- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Rwork > Rfree
by Singh, Bishal 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

Hello everybody, While depositing a structure in PDB, I observed that Rwork was more than Rfree in the highest resolution shell and in a few more shells as well. I shall be delighted if somebody can suggest me the reasons and also what should I do now. With regards, Bishal PhD student, DKFZ, University of Heidelberg, Germany

4 3

MRage against local "select" PDB database on commandline
by Kaushik Hatti 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

Hi, I am new to Phenix. Sorry if my question is naive. For a given mtz file, I want to pick templates from a local PDB database (its actually iTasser template library) and perform Molecular Replacement using MRage. I have already installed Blast, downloaded iTasser PDB library (http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/library/PDB.tar.bz2) and extracted sequences from both the downloaded PDB template library set and target protein for which mtz is available. How should I go about building pipeline to perform MR using templates from locally downloaded select PDB database? Are there any more parameters available for parameter name: services under scop: search other than "local" and "ncbi"? Thanks in advance, Kaushik -- People living deeply have no fear of death - Anais Nin Caution: I am still the dumbest person I have ever known :-)

2 6

Submissions for Comput. Cryst. Newsletter
by Nigel Moriarty 21 Nov '14

21 Nov '14

Folks Calling for articles and short communications of interest to structural biologists. The deadline for submission in the January 2015 issue is 17 December 2014 (with some leeway if you are still working on the text, especially as it can be polished over the break). The Computational Crystallography Newsletter (CCN) is an electronic newsletter for structural biologists, and is published online every 6 months. Feature articles, meeting announcements and reports can be submitted to me at any time for consideration. Submission of text by email or word-processing files using the CCN templates is requested. Past newsletters and a Microsoft Word template are available at www.phenix-online.org/newsletter. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] Rwork > Rfree
by Ed Pozharski 20 Nov '14

20 Nov '14

Generate a different test set and repeat refinement. Do it twenty times. If R turns out to be systematically higher than Rfree even in few resolution shells, you have an interesting case worth looking at. If not, it's just noise. Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: "Singh, Bishal" <b.singh(a)dkfz-heidelberg.de> </div><div>Date:11/20/2014 9:52 AM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org </div><div>Subject: [phenixbb] Rwork > Rfree </div><div> </div>Hello everybody, While depositing a structure in PDB, I observed that Rwork was more than Rfree in the highest resolution shell and in a few more shells as well. I shall be delighted if somebody can suggest me the reasons and also what should I do now. With regards, Bishal PhD student, DKFZ, University of Heidelberg, Germany _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

1 0

GeoStd: was definition of glycosylation in phenix.refine
by Schubert, Carsten [JRDUS] 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hi Nigel, could you please comment on any plans to harmonize the use of these restraints for other refinement programs as well. Phenix originally appears to have implemented the restraint dictionaries from CCP4. Right now there seems to be some kind of parallel development going on with the dictionaries being in sync to some degree. Is there a plan to move to a unified restraints distribution at some point? Thanks Carsten From: phenixbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nigel Moriarty Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 12:38 PM Cc: PHENIX user mailing list Subject: Re: [phenixbb] definition of glycosylation in phenix.refine @Laurent Engin advice is sound but you are having trouble free feel to send me the inputs directly. NB. Any files sent to me will be held in strictest confidence. @Engin I think you will find what you are looking for in the GeoStd. As restraints are improved, they are moved from $PHENIX/chem_data/mon_lib to $PHENIX/chem_data/geostd (which is hosted on SourceForge for anybody's use). The directory structure is the same as the Monomer Library with a geostd_list.cif file corresponding to mon_lib_list.cif which specifies the links. Cheers Nigel --- Nigel W. Moriarty Building 64R0246B, Physical Biosciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA 94720-8235 Phone : 510-486-5709 Email : NWMoriarty(a)LBL.gov<mailto:[email protected]> Fax : 510-486-5909 Web : CCI.LBL.gov<http://CCI.LBL.gov> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Engin Özkan <eozkan(a)uchicago.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Laurent, If I am reading the error message right, you did not delete the hydrogens that get removed upon bond formation. That's what it is complaining about. I always thought Phenix probably removed these atoms (the hydroxyl and the hydrogen) automatically when you defined the link, but never tested if it really does it. I also usually remove all hydrogens right away when sugar residues are inserted. Finally, I will recommend that you use automatic linking in the phenix.refine GUI. It works great (I am on the latest nightly, dev-1839; you may need to upgrade). No need to define pesky links anymore. Thank you developers! At the risk of hijacking the thread, I could not find in my installation the cif files for N-linked sugars. Have they been moved elsewhere? Hope this helps, Engin On 11/18/14 10:02 AM, Laurent Maveyraud wrote: Hi, I am currently refining a structure of a glycosylated protein, but I fail to define the appropriate links... The glycosylatin is Asn638-NAG1061-(beta1-4)-NAG1062-(beta1-4)-BMA1063-(ALPHA1-3)-MAN1064 This is what I add in the eff file : apply_cif_link { data_link = NAG-ASN residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 residue_selection_2 = chain A and resname ASN and resid 638 } apply_cif_link { data_link = BETA1-4 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 } apply_cif_link { data_link = BETA1-4 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 } apply_cif_link { data_link = ALPHA1-3 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname MAN and resid 1064 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 } this is correctly read in refine: apply_cif_link: data_link: NAG-ASN mod_id_1: DEL-O1 mod_id_2: DEL-HD22 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 residue_selection_2: chain A and resname ASN and resid 638 apply_cif_link: data_link: BETA1-4 mod_id_1: DEL-HO4 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 apply_cif_link: data_link: BETA1-4 mod_id_1: DEL-HO4 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 apply_cif_link: data_link: ALPHA1-3 mod_id_1: DEL-HO3 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname MAN and resid 1064 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 but generates an error : Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 5 "HETATM10951 HO4 NAG D1052 .*. H " "HETATM10973 HO4 BMA D1053 .*. H " "HETATM11028 HO4 NAG D1062 .*. H " "HETATM11050 HO4 BMA D1063 .*. H " "HETATM11070 HO3 MAN D1064 .*. H " and the job stops. Any ideas on what if wrong ? thanks for your help Laurent _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org<mailto:[email protected]> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

1 0

definition of glycosylation in phenix.refine
by Laurent Maveyraud 19 Nov '14

19 Nov '14

Hi, I am currently refining a structure of a glycosylated protein, but I fail to define the appropriate links... The glycosylatin is Asn638-NAG1061-(beta1-4)-NAG1062-(beta1-4)-BMA1063-(ALPHA1-3)-MAN1064 This is what I add in the eff file : apply_cif_link { data_link = NAG-ASN residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 residue_selection_2 = chain A and resname ASN and resid 638 } apply_cif_link { data_link = BETA1-4 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 } apply_cif_link { data_link = BETA1-4 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 } apply_cif_link { data_link = ALPHA1-3 residue_selection_1 = chain D and resname MAN and resid 1064 residue_selection_2 = chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 } this is correctly read in refine: apply_cif_link: data_link: NAG-ASN mod_id_1: DEL-O1 mod_id_2: DEL-HD22 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 residue_selection_2: chain A and resname ASN and resid 638 apply_cif_link: data_link: BETA1-4 mod_id_1: DEL-HO4 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1061 apply_cif_link: data_link: BETA1-4 mod_id_1: DEL-HO4 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname NAG and resid 1062 apply_cif_link: data_link: ALPHA1-3 mod_id_1: DEL-HO3 mod_id_2: DEL-O1 residue_selection_1: chain D and resname MAN and resid 1064 residue_selection_2: chain D and resname BMA and resid 1063 but generates an error : Number of atoms with unknown nonbonded energy type symbols: 5 "HETATM10951 HO4 NAG D1052 .*. H " "HETATM10973 HO4 BMA D1053 .*. H " "HETATM11028 HO4 NAG D1062 .*. H " "HETATM11050 HO4 BMA D1063 .*. H " "HETATM11070 HO3 MAN D1064 .*. H " and the job stops. Any ideas on what if wrong ? thanks for your help Laurent -- ---------------------------------------------------------- Laurent Maveyraud laurent.maveyraud AT ipbs DOT fr P I C T --- Plateforme Intégrée de Criblage de Toulouse Université Paul Sabatier / CNRS / I.P.B.S. UMR 5089 Département Biologie Structurale et Biophysique http://cribligand.ipbs.fr http://www.ipbs.fr 205 route de Narbonne 31077 TOULOUSE Cedex FRANCE Tél: +33 (0)561 175 435 Fax : +33 (0)561 175 994 ----------------------------------------------------------

3 3

mrage with nucleic acids?
by Paul Paukstelis 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

I'm trying to run mrage with nucleic acid models. With phaser, it is possible to specify the molecule type, but this option doesn't exist in mrage (from what I can see). Providing a sequence file automatically assumes protein one letter codes. Any suggestion on how to clearly define a sequence file as a nucleic acid? Thanks, --paul

2 1

Filtering CCP4 maps to lower resolution
by Barad, Ben 17 Nov '14

17 Nov '14

Hi All, I am currently trying to filter a CCP4-formatted real space map from the EMDB, which is at 3.2 Å resolution, to different resolutions from 3.2 to 5 Å, and I've been having a bit of a difficult time getting it to work. My first thought was to do an fft to get structure factors, then regenerate the map from those structure factors with a resolution cutoff. To do this, I used the tools "phenix.map_to_structure_factors" and "phenix.mtz2map" to generate a structure factor file, then convert it back into a map. When I do this, I end up with a very noisy map that is not usable for what I would like to do. Is there a better way to accomplish this in phenix (or another tool)? I've also tried some low-pass filtering with proc3d, without much success... Thanks, Ben Barad Fraser Lab @ UCSF

3 3

Re: [phenixbb] simulated annealing omit map
by Pavel Afonine 16 Nov '14

16 Nov '14

Hello Bishal, as discussed before, computing ligand-omit map is tricky. Quoting my previous email: """ There are two commonly used options for omitting the ligand in order to demonstrate its presence/absence in Fo-Fc OMIT map: 1) Physically remove the ligand from PDB file. Then do some refinement and calculate Fo-Fc map. 2) Keep ligand in the file, set its occupancy to zero. Then, again, do some refinement and calculate Fo-Fc map. In this case you may want to ask refinement program to not move the ligand or move it only a little. Now, here is why these two options are poor and will not give you what you want. In the first case the bulk-solvent mask will be set in the ligand region and therefore it will mask ligand density (bulk-solvent will be filled into the ligand region). Depending on the strength of ligand density it may be masked completely or deteriorated. If you follow the second option you will always get positive density in ligand area. This density may correspond to bulk-solvent, ligand or mixture of both. That is there will be no simple way to differentiate whether this density arises from the ligand or bulk-solvent. """ Dale Tronrud offered a great alternative option: """ An alternative you might want to consider is what I call the "discovery map". At some point in the refinement process there was a map that convinced YOU that this ligand was present. You should be the hardest person to be convinced so that map will be both an omit map (because the model had been refined without the ligand prior to this) and clear enough to satisfy the reader. """ Now, recently I improved composite OMIT map calculation in phenix.composite_omit_map tool, see picture that illustrates how it works: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dbp8e0348v5p78h/fig_6.png?dl=0 I think at present that's the best option to follow if for some reason you cannot follow Dale's suggestion. Pavel On 11/13/14 6:58 AM, Singh, Bishal wrote: > Hello everybody, > I am generating figures showing the electron density map around the > ligands. I deleted the ligands from final co-ordinate file and then > performed refinement with identical parameters as before while > keeping simulated annealing=true. I shall be thankful if someone could > suggest me whether I consider mFo-DFc map or 2mFo-DFc map or both. > Kindly also tell me the minimum acceptable contour level required for > showing difference map. All structures are at 1.4 - 2.0 angstrom > resolutions. > > Regards, > Bishal

5 5

CB outliers
by George Devaniranjan 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Hi, I refined a structure using phenix.refine. The R/R free decreased slightly from 13.46/15.87 to 13.0/15.6. But, molprobity said there were 3 CB outliers (starting from 0). I looked at those residues in COOT. I could NOT really see a different between the refined and initial model. In addition I looked at COOT validate-->density fit analysis I cannot see ANY difference in the peak heights (same numerical value too). I looked at RSCC (using phenix validate tools as well). I still can't see a difference in the plots. I am not sure how to get rid of the 3 CB outliers that have crept in since I can't pick them out as worse off in the refined model. I ask since in another case > 3 CB outliers, with the same results in picking them out in COOT/RSCC. I am wondering if there is another way I can see the deviation and fix it? Thank you, George

3 6

Rosetta compile problem
by miyatake 14 Nov '14

14 Nov '14

Dear all, I tried to compile Rosetta for rosetta_refinement, on Mac OX10.10. I run " /rosetta_2014.22.56873_bundle/main/source] user% sudo scons.py But it was in failure, showing the following message: g++-4.2 -o build/external/debug/macos/14.0/64/x86/gcc/4.2/default/dbio/cppdb/atomic_counter.os -c -isystem external/boost_1_55_0/ -isystem external/include/ -isystem external/dbio/ -pipe -ffor-scope -Wall -Wextra -pedantic -Werror -Wno-long-long -Wno-strict-aliasing -m64 -march=nocona -mtune=generic -O0 -g -ggdb -ffloat-store -fPIC -DBOOST_ERROR_CODE_HEADER_ONLY -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED -DCPPDB_EXPORTS -DCPPDB_LIBRARY_SUFFIX=\".dylib\" -DCPPDB_LIBRARY_PREFIX=\"lib\" -DCPPDB_DISABLE_SHARED_OBJECT_LOADING -DCPPDB_DISABLE_THREAD_SAFETY -DCPPDB_SOVERSION=\"0\" -DCPPDB_MAJOR=0 -DCPPDB_MINOR=3 -DCPPDB_PATCH=0 -DCPPDB_VERSION=\"0.3.0\" -DCPPDB_WITH_SQLITE3 -Ibuild/external/debug/macos/14.0/64/x86/gcc/4.2/default/dbio/sqlite3 -Iexternal/dbio/sqlite3 -Iexternal/boost_1_55_0 -Iexternal/dbio -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/include external/dbio/cppdb/atomic_counter.cpp sh: g++-4.2: command not found scons: *** [build/external/debug/macos/14.0/64/x86/gcc/4.2/default/dbio/cppdb/atomic_counter.os] Error 127 scons: building terminated because of errors. How can I resolve that? Best regards, H. Miyatake

3 2

simulated annealing omit map
by Singh, Bishal 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Hello everybody, I am generating figures showing the electron density map around the ligands. I deleted the ligands from final co-ordinate file and then performed refinement with identical parameters as before while keeping simulated annealing=true. I shall be thankful if someone could suggest me whether I consider mFo-DFc map or 2mFo-DFc map or both. Kindly also tell me the minimum acceptable contour level required for showing difference map. All structures are at 1.4 - 2.0 angstrom resolutions. Regards, Bishal

1 0

Settings-Directories of MR-Rosetta wizard is altered when phenix-GUI is restarted?
by Martin Moche 13 Nov '14

13 Nov '14

Dear colleagues, When restarting phenix followed by opening the "MR-Rosetta(beta)" the Settings-Directories need to be reset each time? How can I set Rosetta binary directory name: Rosetta binary name: Rosetta script directory name: Rosetta database directory name: in Settings-Directories of "MR-Rosetta(beta)" wizard (or elsewhere) so that they do not change each time I restart the phenix-GUI? These settings are not changed: Base output folder: Rosetta path: Likely "Rosetta path" does not change between phenix-GUI restarts since PHENIX_ROSETTA_PATH is set in the shell as: echo $PHENIX_ROSETTA_PATH /software/apps/rosetta/2014.35/gcc01/rosetta_2014.35.57232_bundle The "Path to Rosetta" in "Phenix preferences - Wizards" is currently left blank since $PHENIX_ROSETTA_PATH is set in the shell. I have by accident started a few jobs with mixed (new and old) settings and phenix-GUI starts without error messages and all processors are running 100% CPU, however likely in some infinite loop since no work is performed beyond "place model"... Best regards, Martin Martin Moche, Ph.D. Head of Protein Crystallography Karolinska Institutet MBB/PSF Scheeles väg 2 171 77 Stockholm Sweden phone: +46-8-524 868 43 mobile: +46-73-322 93 27 fax: +46-8-524 868 68 email: Martin.Moche(a)ki.se

1 0

fix atoms during refinement
by CPMAS Chen 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

Dear All Phenix Users, Is there a way to fix certain atoms position during refinement? I have some heavy atoms identified with MR-SAD, but when I build the whole molecule and have phenix to refine its position, the heavy atom's position is shifted from the anomalous signal. Therefore I would like to have these heavy atoms positions fixed during refinement. Thanks! Charles -- *************************************************** Charles Chen Research Associate University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology ******************************************************

2 1

Ringer
by Ivan IVANOV 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

Dear All, I am trying to use ringer with a model I have. I followed the tutorial for Calmodulin and it worked very well for my protein. (http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/ringer/ringer/Tutorial/tutorial.htm). Now I have all files sigma vs chi angles for the residues I want and also the list of peaks identified above the sigma cutoff I selected. I am struggling to analyse the outputs as it is shown on the calmodulin exemple. I found this website (http://bl831.als.lbl.gov/ringer/ringer/Documentation/ringerManual.htm#Userp…) which is explaining very briefly how to plot all different conformation vs chi angles and how to show all selected amino acid conformation in the electron density (4.4 Plotting Accessory). I have to admit that this is not straigthforward for me to plot all outputs in a comprehensive way. Does anyone of you have a script to run with ringer outputs and get the final figures as it is shown on both websites ?? Kind regards, Ivan -- Ivan Ivanov, PhD PostDoctoral fellow at EMBL, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural biology of RNA-protein complexes, Dr. Stephen Cusack, EMBL 71, avenue des Martyrs CS 90181 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9 T: +33 (0)4 76 20 7630 T(lab): +33 (0)4 76 20 7014 Email: ivanov(a)embl.fr Url: http://www.embl.fr

3 2

"Femtosecond crystallography of membrane proteins in lipidic cubic phase (LCP)” Webinar
by Angela Criswell 05 Nov '14

05 Nov '14

Dear colleagues, I would like to draw your attention to an upcoming free, educational webinar to be presented by Dr. Wei Liu titled “Femtosecond crystallography of membrane proteins in lipidic cubic phase (LCP).” Despite recent technological advances in heterologous expression, stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins, structural studies remain difficult. Wei’s presentation will describe the use of serial femtosecond crystallography of membrane proteins in LCP and how this approach holds promise to interrogate this difficult, yet important, class of proteins. This webinar is scheduled to occur on Thursday, November 13th at 11:00 AM CST (9:00 AM PST / 5:00 PM GMT). You can find an abstract and registration link for this webinar at: http://www.rigaku.com/webinars. We hope you will join us for the event. Best regards, Angela Criswell -- Angela Criswell VP, Life Science X-ray Products Rigaku Americas Corporation 9009 New Trails Drive The Woodlands, TX 77381 USA Ph: +1 281 362 2300 ext. 216 Fax: +1 281 364 3628 Email: angela.criswell(a)rigaku.com URL: http://www.rigaku.com Subscribe to Rigaku eNewsletters<http://www.rigaku.com/subscribe>

1 0

green ball in aspartate
by Murpholino Peligro 31 Oct '14

31 Oct '14

Hi Everybody. Does anybody knows what could this be? Blue map at 1rmsd Green and red map at 3.5 rmsd Purple map (FEM map) at 1rmsd Conditions 100mM sodium acetate, NaCl 10% w/v, cryo=glycerol 30 % v/v; protein is hen egg white lysozyme (usual condition, usual protein and ohh..almost forget it.. ascorbic acid at 0.5 M) A water molecule overlaps with the oxygen atom (OD1) of the aspartate residue. So it is not a water molecule. Any ideas? (In coot -> validate-> difference map peaks and holes-> its the only one at 7.7 rmsd) Thanks

2 1

[ot]: nedit on Mac 10.10 yosemite
by Sebastiano Pasqualato 29 Oct '14

29 Oct '14

Hi folks, sorry for the off-topic and slightly ‘demodée’ question, but, since I updated to Yosemite on my Mac, "nedit" does not work any more. Here’s the error message: Seba@host041:~> nedit dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXp.6.dylib Referenced from: /Applications/nedit/nedit Reason: image not found Trace/BPT trap: 5 Seba@host041:~> Anybody knows if there is a fix for that? Thanks in advance, S -- Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD Crystallography Unit Department of Experimental Oncology European Institute of Oncology IFOM-IEO Campus via Adamello, 16 20139 - Milano Italy tel +39 02 9437 5167 fax +39 02 9437 5990 web http://is.gd/IEO_XtalUnit

3 3

Fwd: Postdoc position in acoustic crystal preparation and high throughput screening at NSLS II
by Nathaniel Echols 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Soares, Alexei" <soares(a)bnl.gov> To: "CCP4BB(a)JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <CCP4BB(a)jiscmail.ac.uk>, "cnsbb(a)yahoogroups.com" <cnsbb(a)yahoogroups.com>, "pdb-l(a)rcsb.org" <pdb-l(a)rcsb.org>, " phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org" <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org>, " x-plor(a)net.bio.net" <x-plor(a)magpie.bio.indiana.edu>, "xtal-log(a)net.bio.net" <xtal-log(a)magpie.bio.indiana.edu> Cc: Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:44:30 +0000 Subject: Postdoc position in acoustic crystal preparation and high throughput screening at NSLS II *Postdoctoral Research Associate – Macromolecular Crystal Preparation for NSLS-II* *2-year Term Position* *BNL Overview:* Brookhaven National Laboratory is a nonprofit research and development institution whose purpose is to advance ideas and knowledge through a multidisciplinary program of basic and applied research. *Project Overview:* A postdoctoral position is available to develop new crystal-preparation technologies to advance the use of serial macromolecular crystallography (MX) at NSLS-II. This new synchrotron will soon begin operation at Brookhaven National Laboratory. The individual will develop technologies for crystallization, drug discovery, and crystal handling to make serial crystallography possible, using various technologies, including acoustic droplet ejection (ADE). The project will provide the capability for experimenters to employ nanoliter quantities of material to produce specimens for diffraction studies with a large number of discrete experiments in a small area. This will exploit the micro-beam capabilities of NSLS-II MX beamlines; both room temperature and cryogenic serial crystallography strategies will be explored. High-throughput screening will be used for different types of structural biology projects (crystallization conditions, fragment binding, etc). The individual will work closely with a broad technology-development team. Our team members have different areas of expertise, from 3D labware design to research on medically relevant expressed proteins. No experience with ADE is necessary. *Essential Duties and Responsibilities:* The successful candidate will assist in the development and implementation of procedures and computer algorithms that leverage the Echo 550 instrument for macromolecular crystallography applications for serial crystallography applications in the few-nanoliter regime. The candidate will also develop novel technologies as well as improve existing technologies, and will have opportunities to participate in other related projects in a large and diverse group. *Required Knowledge, Skills and Abilities:* - Ph.D. in an appropriate chemistry, biology, or physics discipline; structural biology, crystallography, or a related field will have preference - Demonstrated experience (preferably including publications) in innovative experimentation and/or methods development with crystallography or drug discovery - Experience with conventional crystallization, and familiarity with micro crystallization and handling of micro crystals will be valuable - Experience in computer programming - The candidate must have a demonstrated ability to work with a team. *Other Information:* BNL policy states that Research Associate appointments may be made to those who have received their doctoral degrees within the past five years. *Please apply to Job # 137 on our jobs website:* *http://www.bnl.gov/HR/careers/ <http://www.bnl.gov/HR/careers/> * At Brookhaven National Laboratory we believe that a comprehensive employee benefits program is an important and meaningful part of the compensation employees receive. Our benefits program includes but is not limited to: - Medical Plans - Vacation - Holidays - Dental Plans - Life Insurance - 401(k) Plan - On-site Child Development Center, Swimming Pool, Weight room Tennis Courts, and many other employee perks and benefits.

1 0

R/R free reported values
by Cedric 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

Hi Phenix and CCP4 community, (sorry for the cross posting). I was looking at a PDB file. The http://www.rcsb.org/ website page gives the following values: R-Value: 0.103 (work) R-Free: 0.134 The actual PDB file gives the following: R :0.110 FREE R VALUE : 0.170 I was wondering why the difference. The structure is 1.0A resolution 2CWS. Thank you, ____________________________________________________________ FREE ONLINE PHOTOSHARING - Share your photos online with your friends and family! Visit http://www.inbox.com/photosharing to find out more!

6 7

difference between phenix.mrage and phenix.MRage?
by Murpholino Peligro 28 Oct '14

28 Oct '14

? Thanks

2 1

Cacodylate won't stay in place
by Kgosisejo, Oarabile 27 Oct '14

27 Oct '14

Hello all, I am trying to fit cacodylate ion in my model using Coot but it does not stay where I put it. The molecule breaks apart and some of its components attach to the peptide residues. Due to this, phenix.refine would not accept this as the input for refinement. Is there a way I can make cacodylate ion stay in its electron density and refine my structure with cacodylate ion? I appreciate your help! Best Regards, Oarabile M. Kgosisejo o.kgosisejo(a)usask.ca

2 1

help on MIR dataset
by Ni, Fengyun 25 Oct '14

25 Oct '14

Hi everyone, I am working on a MIR dataset: one native data, three EMTS soaked data at different concentration, one PbAc2 data. My initial trial with phenix autosol did not give positive solutions. I hope I could get some information from all of you. I index and integrate the data in Mosflm and possible group is P3, though the Pointless said the most possible is P3121. But for now, I only tried P3 at different resolutions for the reason that a potential MR solution (below 20% identities, TFZ=7.1) was found in P31 space group. If P3121 is the real space group, the space is too crowed to fit my molecules unless they have some unexpected symmetry. For the difference among dataset in P3 space group, the output from SCALEIT of CCP4 gives as follows, RMS differences|RMSiso RMSano ---------------------------------------- FP-hg |172.30 22.50 FP-hg2 |159.20 24.07 FP-hg3 |85.08 27.92 FP-pb |31.15 24.55 The native data's resolution cutoff is 3.2 A, and 3.2/3.8/3.5 for different EMTS data, 3.5 for Pb data.I did notice some radiation damage for EMTS (Hg) data (large negative B-factors in SCALA), but not for Pb data. And the anomalous signal only extend to 5.6 and 4.5 A for EMTS and Pb data, respectively, as indicated by phenix.xtriage. These are all the possible heavy atom data we could obtain. So i tried all of them in phenix.autosol. The input is like follows, autosol { seq_file = ../seq.dat crystal_info { solvent_fraction = 0.62 #determined from matthews coefficient to assure "reasonable" content in asymmetric unit. } native { data = nat.mtz } deriv { data = hg1.mtz atom_type = Hg inano = noinano *inano anoonly lambda = 1.00394 } deriv { data = hg2.mtz atom_type = Hg inano = noinano *inano anoonly lambda = 1.00394 } deriv { data = hg3.mtz atom_type = Hg inano = noinano *inano anoonly lambda = 1.00394 } deriv { data = pb.mtz atom_type = Pb inano = noinano *inano anoonly lambda = 0.94640 } model_building { build = False #my structure is DNA/protein complex, so i choose to stop the building process. } } I tried at different resolutions, 3.6/4.0/4.4/4.8/5.2/5.6/6.0 A. One solution was given based on Pb data at 4.8 A with following statistics, Solution # 6 BAYES-CC: 59.7 +/- 17.2 (2SD) Dataset #4 FOM: 0.24 Score type: SKEW CORR_RMS NCS_OVERLAP Raw scores: 0.31 0.69 0.00 100x EST OF CC: 59.74 17.55 31.25 Refined heavy atom sites (fractional): X Y Z xyz 0.033 0.020 0.538 xyz 0.417 0.217 0.113 xyz 0.041 0.010 0.721 The statistics is almost the same for its inverse, and i read from the output that the statistics for phasing other Hg datasets are very low (BAYES-CC is lower than 20) based on the above solution. The resulting map does not make much sense yet. Sorry for the long post. Any suggestion is welcome. Thank you very much! Fengyun

2 8

pdb deposition
by Sneha Rangarajan 25 Oct '14

25 Oct '14

Hi everyone, For a 1.9A dataset, here are my statistics- Rfactors: 22/26 Ramachandran favored: 90.60% Ramachandran outliers: 2.17% Rotamer outliers: 4% Clashscore: 8 Bonds: 0.007 Angles: 1.2 I have tried a couple of things to refine it further but nothing seems to improve all the parameters. My question is what is an acceptable Rfactor at this resolution for deposition in pdb? Thanks, Sneha

2 1

how to refine everything except n residues in phenix.refine?
by Murpholino Peligro 23 Oct '14

23 Oct '14

Hi everybody! Everytime when I (within coot) do "real space refine" two arginines that have two alternate conformations ..(interacting by hydrogen bonds); and then phenix.refine everything, both conformers move away. Therefore, when I open my mtz and pdb files from phenix.refine in coot, I'll have green blobs where there should be guanidium groups. Can I tell phenix.refine not to move only those two residues? It should be something like the following lines in the eff file? sites { individual = None torsion_angles = None rigid_body = None remove_selection=resid 45 remove_selection=resid 68 } Thank you very much

4 8

Electrostatic potential map/Delphi/PDB2PQR
by Ivan IVANOV 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Dear All, I am facing a problem. I have a protein-RNA complex at 2A resolution I refined using TLS in Phenix. Now in the pdb file I have ANISOU line for every atom and probably many other errors. This is the reason I am not able to run Delphi or PDB2PQR to create potential electrostatic map. I removed already all water molecules and all heteratoms and ANISOU lines and RNA molecule. The program creating the phi file for the potentials does not work at all. Do you know any server which can correct any errors in the pdb file in order to run properly the program to create electrostatic map ?? Thanks a lot, Ivan -- Ivan Ivanov, PhD PostDoctoral fellow at EMBL, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural biology of RNA-protein complexes, Dr. Stephen Cusack, EMBL 71, avenue des Martyrs CS 90181 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9 T: +33 (0)4 76 20 7630 T(lab): +33 (0)4 76 20 7014 Email: ivanov(a)embl.fr Url: http://www.embl.fr

3 2

An old (?) tutorial?
by Bryan Lepore 22 Oct '14

22 Oct '14

Greetings - On the public webpage, there used to be an outstanding text tutorial under the phenix.refine link (I think!) that described the attachment of prosthetic groups and such to protein, I think using NAG (or was it something else...). It had all the commands for inclusion in the .def. and of course I can't find it now on the public site. Should I look in the local docs of an old release? -Bryan

2 2

Phenix Table 1 discrepancy
by Rich Grey 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

I'm preparing Table 1 for a structure I have recently solved. I chose to compare the Table 1 Phenix produces to the data found in the PDB file and the log file from my last refinement in Phenix. I see discrepancies between the data for the highest resolution bin's R-factors, including what resolution data that bin contains. In addition, the number of reflections used in refinement is different (although only by about 5, so not a large difference). The PDB file appears to match the log file, and the overall Rwork and Rfree agree for all. Does anyone know where the Table 1 program in Phenix pulls these values from why I may be seeing these differences? Thank You. -Rich

2 1

anomalous signal
by Matteo Colombo 21 Oct '14

21 Oct '14

Hello, I was wondering if the f'' determined by XANES experiment is quantitatively significant and if it can be contributed by two different anomalous scatterers. For example in my protein I know that Co and Zn are present. In theory, at Zn absorption edge, I have a contribution from Co too. If I perform a XANES experiment to determine Zn absorption edge and I obtain a f'' of 5.87, does this value correspond to only Zn signal or to a sum of Zn+Co? Thanks a lot Matteo -- Matteo Colombo PhD Groupe Extremophile et grands assemblages moléculaire Institut de Biologie Structurale 71 avenue des Martyrs CS 10090 38044 Grenoble Cedex 9

4 4

phenix error
by Ivan IVANOV 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

Dear all, I have an error appearing in phenix. I think it is a problem of my pdb file. I do not know how to change it. Error: residue.id_str(suppress_segid=false):segid is not unique: pdbres=ATP C 1 "segid= "O" Does anyone can help me?? Where is the mistake and how to solve it ?? Kind regards, Ivan -- Ivan Ivanov, PhD PostDoctoral fellow at EMBL, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Structural biology of RNA-protein complexes, Dr. Stephen Cusack, EMBL 71, avenue des Martyrs CS 90181 38042 Grenoble Cedex 9 T: +33 (0)4 76 20 7630 T(lab): +33 (0)4 76 20 7014 Email: ivanov(a)embl.fr Url: http://www.embl.fr

3 2

Re: [phenixbb] COOT and default dictionary
by Yazan Abbas 17 Oct '14

17 Oct '14

Hi, I was trying to troubleshoot this and it seems to be a problem related to the FEM map only. When I open my FEM.mtz and do RSR in coot it works well if I choose the 2mFoDfc map but not the FEM map. I'm still not sure why it stopped working since coot was behaving normally just yesterday. Maybe it had something to do with the cif file I tried to import earlier (see previous message). Yazan PS I'm replying to my previously sent message, I hope it ends up in the same thread... On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Yazan Abbas <yazan.abbas(a)mail.mcgill.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > I am encountering a problem with coot real space refinement (RSR). > Basically when I try to fit any residues using RSR the atoms come apart and > fit into the center of the density, possibly because it is not reading in > any geometry restraints. This happens for examples when I am opening my > FEM .mtz map (either manually or 'open in coot' via phenix). > > The only times coot RSR behaves normally is when I load it via phenix > after running phenix refine, or when I open coot via the command line and > auto-open an mtz (the same one generated by phenix refine). Also, fetching > a pdb and map via EDA/PDBredo still allows me to use RSR. > > When I encountered the problem I tried to reinstall coot 0.8 stable and > also tried to install the latest pre (0.8.1-5404), and upgraded to phenix > 1.9-1692. My coot installation comes from the stand alone packages of the > Scott lab website. > > The only thing I can think of as having caused this is when I was trying > to fit an unusual ligand into my density, I used phenix elbow to generate a > cif file and then loaded that into coot (--> import cif dictionary). > Shortly afterwards coot gave up on real space refinement under most > circumstances. > > Have I somehow replaced a default dictionary file? > > Thanks, > > Yazan > > > -- > PhD Candidate > Dr. Bhushan Nagar Lab > McGill University > Tel: (514)-398-7271 > http://bhushan-nagar.lab.mcgill.ca/ > -- PhD Candidate Dr. Bhushan Nagar Lab McGill University Tel: (514)-398-7271 http://bhushan-nagar.lab.mcgill.ca/

2 1

R-factor difference between phenix and sftools
by Simon Jenni 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

Hi, we refined a structure in phenix.refine (dev-1810) and the R-factors are: Final R-work = 0.3221, R-free = 0.3638 phenix.cc_star agrees: phenix.cc_star com_001.pdb com_001.mtz \ f_obs_labels="F-obs,SIGF-obs" \ f_model_labels="F-model,PHIF-model" \ unmerged_data="xscale.hkl" r_work: 0.322 r_free: 0.364 so does phenix.model_vs_data: phenix.model_vs_data com_001.pdb com_001.mtz r_work : 0.3221 r_free : 0.3638 sigma_cutoff : None However, when I calculate the R-factors with sftools, I get a discrepancy between the phenix and sftools results: sftools << eof read com_001_f_model.mtz Y select col R_FREE_FLAGS > 0 correl col FOBS FMODEL select invert correl col FOBS FMODEL quit Y eof R-work: 33.6 R-free: 38.1 Does anyone perhaps know what causes this difference? With best regards, Simon PS: The structure is in spacegroup P212121 with strong pseudocentering tNCS (dimer in the asymmetric unit, native Patterson peak at 0.500 0.500 0.497). No indication for a P21 twin (L-test and refinement in P21 with twin law), not higher symmetry spacegroup I222 (alternating strong and weak reflections are visible in the diffraction patterns, resolved structural differences in the two protomers of the dimer). Two datasets from different beamlines. As might be expected, the R-factors after refinement are unusually high (e.g. 28/35 [conventional resolution cutoff at 3.1 A], 32/36 with Kay's CC cufoff at 2.6 A). I wanted to compare refinements between different programs to see how they cope with the unexpected bimodal amplitude distribution.

4 8

ligand fitting
by Sneha Rangarajan 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

Hello everyone, I have a question about ligand fitting into density. At this point my maps look quite good with decent density for the peptide (ligand)[Rfactprs 26/31]. I tried using ligandfit by giving it the pdb and mtz of the ligand free model along with peptide.pdb (peptide stripped from a pdb where it was complexed with a homologous protein). However the output was a ligand.pdb file with a CC of 0.49. I am not sure how to interpret this. Does this mean it could not find the density for the ligand? Is there a better way to fit the peptide into density? Thanks, S From: phenixbb-bounces(a)phenix-online.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sneha Rangarajan Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:30 AM To: Nathaniel Echols Cc: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org Subject: Re: [phenixbb] (no subject) This was a great idea. My Rfactors after a second round of autobuild are now 25/32. I think it might be getting there afterall ☺ S From: Nathaniel Echols [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:08 PM To: Sneha Rangarajan Cc: Pavel Afonine; phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [phenixbb] (no subject) On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Sneha Rangarajan <rsneha(a)umd.edu<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I did another round of refinement with default settings (XYZ,realsp, IndB and occ) with and without weight optimization. Without weight opt, the Rfactors are 23/36 with RMSbonds-0.0108 and RMSangles-1.750 One idea would be to run AutoBuild again. I've seen cases before where it didn't converge using the default settings, and feeding a previous result back into the program for a second run produced significantly better models. It might help get rid of the overfitting. -Nat

5 12

Re: [phenixbb] R-factor difference between phenix and sftools
by Ed Pozharski 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

To be fair, I made the same mistake initially, but the question is about calculating Rs with sftools using output mtz from phenix.refine, not sfcheck. Thusly, bulk solvent explanation does not seem to apply. My other theory (impossible to check without actual data) was that phenix.refine outlier reflection rejection makes the difference here, although it's surprising if effect is so noticeable. Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Pavel Afonine <pafonine(a)lbl.gov> </div><div>Date:10/13/2014 2:21 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Tim Gruene <tg(a)shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de>, phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org </div><div>Subject: Re: [phenixbb] R-factor difference between phenix and sftools </div><div> </div>Thanks Tim, yes missed this one! Hi Simon, the differences in R-factors you observe are most likely because we use improved bulk-solvent modeling and overall scaling procedure. This is described here: Bulk-solvent and overall scaling revisited: faster calculations, improved results. Afonine PV, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Urzhumtsev A. Acta Cryst. D69, 625-34 (2013). Specifically, Figures 3-4 in this paper make your observations very expectable. Other contributions to differences are discussed here: phenix.model_vs_data: a high-level tool for the calculation of crystallographic model and data statistics. P.V. Afonine, R.W. Grosse-Kunstleve, V.B. Chen, J.J. Headd, N.W. Moriarty, J.S. Richardson, D.C. Richardson, A. Urzhumtsev, P.H. Zwart, P.D. Adams J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 677-685 (2010). Pavel On 10/13/14 11:10 AM, Tim Gruene wrote: Dear Simon, I found this a very puzzling observation and given the high throughput of this board, it is likewise puzzling you have not received a reply yet - or have you? Best regards, Tim On 10/12/2014 08:25 PM, Simon Jenni wrote: Hi, we refined a structure in phenix.refine (dev-1810) and the R-factors are: Final R-work = 0.3221, R-free = 0.3638 phenix.cc_star agrees: phenix.cc_star com_001.pdb com_001.mtz \ f_obs_labels="F-obs,SIGF-obs" \ f_model_labels="F-model,PHIF-model" \ unmerged_data="xscale.hkl" r_work: 0.322 r_free: 0.364 so does phenix.model_vs_data: phenix.model_vs_data com_001.pdb com_001.mtz r_work : 0.3221 r_free : 0.3638 sigma_cutoff : None However, when I calculate the R-factors with sftools, I get a discrepancy between the phenix and sftools results: sftools << eof read com_001_f_model.mtz Y select col R_FREE_FLAGS > 0 correl col FOBS FMODEL select invert correl col FOBS FMODEL quit Y eof R-work: 33.6 R-free: 38.1 Does anyone perhaps know what causes this difference? With best regards, Simon PS: The structure is in spacegroup P212121 with strong pseudocentering tNCS (dimer in the asymmetric unit, native Patterson peak at 0.500 0.500 0.497). No indication for a P21 twin (L-test and refinement in P21 with twin law), not higher symmetry spacegroup I222 (alternating strong and weak reflections are visible in the diffraction patterns, resolved structural differences in the two protomers of the dimer). Two datasets from different beamlines. As might be expected, the R-factors after refinement are unusually high (e.g. 28/35 [conventional resolution cutoff at 3.1 A], 32/36 with Kay's CC cufoff at 2.6 A). I wanted to compare refinements between different programs to see how they cope with the unexpected bimodal amplitude distribution. _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb

1 0

Refine three alternate conformations of residues and two loop confirmations.
by AMIT 14 Oct '14

14 Oct '14

Hi All, I am unable to refine three alternate conformations of a residue provided in PDB file prefixed before resname as A,B and C in Phenix dev-1370. When I make it two alternate conformations it runs OK. Also I am not able to refine two loop confirmations, the refinement somehow puts both in the major 2Fo-Fc map peak and makes the almost same, even though the starting loop has different trace.Turning off siulated annealing or making temp. lower or just doing 1 cycle is not doing any good. Any suggestions will be helpful. Thanks, Amit. ------------------------------------------------------- AMIT DAS, Ph.D. PRESENT ---- BUILDING 8600, MS-6460 BIOLOGY AND SOFT MATTER DIVISION P O BOX 2008 OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY 1 BETHEL VALLEY ROAD OAK RIDGE, TN 37831-6460 U.S.A. PROTEIN CRYSTALLOGRAPHY SOLID STATE PHYSICS DIVISION BARC, TROMBAY, MUMBAI-400085. INDIA. --------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Test
by Paul Adams 11 Oct '14

11 Oct '14

-- Paul Adams Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 64, Room 248 Building 80, Room 247 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 64R0121 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

1 0

anomalous difference map
by CPMAS Chen 11 Oct '14

11 Oct '14

Hi, phenix users, A difference map is used to identify whether there is anything not-modeled, say some ligands, ions. Then when I generate anomalous difference map, I should not put the ligand(which contains Br) in the model, right? Or in phenix, after I put the Br-ligand in the model, I should not see the anomalous difference density at the site, right? Could anyone give me a confirmation of this? Thanks! Charles -- *************************************************** Charles Chen Research Associate University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology ******************************************************

6 15

Re: [phenixbb] (no subject)
by Sneha Rangarajan 08 Oct '14

08 Oct '14

After running autobuild, the Rfactors were 26/39 (autobuild removed the first 30 residues from the Nter!) but the maps look much better. I ran a quick refinement with default settings and the Rfactors are now 31/39 and can now see the density for my peptide (absent in the model) coming up. I have a few questions- 1) When is a good time to start building the peptide into the density (should I wait until Rfactors improve significantly)? 2) If so, should I be masking the peptide density somehow so that further refinement doesn't flatten out that density? 3) What is a general good strategy for lowering Rfactors? (Esp if the gap between Rwork and Rfree is high..like 28/40 or so)? Thanks a lot, S -----Original Message----- From: Sneha Rangarajan Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 12:54 PM To: 'Paul Adams' Cc: phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org Subject: RE: I think my problem in MR has been one of the chains. Anyway I tried the ideas you suggested and seems like they worked! I used ensembler to create a merged pdb of the problematic chain and used phaser giving both chains as multiple ensembles. It gave me a solution with LLG=474 (highest I have got so far) and TFZ=18.8. I also tried MRage and got a solution with LLG=294. In both these maps, the density for chain1 ("bad chain") is not as good as the other chain but is nonetheless far better than what I have got before. I am currently running autobuild on the solution hoping my Rfactors would be reasonable this time. Thanks a lot for your inputs. They really helped!! S -----Original Message----- From: Paul Adams [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:51 PM To: Sneha Rangarajan Subject: Re: This likes normal orthorhombic data. In this case I suggest that the most likely issue is the search model (I assume your molecule is fairly small given the unit cell dimensions). I would look at ways to create the best search model using using tools like sculptor and ensembler. You can get Phaser to search for the two domains in the same run but using multiple ensembles. You might also want to try MRage in Phenix, where you can just provide the data file and the sequence and it will try to make the best model and solve the MR problem. On Sep 30, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Sneha Rangarajan <rsneha(a)umd.edu> wrote: > Oh I see. I tried to repeat xtriage with the scala.mtz file and am attaching the log file. > > ________________________________________ > From: Sneha Rangarajan > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:58 PM > To: Paul Adams > Cc: help(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: RE: > > Even i thought so but after i run mosflm and process the data in p21 or p1 and run quicksymm/quickscale it always suggests that the chosen space group is not correct and that it should be p212121. > > I will try looking into Zanuda. Thanks. > > S > ________________________________________ > From: Paul Adams [pdadams(a)lbl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:36 PM > To: Sneha Rangarajan > Cc: help(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: Re: > > It looks like your R-merge etc in P222 is very high, what leads you to think this is the correct point group? Can you send the xtriage output for the unmerged P2 data? > > On Sep 30, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Sneha Rangarajan <rsneha(a)umd.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Nat, >> >> I am attaching the Xtriage log file from p222.mtz. >> Would you need anything else (mtz,pdb)? >> >> Thanks, >> Sneha >> <xtriage_237.log> > > -- > Paul Adams > Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence > Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, > Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, > U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy > Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area > > Building 64, Room 248 > Building 80, Room 247 > Building 978, Room 4126 > Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul > > Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory > 1 Cyclotron Road > BLDG 64R0121 > Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. > > Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ > 1-510-495-2506 ] > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > <xtriage_264.log> -- Paul Adams Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 64, Room 248 Building 80, Room 247 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 64R0121 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

3 5

PDBe workshop on programmatic access to macromolecular structure information, 20-21 Nov 2014, Cambridge UK
by swanand＠ebi.ac.uk 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

=============================================================== Programmatic Access to the Macromolecular Structure Information =============================================================== -------- PDBe Workshop for Programmers, 20-21 Nov 2014 -------- ============= What? The Protein Data bank in Europe (PDBe; http://pdbe.org) is organising a hands-on, interactive workshop for developers interested in using primary and value-added information about the 3D structures in PDB and EMDB. Programmatic access to macromolecular structure data as well as information about assemblies, structure quality, literature and citations, and up-to-date cross-references to other biomedical resources (UniProt, Pfam, CATH, SCOP, etc.) is a critical requirement for integrative bioinformatics analyses and workflows. PDBe has developed a set of REST APIs (http://wwwdev.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/api/doc) that provide easy access to high-quality information regarding biomacromolecular structures archived in PDB and EMDB. They provide a simple, reliable, light-weight mechanism to query macromolecular structure data, select entries or molecules of interest, and access targeted information about them, including information about the molecules, experimental details, assemblies, motifs, function, taxonomy, structure quality, etc. The API is used by the PDBe services and is also integrated in Jmol/Jsmol. We will also present Solr/Lucene based query API for macromolecular structure information including PDB, EMDB and value added information on assemblies, structure quality and up-to-date cross-reference infromation to other biomedical databases based on SIFTS (http://pdbe.org/sifts) . ============= Is it for me? Do you (plan to) develop software or on-line resources that use or need access to information about structures in PDB or EMDB? Would you rather not maintain your private infrastructure for retrieving, parsing, storing and updating such information? If so, then this workshop is for you! In the workshop, we will explain what information is available through the API and how you can access it from your own software or resource. There is plenty of time for hands-on work where experienced PDBe developers will try to help you use the API for your specific needs. ============= When? 20 & 21 November 2014. ============= Where? EMBL-EBI (http://www.ebi.ac.uk) , Cambridge. ============= How much does it cost? We expect you to pay for (and arrange) your own travel to and from Cambridge. However, there is no fee for the workshop, and we will provide free accommodation (Holiday Inn Express; http://www.hiexpresscambridgeduxford.co.uk), transportation between the hotel and the EMBL-EBI, coffee/tea, lunches and a workshop dinner on the 20th. This is all thanks to generous funding from the Wellcome Trust to PDBe. ============= How can I apply? E-mail Swanand Gore (swanand(a)ebi.ac.uk) or Jose Dana (dana(a)ebi.ac.uk) at PDBe no later than 20 October 2014 with the following details: * a brief description of the software you have developed or are developing - i.e. what it does, in which field, how many users, relevant publications, etc. * programming language(s) you are specifically interested in (python examples and tutorials will be provided). * how you would benefit from this workshop. * any specific topics or questions you would like to see addressed in the workshop. If the workshop is oversubscribed, we will select participants based on the information provided. You will be informed by the end of October if you have been selected or not, or whether you are on the stand-by list. ============= Prerequisites? Basic programming experience in use of REST API’s. Bring your own laptop with git and iPython notebook pre-installed if you want to follow the python tutorial and examples. If you need to make plots, make sure that matplotlib is also installed. ============= Questions? Swanand Gore (swanand(a)ebi.ac.uk) or Jose Dana (dana(a)ebi.ac.uk) at PDBe will be happy to answer your queries.

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] Calculate average B-factor?
by Ed Pozharski 06 Oct '14

06 Oct '14

grep "^ATOM " filename.pdb | cut -c 61-66 | awk '{s+=$1;} END {print s/NR;}' "Nobody likes a show off, Private" Skipper Cheers Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Chen Zhao <c.zhao(a)yale.edu> </div><div>Date:10/04/2014 4:03 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: PHENIX user mailing list <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> </div><div>Subject: [phenixbb] Calculate average B-factor? </div><div> </div>Dear all, I am just wondering whether there is a command line tool in phenix that calculates the average B-factor of a PDB file? Can it deal with the ANISOU records (from TLS refinement or not) properly? I looked into previous posts but the --show-adp-statistics option in phenix.pdbtools seems to be no longer available in the version (1.9-1678) I installed. Thank you so much, Chen

3 2

Calculate average B-factor?
by Chen Zhao 05 Oct '14

05 Oct '14

Dear all, I am just wondering whether there is a command line tool in phenix that calculates the average B-factor of a PDB file? Can it deal with the ANISOU records (from TLS refinement or not) properly? I looked into previous posts but the --show-adp-statistics option in phenix.pdbtools seems to be no longer available in the version (1.9-1678) I installed. Thank you so much, Chen

2 2

Off Topic: Calculating accurately RMSD
by PC 03 Oct '14

03 Oct '14

4 7

Problems building source
by Jason Swails 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

Hi everyone, I'm a new user that is trying to get Phenix installed. I'm trying the source build since I want to poke around with a little development. I haven't had much luck in this endeavor (I'm fairly competent when it comes to building especially scientific software from source). What I tried was untarring the 1.9-1692 release tarball and running ./install in that directory. The first thing to fail was Imaging, and the build log complained of a missing freetype/fterrors.h header. On my machine, that file is located in /usr/include/freetype2/fterrors.h. OK, so I symlinked /usr/local/include/freetype to /usr/include/freetype2 and tried again. Imaging succeeded, but then I noticed that Phenix tried to compile its own version of freetype later (!). I'm curious as to why it would either a) not build freetype first so Imaging could use it or b) why it would try to build freetype at all when it already has to be installed. Anyway, after that was done, I got another problem when the install process got to Pango. Then I get the error: fribidi_config.h:1:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory But glib has already been installed according to the Phenix install log (and I have it installed on my system, too). There's a glib.h in tmp/glib-2.12.11/glib/glib.h (but that directory is never added to the include search path), and also in /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib.h. I admit that the install process has me puzzled (for instance, I can't figure out how to augment CFLAGS for the Pango install to make it find glib.h), and I feel that I'm playing a bit of whack-a-mole with the build problems here... Any help or advice regarding getting the source code built is appreciated. Thanks! Jason -- Jason M. Swails BioMaPS, Rutgers University Postdoctoral Researcher

2 1

Re: [phenixbb] (no subject)
by Sneha Rangarajan 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

I think my problem in MR has been one of the chains. Anyway I tried the ideas you suggested and seems like they worked! I used ensembler to create a merged pdb of the problematic chain and used phaser giving both chains as multiple ensembles. It gave me a solution with LLG=474 (highest I have got so far) and TFZ=18.8. I also tried MRage and got a solution with LLG=294. In both these maps, the density for chain1 ("bad chain") is not as good as the other chain but is nonetheless far better than what I have got before. I am currently running autobuild on the solution hoping my Rfactors would be reasonable this time. Thanks a lot for your inputs. They really helped!! S -----Original Message----- From: Paul Adams [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:51 PM To: Sneha Rangarajan Subject: Re: This likes normal orthorhombic data. In this case I suggest that the most likely issue is the search model (I assume your molecule is fairly small given the unit cell dimensions). I would look at ways to create the best search model using using tools like sculptor and ensembler. You can get Phaser to search for the two domains in the same run but using multiple ensembles. You might also want to try MRage in Phenix, where you can just provide the data file and the sequence and it will try to make the best model and solve the MR problem. On Sep 30, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Sneha Rangarajan <rsneha(a)umd.edu> wrote: > Oh I see. I tried to repeat xtriage with the scala.mtz file and am attaching the log file. > > ________________________________________ > From: Sneha Rangarajan > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:58 PM > To: Paul Adams > Cc: help(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: RE: > > Even i thought so but after i run mosflm and process the data in p21 or p1 and run quicksymm/quickscale it always suggests that the chosen space group is not correct and that it should be p212121. > > I will try looking into Zanuda. Thanks. > > S > ________________________________________ > From: Paul Adams [pdadams(a)lbl.gov] > Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:36 PM > To: Sneha Rangarajan > Cc: help(a)phenix-online.org > Subject: Re: > > It looks like your R-merge etc in P222 is very high, what leads you to think this is the correct point group? Can you send the xtriage output for the unmerged P2 data? > > On Sep 30, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Sneha Rangarajan <rsneha(a)umd.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Nat, >> >> I am attaching the Xtriage log file from p222.mtz. >> Would you need anything else (mtz,pdb)? >> >> Thanks, >> Sneha >> <xtriage_237.log> > > -- > Paul Adams > Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence > Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, > Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, > U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy > Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area > > Building 64, Room 248 > Building 80, Room 247 > Building 978, Room 4126 > Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul > > Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory > 1 Cyclotron Road > BLDG 64R0121 > Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. > > Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ > 1-510-495-2506 ] > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > <xtriage_264.log> -- Paul Adams Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 64, Room 248 Building 80, Room 247 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 64R0121 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

1 0

PHENIX installation errors with CentOS 6
by Mark A. White 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

Hello, I am getting install errors with several phenix installations after upgrading to CentOS 6. I started with the nightly-build ========================================================================== PHENIX Installation version: dev release tag: 1807 machine type: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 OS version: 2.6.32-431.29.2.el6.x86_64 user shell: /bin/tcsh destination: /usr/local ========================================================================= Warning: /usr/local/phenix-dev-1807 already exists, will be overwritten removing existing temporary directory... ok finding existing installations... Removing out-of-date lib directory... ok Removing out-of-date base software directory... ok Installing new binary package... ok Configuring PHENIX components... ******************************************************************************** configuration step incomplete! See the log file for detailed error messages. ******************************************************************************** The log contains only a list of files ending with (./docutils/._MANIFEST.in) and no error messages. Then I went back to the latest stable version, which was installed on my server when it ran CentOS 5. Both my server and WS now produce the same error (CentOS 6). ========================================================================== PHENIX Installation version: 1.9 release tag: 1692 machine type: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 source machine type: intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 OS version: redhat-e6.5 user shell: /bin/tcsh destination: /usr/local ========================================================================= ========================================================================== Installing from binary bundle ========================================================================== bundle file: bundle-1.9-1692-intel-linux-2.6-x86_64.tar.gz PHENIX installation source directory set to: /home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-1.9-1692 PHENIX installation target directory <PHENIX_LOC > set to: /usr/local/phenix-1.9-1692 PHENIX installation build directory set to: <PHENIX_LOC > /build/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64 PHENIX temporary build directory set to: build-binary/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/marvin/tmp PHENIX installation log directory set to: build-binary/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/marvin/log ==== warning: "/usr/local/phenix-1.9-1692" already exists ==== ==== warning: cannot determine installation time-stamp, proceeding ==== installing binary components removing existing files in build-binary/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/marvin/tmp/binary finding installed versions finding binary versions binary components up-to-date the binary package will not be installed setting environment configuring PHENIX components /home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-1.9-1692/bin/install-from-binary: line 361: 19688 Segmentation fault $PHENIX_BUILD/base/bin/python $PHENIX_LOC/cctbx_project/libtbx/configure.py --current_working_directory="$PHENIX_BUILD" $PHENIX_COMPONENTS $CONFIG_OPTS >> $PHENIX_LOG/binary.log 2>&1 Error configuring: see /home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-1.9-1692/build-binary/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/marvin/log/binary.log for details The log contains only a list of files ending with (./docutils/._MANIFEST.in) and no error messages. Then I tried installing phenix-dev-1810 from source: Installing cairo... log file is /home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/install_tmp/intel-linux-2.6-x86_64/marvin/cairo_install_log getting package cairo-1.8.10.tar.gz... using /home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/gui/cairo-1.8.10.tar.gz Traceback (most recent call last): File "./bin/install.py", line 815, in <module> run(sys.argv[1:]) File "./bin/install.py", line 72, in __init__ self.install_from_source() File "./bin/install.py", line 292, in install_from_source log=out) File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 113, in __init__ self.build_cctbx_dependencies() File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 168, in build_cctbx_dependencies self.build_wxpython_dependencies() File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 425, in build_wxpython_dependencies self.build_wxpython_dependencies_linux() File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 504, in build_wxpython_dependencies_linux self.build_compiled_package_simple(pkg_name=pkg, pkg_name_label=name) File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 377, in build_compiled_package_simple log=pkg_log) File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 196, in configure_and_build self.call("make -j %d %s" % (self.nproc, " ".join(list(make_args))), log=log) File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/install_base_packages.py", line 192, in call return call(args, log=log) File "/home/white/downloads/phenix-installer-dev-1810/lib/libtbx/auto_build/installer_utils.py", line 53, in call raise RuntimeError("Call to '%s' failed with exit code %d" % (args, rc)) RuntimeError: Call to 'make -j 8 ' failed with exit code 2 I would like to install the latest developmental version. Any idea what could be going wrong? I have the latest updates installed. -- Yours sincerely, Mark A. White, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Manager, Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics Macromolecular X-ray Laboratory, Basic Science Building, Room 6.630 University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, TX 77555-0647 Tel. (409) 747-4747 Fax. (409) 747-1404 mailto://[email protected] http://xray.utmb.edu QQ: "Life is no brief candle to me. It is a sort of splendid torch which I have got a hold of for the moment, and I want to make it burn as brightly as possible before handing it on to future generations. " - George Bernard Shaw

3 4

refinement problem
by Sneha Rangarajan 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

Hello, I have a 1.9A dataset for a single chain Fv-peptide complex that shows psedomerohedral twin operators in Xtriage (1 in p212121, 3 in p21 and 7 in p1). Although most programs (in CCP4) identify the best SG to be p212121, MR cannot find a solution with p212121 due to packing clashes. I tried reprocessing it in p21 and MR can find only one molecule in the asu. The map looks quite good with good density for the sidechains. However the Rfactors wont come down. After a few rounds of refinement (rigidbody, Xray, TLS and Ind B fac) it is still 38/48. I tried processing it in p1 and have managed to find 3 molecules in the asu (missing one molecule). The map looks good. While the Rfactors are lower, the gap between Rwork and Rfree is still high (27/40). I don't know what space group I should choose to ultimately refine it and get the Rfactors low. If you need any more information, I would be happy to provide it. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks a lot, Sneha

2 2

Target function for refinement in case of Pseudo-translational symmetry
by Varun Bhaskar 29 Sep '14

29 Sep '14

Hi, I collected a dataset for a binary complex (72kDa size) to 3.62A resolution which could be processed in P32 2 1 space group. Data quality analysis with phenix.xtriage showed a presence of Pseudotranslational symmetry (Non-origin peak in the patterson with 60% intensity at 0.33, -0.33, -0.013). I determined the structure with MR. I have 6 copies in ASU. I tried Zanuda for SG validation and this looks like the right space group. For refinement when I use Maximum likelihood (ML) as the target function, my Rfactor/Rfree is around 31.3/32 but when I change it to Least square (LS) my Rfactor/Rfree drops to 27.3/29.8. The map quality after ML or LS refinement looks very similar for most of the molecule, except for few places where the map from ML has slightly better features. I read people use LS instead of ML only in the case of twinning but I am not sure if it could also be used in the case of PST. Would the use of LS as the target function for refinement be right in this case? Thanks in advance Best Regards Varun

2 1

Histidine as a hydrogen bond acceptor in Phenix refine
by Phan, Jason 27 Sep '14

27 Sep '14

Hi All, I've been refining a 1.1 Å structure with explicit hydrogen atoms and noticed that the serine HG atom (hydrogen atom attached to oxygen gamma) is rotated more than 90 degrees from the OG - NE2 (histidine) line (5 cases observed). In this position, the HG is staggered with the two carbon beta hydrogens and should be the preferred configuration. However, there is a histidine nearby with atom NE2 at 2.7 Å from the serine OG and in good geometry for Hbond formation. The other nitrogen, ND1, is protonated and interacting with an aspartic acid (similar to the catalytic triad configuration). In this protomer, the NE2 atom has a lone pair and should act as an acceptor. Thus, the OG - H - NE2 angle should be as close to 180 as possible for an ideal hydrogen bond angle. The OG - H - NE2 angle of more than 90 degrees looks a little off to me. I checked the other program, e.g. Schrodinger Prime to see how it treats this situation and found that all the OG - H - NE2 angles are within 10-60 degrees from the ideal value of 180, certainly not 90 as observed in Phenix refine. My question is is NE2 or ND1 atom of the HID or HIE protomer treated as a potential hydrogen bond acceptor in Phenix? For other acceptors like the backbone carbonyl oxygen, carboxylic acid oxygen, and water oxygen, the hydrogen bond angle OG -H -O looks good. Not when it involves histidine atom NE2 or ND1 though. The pH of the crystallization is 7 by the way. Also, there's no water nearby that would draw the HG away from the histidine. Jason

4 5

Fo-Fc omit map for ligand in the protein-ligand structure
by Wei Shi 21 Sep '14

21 Sep '14

Hi all, I am working with a protein dimer-ligand structure (resolution: 2.8Å) and am going to make a figure showing the bound ligand superimposed with the electron density (Fo-Fc) map obtained after omit refinement. What I did is to make the ligand-free structure model and then use Phenix.refine using the following parameters plus simulated annealing (torsion angle) or (Cartesian): Default: XYZ coordinates + Real-space+ Individual B factors + Occupancies. Also click: Optimize X-ray/stereochemistry weight + Optimize X-ray/ADP weight + Secondary structure restraints + NCS. Contoured at 2σ, the Fo-Fc map generated show green density for most part of the ligand, but for several atoms in the middle of the ligand, the green density is missing... It's like this: some atoms have green density and the next few no green density and then a couple few has green density and then a couple more no green denisty.... The missing green density usually means that part is disordered in the structure, right? I am not sure why the density is missing for some atoms in the middle of the ligand. It would makes more sense if the missing green density is at the end of the ligand... Does anyone happen to have any clue about what it means for the green density missing in my case? Also, I am not sure whether I did the omit refinement right: (1). For simulated annealing, it has two options, one is Cartesian and the other is Torsion angle, and it's said that torsion angle is more suitable of low resolution data. Is there any difference about which one to choose in my case? (2). Is it Okay to run the omit refinement in the presence of the following parameters as I did: Optimize X-ray/stereochemistry weight + Optimize X-ray/ADP weight + Secondary structure restraints + NCS. Thank you so much! Best, Wei

5 24

Increase in R/R(free) after phenix.real_space_refine
by George Devaniranjan 20 Sep '14

20 Sep '14

Hi, I refined (phenix.refine) a 1.0Å structure but it had a few CB outliers and some rotamer outliers. I decided to try real_space_refine, to check if they could be fixed (given that it has a higher radius of convergence). (using run=local_grid_search+minimization_global in real_space_refine) But, the R/R(free) increased from 11.39/13.24( for the refine model) to 16.51/17.55 (real_space_refine model). It seemed a big increase, when I looked at the map against the structure the protein itself seemed fine. The rotamers outliers had decreased, the CB outliers were fixed..etc The solvent fit to the density had worsened in COOT. What am I doing wrong? Any suggestions, advice would be much appreciated. Thank you, George

3 2