- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

ensemble refinement rfree values
by Arjun Raman 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

Dear Phenix Guys, I have recently been trying my hand at the ensemble refinement option in phenix.refine. I generally observe an increase in rfree after performing the ensemble refinement with a well refined (using anisotropic B) structure, but the r-free increases are fairly small. For instance, 18.53% to 18.9% (1.8 Angstrom structure) or 20.45% to 21.1% (1.9 A)...I understand what this technically means (the ensemble refined model isn't as good) but given the noise in the calculation due to the limited number of reflections for the test set (~1000), would someone consider these rfree increases significant? My apologies if this question is a well-answered one...I can't seem to find much discussion about the range of rfrees to be expected or whether a 0.3-0.5% increase is large enough to toss out the refinement. Normally, I would take the lower rfree but because the ensemble refinement procedure gives potentially much more information, this seemed like a relevant question to ask. Thanks so much for your time, Arjun Raman Ranganathan Lab UT Southwestern ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today.

3 2

MR-SAD, Yb, combined phases
by Joseph Noel 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

Hi All, I am carrying out a structure refinement using experimental phases combined with an MR solution. The experimental phases are being determined from bound Yb3+ cations and the data is collected at one of the Yb absorption peaks of 1.385 A. I do have a few questions about the heavy atom arrangement and then refinement. At this wavelength, I am also seeing peaks after running MR-SAD that are actually not the Yb cations but the sulfurs on several of the proteins Cys and Met residues. Should I try and change this "heavy atom arrangement" to include Yb and S before determining the final refined phases that I would like to then use as restraints during the structure refinement? If so, its not clear how to do this in Phenix without it finding additional sites that it attributes to Yb but which are actually sulfurs. For MR, this is an exact structure. All I am doing is using Yb which substitute for Mg coordination sites as a source of experimental phases to see how it improves refinement and maps. Second, when I do refine using the MLHL target function, I am finding quite a bit of excess positive density around the Yb sites. How do I try and account for this? I have attempted to take care of it with ADP and occupancy refinement but that doesn't seem to be enough. The resolution is 2.2 A and the anomalous signal is quite good (alas that is why I am also seeing the sulfurs clearly in the anomalous difference map). Do I need to change the scattering table since the structure now includes at least 4 Yb cations per asymmetric unit (one 550 amino acid residue protein per asymmetric unit - 68% solvent)? Is it important to refine the anomalous groups? For the latter, one can't refine with phase restraints (MLHL) and anomalous groups together. I have to choose one or the other - no phase restraints and anomalous groups refined, or experimental phase restraints and no anomalous group refinement. My goal is to use additional experimental measurements - amplitudes and phases to improve refinement, map interpretation and ultimately ensemble refinement. Any help, comments, criticisms, etc will be very appreciated! Happy Holidays! Joe ______________________________________________________________________________________ Joseph P. Noel, Ph.D. Arthur and Julie Woodrow Chair Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Professor, The Jack H. Skirball Center for Chemical Biology and Proteomics The Salk Institute for Biological Studies 10010 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, CA 92037 USA Phone: (858) 453-4100 extension 1442 Cell: (858) 349-4700 Fax: (858) 597-0855 E-mail: noel(a)salk.edu Publications & Citations: http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=xiL1lscAAAAJ Homepage Salk: http://www.salk.edu/faculty/noel.html Homepage HHMI: http://hhmi.org/research/investigators/noel.html ______________________________________________________________________________________

3 3

phenix.rosetta_refine on OS X?
by Ben Eisenbraun 19 Dec '13

19 Dec '13

4 5

Please apply for RapiData 2014, a course on Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS.
by Robert Sweet 15 Dec '13

15 Dec '13

We are offering RapiData 2014, the sixteenth offering of our popular course: Rapid Data Collection and Structure Solving at the NSLS: A Practical Course in Macromolecular X-Ray Diffraction Measurement The course will be held 27 April - 2 May 2013: http://www.bnl.gov/RapiData/. Students could be at any level from advanced undergraduate to full professor. The course should accommodate 48 students total. We encourage all students to bring their own specimens for data collection, and to bring old data for the data-reduction and structure-solving tutorials. Please read the Course Announcement at http://www.bnl.gov/RapiData/. You'll see that many experts in the field will be available for lectures and tutorials. In addition to MX there will be opportunity for learning about correlated MX and spectroscopy, and SAXS. You'll find the application materials on the Course Application tab at this site. For the twelfth time we will hold a short lecture course on the fundamentals of crystallography for roughly five hours on Sunday 27 April. The body of the RapiData course really requires that students have a healthy knowledge of crystallography. For potential students who have some experience but are shaky about fundamentals, this course will help. There will be an additional fee for the fundamentals course, to pay for Saturday night accomodations and food on Sunday morning and noon. Latin American Scientists: Several scholarships are available, from the International Union of Crystallography, to pay partial travel and subsistence costs for Latin-American students and junior faculty (no more than 30 yrs). Please apply for the course, and then contact R. Sweet (sweet(a)bnl.gov) if you are interested in applying for a scholarship. In accordance with the standards of the International Union of Crystallography, we observe the basic policy of non-discrimination, affirming the right and freedom of scientists to associate in international scientific activity without regard to such factors as citizenship, religion, creed, political stance, ethnic origin, race, colour, language, age, or gender, in accordance with the Statutes of the International Council for Science. At this course no barriers will exist beyond the application procedure that would prevent the participation of bona fide scientists. Please apply yourself, or send your students to our course, Bob Sweet, Sonya Kiss, and Alex Soares Course Announcement at http://www.bnl.gov/RapiData/ ========================================================================= Robert M. Sweet E-Dress: sweet(a)bnl.gov Group Leader, PXRR: Macromolecular ^ (that's L Crystallography Research Resource at NSLS not 1) http://px.nsls.bnl.gov/ Photon Sciences and Biosciences Dept Office and mail, Bldg 745, a.k.a. LOB-5 Brookhaven Nat'l Lab. Phones: Upton, NY 11973 631 344 3401 (Office) U.S.A. 631 344 2741 (Facsimile) =========================================================================

1 0

off topic - linux flavors for crystallography
by Todd Jason Green 12 Dec '13

12 Dec '13

Hello All- I have used a trusty box running fedora core 3 for nearly a decade and I am (finally) upgrading to a new workstation. In lieu of Nat's recent mention of new linux installers of phenix, I thought I would try to get a consensus on what linux flavor(s), I should consider installing on my new box. It will be used with emphasis on typical crystallography software including 3D graphics (3 GB NVIDIA Quadro K4000 card). If anyone would like to make a suggestion for an OS, I thank you in advance. Pointers to a web review can work too. Best- Todd

7 7

cyclic peptide refinement
by wei xia 12 Dec '13

12 Dec '13

Hi, I am trying to refine a structure with a cyclic peptide ligand.I create a 'TRANS' link between the C-ter and N-ter residues of the cyclic peptide during refinement.But there is obvious no bond formed between the two residues in the refined structure.I checked the geo file and found that there are only angle restraints but no bond restraints between the two residuesAnyone can help me out?Thanks in advance! Wei P.S. refinement.pdb_interpretation.apply_cif_link { data_link = TRANS residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname MVA and resid 5005 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname ARG and resid 5001 }

3 3

phenix.find_ncs_from_density density_search.dump_ncs_density doesn't output mtz
by Francis Reyes 11 Dec '13

11 Dec '13

I'd like to see the region of my maps that obey the NCS operators and I was hoping for separate mtz's for each region given I had set density_search.dump_ncs_density = True. However, I'm not getting any output mtzs. Any ideas? Thanks, F --------------------------------------------- Francis E. Reyes PhD 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder

2 5

phenix.refine nproc
by de Waal, Parker 10 Dec '13

10 Dec '13

Hello Everyone, I recently compiled phenix 1.8.4-1496 on a CentOS 6.4 server and am having trouble using phenix.refine in parallel using the nproc flag which always runs as a single thread. Please find my input parameters here: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/13b9d4d39ed4d0c9622a I'm wondering if maybe OpenMP isn't configured properly on our server? Or maybe the correct version is not installed when I compliled phenix. If anyone has any input or experience with a problem such as this I would be extremely grateful. Cheers, Parker

3 3

Spatial filtering
by Machius, Mischa Christian 06 Dec '13

06 Dec '13

Potentially silly question: is spatial filtering used for increasing contrast in electron density maps? Is it used for any other kind of data manipulation in macromolecular crystallography, e.g., diffraction data processing, density modification, etc. I'm a bit fuzzy on that subject, and so I said 'potentially silly', because it could be that such approaches are totally common but have different names (such as local averaging/scaling and so on). Many thanks in advance. Cheers, MM

2 1

Submissions for next CCN newsletter
by Nigel Moriarty 06 Dec '13

06 Dec '13

Folks Calling for articles and short communications of interest to structural biologists. The deadline for submission in the January 2014 issue is 15 December 2013 but if you can send me an email we can make exceptions so you can use the holiday break to work on your drafts. The Computational Crystallography Newsletter (CCN) is an electronic newsletter for structural biologists, and is published online every 6 months. Feature articles, meeting announcements and reports can be submitted to me at any time for consideration. Submission of text by email or word-processing files using the CCN templates is requested. Past newsletters and a Microsoft Word template are available at www.phenix-online.org/newsletter. Cheers Nigel -- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 1

DEN refinement
by Scott Thomas Walsh 05 Dec '13

05 Dec '13

Dear Phenix Users, Is it possible to use NCS restraints in DEN refinement like we can do in regular phenix.refine refinement? Thank you for your help. Cheers, Scott ************************************************ Scott T. R. Walsh, PhD Assistant Professor University of Maryland IBBR/CBMG 3127E CARB-2 9600 Gudelsky Drive Rockville, MD 20850 USA phone: (240) 314-6478 fax: (240) 314-6225 email: swalsh12(a)umd.edu<mailto:[email protected]>

2 1

new Linux installers
by Nathaniel Echols 05 Dec '13

05 Dec '13

Hi Linux/Phenix users-- We are now building installers on several "new" platforms, including Ubuntu 10.04 and several versions of CentOS (which isn't much different from Fedora, except that it's supported by the virtual machine software we're using). Since we don't actually run these OSes outside of the VMs, we're going to crowd-source the testing a little more than usual. Our goal is to retire our ancient Fedora 3 systems - these are old and slow and take up too much space, but it's also the most compatible with other distributions. I'm hoping that the CentOS 5 builds will be a suitable replacement, or perhaps CentOS 4 (but we can only build the 32-bit installer on that OS). In addition to Ubuntu, I'm particularly interested in hearing whether any of these builds runs smoothly on SuSE and Debian. The virtual machine software supposedly supports these OSes too but I haven't yet managed to install SuSE on it after several attempts. The latest builds are here: https://www.phenix-online.org/download/phenix/nightly/?version=dev-1558&sho… We're missing the 64-bit CentOS 5 build right now, but I hope to get that working in the next few days. thanks, Nat

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] reduce hangs
by Andreas Förster 05 Dec '13

05 Dec '13

Dear all, I'm not sure how much of my conversation with Jeff Headd and the comments from others that I received made it onto the mailing list. The problem with reduce being stuck in an infinite loop and refinement never completing has now a workaround, if no solution: Mark van Raaij pointed out that running refinement repeatedly while varying the number of cores would eventually avoid the infinite loop. I didn't observe that, but while running refinement with a handful of Xeons got stuck, running the same job with the same executable on the same OS with a bucketful of Opterons instead succeeded. As I said, there's no solution but a number of ways to get unstuck if you find yourself in the same situation like Mark and me. Best. Andreas -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [phenixbb] reduce hangs Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 09:46:20 -0500 From: Jeff Headd <jjheadd(a)lbl.gov> To: Andreas Förster <docandreas(a)gmail.com> If the different machine is a slightly different architecture it's possible that it may run, even under the same OS version. My guess is that it's down to slight floating point differences in the coordinates throughout the course of refinement, but it's so hard to pinpoint. If you have access to other machines it is probably worth trying. <snip> Jeff

1 0

Coot not allowing real space refinement when connected to phenix
by Jobichen Chacko 04 Dec '13

04 Dec '13

Dear All, I recently upgraded to latest version of coot (version0.7.2). When I try to do the Real space refine zone option, coot is giving the following complaint (Refinement setup failure. Failed to find restraints for PROLYSILE). But it works fine when I open coot separately from a terminal and read the pdb and mtz file. I downloaded this coot along with the ccp4 package and it also works fine when I open from ccp4 interface. Any suggestions will be much appreciated. Jobi

3 2

hi.
by Hexi Zhang 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

http://satis.egitmeni.org/dxibo/axzjmylquusc.html Hexi Zhang

1 0

reduce hangs
by Andreas Förster 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Dear all, I'm refining a structure with 11 molecules in the asymmetric unit. Recently I took out NCS (data are to 2.2A and differences between molecules of interest). Refinement now stalls halfway through with two reduce jobs running at 100% CPU. The current job has been sitting like this for four days. The last entry in the log file are a few XYZ individual lines. Refinement includes XYZ, TLS, individual B, weight optimization. I launched 8 cycles. Phenix hangs after 4_bss. I've observed this twice in a row. Any suggestions to overcome this, short of going back to using NCS? This is with Phenix dev-1538 on RHEL 6.3. Thanks. Andreas -- Andreas Förster Crystallization and Xray Facility Manager Centre for Structural Biology Imperial College London

4 3

AutoSol/Heavy atom sites/outside the model
by Egor Tchesnokov 03 Dec '13

03 Dec '13

Thank you for the feedback. WinCoot 0.7/Draw/Cell Symmetry brings up "Show Symmetry" window, which only allows to alter the display but not to coincide the heavy atom sites with the model. Am I not looking at the right menu in Coot ? Thank you for your time and help. Egor

1 0

Autobuild combine
by Heather L Condurso 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

Hi all, I am still having issues with Autobuild giving errors during the combine step. I've downloaded the latest build and hope that will solve the problem, but in the mean time I'm having an issue trying to combine the models. I've been following the script: #!/bin/csh -f #COMBINE_MODELS SCRIPT if (-d PDS || -d AutoBuild_run_1_) then echo "Please run in a directory without PDS or AutoBuild_run_1_" exit 1 endif echo "Setting up combine models with a dummy run. NOTE: multiple_models_group_number must be correct" phenix.autobuild fobs.mtz multiple_models=true seq_file=seq.dat combine_only=true multiple_models_group_number=2 multiple_models_number=1 > dummy_autobuild.log echo "Copying files to AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS" mkdir AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS cp coords1.pdb AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS/initial_model.pdb_1_1 cp coords2.pdb AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS/initial_model.pdb_1_2 cp map_coeffs_1.mtz AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS/initial_model.mtz_1_1 cp map_coeffs_2.mtz AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS/initial_model.mtz_1_2 ls AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS/ echo "Running autobuild to combine files in AutoBuild_run_1_/MULTIPLE_MODELS" phenix.autobuild combine_only=true seq_file=seq.dat carry_on=true run=1 > autobuild_combine.log # END OF COMBINE_MODELS SCRIPT # Here are the two log files. I used the expl_fobs_phases_freeR_flags.mtz as fobs.mtz and changed each overall_best.pdb and overall_best_refine_map_coeffs.mtz as the model and map to combine. Thanks, Heather

2 2

AutoSol/Heavy atom sites/outside the model
by Egor Tchesnokov 02 Dec '13

02 Dec '13

Hello, Level: beginner 1. Data collected at wavelength of 0.9537 2. Ran Xtriage: anomalous data seem to extend to 2.2 A 3. Ran Phaser-MR to get partial model (1 copy in AU) 4. Ran AutoSol using partial model and anomalous data AutoSol finds heavy atom sites (FOM=0.69; Overall score=75.6+/-3.3). Coot displays model/density without heavy atoms Heavy atoms are displayed outside the model (using zoom out). Question: what did I do wrong? Thank you for your time and help. Egor

2 1

Red patches of electron density
by Singh, Bishal 01 Dec '13

01 Dec '13

Hi, I am solving a crystal structure at 1.2 Å with completeness 97.3% in the highest resolution shell. There are few small patches of red electron densities on the main chain of a flexible loop at a contour level of ~3sigma of difference ED map. Refinement parameters were following: XYZ coordinates, individual B-factor, optimize X-ray/stereochemistry weight, optimize X-ray/ADP weight and individual Anisotropic ADP for amino acids excluding hydrogen. Target weights are as default in phenix.refine. I already have observed two alternative conformation for this region in another crystal structure. Therefore I am thinking that these red patches are because of lower occupancy of these residues. Please suggest me what shall I do. I shall be grateful for your words. With regards, Bishal Singh University of Heidelberg, Germany

2 1

Iterative build omit map error
by Heather L Condurso 27 Nov '13

27 Nov '13

SO just as my omit map run should have finished, it gave an error instead. I'm running 1.8.4-1496 on a Mac with OSX 10.6.8 and 8GB of memory. Here is the end of the log file: Splitting work into 32 jobs and running with 1 processors using sh background=False in /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0 Final job will be run with sh with background=True Starting job 1...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_1.log Starting job 2...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_2.log Starting job 3...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_3.log Starting job 4...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_4.log Starting job 5...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_5.log Starting job 6...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_6.log Starting job 7...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_7.log Starting job 8...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_8.log Starting job 9...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_9.log Starting job 10...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_10.log Starting job 11...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_11.log Starting job 12...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_12.log Starting job 13...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_13.log Starting job 14...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_14.log Starting job 15...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_15.log Starting job 16...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_16.log Starting job 17...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_17.log Starting job 18...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_18.log Starting job 19...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_19.log Starting job 20...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_20.log Starting job 21...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_21.log Starting job 22...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_22.log Starting job 23...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_23.log Starting job 24...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_24.log Starting job 25...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_25.log Starting job 26...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_26.log Starting job 27...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_27.log Starting job 28...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_28.log Starting job 29...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_29.log Starting job 30...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_30.log Starting job 31...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_31.log Starting job 32...Log will be: /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_32.log ******************************************************************************** Sorry, a subprocess has failed... END OF LOG FILE /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_32.log : /TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_3.pdb R/Rfree=0.32/0.39 Maps from refinement will be filled (2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT) Set refine map coeffs file pdb_file_refine_map_coeffs to refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz Rebuilding side chains from Build_composite_refined_3.pdb Refining model: edit_model.pdb approx_equal eps: 1e-06 approx_equal multiplier: 10000000000.0 0.0197876048373 approx_equal ERROR 0.0197856373852 approx_equal ERROR Refinement strategy: ['individual_sites', 'individual_adp', 'occupancies'] Moving refinement file AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3_001_f_model.mtz to AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/refine_fmodel.mtz Moving refinement file AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3_001.mtz to AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz Model: AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3.pdb R/Rfree=0.33/0.38 Maps from refinement will be filled (2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT) Set refine map coeffs file pdb_file_refine_map_coeffs to refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz ******************************************************************************** Failed to carry out AutoBuild_parallel_omit: ******************************************************************************** Sorry, a subprocess has failed... END OF LOG FILE /Users/stevebruner/Desktop/APS_102313/MdnJB/AutoBuild_run_22_/TEMP0/RUN_FILE_32.log : /TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_3.pdb R/Rfree=0.32/0.39 Maps from refinement will be filled (2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT) Set refine map coeffs file pdb_file_refine_map_coeffs to refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz Rebuilding side chains from Build_composite_refined_3.pdb Refining model: edit_model.pdb approx_equal eps: 1e-06 approx_equal multiplier: 10000000000.0 0.0197876048373 approx_equal ERROR 0.0197856373852 approx_equal ERROR Refinement strategy: ['individual_sites', 'individual_adp', 'occupancies'] Moving refinement file AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3_001_f_model.mtz to AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/refine_fmodel.mtz Moving refinement file AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3_001.mtz to AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz Model: AutoBuild_run_32_/TEMP0/Build_composite_refined_side_3.pdb R/Rfree=0.33/0.38 Maps from refinement will be filled (2FOFCWT PH2FOFCWT) Set refine map coeffs file pdb_file_refine_map_coeffs to refine_map_coeffs_3.mtz ******************************************************************************** Can this be salvaged? It took 5 days to run. I found a section about this in the documentation, but I can't find the maps for each region overall_best_denmod_map_coeffs.mtz_OMIT_REGION_1 etc. I can only find working_best_denmod_map_coeffs.mtz_OMIT_REGION_1 etc. Will these maps work? Can you tell what the error means so that I can avoid this problem in the future? Thanks, Heather

2 1

zero B-factors
by Edna Patricia Matta, Ms 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Hello, Recently I did submit a structure to the PDB but they found that some atoms had zero value for the B-factors. I am new in this filed and I do not know what to do. There have been reports of problems with some versions of phenix about this. I used Phenix 1.8. I repeted the refinement doing restrain NCS-related B-factors but I do not find where to check for the the B-factor values in the the log file. Somebody can help me? Thanks a lot, Edna

7 15

Re: [phenixbb] [ccp4bb] Ligandfit - problem with ligand_start
by Terwilliger, Thomas C 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Hi Danilo, The most likely problem is that the ligand_start file has to have enough atoms in it to define a fixed group in the ligand. The way that ligandfit works is that it breaks a ligand up into rigid groups connected by rotatable bonds. The ligand_start file has to contain one complete rigid group. So probably if you supply a little more of the ligand then it might run. Just to test this, can you try this test of using a ligand_start file: phenix_regression.wizards.test_resolve resolve test_fit_start And then if that gives an "OK", try this: cd test_fit_start phenix.ligandfit ligand=side.pdb ligand_start=start.pdb resolve_map.mtz quick=true Does that run? If you the look at LigandFit_run_1_/TEMP0/resolve_ligand_fit.log Does that say >ligand_start start.pdb Starting configuration of ligand will be read from: start.pdb If all that works, then try adding more atoms to your ligand_start file. Let me know if that doesn't do it! All the best, Tom T Dear all, I am working on a membrane protein covalently bound to a molecular antanna: it is known that this molecule binds to lysine residue but I do not know how many and which lysine residues it binds. 20 diffraction datasets of this protein-ligand complex have been obtained and now, I would quickly localize the ligand using the Fo-Fc map of each data set and using the information on the covalent bound protein-ligand. Ligandfit tool (PHENIX) seems to be indicated to do this; to use the information on the covalent bound, I am using the ligand_start keyword with a pdb containing a ghost atom (however present in ligand model) perfectly superposed to the lysine atom that should bind the ligand. The command used is: phenix.ligandfit data=prot.mtz model=prot.pdb ligand=lig.pdb ligand_start=lig_start.pdb input_labels="FOFCWT PHFOFCWT" \ refine_ligand=True \ nproc=32 \ cif_def_file_list=lig.cif description: - prot.mtz (data) - prot.pdb (protein without ligand) - lig.pdb (ligand containing ghost atom) - lig_start.pdb (ghost atom superpose to NZ of a lysine) - lig.cif (restrain of lig.pdb) Strangely, no ligand is found at the end of the process even reducing ligand_cc_min to 0.01. I have run the same command by using an other protein where an other ligand has been correctly fitted but, also in this case, no ligand has been detected. Conversely, without the use of ligand_start, ligandfit properly localizes the ligand. I'm doing some mistake in the use of ligand_start? Do you know an other tool to perform a ligand fitting in these conditions? Thanks for your answers. Danilo

1 0

Ligandfit - problem with ligand_start
by Danilo Belviso 25 Nov '13

25 Nov '13

Dear all, I am working on a membrane protein bound to a antenna molecule: I know that the molecule binds to lysine residue but I do not know how many and which lysine residues it binds. 20 diffraction datasets of protein-ligand complex have been obtained and now, I would quickly localize the ligand using the Fo-Fc map of each data set and using the information on the covalent bound protein-ligand. Ligandfit tool (PHENIX) seems to be indicated to do this; to use the information on the covalent bound, I have thought to use the ligand_start keyword with a pdb containing a ghost atom (however present in ligand model) perfectly superposed to the lysine atom that should bind the ligand. The command used is: phenix.ligandfit data=prot.mtz model=prot.pdb ligand=lig.pdb ligand_start=lig_start.pdb input_labels="FOFCWT PHFOFCWT" \ refine_ligand=True \ nproc=32 \ cif_def_file_list=lig.cif description: - prot.mtz (data) - prot.pdb (protein without ligand) - lig.pdb (ligand containing ghost atom) - lig_start.pdb (ghost atom superpose to NZ of a lysine) - lig.cif (restrain of lig.pdb) At the end of the processing, ligand is not found. So, I have tryed with ligand_cc_min=0.01, but also in this case ligandfit does not give result. I have thought that no ligand is present. However, to be sure that all was correct, I have run the same command by using an other protein where an other ligand has been correctly fitted. Also in this case, no result has been obtained. Conversely, without the use of ligand_start, ligandfit properly localizes the ligand. I'm doing some mistake in the use of ligand_start? Thanks for your answers. Danilo

1 0

using reference model with polyA chain.
by Francis Reyes 19 Nov '13

19 Nov '13

I'm refining a structure ( at low res ), so I trimmed off all the side chain atoms from my model while my reference model still has these chains. I'm receiving errors like... ----------Correcting rotamer outliers to match reference model---------- ** evaluating rotamers for working model ** A 502 ILE is missing some sidechain atoms, **skipping** A 504 LYS is missing some sidechain atoms, **skipping** A 505 VAL is missing some sidechain atoms, **skipping** I don't care about the side chain atoms, but I'd still like the reference model restraints to provide secondary structure. Does "**skipping**" mean that the reference model is no longer being considered for the particular residue? Or will I still retain my secondary structure from the reference model? Thanks, F --------------------------------------------- Francis E. Reyes PhD 215 UCB University of Colorado at Boulder

2 1