- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Gordon Research Conference on Diffraction Methods
by Edward Snell 01 Jun '16

01 Jun '16

While not a Phenix posting, we do encourage attendance from the usual suspects! We'd like to remind you to register for the Gordon Research Conference on Diffraction Methods to be held at Bates College in Lewiston, Maine, July 17th-22nd 2016. The conference is themed around "Probing the structure and dynamics of macromolecules" and details of the program are at https://www.grc.org/programs.aspx?id=11655. The closing date for applications is June 19th 2016, about 5 weeks away, however GRC conferences have a limited number of participants and we will close registration early if that number is reached. Please join us in Maine this summer for the 40th anniversary of this meeting. If you are planning on attending, please note the deadline, and the growing potential that registration may close earlier. Thanks, Eddie Snell and Arwen Pearson - Chair and co-chair for 2016. Edward Snell Ph.D. CEO Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute Assistant Prof. Department of Structural Biology, University at Buffalo 700 Ellicott Street, Buffalo, NY 14203-1102 Phone: (716) 898 8631 Fax: (716) 898 8660 Skype: eddie.snell Email: esnell(a)hwi.buffalo.edu Heisenberg was probably here!

1 0

rosetta_refine connecting non-consecutive residues around break in chain
by wtempel 27 May '16

27 May '16

Hello, can one prevent rosetta_refine from connecting two residues that surround a gap? For example, how do I keep near-by residues 108 and 115 apart when 109 through 114 are missing? Thank you. Wolfram Tempel

2 1

Fwd: Re: Scultor model with gaps included
by Gabor Bunkoczi 26 May '16

26 May '16

Apologies, this should have been directed to the mailing list. Gabor -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [phenixbb] Scultor model with gaps included Date: 2016-05-25 14:33 From: Gabor Bunkoczi <gb360(a)cam.ac.uk> To: Joseph Brock <joseph.brock(a)ki.se> Dear Joseph, apologies for the late response, and sorry for the trouble. Please find some answers inlined. On 2016-05-24 15:10, Joseph Brock wrote: > Dear Phenix community, > > I was hoping if someone could help me with using Phaser correctly, > since I can't seem to produce the desired search model. > > The first thing that I was wondering about is that the CLUSTAL > alignment from the log file is quite different to the .aln alignment I > made with phenix --> other tools --> multiple sequence alignment. Why > is a sequence alignment required as input if sculptor performs it's > own internally? Sculptor can perform sequence alignment, but the algorithm is relatively basic, and you can get much better results with an external method (such as HHPRED), and hence alignment input is preferred over the target sequence. The alignment selected is printed into the logfile for reference. On the other hand, Sculptor does align the structure of your model chain to the sequence of your model (this is a surprisingly non-trivial task). However, this alignment should be close to 100% identical, unless a mistake has been made (such as using the wrong alignment file). You should get a warning if the sequence identity is too low. It is normally OK to have a couple of mismatches (such as having SeMet in the model structure with translates to "X" and not as "C"). > > My model sequence aligned to my target sequence in the log file has > several gaps in the alignment . For e.g., > > MASTER ......AASFIMV...... > CHAIN_A ......AKM--MF....... > > I would like to great a search model in which the residues aligned to > gaps in the MASTER chain are included, however the resulting sculptor > .pdb file has these residues removed. Shouldn't they be inserted so > that the rest of the chain is in the correct register? You need to do homology modelling to achieve this, as an insertion can affect the whole structure. Sculptor is designed for quick model improvement, and just renumbers/renames residues. However, the new residues numbers should reflect your sequence, i.e. in your example alignment the two methionines on both sides of the gap will get a non-consecutive number and are displayed as non-bonded in e.g. Coot. > > If anyone can let me know the parameters to allow this, I would > greatly appreciate it. I tried unselecting 'gap' in main-chain > deletion scope and some other variations, but this didn't seem to > help. > > I seem to get the same result even if I change the target index from 1 > to 2 in the associated .aln alignment. Does anyone know why this is? Hmm, this does not sound right. Can you send me the logfile so that I can have a look (please use my direct email address)? Best wishes, Gabor > > Apologies if this is quite obvious, I have been reading the > documentation but can't seem to figure it out. > > All the best, > > Joseph. > > Joseph Brock | PhD > Division of Physiological Chemistry II > Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics > Karolinska Institutet > Scheeles väg 2 > SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden > > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave(a)phenix-online.org -- ################################################## Dr Gabor Bunkoczi Cambridge Institute for Medical Research Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Addenbrooke's Hospital Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0XY ##################################################

1 0

Appropriate model_vs_data usage over part of a structure
by Andy Watkins 25 May '16

25 May '16

Perhaps necessary preface: I am largely learning as I go, and large parts of Phenix (and the details of refinement data file formats) are still black boxes for me. Suppose I have a model of one chain of a complex and an .mtz describing the entire complex. I have performed some refinement procedure altering the model of that single chain. My aim is to determine how this refinement procedure has affected the fit to the experimental data--or, really, the subset of the experimental data expected to be relevant for my model. For obvious reasons, phenix.model_vs_data chain_A.pdb whole_complex.mtz phenix.model_vs_data chain_A_refined.pdb whole_complex.mtz are undesirable: they evaluate the model of a single chain against the whole complex's data, and there's obviously a lot of unsatisfied electron density. So, while this command *works*, it reports an unrepresentative fit. (In theory, one solution to my problem would be to re-combine each chain's refined version, then run model_vs_data on the recombined, refined complex. I'm interested nonetheless in how it would work on the chains separately. Now, during the refinement procedure, we of course generate .ccp4 density maps for the individual chain models: phenix.maps chain_A.pdb whole_complex.mtz which produces the ccp4 file as well as, crucially, chain_A_map_coeffs.mtz. Attempting to employ that resulting .mtz file, i.e. phenix.model_vs_data chain_A.pdb whole_complex.mtz phenix.model_vs_data chain_A_refined.pdb whole_complex.mtz leads to an evocative error: Sorry_No_array_of_the_required_type: No reflection arrays available. My highest suspicion is that I need to alter maps.params in a particular way so that reflection arrays are also output to model_map_coeffs.mtz. I could also imagine that I need to be using another program entirely! Thanks in advance for whatever help you can provide; unfortunately, I can't provide any input files.

4 7

July ACA meeting in Denver early registration still open!
by Terwilliger, Thomas Charles 24 May '16

24 May '16

?Hi Phenix colleagues! Heading to Denver for ACA's Annual Meeting in July? Early registration ends May 31 (abstracts still being accepted too!) See: http://www.amercrystalassn.org/2016-meeting-homepage ?All the best, Tom T Tom Terwilliger (2016 ACA President)

1 0

Scultor model with gaps included
by Joseph Brock 24 May '16

24 May '16

Dear Phenix community, I was hoping if someone could help me with using Phaser correctly, since I can't seem to produce the desired search model. The first thing that I was wondering about is that the CLUSTAL alignment from the log file is quite different to the .aln alignment I made with phenix --> other tools --> multiple sequence alignment. Why is a sequence alignment required as input if sculptor performs it's own internally? My model sequence aligned to my target sequence in the log file has several gaps in the alignment . For e.g., MASTER ......AASFIMV...... CHAIN_A ......AKM--MF....... I would like to great a search model in which the residues aligned to gaps in the MASTER chain are included, however the resulting sculptor .pdb file has these residues removed. Shouldn't they be inserted so that the rest of the chain is in the correct register? If anyone can let me know the parameters to allow this, I would greatly appreciate it. I tried unselecting 'gap' in main-chain deletion scope and some other variations, but this didn't seem to help. I seem to get the same result even if I change the target index from 1 to 2 in the associated .aln alignment. Does anyone know why this is? Apologies if this is quite obvious, I have been reading the documentation but can't seem to figure it out. All the best, Joseph. Joseph Brock | PhD Division of Physiological Chemistry II Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics Karolinska Institutet Scheeles väg 2 SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden

1 0

Senior Research Assistant position - MD Anderson Cancer Center
by Leonard,Paul 23 May '16

23 May '16

Dear all, This post is to bring your attention to a job opportunity for a Senior Research Assistant position at the University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center (in Houston, Texas, USA). MD Anderson Cancer Center is the number one cancer center in the United States and a center of excellence for both oncology treatment and research. This is an opportunity to join a dedicated team of researchers that are working together to develop new cancer therapeutics to positively impact the lives of our patients. We are looking for a highly motivated individual with experience in molecular biology and protein production to work within our structural biology team to support research projects across the MD Anderson research community and the drug discovery pipeline of the Institute for Applied Cancer Science. The research that stems from the proteins produced has a direct impact on the lives of our patients. Salaries are competitive and based on the level of experience of the applicant. We are looking for applicants with a Bachelors or Masters degree in Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Pharmacology or a related subject. Previous experience working in a research lab environment is desired. The ideal candidate will have previous molecular biology or protein purification experience. For more information and to submit a job application please refer to the job posting… https://mdanderson.referrals.selectminds.com/jobs/sr-research-asst-genomic-… We look forward to reviewing your application. Please use the above link to submit your application, CV and cover letter. Best wishes, Paul Leonard The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.

3 2

ncs average map
by Jarrod Mousa 21 May '16

21 May '16

Hi all I am trying to use phenix refine to NCS average my density map during refinement. If I check refinement, I get an error saying 'Missing a map type defiinition for one or more CCP4 or XPLOR maps." If I try to upload a 2Fo-Fc map generated from FFT map coefficients, I get an error saying that phenix does not recognize the file. Any tips or other methods to calculate such a map? thanks, Jarrod Mousa

1 0

Postdoc positions at Arizona State Uni: algorithm development for XFEL data
by Nadia Zatsepin 19 May '16

19 May '16

*Open positions: 2 Postdoc positions in XFEL Biophysics at Arizona State University.* Full details & how to apply: *https://physics.asu.edu/about/employment-opportunities <https://physics.asu.edu/about/employment-opportunities>* We are applicants for 2 postdoctoral researcher positions for the development of algorithms for biological X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) data, both in crystallography and solution scattering. The successful applicants will become part of an interdisciplinary team at ASU working on solving important biological questions using XFELs. This is a two-year Postdoctoral appointment with the possibility of extension to a maximum of three years. *Objectives* The objective of these postdoctoral researcher positions is to develop algorithms for improving data accuracy in SFX through modeling and optimization, develop novel phasing methods which exploit the full spatial coherence of the XFEL for 2D and 3D nanocrystals, and/or develop structure-determination methods that can be applied to samples that cannot be crystallized, through XFEL fast solution scattering. *Essential Functions of the position:* - Develop improved algorithms and software for analyzing biological XFEL data (static and time-resolved crystallographic or solution scattering data). - Analyze and present results at conferences, workshops, seminars and technical meetings. - Document and publish research results in peer-reviewed scientific or technical journals. - Contribute to XFEL data analysis workshops organized by the Group The successful candidates are expected to support the analysis of serial femtosecond crystallography experiments at the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), SPring-8 Angstrom Compact free electron Laser (SACLA), the European X-Ray Laser (XFEL), or other applicable x-ray sources (XFELs or 3rd generation synchrotrons). This work is complementary to XFEL data analysis work in the NSF BioXFEL Science and Technology center (STC), and so the candidates will interact and collaborate with students and postdoctoral researchers working in the BioXFEL STC. They will report to the PI for the project. *Required Qualifications:* - PhD in related field such as physics, biophysics, bioinformatics, structural biology, by time of appointment. - Experience in analysis of X-ray diffraction imaging or crystallographic data. - Demonstrated algorithm and/or code development. - Demonstrated publication record in peer-reviewed literature; and experience in presenting research results to large audiences. - Demonstrated ability to perform independent research and in a diverse team environment to achieve program goals in a timely fashion. - Demonstrated fundamental verbal and written communication skills (in English) necessary to work in a multidisciplinary team environment, author technical and scientific reports and publications, and deliver scientific presentations. *Desired Qualifications:* - Experience with X-ray experiments at synchrotrons or XFELs related to high-resolution imaging or crystallography. - Experience and familiarity with coherent x-ray imaging experiments. - Experience with analyzing and solving protein structures. - Demonstrated programming experience in C and Python; experience with , web-interface development - Experience with parallel programming and large data sets. *To apply, *please submit as a single PDF document: (1) a cover letter which includes the names and email addresses of three references, (2) a curriculum vitae with a list of publications. PDF application materials should be submitted via the employment application portal. <https://physics.asu.edu/content/postdoc-position-job-11577-0> *Applications will be reviewed beginning June 15, 2016.* If not filled, every week thereafter until the search is closed. *Anticipated starting date: August 2016. * Please email nadia.zatsepin(a)asu.edu for more information. -- Nadia Zatsepin Assistant Research Professor Dept of Physics PSF246 Arizona State University +1 480 727 6444 nadia.zatsepin(a)asu.edu *http://www.public.asu.edu/~nzatsepi/ <http://www.public.asu.edu/~nzatsepi/>*

1 0

Rfree doesn't decrease and keeps around 36%, High ramachandran outlier, High RMSD
by chen c 13 May '16

13 May '16

Dear all, I am solving a structure which diffracted to 2.8 angstrom resolution and containes 8 molecules (MW:12 kDa) per ASU. It's noteworthy that though the model used for molecular replacement shares 50% sequence identity with my protein, however, severe clashes were found as listed below: Packing Table ------------- Solutions accepted if total number of clashes <= 5% of trace atoms i.e. total number of clashes <= 32 AND if number of clashes <= 5% of trace atoms for each ensemble i.e. ensemble1: number of clashes <= 4 # # #Clash Packs SpaceGroup Annotation 1 17 NO C 2 2 21 ... PAK=11 LLG=802 RFZ=3.8 TFZ=9.3 Only after I changed the packing criteria from 5% to 100%, can I get the solution. Severe clashes and even coincidence of different molecules were found as briefly listed below: Molecule A (C-terminal) vs Molecule D (N-terminal) of neighbouring ASU Molecule B (C-terminal) vs Molecule C (N-terminal) Molecule C (C-terminal) vs Molecule D (C-terminal) Molecule E (C-terminal) vs Molecule G (N-terminal) Molecule F (C-terminal) vs Molecule H (N-terminal) Molecule G (C-terminal) vs Molecule G (C-terminal) of neighbouring ASU Molecule H (C-terminal) vs Molecule H (C-terminal) of neighbouring ASU Upon this, I manually rebuild the structure in COOT and particularly deleted those coincided atoms. Then I refined the structure in phenix. However, all the refine gives a bad result, namely, RMSD(angle) at 1.8-2.1, RMSD(bond) at 0.015-0.02, The Rwork/Rfree at around 0.28/0.36, Ramachandran outlier + Rotamer outlier at around 15-20%. I tried a lot of refinement strategy and the current status is : RMSD(angle)= 1.545, RMSD(bond) = 0.01, Rwork/Rfree = 0.290.36, Ramachandran outlier=11.3%,Rotamer outlier =1.5%. The data set belonged to C2221 and phenix.xtriage analysis reflects no twinning or pseudotranslation problem. In addition, there are two beta-turns in each molecule which displays poor electron density and geometry. And this two loop are the very residues which appears in disallowed regions in ramachandran diagram apart some other residues. However, these residues should have little effect on the R factor considering of their low contribution to the overall structure due to their poor electron density. Has anyone has experiences about this? Your help and advice is greatly appreciated! Thank you! Chen -- Cheng Chen, Ph.D. Candidate Laboratory of Structural Biology Life Science Building,Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Tel:+86-10-62772291 Fax:+86-10-62773145 E-mail:[email protected] 北京市海淀区清华大学生命科学馆201-212室邮编：100084

2 1

occupancy refinement with constrained groups
by Schnicker, Nicholas J 13 May '16

13 May '16

Dear all, I am trying to do use constrained groups with occupancy refinement but struggling with syntax. I am trying to define selection1 as 2 different atoms and selection2 as another 2 different atoms. Therefore I want the 2 atoms in selection1 to have the same occupancy and the atoms in selection2 to have the same and the sum of selection 1 and 2 will be 1. If someone could help me with this syntax I would appreciate it! I have tried using brackets to separate selections but phenix doesn't recognize this. I can provide more information if needed, it's just a complicated scenario. Thanks! Nick

3 2

FreeR flags from AutoBuild
by Sam Tang 13 May '16

13 May '16

Dear all May I enquire a simple question about AutoBuild - I input an experimental data (ccp4 mtz from Aimless) and a model from Phaser-MR to AutoBuild hoping that some mis-fit flexible regions could be re-build. May I know if the output mtz *overall_best_refine_data.mtz* contains the same FreeR flags as in the input, or would AutoBuild generate a new set of FreeR? Or in other words, are the R values directly comparable if I refine against the input experimental data mtz or the overall_best_refine_data.mtz? Thanks! Cheers Sam Tang Biochemistry Programme, School of Life Sciences, CUHK

4 4

FW: [SA_Scat] 4th Annual CCP-SAS Project Meeting
by Kushol Gupta 13 May '16

13 May '16

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <stephen.king(a)stfc.ac.uk> Date: Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:27 AM Subject: [SA_Scat] 4th Annual CCP-SAS Project Meeting To: sa_scat(a)iucr.org Dear Colleagues, We are pleased announce the 4th Annual CCP-SAS Project Meeting to be held at the NIST NCNR, Gaithersburg MD, USA from Mon 23 through Wed 25 May 2016. CCP-SAS includes the SASSIE and SCT suites of 'atomistic' modelling software. The Meeting program is available online at http://www.ccpsas.org/Meetings/Fourth/Program.html This year the Meeting also includes two 'hands-on' Tutorial Sessions on Wed 25 May: one aimed at those who wish to learn how to incorporate additional modules into the SASSIE Framework, and another aimed at those who wish to learn about wrapping applications for Web deployment using GenApp. Registration for the Meeting and Tutorials is FREE, but space is limited and places will be allocated on a first-come, first-served basis. IMPORTANT: As the meeting is being held on the NIST Campus, registration with NIST is mandatory. Please follow the 'Registration' link on the above webpage. Photo ID will be required for entry. There is also the opportunity to present relevant posters on Mon 23 May. Please contact Prof Paul Butler (pbutler(a)utk.edu<mailto:[email protected]>) if you would like to do this. On Tue 24 May there will be a special Workshop for potential future collaborators, software developers, and funders. Attendance at this Workshop is by invitation only. Please also contact Paul Butler (pbutler(a)utk.edu<mailto:[email protected]>) if you might like to contribute to these discussions. We hope you can join us! The CCP-SAS Team

1 0

bug?
by Patrick Loll 12 May '16

12 May '16

I just ran into something that might be a small bug (phenix 1.10.1-2155) Background: I have a problem data set for which the unit cell is too small to hold we thought we were crystallizing (which probably means we crystallized the wrong protein). In any case, I ran the data through Xtriage, supplying the sequence file for the too-large protein, even though I knew this is probably not correct. This sequence file contains 264 residues. I was surprised to see that the program returned with a perfectly reasonable estimate of the Matthews coefficient, making me briefly hopeful that I had been doing the calculation incorrectly. Alas, not so; when I dig through the log file, I find the following: ____begin excerpt_______________________________________________________________ determining composition from sequence file /xxxx/seq.dat Too many residues to fit in the ASU resetting numer of residues in monomer to 26 =================== Solvent content and Matthews coefficient ================== Crystallized molecule(s) defined as 264 protein residues ------------------------------------------------------------------- | Solvent content analysis | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | Copies | Solvent content | Matthews coeff. | P(solvent content) | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | 1 | 0.666 | 3.68 | 0.621 | | 2 | 0.331 | 1.84 | 0.379 | ------------------------------------------------------------------- Best guess : 1 copy in the ASU _____end excerpt_______________________________________________________________ So it seems as though the program, when confronted with a protein mass that’s too large for the AU, divides the mass by 10 and tries again. However, this is not clear from the results; in the results section, it states “Crystallized molecule(s) defined as 264 protein residues." So a user might be misled into thinking that everything is OK, when in fact it’s not… Cheers, Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrick J. Loll, Ph. D. Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Director, Biochemistry Graduate Program Drexel University College of Medicine Room 10-102 New College Building 245 N. 15th St., Mailstop 497 Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA (215) 762-7706 pat.loll(a)drexelmed.edu

1 0

BCA/CCP4 Summer School 2016 - Applications now open
by Airlie McCoy 10 May '16

10 May '16

I am pleased to announce that applications are now open for the BCA/CCP4 Summer School in Protein Crystallography to be held at Diamond Light Source from Sunday 21st August to Friday 26th August 2016 Applications will close Friday 13th May. The registration fee of the school has been kept low due to the generous sponsorship of the BCA and CCP4. Note that up to 10 free places are available to BBSRC funded students. For a draft programme and application details see: http://www.diamond.ac.uk/Home/Events/2016/BCA-Summer-School.html The BCA/CCP4 Protein Crystallography Summer School is intended for students and researchers new to crystallography. Its dual aims are to provide comprehensive training in crystallography and to promote best practise within the British crystallographic community. The lectures cover the gamut of techniques required for a structure solution, from protein expression through to structure validation. Intensively supervised computer tutorials enable students to relate the theory presented in the lectures to practice. Although CCP5 programmes will primarily be used in these tutorials, the aim will be to approach crystallographic questions in a software-agnostic manner. There will also be a crystal manipulation and cooling workshop. (Note that the course is scheduled during Diamond synchrotron downtime, so there will not be active data collection at the Diamond beamlines.) We recognise that an active social programme plays a role in enabling students to make links that may be maintained throughout a research career. There will be a conference dinner, and a number of other events, including a boat trip on the Thames from Oxford. Airlie McCoy

1 1

Research Technician Position at Structural Biology Lab at University of Southern California
by Xiao Lei 07 May '16

07 May '16

Dear All, The Lin Chen laboratory at the University of Southern California is seeking a research technician to join the lab. The Chen lab is interested in the structure and function of molecular complexes that control cell signaling and gene expression. We use a multi-disciplinary approach that combines structural biology, chemical biology, biochemistry/cell biology, and computational biology/bioinformatics to study the molecular basis of signal transduction and transcription regulation. For more detailed description of our research, please visit the lab page: http://structure.usc.edu/ Job Responsibilities Include: Assist postdoctoral fellows and graduate students in the lab on a variety of biochemical and biophysical studies, including gene cloning, protein expression, purification, and characterization of purified protein by various biochemical and biophysical techniques, and protein crystallization. The technician may also be involved in developing new techniques to study the structure and function of the genome. The technician is also expected to take a small amount of lab managing duty such as ordering and organizing lab supplies,. Commitment of 1 year is required; 2 years is preferred, the position is grant-funded and renewable Preferred Qualifications: • BS in Biochemistry, or Chemistry, or Molecular Biology, or related field • 2 years lab experience • Working knowledge of laboratory equipment and research protocols • Must be meticulous, detail-oriented, and responsible • Basic biochemistry, molecular biology and chemistry knowledge To apply for this position, Please send CV, three names of reference and a cover letter to: linchen(a)usc.edu Best Regards.

1 0

autoBuild error, OSError: [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory
by luzuok 06 May '16

06 May '16

Hello, The autobuild had been running for almost 2 hours in my Desktop, but it suddenly stopped and posed an error message as indicated below. Is this caused by my insufficient memory? Best wishes! Luzuokun Splitting work into 4 jobs and running with 2 processors using sh background=True in /home/lu/Documents/StructurePro/why/P43212/AutoBuild_run_2_/TEMP0 Starting job 1...Log will be: /home/lu/Documents/StructurePro/why/P43212/AutoBuild_run_2_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_4.log Starting job 2...Log will be: /home/lu/Documents/StructurePro/why/P43212/AutoBuild_run_2_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_5.log Starting job 3...Log will be: /home/lu/Documents/StructurePro/why/P43212/AutoBuild_run_2_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_6.log Starting job 4...Log will be: /home/lu/Documents/StructurePro/why/P43212/AutoBuild_run_2_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_7.log Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/autosol/AutoBaseExtend.py", line 987, in DoNextMethod self.CarryOutBest() # to be obtained after it is finished File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/autosol/AutoBaseExtend.py", line 2147, in CarryOutBest getattr(self,str(self.application_method))() # call this fn File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/wizards/AutoBuild.py", line 2372, in AutoBuild_build_cycle self.AutoBuild_rebuild_cycle_run() File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/wizards/AutoBuild.py", line 4714, in AutoBuild_rebuild_cycle_run always_reuse_model=always_reuse_model) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/wizards/AutoBuild.py", line 7589, in AutoBuild_build_refine mtz_file=mtz_file,mtz_ref_file=mtz_ref_file) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/wizards/AutoBuild.py", line 7833, in run_standard_build_in_parallel r.run(out=sys.stdout) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/autosol/run_group_of_wizards.py", line 294, in run self.start_run(run_file,last=is_last) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/phenix/phenix/autosol/run_group_of_wizards.py", line 604, in start_run cmd+" "+self.add_double_quote(run_file,escape_space=False)) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/modules/cctbx_project/libtbx/easy_run.py", line 160, in __init__ close_fds=not subprocess.mswindows) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/base/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 710, in __init__ errread, errwrite) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.10.1-2155/base/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 1223, in _execute_child self.pid = os.fork() OSError: [Errno 12] Cannot allocate memory -- 卢作焜南开大学新生物站A202 Lu Zuokun, Ph.D. Candidate College of Life Science, Nankai University

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] Self Rotation Function
by Sharan Karade 04 May '16

04 May '16

Thank you for your valuable Edward, Patrick, Francis. I will try with your suggestions. And let you know the results. On 4 May 2016 20:03, "Edward A. Berry" <BerryE(a)upstate.edu> wrote: On 05/04/2016 10:17 AM, Patrick Loll wrote: > You won’t see peaks in the self-rotation function unless the AU contains > non-crystallographic rotational symmetry, which frequently is not the case > (just because you have multiple copies of your protein in the AU does not > imply that they are arranged in any specific, symmetric manner). And even > if there is rotational NCS, if the axis of rotation is parallel to a > crystal symmetry operator, the effect of the NCS will be masked. So > everything may be working as it should. > > If you’re not certain if you have the program working correctly, then I > suggest that you find a structure in the PDB that contains rotational NCS, > download the structure factors, and calculate the self-rotation map, as a > positive control. > > Try bacterioferritin (in a low-symmetry space group) or GroEL ! > On 4 May 2016, at 12:10 AM, Sharan Karade <sharankarade(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> i am working on data set which has resolution of 2.8 A >> space group C2, the protein have 394 a a . when i estimate Mathews >> coefficient it shows four to five molecules in asymmetric unit. when i try >> to get self rotation function Map by default parameter (10A-3A and 25 >> radius of integration) i was not getting any peak at all 180, 90, 120, 60. >> Or radius of integration affect the results. >> >> Can anybody please help me to sort out with this problem, welcome for >> suggestions, thanks in advance. >> >> -- >> Sharan >> C/O Dr. J V Pratap >> Senior Research Fellow, >> CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, >> Lucknow >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave(a)phenix-online.org >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Patrick J. Loll, Ph. D. > Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology > Director, Biochemistry Graduate Program > Drexel University College of Medicine > Room 10-102 New College Building > 245 N. 15th St., Mailstop 497 > Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA > > (215) 762-7706 > pat.loll(a)drexelmed.edu > > > _______________________________________________ > phenixbb mailing list > phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb > Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave(a)phenix-online.org > >

1 0

Self Rotation Function
by Sharan Karade 04 May '16

04 May '16

Hello everyone, i am working on data set which has resolution of 2.8 A space group C2, the protein have 394 a a . when i estimate Mathews coefficient it shows four to five molecules in asymmetric unit. when i try to get self rotation function Map by default parameter (10A-3A and 25 radius of integration) i was not getting any peak at all 180, 90, 120, 60. Or radius of integration affect the results. Can anybody please help me to sort out with this problem, welcome for suggestions, thanks in advance. -- Sharan C/O Dr. J V Pratap Senior Research Fellow, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow

4 3

Phenix.multi_crystal_average
by Sam Tang 03 May '16

03 May '16

Hello colleagues May I enquire if the captioned programme is still supported in the latest version of Phenix and, if not, which programme is now in place for this? Thanks in advance. Cheers Sam Tang Biochemistry Programme, School of Life Sciences, CUHK

2 4

CCN submissions
by Nigel Moriarty 02 May '16

02 May '16

Folks Calling for articles and short communications of interest to structural biologists. The initial deadline for submission in the July 2016 issue is 1 June 2016. The Computational Crystallography Newsletter (CCN) is an electronic newsletter for structural biologists, and is published online every 6 months. Feature articles, meeting announcements and reports can be submitted to me at any time for consideration. Submission of text by email or word-processing files using the CCN templates is requested. Past newsletters and a Microsoft Word template are available at www.phenix-online.org/newsletter. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

Refmac error using PDB coordinates generated by Phenix PDB File Editor
by Xiao Lei 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

Hi Phenixbb members, I'm using Phenix PDB File Editor under Phenix GUI "Model Tool" to change occupancy of two short 7 polyalanine alpha helix peptide chain (chain I and K, placed in reverse orientation of each other in one region (or density blob) of my model, each chain half occupancy) , I can change the occupancy very easily with the tool, but I have two types of errors using the coordinates generated by the tool in Refmac. 1. If I set chain ID of chain K to chain I with the same residue number with half occupancy but in reverse order (Chain I, Ala7th--13th 0.5 occupancy and Chain I, Ala7th--13th 0.5 occupancy) , Refmac could not refine the model with an error message below: I am reading library. Please wait. mon_lib.cif ERROR : ALA : duplicated atom_name : "N ". chain: II residue: 7 ERROR : ALA : duplicated atom_name : "CA ". chain: II residue: 7 ERROR : ALA : duplicated atom_name : "CB ". chain: II residue: 7 ERROR : ALA : duplicated atom_name : "C ". chain: II residue: 7 ERROR : ALA : duplicated atom_name : "O ". chain: II residue: 7 IERR = 1 There is an error. See above ===> Error: Fatal error. Cannot continue. I understand Refmac can not allow two peptide chain with the same ID and residue number if both peptides are full occupancy (1), but why in this case even half occupancy of the same chain ID and residue number is not tolerated? 2. If I set chain ID of chain K and chain I half occupancy (Chain K, Ala7th--13th 0.5 occupancy and chain I, Ala7th--13th 0.5 occupancy) , put chain K and chain I in the same density blob with reverse direction, and run Refmac, this time Refmac can finish but gave me error message in log file as below: I am reading library. Please wait. mon_lib.cif INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.486 ideal_dist= 1.240 ch:II res: 7 ALA at:N .->ch:KK res: 11 ALA at:O . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.625 ideal_dist= 1.080 ch:II res: 8 ALA at:O .->ch:KK res: 9 ALA at:O . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.584 ideal_dist= 1.400 ch:II res: 10 ALA at:N .->ch:KK res: 11 ALA at:N . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.397 ideal_dist= 1.530 ch:II res: 10 ALA at:CB .->ch:KK res: 11 ALA at:CB . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.153 ideal_dist= 1.400 ch:II res: 11 ALA at:N .->ch:KK res: 10 ALA at:N . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.820 ideal_dist= 1.524 ch:II res: 11 ALA at:CA .->ch:KK res: 10 ALA at:CB . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 0.888 ideal_dist= 1.530 ch:II res: 11 ALA at:CB .->ch:KK res: 10 ALA at:CB . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.808 ideal_dist= 1.530 ch:II res: 12 ALA at:CB .->ch:KK res: 9 ALA at:CB . INFO: link is found (not be used) dist= 1.764 ideal_dist= 1.400 ch:II res: 13 ALA at:N .->ch:KK res: 7 ALA at:N . -------------------------------- I do not know why Refmac gave me this message, is it because the two helix chain (I and K) are placed in the same region, even though both with 0.5 occupancy of both chain, Refmac still automatically tries to connect the main chain atom between two different chains (I and K) because main chain atoms are placed too close to each other (Refmac think there is a link between them?) ? 3. In summary, should I use Phenix Refine instead of Refmac to handle the pdb coordinates generated by Phenix PDB file editor because Phenix Refine may have better compatibility? Thanks in advance.

3 5

build two helix run in opposite direction and set half occupancy or each in Coot
by Xiao Lei 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

Hi Phenixbb members, Is there a way in the Coot GUI that I can build two helix of the same sequence (or just short 5aa or 6aa peptide chains of the same sequence) that run in the opposite direction (180 degree opposite direction) of each other and set half occupancy of each peptide chain? I tried to use Calculate---> Model/fit/refine/----> add alternative conformation, but it seems I only have two options: "split single residue at C-alpha" or "split all of a single residue", which are applying to single residue only, not a short peptide chain. Thanks.

4 6

Re: [phenixbb] Rosetta refine compilation issue Centos 7
by ludovic Pecqueur 29 Apr '16

29 Apr '16

Dear Phenix developers, This is a feedback from a previous post started a long time ago when I was trying to install the rosetta interface for phenix in Centos 7. As a reminder, I could compile Rosetta with './scons.py -j8' without problem but rosetta.build_phenix_interface exited with an error message related to python. I had given up for some time but I tried again today with more luck. setting up PYTHONHOME as previously suggested was breaking something: which python /usr/bin/python python -c "import site" returns no error > export PYTHONHOME=/usr/bin/python (so the distribution's python) python -c "import site" returns "no module named site" unset PYTHONHOME python -c "import site" returns no error message. adding the path to my local PYTHON with export PATH=/where my local Python 2.7 is/bin/:$PATH was the correct fix and I could finally run rosetta.build_phenix_interface without errors. Cheers Ludovic. On Sep 28, 2015, at 3:24 AM, phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org wrote: > Message: 8 > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:43:40 +0200 > From: ludovic Pecqueur <ludovic.pecqueur(a)college-de-france.fr> > To: Paul Adams <pdadams(a)lbl.gov> > Cc: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] Rosetta refine compilation issue Centos 7 > Message-ID: > <0CB7F2F9-4E89-4598-92FA-58AE2526FF8D(a)college-de-france.fr> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi Paul, Nigel, > > Thank you for the suggestion. > > I tried to set PYTHONHOME with > export PYTHONHOME=/usr/bin/python > or > export PYTHONHOME=to PHENIX's python > or > export PYTHONHOME=to a local python compiled from source that I use to compile programs like Pymol > > to no avail, I get the same error message. > > As I can compile Rosetta without phenix using : ./scons.py -j6 mode=release bin, do you think the problem could reside in the way rosetta.build_phenix_interface works? > > Cheers, > > Ludovic. > > > On Sep 23, 2015, at 11:09 PM, Paul Adams <pdadams(a)lbl.gov> wrote: > >> Hi Ludovic, >> >> the problems seem to occur when scons is called to compile Rosetta. I notice that the scons.py file uses the python that appears first in your path (#! /usr/bin/env python). Is it possible that this is a python that is broken in some way? >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >>> On Sep 23, 2015, at 9:11 AM, ludovic Pecqueur <ludovic.pecqueur(a)college-de-france.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Developers, >>> >>> I have a fresh Centos 7 system and after installing Phenix I wanted to compile the Rosetta.refine module. (Rosetta from source version 2015.31.58019) >>> >>> I have succesfully compiled Rosetta but when I try to build the dedicated Rosetta for Rosetta_refine with rosetta.build_phenix_interface after setting up PHENIX_ROSETTA_PATH and ROSETTA3_DB I get the following error message: >>> >>> [XXX@...]$ rosetta.build_phenix_interface nproc=6 >>> False >>> scons: Reading SConscript files ... >>> Running versioning script ... Done. (0.1 seconds) >>> Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix> >>> Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix> >>> Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to <prefix>[:<exec_prefix>] >>> ImportError: No module named site >>> CalledProcessError: Command '['./update_options.sh']' returned non-zero exit status 1: >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/SConstruct", line 172: >>> main() >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/SConstruct", line 163: >>> SConscript("SConscript", "build") >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/external/scons-local/scons-local-2.0.1/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 614: >>> return method(*args, **kw) >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/external/scons-local/scons-local-2.0.1/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 551: >>> return _SConscript(self.fs, *files, **subst_kw) >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/external/scons-local/scons-local-2.0.1/SCons/Script/SConscript.py", line 260: >>> exec _file_ in call_stack[-1].globals >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/ROSETTA/PHENIX_Rosetta_refine/main/source/SConscript", line 28: >>> subprocess.check_call(["./update_options.sh"]) >>> File "/usr/local/PROGRAMS/XTAL/PHENIX/phenix-1.10-2155/base/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 540: >>> raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd). >>> >>> If you have any idea of what could cause the problem, I would welcome any suggestions. >>> I updated Phenix and I could compile phenix.rosetta_refine without problems on Centos 6.7. >>> >>> Thank you very much for your time and help. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Ludovic. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> phenixbb mailing list >>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >>> Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave(a)phenix-online.org >> >> -- >> Paul Adams >> Interim Division Director, Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley Lab >> Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab >> Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley >> Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute >> Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area >> >> Building 33, Room 347 >> Building 80, Room 247 >> Building 978, Room 4126 >> Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 >> http://cci.lbl.gov/paul >> >> Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory >> 1 Cyclotron Road >> BLDG 33R0345 >> Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. >> >> Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] >> -- >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 01:21:21 +0000 (UTC) > From: Smith Lee <smith_lee123(a)yahoo.com> > To: PHENIX User Mailing List <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: [phenixbb] on Phenix10 > Message-ID: > <615863586.1820571.1443403281522.JavaMail.yahoo(a)mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear All, > With the EM cryo data, I have compared the function of phenix.real_space_refine of Phenix10 and Phenix1.9-1692. For the Ramachandran favored, the new version is about 90%, the old version is about 92%. For the clashscore by Molprobity, the new version is about 30, the old version is about 20. Molprobity indicated the clashing atoms were systematically existing in the whole molecule, rather than on specific parts of the protein which may be indication of bad modelling. > Clearly the clashscore of 30 is unacceptable. Will you please give some advise on how to improve the function of new version of Phenix, considering adding H was not suitable as for the resolution was poorer than 4.0 A? > Smith >

1 0

Algorithm developer postdoc opening at Berkeley National Lab
by Nicholas Sauter 28 Apr '16

28 Apr '16

Berkeley Lab's Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division <http://biosciences.lbl.gov/divisions/mbib/> is looking for a Computational Biologist Postdoctoral Fellow to work in the Sauter group. We are seeking an algorithm developer for the increasingly complex analysis of large diffraction datasets in structural biology. Current projects utilize XFEL crystallography and spectroscopy to investigate the photosynthetic mechanism of water splitting and to probe other metalloenzyme reactions. We also wish to test whether diffuse scattering can reveal correlated atomic motions in crystals. Many problems remain to be solved, including the details of how to optimally merge datasets from thousands of crystals. Our software development projects (including packages such as DIALS <http://dials.lbl.gov> and cctbx.xfel <http://cci.lbl.gov/xfel>) have been highlighted in several high-impact publications listed HERE <http://biosciences.lbl.gov/profiles/nicholas-sauter>. Candidates should have expertise in one or more computational techniques including, but not limited to, ray tracing to test underlying physical models of the diffraction, Bayesian approaches for refining model parameters, macromolecular modeling and refinement, neural networks for interpreting image features, as well as signal processing and denoising methods. Extensive data analysis experience in crystallography or from more general bioimaging backgrounds are welcome. We particularly encourage strong mathematical intuition and a track record of bringing new ideas and tools to fruition, as evidenced through written publication and clear presentation. Candidates should send an expression of interest, CV, and list of three references to *Nick Sauter, nksauter(a)lbl.gov <nksauter(a)lbl.gov>.* Further details are posted at https://lbl.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?lang=en&job=82354. Nicholas K. Sauter, Ph. D. Computer Staff Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Rd., Bldg. 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720

1 0