- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Resolution of datasets for using PHENIX automated ligand identification
by Xiao Lei 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

Hi All, I am asking is there any resolution requirement for using the PHENIX automated ligand identification tool. Can I use the tool with 3A resolution protein datasets?

1 0

.hhr files?
by Patrick Loll 02 Sep '17

02 Sep '17

This feels like a silly question, but I’ve already wasted some time head-banging, so here goes: I would like to generate a .hhr sequence alignment file for use in MR-Rosetta. After running HHPRED, I get a lovely alignment, but I see no place to save it as a .hhr file. Several “how-to” pages talk about a “save” button above the alignment, but the MPI bioinformatics pages seem to have been reformatted in the past few months, and I see no such button. There is a tab labeled “raw output” with a download option, but that appears to give a FASTA format. So…can anyone suggest a way forward? Either by capturing the elusive .hhr file, or by saving the data in some other format that is still useful for MR-Rosetta? Thanks, Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrick J. Loll, Ph. D. Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Drexel University College of Medicine Room 10-102 New College Building 245 N. 15th St., Mailstop 497 Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA (215) 762-7706 pjloll(a)gmail.com pjl28(a)drexel.edu

2 1

Few questions about the model building and refinement of cryo-EM data
by Wang, Bing 29 Aug '17

29 Aug '17

Hi guys, Sorry for the detailed questions from a beginner! I am starting a modeling/refinement work for a set of cryo-EM data. Data basic information: phage data (looks like a ball with P1 space group), map size ~870 MB, resolution ~6 A, two X-ray structures for model building General strategies: I select COOT for the model building; using phenix.real_sapce_refine for the real space refinement with secondary structure restrain and REFMAC for the reciprocal space refinement. Few questions are listed here. 1. The map was too bigger to open it in COOT. The phenix.map_to_structure_factors was used to obtaine ~120 MB sized MTZ file (still a little big for my computer). I manually build up the whole ball-shaped phage with the rigid body fit in COOT (from two X-ray structures to 120 chains). My first question will be: In this case, should I crop the map in Chimera or other software and only focus on a small asymmetric unit to do the model building and the followed refinement. 2. I would like to do a real space refinement after the model building. Input files: A pdb file I just built up from COOT A original MAP file A transfered MTZ file Two restraint files from two X-ray structures by ProSMART (TXT formart) The refinement parameters I would like to select in GUI interface: minimization_global, rigid_body, local_grid_search, adp Use secondary structure restraints Reference model restraints: use starting model as reference, main chain, side chain, fix outliers, secondary structure only Rotamer restraints Ramachandran restraints Show per residue My second set of questions: Should I select the MAP file (~870 MB) or the MTZ file (~120 MB)? Is that necessary to add the two restraint files from ProSMART if I use the starting model as reference? Is the refinement parameters selected properly? 3. I gave a try by phenix.real_space_refine. An first error showed up: Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 6840 "ATOM 184 HG1 SER 1 12 .*. H " "ATOM 458 HG1 SER 1 30 .*. H " "ATOM 699 HG1 SER 1 45 .*. H " "ATOM 720 HG1 SER 1 47 .*. H " "ATOM 762 HG1 SER 1 50 .*. H " "ATOM 1241 HG1 SER 1 81 .*. H " "ATOM 1465 HG1 SER 1 95 .*. H " "ATOM 1747 HG1 SER 1 113 .*. H " "ATOM 1758 HG1 SER 1 114 .*. H " "ATOM 2173 HG1 SER 1 141 .*. H " ... (remaining 6830 not shown) I tried phenix.ready_set to fix this problem according to a previous discussion but it gave me another error: ENDMDL record missing at end of input. Thus my third question will be how to fix the first error? Thank you for patience! I would really appreciate your help! Bing

2 1

Opening phenix X-ray/neutron maps in Coot without the Phenix GUI
by Derek Logan 24 Aug '17

24 Aug '17

Hi ccp4bb and phenixbb, Is there a convenient way to open MTZ files in Coot that are the result of joint X-ray/neutron refinement in phenix.refine, but where phenix.refine was run in command-line mode? I would like achieve what is done in the Phenix GUI at the click of a button, i.e. open Coot with the structure and 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps for both neutron and X-ray. At the moment I have to open each MTZ file four times in the Coot GUI, once for each type of map. Is there a script buried somewhere in the Phenix installation that can be modified? /Derek ________________________________________________________________________ Derek Logan tel: +46 46 222 1443 Associate Professor mob: +46 76 8585 707 Dept. of Biochemistry and Structural Biology www.cmps.lu.se<http://www.cmps.lu.se> Centre for Molecular Protein Science bit.ly/2d0HxmS Lund University, Box 124, 221 00 Lund, Sweden

2 1

Master Your Proteins, NKI Amsterdam, 20-23 November 2017
by Anastassis Perrakis 18 Aug '17

18 Aug '17

Dear all, Applications for the Instruct-ERIC course on Biophysical Characterisation of Macromolecules and Quantification of Biomolecular Interactions are now open. The course aims to provide the theoretical background of popular biophysical methods that are often used in relation to Structural Biology research, and practical experience both in performing experiments and in analysing the resulting data. The rationale behind an extended kit of experiments to characterise macromolecules and their interactions will be explained. You will be shown how to perform and analyse the related experiments in dedicated practical sessions. The course will include theory and practical sessions on thermal shift assays (also label free), Surface Plasmon Resonance, sothermal Titration Calorimetry, Miscroscale Thermophoresis , Fluoresence Methods, Stopped Flow, and the Graphpad/Prism and Kintek analysis software. Details can be found at: https://www.structuralbiology.eu/events/biophysical-characterisation-of-mac… <https://www.structuralbiology.eu/events/biophysical-characterisation-of-mac…> On the behalf of the organisers, Tassos

1 0

Macromolecular Crystallography workshop in South America
by Alejandro Buschiazzo 18 Aug '17

18 Aug '17

Dear colleagues, We are pleased to announce our sixth edition of the Workshop: Macromolecular Crystallography School "From data processing to structure refinement and beyond", to be held at the Institut Pasteur de Montevideo (Uruguay). http://pasteur.uy/mx2017 Dates: November 13 - 23, 2017 Confirmed speakers and tutors (so far... a few more may join the crew): Alejandro Buschiazzo, Montevideo, Uruguay Paul Emsley, Cambridge, UK Richard Garrat, São Carlos, Brazil Ronan Keegan, Oxford, UK Eugene Krissinel, Oxford, UK Andrey Lebedev, Oxford, UK Andrew Leslie, Cambridge, UK Garib Murshudov, Cambridge, UK Colin Palmer, Oxford, UK James Parkhurst, Oxford, UK Randy Read, Cambridge, UK Clemens Vonrhein, Cambridge, UK Please find the program of the Workshop, the application form and further contact information, at http://pasteur.uy/mx2017 (this www site will be updated regularly, so stay tuned!) This Workshop is supported by the Collaborative Computational Project Nº4 (CCP4, UK) & Science and Technology Facilities Council (UK); the Centro de Biologia Estructural del Mercosur (CeBEM); the International Union of Crystallography (IUCr); and the Institut Pasteur de Montevideo. Organizers: Alejandro Buschiazzo, PhD. Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Uruguay Ronan Keegan, PhD. CCP4, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, United Kingdom Richard Garratt, PhD. Instituto de Fisica de Sao Carlos, USP, Brazil Applicants: 24 students will be selected, aiming at advanced PhD, postdocs and young researchers. The Course will provide financial support covering registration fees, and for the case of those students coming from abroad, all local expenses (lodging, per diem and local transportation). Look in the www site for details on application procedures. The application deadline is September 17, 2017. Please address further inquiries to: mx2017(a)pasteur.edu.uy Looking forward to welcoming you in Montevideo! -- Alejandro Buschiazzo, PhD Associate Professor Laboratory of Molecular & Structural Microbiology Institut Pasteur de Montevideo Mataojo 2020 Montevideo 11400 URUGUAY Phone: +598 25220910 int. 120 Fax: +598 25224185 http://pasteur.uy/en/laboratorios-eng/microbiologia-estructural-y-molecular…

1 0

Postdoctoral position at the University of Chicago
by Robert Keenan 16 Aug '17

16 Aug '17

The Keenan lab at the University of Chicago has an opening for a postdoctoral scientist to study the structure and function of protein complexes involved in membrane protein biogenesis and quality control. Applicants should be nearing completion of a PhD in structural biology and have a strong academic record with significant publications. Experience in molecular biology, protein purification and electron microscopy/x-ray crystallography is required. To apply, please send a CV and a short statement describing your motivation for wanting to join the lab. Please be prepared to arrange for three letters of reference to be sent by email. For more information, please visit our webpage: http://keenanlab.bsd.uchicago.edu

1 0

Phenix.real_space_refine
by Reza Khayat 11 Aug '17

11 Aug '17

Hi, I am refining a virus into an image reconstruction and have been having issues using the NCS capability of phenix.real_space_refine_1.12-2829. I think it may be my misunderstanding of the manual. The virus has 60subunits and I am feeding phenix a complete oligomer. I manually modify the first subunit with coot (simple movements and such), define an NCS group file where the first subunit is the reference and the other 59 are selection, and feed these into phenix.real_space_refine. Does phenix recapitulate my modifications of the first subunit into the remaining 59 subunits to create an oligomer that contains all my modifications before starting refinement? Reza Khayat, PhD Assistant Professor City College of New York Department of Chemistry New York, NY 10031

2 1

Appplying symmetry to a Cryo-EM map in phenix map_to _model
by Joshua Jude Lobo 11 Aug '17

11 Aug '17

Hi Phenix Group I am very new to model building and using phenix . I am trying to use phenix.map_to_model to generate a model just using my cryo-EM map( mrc format) and a fasta sequence .My protein has octahedral symmetry . I found the use_space_group_symmetry argument but am not sure what argument to give to impose the symmetry . Any inputs are appreciated Sincerely Joshua Lobo University of Minnesota Twin Cities

2 3

seeking advice on how to configure Phaser-MR (full-featured) to use a previous partial solution
by Emilia C. Arturo (Emily) 09 Aug '17

09 Aug '17

Hello. I have a 3-domain protein (let's say it's organized from N to C as A-B-C) whose structure I am working to determine now. Although several single- (A alone, B alone), double- (A+B and B+C) and 3-domain (A+B+C) structures of this protein (from a different organism whose primary sequence is, overall, ~85% identical to the one on which I'm working) have already been determined and deposited in the PDB, I would ideally like to use a minimal probe (i.e. as few domains as possible) in order avoid model bias that could be imposed on the relative orientation of domains A, B, and C. So far, I have phase solutions (TFZ scores for all in the high-50s and 60s) using B-only, A+B, and B+C pdb files as probes. A-only structures have not given a phase solution (TFZ is ~7 and autobuild gives a solution that looks unbelievable in Coot), perhaps because A is relatively small in size. Here is my problem: I suspect that A and B sit relative to one another in an interesting way in this particular structure, so I'd like to use Phaser to search for a solution given the fixed partial solution from a B-only search, together with an A-only structure as a separate probe. So far no MR solutions have been found when I configure the run with an A-only pdb file and a B-only-derived Phaser result that is input as a fixed partial solution. I'm writing to ask for advice on how to configure the search. I think that the problem is my configuring the search, and not that a solution cannot be found from these coordinates. This is the reason I think that my problem is in configuring the search; please correct me if I'm wrong: Using a Phaser result derived from using an A+B structure as probe, I cut up the resulting pdb file into 2 pdb files - one containing an A' and another containing a B', where A' is the A domain of the Phaser result, and B' is the B-only part. Then I configured a Phaser result with B' as an ensemble that is a fixed partial solution, and A' as a separate ensemble/probe. I searched for 4 of each since 4 chains is the most likely composition in the ASU. I expected to get a result similar to what Phaser calculated when I input the A+B structure as an intact probe. Instead of getting a solution where 4 A+B chains were placed as they were in the first Phaser result, which gave one solution with a TFZ score of 65, I got 13 solutions, the top scoring a TFZ of 7.5, and each solution having a total of 9 chains - 4 As and 5 Bs. Is anyone willing to help me troubleshoot the above before I throw up my hands and settle on either manually building two domains onto the single-domain solution, or one domain onto the 2-domain solution, keeping in mind the potential for model bias? I am keen on using the B-only solution as a fixed partial solution to place domain A because all the B-only structures provide coordinate information for a portion of domain B that is unresolved in any of the multi-domain structures that contain domain B. I am using the Phenix gui, version 1.12rc1-2807. Regards, Emily. -- "Study as if you were going to live forever; live as if you were going to die tomorrow." - Maria Mitchell "I'm not afraid of storms for I'm learning to sail my ship." - Louisa May Alcott

2 1

Very low rmsd bond length
by Mark Saper 07 Aug '17

07 Aug '17

Hi all, A reviewer points out that my refined structures (which have already been deposited in PDB) have very small RMSD values for bond lengths (0.005–0.002) (refinement resolutions are 2.0–2.8 Å), and that my weights should be decreased. The weights were calculated with “Optimize XYZ Weight” option turned ON. This seems to be the case with all of the structures that I have refined during the past 5 years. My impression from previous discussions is that deriving explicit weights from these optimized ones is not straightforward and so I have never tried to relax the weights. Moreover inspecting the optimization results in the log file, suggest that changing the weights to increase the RMSD would increase the Rfree. (I can post this if its helpful). How do I address the reviewer’s concerns? Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ Mark A. Saper, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Biological Chemistry, U-M Medical School Room 3220B, MSRB III saper(a)umich.edu +1 (734) 764-3353

6 6

Comput. Cryst. Newsl. (2017) 2
by Nigel Moriarty 05 Aug '17

05 Aug '17

The latest Computational Crystallography Newsletter is available for download. Below is the clickable table of contents. July 2017 <https://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2017_07.pdf> Short Communications - phenix.mtriage: a tool for analysis and validation of cryo-EM 3D reconstructions <https://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2017_07.pdf#page=6> - More TLS validation with phenix.tls_analysis <https://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2017_07.pdf#page=8> Fitting tips #14 – How Ser & Thr behave oddly on helices <https://www.phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2017_07.pdf#page=2> Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

3 4

mrc to mtz conversion to open map in coot
by Joshua Jude Lobo 04 Aug '17

04 Aug '17

Hi phenixbb I am new to phenix and am trying to convert a cryo-em map(mrc format) to mtz format using the phenix.map_to_structure_factors command .This proceess finishes without errors but the resultant mtz file is not viewable in coot . I have tried both the phenix.map_to_model and the phenix.map_to_model_histogram_1.12-2829 How is the best way to troubleshoot this ? Any inputs would be appreciated Sincerely Joshua Lobo University of Minnesota Twin Cities

3 5

Berkeley servers are back in service
by Billy Poon 04 Aug '17

04 Aug '17

Hi everybody, The servers at Berkeley are now available. Please let us know of any issues. Thanks! -- Billy K. Poon Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720 Tel: (510) 486-5709 Fax: (510) 486-5909 Web: https://phenix-online.org

1 0

Lab Evac
by Nigel Moriarty 04 Aug '17

04 Aug '17

Folks The Grizzly Fire (the media loves a interesting name) is more than 50% contained and the lab is now open. The servers are, once again, available for downloading the latest version of Phenix, 1.12. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

Emergency shutdown
by Nigel Moriarty 03 Aug '17

03 Aug '17

Folks Phenix servers are shutting down due to a grass fire in the area. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

Postdoctoral position in Structure and Function of Fungal Membrane Proteins
by Maike Bublitz 02 Aug '17

02 Aug '17

Postdoctoral position in Structure and Function of Fungal Membrane Proteins A post-doctoral position is available in the research group of Associate Prof. Maike Bublitz at the Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford. The project aims to understand the structure and function of fungal membrane transport proteins identified as potential new drug targets, using a combination of state-of-the-art structural (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM) and biochemical/biophysical techniques. Applicants should hold a PhD in a relevant subject area, such as membrane protein biochemistry or structural biology. Experience in native or recombinant membrane protein expression, purification and either structural determination or functional analysis using biochemical and biophysical techniques is essential. Ability to work in a team as well as contribute to supervision activities and excellent verbal and written communication skills are expected. Experience in protein X-ray crystallography and/or cryo-EM is an advantage. To apply for this role and for further details, including the job description and selection criteria, please click on the link below: https://www.recruit.ox.ac.uk/pls/hrisliverecruit/erq_jobspec_details_form.j… Applications for this vacancy are to be made online by 31th August 2017.

1 0

(no subject)
by Priyanka Abeyrathne 22 Jul '17

22 Jul '17

1 0

Phenix version 1.12 released
by Paul Adams 15 Jul '17

15 Jul '17

The Phenix developers are pleased to announce that version 1.12 of Phenix is now available (build 1.12-2829). Binary installers for Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows platforms are available at the download site: http://phenix-online.org/download/ Highlights for this version: New tools for secondary structure validation, comparing multiple related structures, cryo-EM model and map validation, and calculation of real space difference maps. Video tutorials are now available on the new Phenix Tutorial YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/c/phenixtutorials). A suite of tools for cryo-EM model building and structure refinement including automated map sharpening, segmentation, and model building. Real space refinement now has an option to use histogram equalized map as a refinement target. Phaser version 2.8 has several new features, including unit cell refinement for EM data, more extensive use of eLLG in decision making and analysis, anomalous substructure determination (Phassade), improved tNCS detection and analysis, and improvements to SCEDS. - NEW TOOLS - phenix.secondary_structure_validation - tool to validate secondary structure section in .pdb and .mmcif files with option to filter bad annotations. - Structure Comparison: tool for parallel validation and analysis of near-identical protein structures. Results include the analysis of ligands, rotamers, Ramachandran angles, missing atoms, water locations and B-factors. - phenix.mtriage: command-line tool to validate cryo-EM models. GUI is available. Computes various map statistics including resolution estimates, FSC between half-maps, full and model maps. Outputs mask file used to compute FSC. Still under development. - phenix.real_space_diff_map: command-line tool to compute difference map. This is a real-space analogue of Fo-Fc map mainly designed for cryo-EM maps. See http://phenix-online.org/newsletter/CCN_2017_01.pdf for details. - PHENIX VIDEO TUTORIALS Video tutorials about Phenix tools are now available on the Phenix Tutorial YouTube channel (www.youtube.com/c/phenixtutorials). The following topics are covered: - How to run phenix.refine - How to calculate polder maps - How to run phenix.real_space_refine - How to run PDB tools - How to change phenix.refine parameters via the GUI - Basic Phenix eLBOW tutorial - How to run Phaser-MR from the Phenix GUI - Explaining the atom selection syntax - How to run Structure Comparison - NEW FEATURES - Phenix.auto_sharpen: New map sharpening algorithms available based on (1) optimization of map clarity (adjusted surface area or kurtosis), (2) resolution-dependent map-model correlation, (3) resolution-dependent half-map correlation, and (4) local map sharpening - Phenix.map_to_model: Iterative map improvement using model from one cycle to optimize sharpening of the map for the next cycle - Phenix.map_to_object: Now you can individually map each member of a group of chains onto your target - Phenix.chain_comparison: Now can compare a target to each of a group of models - Phenix.find_alt_orig_sym_mate: Now uses ssmalignment.stats to see what residue pairs were included by ssm in a hypothetical calculation of the ssm-rmsd. This is to avoid including atoms that even for an optimal structural alignmentwould have been too far apart that ssm would use them. Excluding these is necessary to avoid having the calculated rmsd blow up. - Now using angles for restraining hydrogen bonds in alpha helices and beta sheets in secondary structure restraints. - Phenix.polder: New option (compute_box=True) to compute a difference map excluding the bulk solvent mask within a user-defined box. The map can be used to inspect interesting difference density peaks. - phenix.map_model_cc (phenix.model_map_cc): various enhancements and bug fixes. - phenix.real_space_refine: - improved ADP refinement (still group) - improved NCS constraints definition - multi-model PDB file is not output by default anymore - (experimental) option to use masked histogram equalized map as refinement target. Using such map dramatically improves refined model geometry. This map is not suitable for ADP refinement. - show CCmask, CCvolume and CCpeaks that report on local and gloabal model to map fit. - RESTRAINTS - Specialised restraints for ligands with differing chemistry in the same model allows using the same 3-letter code but different restraints for a specific instance - apply_cif_restraints - Detailed control of peptide planes and omega angles - apply_all_trans - apply_peptide_plane - apply_cis_trans_specification: use an atom selection (CA) to force a cis or trans omega angle - REEL - Improvements to robustness and features - GUI - New interfaces - phenix.mtriage - phenix.map_box - phenix.auto_sharpen - phenix.map_to_model - phenix.ncs_average (under "Other Tools") - phenix.sculpt_ensemble (alpha) - Updated interfaces - Comprehensive Validation shows real-space correlations from phenix.map_model_cc when map files are used - Structure Comparison - Validation - improved speed of clashscore validation - bug fix to handling of cis-peptides in ramalyze - contours for ramalyze, rotalyze, and cablam now accessible at https://github.com/rlabduke/reference_data - validation GUI now shows altloc identifirs for most outliers - improved internal code accessibility of validation statistics - Phaser-2.8.0 - refinement of cell for data (electron micrcoscopy) - more analysis using eLLG for component addition - more analysis using eLLG for polyalanine residues for target eLLG given rms - more analysis using eLLG for single atoms more ordered than average - more analysis using eLLG for chains/gyre-and-gimble * Phassade: Fast Fourier Transform Anomalous Substructure Determination - SOLU TRIAL records RF-LLG for trial orientation - gyre and translation function report RF recorded for trial orientations - 'scons --ccp4' command line flag for ccp4 build (generates ccp4-style headers) * improved tNCS detection and analysis * gyre and gimble improved for output and python scripting * NMA outputs all perturbed files in MODEL delimited pdb file '<fileroot>.nma.pdb' * sceds outputs domains to chain delimited file '<fileroot>.nma.pdb' - sceds domain pdb file have TER separated domains - NMA option to output separate pdb files for each perturbation (XYZOUT NMA ALL OFF) - sceds option to output separate pdb files for each domain (XYZOUT NMA ALL OFF) - NMA has option to turn off output of input coordinates (NMA ORIG ON) - pdb chain identifies can be left unchanged from input (XYZOUT CHAIN COPY) (for Eleanor) - bugfixes -- allow peaks and purge percent to override one another if not default -- rms estimation developer options not being set correctly -- throw out of memory error if Patterson map allocation fails For a full list of changes see: http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/CHANGES Please note that this publication should be used to cite use of Phenix: PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. P. D. Adams, P. V. Afonine, G. Bunkóczi, V. B. Chen, I. W. Davis, N. Echols, J. J. Headd, L.-W. Hung, G. J. Kapral, R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve, A. J. McCoy, N. W. Moriarty, R. Oeffner, R. J. Read, D. C. Richardson, J. S. Richardson, T. C. Terwilliger and P. H. Zwart. Acta Cryst. D66, 213-221 (2010). Full documentation is available here: http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/ There is a Phenix bulletin board: http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb/ Please consult the installer README file or online documentation for installation instructions. Direct questions and problem reports to the bulletin board or: help(a)phenix-online.org and bugs(a)phenix-online.org Commercial users interested in obtaining access to Phenix should visit the Phenix website for information about the Phenix Industrial Consortium. The development of Phenix is principally funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH) under grant P01-GM063210. We also acknowledge the generous support of the members of the Phenix Industrial Consortium. -- Paul Adams Division Director, Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 33, Room 347 Building 80, Room 247 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

1 0

Problem with smiles string in elbow
by Edward A. Berry 14 Jul '17

14 Jul '17

I'm not getting the expected result with this string: COC(=O)C(=COC)c1ccccc1COC(N1C)=CC(=N1)C(=C2O)C=C(Cl)C=C2 When used with coot Lidia it gives the expected result (upper picture). But when I run elbow like this: phenix.elbow --smiles="COC(=O)C(=COC)c1ccccc1COC(N1C)=CC(=N1)C(=C2O)C=C(Cl)C=C2" --output="Y7303" --id="Y03" the result is the lower picture. In particular the pyrazole ring (arrow) gets distorted, but other bond lengths are way off. I want to use elbow because it names the atoms as numbered in the order they appear in the smiles string, irrespective of the element. This is good because this is one of a series of compounds in some of which C's are replaced by N's and vice versa so it helps to have the same number for atoms in the same position. What does work is to save the structure as .mol from Lidia and feed that to elbow, which gives the right structure and the elbow atom names. But it would be good to find out why it isn't working directly. my elbow is: electronic Ligand Builder & Optimisation Workbench (eLBOW) 1.12rc1-2801 None

1 0

Problem with rotamer refinement
by Renato Ferras 12 Jul '17

12 Jul '17

Dear all, I am refining a protein structure at 1.74 A resolution with phenix.refine (version 1.10.1_2155) and I have noticed that some side chains don't remain in the electronic density even after careful hand adjustment in which they are almost perfect. It seems pretty clear where the side chain should (must) be located, moreover it is consistent with two rotamers (either rotamer tp60 - #4 in coot - or rotamer tp-100 - #9 in coot -, which are approx. at 180 deg for chi3). In spite of that, after reciprocal space refinement, I observe that the end of side chain rotates chi3 angle and both N and O gets far from where they started (there is this difference in the chi3 angle). My concerns are about the proper interpretation of geometrical restraints listed in .geo file, specially what the ideal value is, how weights are applied to ideal value and why phenix doesn't reach convergence in reciprocal space refinement. Below are the values from .geo for the referred Gln: dihedral pdb=" CB GLN B 21 " pdb=" CG GLN B 21 " pdb=" CD GLN B 21 " pdb=" OE1 GLN B 21 " ideal model delta sinusoidal sigma weight residual 0.00 23.41 -23.41 2 3.00e+01 1.11e-03 8.42e-01 is there a description for us to interpret what these numbers are? To my understanding, the ideal values are established as being either 0 or 180 degrees (yet sinusoidal 2). I cannot say about how heavy the weights are on these (in fact, I left my refinement to optimize weights), but anyway, if I understand correctly, the ideal value (for chi3) should be rotamer dependent. Taking Gln as an example, I see several rotamers do have values close to either 0 or 180 degree, but what about rotamers 4 and 9? I might imagine a similar situation for residues like Asn and His, though I have not searched deep for these yet. Thanks, Renato

2 1

crystal imaging system
by Sebastiano Pasqualato 30 Jun '17

30 Jun '17

Dear all, we are in the process of considering the purchase of a new Crystal Imager. So far, we have been considering the Formulatrix Rock Imager 182 and the TriTek Crystal Pro HT. I would be extremely grateful to anyone who could provide me: - feedback and user experience (positive/negative) on those instruments; - information on other instruments you would suggest. Thank you very much in advance, wishing you a pleasant weekend, best regards, ciao, S -- Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD Crystallography Unit Department of Experimental Oncology European Institute of Oncology IFOM-IEO Campus via Adamello, 16 20139 - Milano Italy tel +39 02 9437 5167 fax +39 02 9437 5990 web http://is.gd/IEOXtalUnit

2 1

Phenix polder error
by Avinash Punekar 27 Jun '17

27 Jun '17

Dear all, When I run phenix.polder through command line, I get a message "Sorry: Multiple equally suitable arrays of observed xray data found." and phenix.polder stops without producing the maps. How to solve this problem? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks, Avinash

2 1

does phenix refine fill in missing data?
by Ursula Schulze-Gahmen 23 Jun '17

23 Jun '17

I have very anisotropic data. I used the staraniso webserver to analyse and process my data which creates a final merged file with very incomplete data in the outer shells. If I use this data file in Phenix, what will happen? Will Phenix automatically fill in the unobserved data? If so, can I prevent it from doing so? I am importing the data with the reflection file editor and it seems the reflections are being filled in already at this stage. Ursula -- Ursula Schulze-Gahmen, Ph.D. Project Scientist UC Berkeley, QB3 360 Stanley Hall #3220 Berkeley, CA 94720-3220 (510) 643 9491

2 1

Cif file recognition
by Joel Tyndall 22 Jun '17

22 Jun '17

Hi there, Having a few minor issues with my phenix setup on windows 10. I have the latest stable build Phenix1.11.1-2575. When introducing a new ligand that exists in the monomer library, Pheix complains it does not have the geometry restraints (cif file) - somehow it is not seeing its own library. How can I set up the cif library as default? Cheers Joel Joel Tyndall | BSc(Hons) PhD Associate Professor in Medicinal Chemistry School of Pharmacy | Te Kura Mātauraka Wai-whakaora University of Otago | Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo PO Box 56 9054 Dunedin | Ōtepoti New Zealand | Aotearoa Ph: 64 3 479 7293 Skype: jtyndall Website | pharmacy.otago.ac.nz

2 1

sculptor modifications
by Emilia C. Arturo (Emily) 21 Jun '17

21 Jun '17

Hello All, Is there a way to identify quickly the changes to a model that Sculptor has made? I am running the Phenix GUI to use Sculptor. I have read through the out-put log file, and understand (mostly) the sculpt protocol as it relates to the circumstances under which modifications to main chain or side chains are made, but it would be nice to see (in a list format, perhaps) what changes (if any...) were made. Regards, Emily. -- "Study as if you were going to live forever; live as if you were going to die tomorrow." - Maria Mitchell "I'm not afraid of storms for I'm learning to sail my ship." - Louisa May Alcott

4 3

phenix.map_to_model input mtz file failure
by dancingdream＠163.com 19 Jun '17

19 Jun '17

Dear Phenix bb, I intend to build a initial model by phenix.map_to_model. And the command line is as follows: phenix.map_to_model_1.12rc0-2787 map_coeffs_file=../rep_dm.mtz map_coeffs_labels="'FP,SIGFP' 'PHIDM' 'FOMDM'" seq_file=../resolve.seq is_crystal=True use_sg_symmetry=True density_select=False truncate_at_d_min=True and the feedback like this: Sorry: No initial assignment made for map_coeffs. Labels used: FP,SIGFP PHIDM FOMDM. Available labels: ['PHIB', 'FOM', 'HLA,HLB,HLC,HLD', 'FP,SIGFP', 'PHIDM', 'FOMDM', 'FDM', 'HLADM,HLBDM,HLCDM,HLDDM'] NOTE: grouped labels like 'FP,SIGFP' must stay together, have commas, and have no spaces. If they come from an MTZ file, they must be in adjacent columns as well. Suggested labels to use: PHIDM FOMDM I try many other input format of map_coeffs_labels, such as map_coeffs_labels="FP,SIGFP PHIDM FOMDM" map_coeffs_labels=["FP,SIGFP PHIDM FOMDM"] ... ... but the result is the same. Dose anyone can tell me how to fix this problem? Thank a lot. -- Wei Ding P.O.Box 603 The Institute of Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing,China 100190 Tel: +86-10-82649083 E-mail: dingwei(a)iphy.ac.cn

7 20

Overall anisotropic ADP in phenix.real_space_refine?
by Oliver Clarke 18 Jun '17

18 Jun '17

Hi, I wonder in phenix.real_space_refine whether it may be worth adding refinement of a single overall anisotropic ADP to the model - or a single TLS group with modeled anisotropic ADPs - in order to model the effects of overall orientation errors (which affect resolution more substantially towards the periphery) and preferred orientation (which tends to give rise to anisotropic resolution across the volume). Maybe this would be helpful at least in generating a calculated map that is better for difference map calculation, for example? Cheers Oli

1 0

real_space_refine questions
by Daniel Larsson 14 Jun '17

14 Jun '17

I'm have some questions about doing real space refinements using phenix.real_space_refine. I am refining a model for an intermediate-resolution (3.79 Å) cryo-EM map. As the starting point I use a model from a higher-resolution map (3.25 Å) of the same system in another conformation. My idea is to first do rigid body fitting of domains and then gradually relax constrains and restraints. - Is it possible to restrain the position of certain parts of the model (i.e. "freeze" them so that they move at all) to do focused refinement of subdomains or loops? - In the instructions it says that you can do both NCS constraints and restraints. How you do the latter? I can only do the former by default or by defining ncs_constraints=True and give a NCS definition file. - When I do a run with run=rigid_body, some rigid body groups move in to each other and overlap. Is there no collision detection using this algorithm? If I do a run=minimization_global, things work a bit better in this regard, but is not really what I want (at this stage). Am I doing something wrong? Here is the run command and the rigid body definition file: phenix.real_space_refine \ model.pdb \ map.ccp4 \ rigid.eff \ resolution=8.0 \ ncs_constraints=False \ rotamer_restraints=True \ ramachandran_restraints=True \ c_beta_restraints=True \ run=rigid_body \ macro_cycles=10 # rigid.eff: refinement { rigid_body { group = chain A and resseq 101:266 group = chain A and resseq 273:388 group = chain B and resseq 101:266 group = chain B and resseq 273:388 group = chain C and resseq 104:266 group = chain C and resseq 273:388 } } Regards, Daniel Larsson

3 3

Computational Crystallography Newsletter (CCN) submissions
by Nigel Moriarty 14 Jun '17

14 Jun '17

Folks Calling for articles and short communications of interest to structural biologists. The initial deadline for submission for the July 2017 issue is 30 June 2017. The Computational Crystallography Newsletter (CCN) is an electronic newsletter for structural biologists, and is published online every 6 months. Feature articles, meeting announcements and reports can be submitted to me at any time for consideration. Submission of text by email or word-processing files using the CCN templates is requested. Past newsletters and a Microsoft Word template are available at www.phenix-online.org/newsletter. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

preparing DL-Malic acid stock solution
by Sebastiano Pasqualato 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

Dear all, we’ve recently having trouble preparing a 3 M stock solution of DL-Malic Acid, pH 7 (which we had, so it’s doable!). When we reach pH 3 - 4 the solution turns milky white and does not goes back to a clear solution even when the pH is raised. Does anybody have any advice on how to get a clear solution? Has anyone gone through the same? Thanks in advance, ciao, Sebastiano -- Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD Crystallography Unit Department of Experimental Oncology European Institute of Oncology IFOM-IEO Campus via Adamello, 16 20139 - Milano Italy tel +39 02 9437 5167 fax +39 02 9437 5990 web http://is.gd/IEOXtalUnit

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] AutoSol invalid MTZ column_types error
by Terwilliger, Thomas Charles 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

Hi Mintu, I'm sorry about this problem! I should have fixed it already but missed this message from Phil Evans that he posted in January: "Columns N(+) and N(-), both of type I, are recent additions to the output file from Aimless. They are the number of observations merged into I(+) and I(-) respectively" AutoSol doesn't know about these columns and can accidentally guess that they are data. To get around this column, use a command like this to create a data file that does not contain the N(+) and N(-) columns: phenix.reflection_file_converter aimless.mtz --mtz=aimless_noN.mtz --label="I(+" ?where the --label=xxxx command specifies the first few characters of the columns you want to use as I+/I- data. Then use aimless_nonN.mtz instead of aimless.mtz as input to autosol. I will fix this in autosol. Let me know if that does not do it! All the best, Tom T Dear all, I am getting an error message "Invalid MTZ column_types for the given miller_array." while I try to run AutoSol. The last line in the log is "Adding array ['N(+)', 'N(-)'] to output file with type II". Do you have any suggestion how to fix this error? Thanks a lot in advance. Best, Mintu

1 0

comfortable OS X level
by Patrick Loll 08 Jun '17

08 Jun '17

I’m still running Yosemite on my Macs, both because I’m change-averse and because folks reported problems with some crystallographic software upon upgrading the OS. These reports have now faded into the haze of the past, and so I ask, have the issues been resolved? Is it safe to move to Sierra? Thanks as always, Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrick J. Loll, Ph. D. Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Drexel University College of Medicine Room 10-102 New College Building 245 N. 15th St., Mailstop 497 Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA (215) 762-7706 pat.loll(a)drexelmed.edu

3 2

ligand - protein close contact
by Nikos Pinotsis 07 Jun '17

07 Jun '17

Dear all, I have a protein-ligand structure with several chains in the AU. After refinement one of the ligands forms a close contact 1.8A with the protein. For the rest of the protein-ligand chains the same interaction is as expected to 2.7-2.8 A forming an H-bond. I tried to adjust this ligand with coot but everytime I am getting back the same 1.8 A close contact. There is enough density for the ligand and I can even see that it can fit better to distance 2.4-2.5A H-bond with the protein Is there a way to constrain this distance to more than 2A? Should I fix the ligand atom that interacts? Unless I am missing something more fundamental. The ligand cif file is the default in phenix, the data set is a quite decent 2.3A. thanks in advance for any suggestions Nikos -- Dr. Nikos Pinotsis Institute of Structural and Molecular Biology Department of Biological Sciences, 3rd Floor, R313 Birkbeck College Malet Street London WC1E 7HX T: +44 (0)207 631 6827 F: +44 (0)207 631 6803 M: +44 (0)792 384 3593

3 3

Composite omit map
by Sam Tang 06 Jun '17

06 Jun '17

Dear all Sorry for a very basic question about generating an omit map. I am trying to generate a SA-omit map for only my ligand but not the protein core of my complex. I presume I can use phenix.composite_omit_map GUI and specify my ligand chain in Atom Selection? All other parameters being the same, I notice that when I did not select any atom the whole structure was divided to 30-40 regions but when I selected my ligand chain it now divides into 89 regions. Is there a reason why and is there any advantage to manually adjust the number of omit regions? Many thanks and regards Sam Biochemistry Programme, School of Life Sciences, CUHK

3 5

Fitting ligand with DM map?
by Sam Tang 04 Jun '17

04 Jun '17

Dear community I guess it may not be a standard practice but I wonder if anyone has tried to use a density modified map for ligand building. My situation is that I am trying to fit a single strand DNA ligand into an enzyme model. The dataset is at 3 Ang, P1 space, with overall completeness of only about 88%. MR was done by the apo-enzyme and the density for the first two-third of the ligand is very good and could easily be modelled. Towards the last one-third the density becomes much weaker so nucleotides cannot be easily put. This is the only dataset so far, so multi-crystal averaging / map averaging is not possible at this stage. NCS averaging is also not possible. We did try to sharpen map during refinement. I understand that DM is usually used to improve phase at the initial stage esp. with experimental phasing. With MR would you think density modification could produce a better map to aid the modelling of the last one-third ligand? Can I use the denmod.mtz directly for manual model building? Any input would be very much appreciated. Best Sam Biochemistry Programme, CUHK

2 1

Questions on TLS output and more info on phenix.tls
by Michael Garavito 30 May '17

30 May '17

I am finishing the final stages of refinement with TLS at 1.7 Å and want to begin some B-factor analysis. Also, I am setting up for a series of ensemble refinements. However, I am second guessing myself and have been finding that several basic questions that are not explicitly answered by the Phenix documentation. (1) Just to be sure, I looked for the definition of what is written in the ATOM records of the output PDB file after refinement with TLS: residual B or total B (residual B + TLS contribution). I always thought the latter after refinement with TLS, but nothing was explicitly stated. (2) Also, I have looked for it extensively in the Phenix documentation, I have not found any information on phenix.tls, even though in several places (e.g., phenix.ensemble_refinement), there are explicit references to phenix.tls: “If TLS is used the TLS components must be present in the atom records (see phenix.tls)” The information from just doing % phenix.tls -h does not give enough insight into options and there use. Can someone point me to the right place to get these answers? Thanks, Michael **************************************************************** R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D. Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 513 Biochemistry Bldg. Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1319 Office: (517) 355-9724 Lab: (517) 353-9125 FAX: (517) 353-9334 Email: garavito(a)msu.edu ****************************************************************

2 1

Linking C-Type Heme
by Julian Esselborn 24 May '17

24 May '17

Hi list, that might sound like a stupid question, but we are having some trouble getting phenix.refine acknowledging a c-type linkage of a heme. That is a covalent Cys SG bond to C18 or C25 in the heme. The pdb file does contain a LINK record for this, but Ready Set seems to ignore that even if told to look for LINK records. The distance in the model is actually around 1.9 Ä and automatic ligand linking is on and set well below that distance. Any ideas why this might be failing and what is the smartest way to proceed? Any ideas highly appreciated. Thanks a lot Julian Esselborn Tezcan Lab UC San Diego

2 1

Research Track Assistant Professor Positions
by Diana Tomchick 22 May '17

22 May '17

Assistant Professor, Research Track Department of Biophysics The Structural Biology Laboratory at UT Southwestern Medical Center currently has two openings at the non-tenure track Research Assistant Professor level for highly-motivated individuals who enjoy working in a collaborative, multi-disciplinary setting. · Position #1: Cryo-electron microscopist with extensive experience in high resolution single-particle reconstruction, including sample grid preparation, data collection, the use of modern software for particle picking and classification, map generation, model building and structure validation. Experience in cryo-EM tomography is a plus. · Position #2: X-ray crystallographer with extensive experience in modern methods of crystallization, data collection using home and synchrotron sources, structure solution via various experimental techniques, refinement and structure validation. For both positions, a Ph.D. in biochemistry, chemistry, physics or a related field is required. Facility with related techniques for each position such as cryo-electron microscopy, X-ray crystallography, NMR, small-angle X-ray scattering, isothermal titration calorimetry, analytical ultracentrifugation and protein expression and purification is highly desirable. Job requirements include a significant amount of both formal and informal teaching, and teaching experience is highly desirable. Salary is competitive and commensurate with experience and qualifications. About the UT Southwestern Structural Biology Laboratory The Structural Biology Laboratory (Diana Tomchick, Director) is a platform that allows researchers with different expertise to come together in a collaborative setting and tackle biological problems in a comprehensive way. Our publications are representative of the success of this strategy: http://www3.utsouthwestern.edu/sbl/Publications.html State-of-the-art equipment is currently installed, operational and shared between the members in the Structural Biology community at UT Southwestern. Cryo-EM equipment consists of one 300 kV Titan Krios microscope, one 200 kV Talos Arctica microscope, and a cryo-Scios DualBeam for cryo-FIB milling. In addition, the Structural Biology Laboratory has a dedicated lab for cryo-EM grid preparation, with an FEI Vitrobot and assorted instruments for sample prep. Computational facilities include a campus high-performance computing cluster. Crystallographic equipment includes an Art Robbins Gryphon crystallization robot and a Scorpion liquid handling robot, a Jansi UVEX UV microscope, a Rigaku FRE superbright rotating anode X-ray generator with an ACTOR sample mounting robot, and 30 days of guaranteed synchrotron beam time at Sector 19 of the Advanced Photon Source. These facilities are supplemented by a variety of biophysical instruments supporting the study of macromolecules using NMR, CD, dynamic light scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation, stopped-flow kinetics, isothermal titration calorimetry, microscale thermophoresis and mass spectrometry. Applicants should submit a curriculum vita and three letters of reference by July 10, 2017 to Diana Tomchick, Chair, Structural Biology Laboratory Search Committee, U.T. Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8816. UT Southwestern is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer. Women, minorities, veterans and individuals with disabilities are encouraged to apply. For further inquiries, please contact: Diana Tomchick Department of Biophysics, Rm. ND10.214A UT Southwestern Medical Center 5323 Harry Hines Blvd Dallas TX 75390-8816 Tel. +1 214 645 6383 Email: Diana.Tomchick(a)UTSouthwestern.edu<mailto:[email protected]> ? ************************************************** Diana R. Tomchick Professor Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 5323 Harry Hines Blvd. Rm. ND10.214A Dallas, TX 75390-8816 Diana.Tomchick(a)UTSouthwestern.edu (214) 645-6383 (phone) (214) 645-6353 (fax) ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today.

1 0

Amit D invited you to check out Dropbox
by Dropbox 21 May '17

21 May '17

Hi there, Amit D (amitd453(a)gmail.com) thinks you should use Dropbox! It’s a free and easy way to access and share your docs, photos, and videos with colleagues and friends—even if they don’t have Dropbox accounts. Accept invite[1] Get started through this email, and you’ll get an extra 500 MB added to your 2 GB of free space. Happy Dropboxing! [1]: https://www.dropbox.com/l/AADiCZMqlucm1Gb-DwLfoxb-Ub8mVCIREm0

1 0

pdb help
by jp d 20 May '17

20 May '17

hi, phenix version 1.11.1-2575 FEM has crashed a few times for me . i have tried using various parameters (resolution_factor=1./3, use_resolve=False) , but it will max out my RAM (24G) and get into swap space. It gets very memory intensive, i think thats why it crashed. Do you have any suggestions to try ? i previously had a similar problem with a pdb using conflicting chain assignments, but this pdb doesn't use chains thanks jpd

2 1

Electronic Laboratory Notebook
by Sebastiano Pasqualato 19 May '17

19 May '17

Dear all, another enquiry for the great community! We are considering the idea of moving to electronic laboratory notebooks rather than paper ones. Are you happily using one and would warmly suggest its implementation? Our department does not only deal with biochemical experiments, but performs a lot of genomics (big data analysis) and mouse genetics experiments, so experience of Notebooks used in departments that also have those activities would be a plus. We will consider free and paid softwares, if you have information on the costs that would be also very much appreciated! Thanks a lot, ciao Sebastiano -- Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD Crystallography Unit Department of Experimental Oncology European Institute of Oncology IFOM-IEO Campus via Adamello, 16 20139 - Milano Italy tel +39 02 9437 5167 fax +39 02 9437 5990 web http://is.gd/IEOXtalUnit

1 0

Associate Researcher Position at the University of Kansas Protein Structure Laboratory
by Lovell, Scott W 18 May '17

18 May '17

The Protein Structure Laboratory at the University of Kansas is seeking a full-time Associate Researcher to assist with various structural biology projects. For a full description and to apply, GO TO: https://employment.ku.edu/staff/8691BR Review of applications begins 5/30/17 Regards, Scott __________________________________ Scott Lovell Ph.D., Director Protein Structure Laboratory University of Kansas Del Shankel Structural Biology Center 2034 Becker Drive Lawrence, KS 66047 Office: SBC 1015 Email: swlovell(a)ku.edu<mailto:[email protected]> Website: https://psf.cobre.ku.edu/cores/psl/about Phone: 785-864-3772 __________________________________

1 0

kick maps
by jp d 13 May '17

13 May '17

hi, sorry if this is easily googleable, but i am not having any luck. how can i generate a kick map? thanks jpd

2 1

Error running ERRASER
by Eric Montemayor 13 May '17

13 May '17

Has anybody encountered this error when running ERRASER in Phenix? If so, any suggestions for how to fix this would be greatly appreciated! -------------------------------------------------------------------------- *TypeError : ('__init__() takes at least 3 arguments (1 given)', <class 'subprocess.CalledProcessError'>, ())Traceback (most recent call last): File "/opt/sbgrid/i386-mac/phenix/1.11.1-2575/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/phenix/wxGUI2/App.py", line 784, in OnTimer self.run_manager.update(update_backgrounded=False) File "/opt/sbgrid/i386-mac/phenix/1.11.1-2575/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/phenix/wxGUI2/ProcessControl.py", line 213, in update process.update() File "/opt/sbgrid/i386-mac/phenix/1.11.1-2575/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/phenix/wxGUI2/ProcessControl.py", line 136, in update self._process.update() File "/opt/sbgrid/i386-mac/phenix/1.11.1-2575/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/cctbx_project/libtbx/runtime_utils.py", line 306, in update (error, traceback_info) = easy_pickle.load(self.error_file) File "/opt/sbgrid/i386-mac/phenix/1.11.1-2575/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/cctbx_project/libtbx/easy_pickle.py", line 82, in load return cPickle.loads(_open(file_name, "rb").read())TypeError: ('__init__() takes at least 3 arguments (1 given)', <class 'subprocess.CalledProcessError'>, ())* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Eric J. Montemayor, Ph.D. Associate Scientist University of Wisconsin-Madison 145 Biochemistry Laboratories 433 Babcock Drive Madison, WI 53706 512.784.5981 http://about.me/montemayor https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericmontemayor <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/eric-montemayor/63/121/98b>

2 2

ERRASER fails to run on ribosome model
by #AHMED TOFAYEL# 11 May '17

11 May '17

Dear PHENIX and ERRASER developers, While ERRASER is running fine (command line) when I use a small PDB file, it fails repeatedly on a complete ribosome model giving following error: Starting erraser Date: Tue May 9 17:53:20 2017 Directory: /home/tofayel/Desktop/test HOSTNAME: localhost.localdomain Log file will be /home/tofayel/Desktop/test/erraser.log Splitting output to /home/tofayel/Desktop/test/erraser.log Running ERRASER Rosetta app... ################################### Path to ERRASER: /usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/tools/ERRASER ERROR: Unique best command line context option match not found for -fixed_res. Possible matches include: -willmatch:fixed_res -stepwise:fixed_res -rna:farna:erraser:fixed_res Either specify namespace from command line; or in code, use add_relevant() to register option. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/phenix-1.11.1-2575/build/../modules/phenix/phenix/command_line/erraser.py", line 14, in <module> erraser_run=phenix.erraser.erraser.erraser(args=sys.argv[1:]) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/phenix/phenix/erraser/erraser.py", line 349, in __init__ self.run(params,out=out) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.11.1-2575/modules/phenix/phenix/erraser/erraser.py", line 459, in run erraser(option) File "/usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/tools/ERRASER/erraser_wrapper.py", line 92, in erraser full_struct_slice_and_minimize( minimize_option ) File "/usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/tools/ERRASER/erraser_wrapper.py", line 662, in full_struct_slice_and_minimize erraser_minimize( minimize_option ) File "/usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/tools/ERRASER/erraser_wrapper.py", line 488, in erraser_minimize subprocess_call(command, sys.stdout, sys.stderr) File "/usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/tools/ERRASER/erraser_util.py", line 101, in subprocess_call subprocess.check_call(command, shell=True, stdout = out_channel, stderr = err_channel) File "/usr/local/phenix-1.11.1-2575/base/lib/python2.7/subprocess.py", line 540, in check_call raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd) subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '/usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/main/source/bin/erraser_minimizer.linuxgccrelease -database /usr/local/rosetta_src_2016.32.58837_bundle/main/database/ -s /home/tofayel/Desktop/test/test-model-coot-19_erraser_temp/minimize_0_full_minimize_temp/before_min_temp_rs.pdb -score:weights stepwise/rna/rna_hires_elec_dens_FCC2012 -score:rna_torsion_potential FCC2012_RNA11_based_new -rna::corrected_geo true -rna::rna_prot_erraser false -rna::vary_geometry true -constrain_P true -attempt_pyrimidine_flip false -rna:farna:erraser:skip_minimize false -chemical:enlarge_H_lj false -in:guarantee_no_DNA false -scale_d 100 -scale_theta 10 -stepwise:rna:o2prime_legacy_mode true -use_2prime_OH_potential false -fixed_res 78 79 100 101 102 106 107 108 109 110 115 116 -edensity:mapfile /home/tofayel/Desktop/test/test-map.ccp4 -edensity:mapreso 3.3 -edensity:realign no -graphics false -skip_connect_info true ' returned non-zero exit status 255 Please suggest some fixes. Thanks in advanced. Best regards, Tofayel

2 1

error when running the tutorials?
by Murpholino Peligro 11 May '17

11 May '17

[murphy@eva00 tut-phenix]$ phenix.run_example gene-5-mad Examples to be run: gene-5-mad Running PHENIX example: gene-5-mad Wed May 10 21:24:26 CDT 2017 Working directory: /home/murphy/X-Rays/tut-phenix/gene-5-mad Starting run now ... please wait a moment Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix> Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix> Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to <prefix>[:<exec_prefix>] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/murphy/X-Rays/phenix/phenix-dev-2747/build/../ modules/cctbx_project/site.py", line 48, in <module> import os ImportError: No module named os tutorial files look ok. ps running phenix dev2747 happens the same thing with p9-sad

1 0

how to run Rosetta using phenix GUI interface on windows
by chen c 08 May '17

08 May '17

Hi, everyone, Can anybody tell how to run Rosetta using phenix GUI interface on windows system? Thank you so much! Best regards Chen -- Cheng Chen, Ph.D. Candidate Laboratory of Structural Biology Life Science Building,Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 China Tel:+86-10-62772291 Fax:+86-10-62773145 E-mail:[email protected] 北京市海淀区清华大学生命科学馆201-212室邮编：100084

1 0

phenix real space refine & free R reflections
by Hillen, Hauke 06 May '17

06 May '17

Dear Phenix bb, I have a rather conceptual question regarding the treatment of free R flags in phenix.refine and phenix.real_space_refine. I am refining an xray structure using phenix.refine (but not using the real space refinement implemented there) and at some point decided to play a bit with the standalone program phenix.real_space_refine. In particular, I was interested in testing real space refinement against different maps (experimental map vs. model-phased). Being used to the excellent handling of free R flags in Phenix, I assumed giving phenix.real_space_refine the output MTZ of a previous phenix.refine run as a map would be safe to do. But I then saw the phenix.refine FAQ states the following: "Are R-free flagged reflections included in the maps used for real-space refinement? No, this is almost guaranteed to bias R-free; these reflections are removed internally prior to map calculation. However, the output maps will include these reflections unless you explicitly request otherwise.” While it makes sense to me that including the free reflections in the maps used for real space refinement will bias R-free, I wonder why the default behavior of phenix.refine is to output maps which include these reflections. I assume most users will use these output maps (for example via the OPEN IN COOT button in the GUI) to iteratively improve their model by local real space refinement in Coot. Conceptually, how is real space refinement performed by phenix.refine (where the free R reflections are not used to calculate the map to refine against) different from manual local real space refinement in Coot? Will the latter not also bias R-free when the default output maps from phenix.refine are used? Best, Hauke

3 4

Different stats with different number of macrocycles
by Patrick Loll 05 May '17

05 May '17

Hi, I have an odd observation. I am finishing a refinement at 2.5 Å, using the Phenix GUI. I performed a three-macrocycle refinement, and saw that the geometry (RMS bonds/angles) and R/Rfree all got better in the first macrocycle, and then worsened in the subsequent two macrocycles. OK, fine. So I repeated the refinement, except I performed only a single macrocycle (starting from the exact same input coordinates). However, the statistics after this one-macrocycle job did not match the stats seen after 1 macrocycle in the 3-macrocycle job (?!). This doesn’t make sense to me; if you’re starting from the exact same coordinates, shouldn’t the first macrocycle always wind up at the same place, regardless of whether or not the program goes on to do additional macrocycles of refinement? In case this isn’t clear: In the 3-macrocycle job, after the first macrocycle, RMS bonds/angles = 0.005 Å/0.9 deg, R/Rfree = 0.208/0.236 (by the end of the third macrocycle, these numbers have changed to 0.009 Å/1.41 deg and 0.212/0.244) At the end of the 1-macrocycle job, RMS bonds/angles = 0.008 Å/1.4 deg, R/Rfree = 0.209/0.240 This is Phenix version 1.11.1-2575-000. Any insights welcome. Cheers, Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrick J. Loll, Ph. D. Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Drexel University College of Medicine Room 10-102 New College Building 245 N. 15th St., Mailstop 497 Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA (215) 762-7706 pat.loll(a)drexelmed.edu

5 8