from 1.5 to 1.0A, as I used to do in shelxl. I know the STIR command is the way to do this, but I cannot figure out the syntax to use. Currently I am using the following commands: high_resolution = 1.0 low_resolution = None stir = 1.5 When I run phenix.refine (2008_02_08_1610) it echos a line that says "STIR 1.5" before the first macrocycle, but at each stage I see "(resolution: 1.00 - 21.77)." Obviously I am not using the STIR command correctly. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Nick Silvaggi Department of Physiology and Biophysics Boston University School of Medicine 715 Albany St. R-702 Boston, MA 02118

2 1

Beam Time at BCSB beamlines in Berkeley
by Peter Zwart 13 Mar '08

13 Mar '08

============================================================= Synchrotron Beam Time available for Macromolecular Crystallography at Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Beamlines (5.0.1, 5.0.2, 5.0.3, 8.2.1 and 8.2.2). The ALS is now accepting General User applications for May/June ============================================================= The Berkeley Center for Structural Biology (BCSB) operates five beamlines at the Advanced Light Source in Berkeley. Beamlines 5.0.1, 5.0.2 and 5.0.3 are equipped with the Berkeley Automounter system. Beamline 8.2.2. has a Rigaku Actor sample mounter capable of handling Rigaku, unipucks and ALS style pucks. Beamlines 5.0.2, 5.0.3, 8.2.1 and 8.2.2 have large 3x3 Q315 or Q315r CCD detectors. Beamlines 5.0.2, 8.2.1 and 8.2.2. are MAD stations, whereas 5.0.3 and 5.0.1 are fixed energy beamlines at the Se high energy remote, suitable for Se-SAD experiments. The beamlines generate between 1.5x10^11 and 8x10^11 photons per second of flux into a 100 micron collimator at 1.5 mrad divergence. Please visit http://bcsb.lbl.gov/ for more details about the Center and its beamlines. If you'd like to apply for beamtime at these, or any other ALS macromolecular crystallography beamlines, please submit a General User proposal by March 15, 2008 in order to be considered for the May-June schedules. To find out more, click on: http://www-als.lbl.gov/als/quickguide/independinvest.html We invite you to submit a proposal at: http://alsusweb.lbl.gov/4DCGI/WEB_GetForm/PXProposalEntry.shtml/Initialize You can also request access to any open beam time on the five BCSB beamlines by e-mailing our scheduler at SLOrtega(a)lbl.gov. Any industrial or academic group interested in becoming part of the Participating Research Team for beamlines 5.0.1 and 5.0.2 should contact the Head of the BCSB (Paul Adams: PDAdams(a)lbl.gov, 510-486-4225). (Please note that executed user agreements and proprietary fees, if applicable, must be received at least five working days prior to scheduled beam time.) -- Peter Zwart Beamline Scientist Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories 1 Cyclotron road, Berkeley, CA-94720 Cell: +1 510 289 9246 Fax: +1 510 486 5664

1 0

Collaborative Crystallography
by Banumathi Sankaran 12 Mar '08

12 Mar '08

The Berkeley Center for Structural Biology (BCSB) is pleased to announce a new Collaborative Crystallography Pilot Program (CC) at the Advanced Light Source in Berkeley. Through this program, scientists are able to send protein crystals to BCSB staff researchers for data collection and analysis. The CC Pilot Program provides a number of benefits to researchers: * Obtain high quality data and analysis through collaboration with expert beamline researchers; * Rapid turn around on projects; * Reduced travel costs. CC proposals go through the regular ALS General User proposal review process. They are reviewed and ranked by the Proposal Study Panel, and beamtime is allocated accordingly. BCSB staff schedule the projects to fit into the available resources. Please note that only non-proprietary projects are currently being accepted. In keeping with similar programs the BCSB staff researchers who participate in data collection and/or analysis should be appropriately acknowledged as authors on publications and/or PDB depositions. Please consult the website for additional information at: http://bcsb.als.lbl.gov/wiki/index.php/Collaborative_Crystallography How To Apply: To submit a proposal, go to: http://alsusweb.lbl.gov/4DCGI/WEB_GetForm/PXProposalEntry.shtml For question 3 select "Collaborative PX 501/502." For question 9, please describe a specific research project with a clear end point. In order to request CC time for Mai/June, 2008, proposals must be submitted by March 15, 2007. Questions: For comments or questions, feel free to contact Banumathi Sankaran (BSankaran(a)lbl.gov) or Gari Kloss (MKloss(a)lbl.gov)

1 0

refine error when optimize_wxc w/o optimize_wxu turned on
by shi jiahai 11 Mar '08

11 Mar '08

Hi, Dear all, I was using phenix.refine to refine the structure. Once I turned on optimize_wxc w/o optimize_wxu, the job failed with the following message. ----------xray term weight optimization (wxc)---------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/command_line/refine.py", line 5, in <module> command_line.run(command_name="phenix.refine", args=sys.argv[1:]) File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/refinement/command_line.py", line 82, in run call_back_after_monitor_collect=call_back_after_monitor_collect) File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/refinement/driver.py", line 1143, in run call_back_after_monitor_collect = call_back_after_monitor_collect) File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/refinement/strategies.py", line 449, in refinement_machine log = log) File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/refinement/weight_xray_chem.py", line 256, in __init__ self.wxc_optimization() File "/Application/phenix/phenix-1.3b-rc6/phenix/phenix/refinement/weight_xray_chem.py", line 511, in wxc_optimization wxc = self.holder.wxc The phenix I used is the latest version, 1.3b rc6. The platform is intel-linux-2.6 redhat-e4. Python is 2.4.2 Could anyone please tell me what the problem is? Thank you very much! -- Best Regards, Shi Jiahai

2 2

autobuild errro message
by Christine Gee 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Hi I was using phenix.autoMR and when it tried to go on to autobuild the job ended with the following error message AutoBuild Input failed can only concatenate list (not "str") to list There are two molecules in the asymmetric unit. I tried running phenix.autobuild with the output pdb from molecular replacement and got the same message. The file looks OK to me though. Can you tell me what the problem is? Regards Christine

2 1

problem compiling phenix 1.3 beta rc3
by Melody Lin 05 Mar '08

05 Mar '08

Dear all, I have a problem compiling phenix-1.3beta-rc3 on my Mac OSX tiger ppc. I downloaded the tar file under the sbgrid directory and issued command "sudo ./install" to compile it after unzipping. Everything went OK until the last step when the installer is trying to compile phenix components, ands says it will take an hour, but in 2 minutes it reports failure for the compilation. Could anyone suggest what problem this is? Did I download the wrong tar file? Your input is greatly appreciated! Best, Yan

5 6

Question about occupancy refinement of riding hydrogens
by Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

I just noticed that occupancies of riding hydrogens are being refined by default, in fact I am unable to turn this feature off (CCI-APPs from Jan-8). I was just (very naively) wondering what is the rationale behind this? The B-factor refinement for riding hydrogens is already enabled and should take care of this or not? It looks a bit odd to have hydrogens with occupancy 0.9 sitting on a carbon with occupancy 1.0 at 2.0 A resolution. Cheers Carsten

2 1

Enhancement request for map formats
by Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

Hi, I was wondering if it would be possible to have the choice of generating ccp4 maps in phenix.refine. This type seems to be best compromise so far between compatibility and size. The xplor type ascii maps are 10x the size and do not offer any advantage in a homogeneous OS environment. Converting the maps after the fact is one more step I am trying to eliminate. Cheers Carsten

2 4

Possible to rebuild only certain residues in a molecule?
by Francis E Reyes 04 Mar '08

04 Mar '08

All Can the rebuild process be directed to rebuilding specific residues in the molecule? Can this be extended to build multiple models of a given set of residues? Thanks FR --------------------------------------------- Francis Reyes M.Sc. 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D 8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC 686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D

2 1

problem with a twinned data set
by Pascal EGEA 02 Mar '08

02 Mar '08

Hi All This a question of general Crystallography and use of Phenix to deal with twinned data. I am having difficulties with a data set. We have data (2.6 ang resolution) that can be scaled and reduced in P222 with a Rmerge of 7%, the systematic absences show a screw axis ( it is P22(1)2). However MR in Phaser failed in this orthorhombic settings when searching for 2 molecules of the complex in the AU. If we reduce and scale the data in P2(1) and look at the diffraction pattern in HKLVIEW there is a /mmm symmetry. In the monoclinic P2(1) setting we can find 4 molecules of the complex (by MR in Phaser) and can refine it with Phenix to a Rfac/Rfree of 28%/34%. 2 molecules have good electron density whereas the two other ones have one of their domain very poorly defined in density. This is looking very suspicious to me and I am wondering if this refined structure is partially wrong? Meanwhile I used phenix.triage on the data processed in P222 and I am confused with the output. ##----------------------------------------------------## ## Twinning Analyses ## ##----------------------------------------------------## Using data between 10.00 to 3.36 Angstrom. Determining possible twin laws. The following twin laws have been found: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- | Type | Axis | R metric (%) | delta (le Page) | delta (Lebedev) | Twin law | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- | PM | 4-fold | 2.851 | 0.000 | 0.013 | - l,k,h | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- M: Merohedral twin law PM: Pseudomerohedral twin law 0 merohedral twin operators found 1 pseudo-merohedral twin operators found In total, 1 twin operator were found --------------------------------------------- Analysing possible twin law : -l,k,h --------------------------------------------- Results of the H-test on acentric data: (Only 50.0% of the strongest twin pairs were used) mean |H| : 0.368 (0.50: untwinned; 0.0: 50% twinned) mean H^2 : 0.194 (0.33: untwinned; 0.0: 50% twinned) Estimation of twin fraction via mean |H|: 0.132 Estimation of twin fraction via cum. dist. of H: 0.115 Britton analyses Extrapolation performed on 0.14 < alpha < 0.495 Estimated twin fraction: 0.127 Correlation: 0.9955 By comparison if I run the detect_twin routine of CNS it tells me that they are no merohedral twin laws for the point group 222 (using the statistical method of Yeates) ? This is confusing me quite a bit. Assuming that the twinning law suggested by Phenix is correct how should I proceed? I have noticed the section concerning refinement using twinned data in Phenix phenix.refine data.hkl model.pdb twin_law="-k,-h,-l" detwin.map_types.aniso_correct=true but It seems I only have a MR solution in P2(1) but not in P222(1) so how can I refine in P222(1) I will greatly appreciate your input, many thanks. Pascal F. Egea, PhD University of California San Francisco Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry Robert Stroud Laboratory pascal(a)msg.ucsf.edu

4 4

ligand refinement - elbow
by Christine Gee 01 Mar '08

01 Mar '08

Hi Its taken me a while to get around to it, but I just ran elbow to create a cif file etc for my inhibitor, but the bond lengths are quite different from what I got from the PRODRUG server, and it seems that the pdb file I got out of elbow has a few problems (COOT doesn't join up the aromatic ring for example because the carbons are now too far away on one part of the ring). I was wondering how the bond lengths are selected? It seems it is giving the aromatic carbons a bond length of 1.5, when my previous file (and phenylalanine for example have 1.3). Also, I still am not 100% sure how to add the CONNECT information to make the ligand able to covalently bind to the protein. Regards Christine

3 2

refinement problems
by Christine Gee 01 Mar '08

01 Mar '08

Hi This is a more general crystallography question maybe. I am using phenix.refine and I have a model structure refined against data at 3.4A. The model was built from experimental phasing. I reprocessed the same dataset, to include another angstrom resolution (3.3). It has 50% of the data from 3.4 to 3.3 and the I/sigI is about 2. When I refine my structure at 3.4 the stats are 32 and 36 for R and Rfree, but when I use the phase extended data (and the same reflections are the test set up to 3.4A as long as CCP4i did the job right with setting the Rfree) the stats suddenly jump to 49 and 56 when I refine the model against the higher resolution data. Is there something I am missing? I am doing a rigid and an anneal before individual sites and adp refinement. The space group is P3121. Regards Christine

2 1

input initial TLS parameters
by iulek 24 Feb '08

24 Feb '08

Dear all, I tried to find a way to input initial TLS parameters for the groups into phenix. I know many times this is not advisable, but I wanted to test what comes out from TLSmd server. I could not find any reference on how to do this. Note that I know how to define the groups (a previous question in this bb), the point now is to input initial parameters (origin, T, L, S). Thanks, Jorge

5 7

ligand refinement
by Christine Gee 22 Feb '08

22 Feb '08

Dear Phenix developers I have a covalently bound ligand in my structure and I would like to use phenix to refine the structure. The ligand is bound to the sulfur of a cysteine. What is the best method for defining the ligand. Should I generate a cif file for the whole amino acid and the ligand, or can I make one for just the ligand and add in some restraint somewhere which tells phenix to make a bond between the ligand atom and a nearby sulfur in a cysteine. If I generate a cif file with the whole amino acid and ligand, I assume I will I have to follow some convention in atom naming so that the main chain bonds and angles will form and refine OK? Regards Christine

3 2

Phenix.refine Questions
by Mary Fitzgerald 22 Feb '08

22 Feb '08

First, I have a hopefully easy question. I can't seem to figure it out although feel like I should be able to. Is there a way to run a phenix.refine job in the background? I tried using the & like I usually do and it didn't work. It would be nice to start a job and go home without leaving myself logged into the computer. I didn't see anything in the documentation which makes me think I'm being dull. Second, a technical question. When phenix.refine does ordered solvent, does it use detwinned maps if you've put in the appropriate twin operator and indicated it was twinned? When I've tried running phenix.refine with my perfect twin, it doesn't seem to find waters like I can using the CNS twinned water picking script. Third, is it possible to run phenix.refine in parallel at all. My structure is annoying large and the parallelization of FFT in CNS seems to help speed things up abit. Thanks, Mary X. Fitzgerald Postdoctoral Associate Arnold Lab

4 4

geometry in phenix.refine
by Jianghai Zhu 22 Feb '08

22 Feb '08

Hi, I recently noticed that the geometry in my structure is much worse than my previous model. Here are some examples. The RMSD results after a refinement by phenix 1.3b. stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu 3_bss: 0.711 0.009 0.059 18.282 0.002 3.917 after switching to cci version 2008_02_08_1610, I tried to do a geometry minimization by setting wxc_scale = 0. The RMSD I got from the previous model is as following. stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu 0 : 1.394 0.124 0.147 20.782 0.004 3.925 and after 6 macro cycles of geometry minimization, stage angl bond chir dihe plan repu 6_bss: 0.622 0.011 0.120 13.143 0.003 3.822 It funny that the RMSD are so different for the same model. What happened? Jianghai +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Jianghai Zhu, Ph.D Immune Disease Institute Department of Pathology Harvard Medical School 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115 Ph: 617-278-3211 Fx: 618-278-3232 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

4 16

Re: [phenixbb] Phenix.refine Questions - specifically running Phenix in the background
by Edward Snell 21 Feb '08

21 Feb '08

Re: <quote> Message: 8 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:23:24 -0500 From: "Mary Fitzgerald" <mary.x.fitzgerald(a)gmail.com> Subject: [phenixbb] Phenix.refine Questions To: "PHENIX user mailing list" <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> Message-ID: <2fc50e280802211123h192c095x9c65f5bd6f1d4a55(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" First, I have a hopefully easy question. I can't seem to figure it out although feel like I should be able to. Is there a way to run a phenix.refine job in the background? I tried using the & like I usually do and it didn't work. It would be nice to start a job and go home without leaving myself logged into the computer. I didn't see anything in the documentation which makes me think I'm being dull. </quote> Apologies if someone has already answered this but you can set up a little command file e.g. 'refine.com', something along the lines of: phenix.refine model_from_coot.pdb data.mtz ligand.cif my_favourite.params --quiet With all your parameters in 'my_favourite.params' and run it with > nohup ./refine.com & You can then log off and check it later and it will still be running. The key seems to be the nohup and the '--quiet' switch. Works for me, hope it works for you. Cheers, Eddie Edward Snell Ph.D. Assistant Prof. Department of Structural Biology, SUNY Buffalo, Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute 700 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203-1102 Phone: (716) 898 8631 Fax: (716) 898 8660 Email: esnell(a)hwi.buffalo.edu Telepathy: 42.2 GHz Heisenberg was probably here!

1 0

refining nucleic acids, formats?
by Green, Todd 20 Feb '08

20 Feb '08

Hello All- I'm trying to refine some RNA and I can't seem to get phenix to read in my pdb file as it seems to not recognize the the nucleic acid as nucleic acid, as opposed to protein. By comparison to another pdb from the rcsb site(3b31) I seem to be following the same convention. Any suggestions on what I am doing wrong? I do have protein in the pdb as well. The protein has a different chain id. I am running phenix-1.24.1b, my next move if I can't figure this out is to upgrade. Do I have the format of the RNA wrong? Here is the error message and below that is an example of the first residue of the rna. Cheers- Todd *********************************** sorry the PDB file xxx.pdb has an incomplete residue (or conformer/residue combination) in conformer '' chain R residue U 1 because this conformer is missing the following main-chain atoms: ['N', 'CA', 'C'] *********************************** ATOM 18243 O5' U R 1 50.409 12.832 14.548 1.00144.33 O ATOM 18244 C5' U R 1 49.763 12.566 15.794 1.00144.88 C ATOM 18245 C4' U R 1 49.745 13.804 16.678 1.00145.19 C ATOM 18246 O4' U R 1 49.036 13.579 17.920 1.00145.17 O ATOM 18247 C1' U R 1 49.400 14.624 18.811 1.00145.36 C ATOM 18248 N1 U R 1 49.443 14.148 20.242 1.00145.47 N ATOM 18249 C2 U R 1 48.886 14.949 21.229 1.00145.51 C ATOM 18250 O2 U R 1 48.347 16.024 21.005 1.00145.55 O ATOM 18251 N3 U R 1 48.976 14.439 22.507 1.00145.32 N ATOM 18252 C4 U R 1 49.555 13.242 22.895 1.00145.27 C ATOM 18253 O4 U R 1 49.558 12.920 24.081 1.00145.43 O ATOM 18254 C5 U R 1 50.118 12.468 21.816 1.00145.29 C ATOM 18255 C6 U R 1 50.045 12.940 20.562 1.00145.32 C ATOM 18256 C2' U R 1 50.735 15.197 18.331 1.00145.42 C ATOM 18257 O2' U R 1 50.561 16.545 17.935 1.00145.28 O ATOM 18258 C3' U R 1 51.102 14.243 17.192 1.00145.51 C ATOM 18259 O3' U R 1 51.827 14.863 16.146 1.00146.05 O

3 2

workshop abstract
by Tom Terwilliger 19 Feb '08

19 Feb '08

Hi Peter he is an abstract for my talk. Thanks! -Tom T Phenix Wizards -- Automation of the Structure Determination Process The PHENIX Wizards allow automation of major steps in the structure determination process. The Wizards carry out decision-making, provide suggestions for the user, and form a flexible environment for investigating alternative strategies for structure determination. New algorithms available in PHENIX include a Iterative-build OMIT procedure for prevention of model bias and ligand identification in electron density maps. The PHENIX AutoBuild Wizard can carry out iterative model-building, density modification and refinement to improve the quality of models at resolutions as low as 3 Å. Electron density maps calculated using an atomic model can be affected by model bias introduced during refinement of the model. We have developed a Iterative-build OMIT procedure that prevents model bias in iterative procedures for model-building and refinement while producing a high-quality electron-density map. The PHENIX LigandFit automated ligand-fitting Wizard can fit flexible ligands into an electron density map. The Wizard can identify unknown ligands by comparing a set of potential ligands to the map and finding the one that fits the density most closely. Thomas C. Terwilliger Mail Stop M888 Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545 Tel: 505-667-0072 email: terwilliger(a)LANL.gov Fax: 505-665-3024 SOLVE web site: http://solve.lanl.gov PHENIX web site: http:www.phenix-online.org ISFI Integrated Center for Structure and Function Innovation web site: http://techcenter.mbi.ucla.edu TB Structural Genomics Consortium web site: http://www.doe-mbi.ucla.edu/TB

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] Clashes problem
by Pavel Afonine 13 Feb '08

13 Feb '08

Hi All, 1) phenix.refine has a standard set of geometry restrains as other refinement programs: bond, angle, planarity, chirality, dihedral, non-bonded. Clash score is not something that is included into refinement as a target and then used directly in refinement. Clash scores may be bad at the beginning of structure refinement and should be good at the end. 2) Using H atoms as a riding model should normally help in fixing clashes, however it's not 100% guaranteed: some clashes may be "locked" so the refinement cannot overcome the barriers even with H atoms. In this case what's Luca Jovine suggesting (see one of the emails in this thread) is an excellent thing to do (to add to his receipt: you may also consider using more than default number of macro-cycles). Running simulated annealing is also helpful (use "simulated_annealing=true" flag for this). 3) Since handling of H atoms in phenix.refine is significantly improved in newer versions, I would warmly recommend to use the latest phenix.refine available (currently from CCI Apps: http://www.phenix-online.org/download/cci_apps/). 4) Also, clashes related concerns may be a result of inoptimal weight between Xray target and restrains. Although one can play with the weight adjusting scales manually by trying different values of "wxc_scale" parameter ("wxu_scale" is analog for b-factors refinement) the new version of phenix.refine has an automatic procedure for finding the best weight (here "the best" means the weight that leads to the lowest Rfree) (Carsten's suggestion). To use this option: % phenix.refine model.pdb data.mtz your_parameters.par optimize_wxc=true Note this this may take a while to run (depending on resolution and structure size) so consider running it overnight. If none of the above helps, I would be *very* interested to look at the data and model myself to 1) help you find the best strategy to overcome this problem, and 2) find and fix problem in phenix.refine (if any). As always, I promise to keep all data confidential. Pavel.

4 5

alternative conformations
by Dr. Colin W. Levy 13 Feb '08

13 Feb '08

Hi, What is the correct procedure in phenix for dealing with alternative conformations of side chains? Thanks Colin

3 2

Clashes problem
by Simon Kolstoe 11 Feb '08

11 Feb '08

Dear Phenix community, I am using phenix.refine version 2007_08_18_1856 to refine a 2.65A structure (with individual_sites, group_adp, TLS & NCS, wxc_scale=0.1). After refinement I am running the pdb file through the Molprobity server. Molprobity gives a clash score of 33.78 indicating the number of steric clashes (within 0.4A) per 1000 atoms. I am slightly concerned that a refinement program seems happy to allow such clashes. Is this a problem with the version of phenix.refine I am running, or is there a more obvious explanation that I have missed? Thanks, Simon

7 7

Making GDP (non-polymer) into an RNA monomer
by Francis E Reyes 09 Feb '08

09 Feb '08

All I need to attach a 5' modification, a diphosphate guanosine to my RNA. I figure GDP (from the monomer library) has everything I need. However, what needs to be done to make a connection with the next nucleotide in the chain (in both phenix.refine and coot) ? Thanks FR --------------------------------------------- Francis Reyes M.Sc. 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 67BA8D5D 8AE2 F2F4 90F7 9640 28BC 686F 78FD 6669 67BA 8D5D

2 3

Re: [phenixbb] Making GDP (non-polymer) into an RNA monomer
by Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve 09 Feb '08

09 Feb '08

Hi Francis, > However, what's the etiquette for how the residue should be named in > the PDB? I have it right now as GDP, though Gr seems much more > sensible? Or should I name it something completely custom? If the monomer library GDP matches what you have in the PDB I'd stick with the name. I'd rename the residue only if modifications are necessary. Gr would be a problematic alternative because the monomer library uses that already for RNA Guanosine (mon_lib/g/GR.cif). Ralf

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] lower case chain IDs
by Engin Ozkan 08 Feb '08

08 Feb '08

Thanks, Ralf. We will have the latest CCI Apps installed in our upcoming February software update (which should include your December update), and give it another try. That will probably fix it. Engin Quoting "Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk(a)cci.lbl.gov>: > Hi Engin, > >> which, I guess, is the CCI Apps version from August 2007. > > Yes, that explains it. Sorry, when I saw your first message > I should have thought of this immediately. > > To resolve your problem, you'll need the latest CCI Apps. > Multiple CCI Apps versions can co-exist and the installation > takes only seconds. Could you try that? > > http://www.phenix-online.org/download/cci_apps/ > > You can install it under your home directory, i.e. you don't need > special privilleges. > Just make sure you source the setpaths of the version you want to use. > > Ralf >

1 0