- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

First-Science Discussions for Life-Science Beamlines at NSLS-II: April 21-22, 2015
by Robert Sweet 27 Mar '15

27 Mar '15

We will hold a "First Science at the ABBIX Beamlines" meeting on Tuesday - Wednesday, April 21-22, 2015, pertaining to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored "Advanced Beamlines for Biological Investigations with X-rays" (ABBIX) Project. These three state-of-the-art beamlines are now under construction at the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS)-II facility at Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). Two of the beamlines are for macromolecular crystallography (MX), and the third is for life sciences applications of x-ray scattering. Visit this web site for further information and registration materials: http://workshops.ps.bnl.gov/?w=ABBIXApr2015 Briefly, the MX beamline called FMX - Frontier MX - is optimized to address microbeam applications, and the other called AMX - Highly Automated MX - is optimized for highly automated throughput. The scattering beamline called LIX - High Brightness X-Ray Scattering for Life Sciences - will offer multiple modes of study. The MX beamlines view canted undulator sources, and the scattering beamline views a single undulator, providing world-leading brightness. Current plans are to conclude construction by the end of 2015 and start commissioning then. During the commissioning period, opportunities will arise to perform early experiments before the general user programs of the beamlines commence in 2016, and it is the upcoming meeting's purpose to explore and discuss scientific areas and opportunities on which early operation of the beamlines could capitalize. Note: Registration is required. There is no registration fee. Visit this site to register: http://workshops.ps.bnl.gov/?w=ABBIXApr2015 Those who registered for the original meeting planned for January must re-register for the new occurrence in April. Contributed presentations describing experiments that exploit the capabilities of the ABBIX beamlines will be selected from submitted abstracts. The meeting will consist of both plenary and parallel sessions. The plenary session will begin with presentations on science topics in research fields that the beamlines are designed to address, followed by facility presentations to update the community about the early scientific capabilities at the suite of ABBIX beamlines and, in addition, of the Life Science and Biomedical Technology Research Resource (LSBR), sponsored by the NIH and the Department of Energy Office of Biological and Environmental Research (DOE BER). Two parallel sessions on Tuesday afternoon will focus on MX and x-ray scattering, consisting mainly of presentations that will address specific opportunities in these areas. These will be followed by two more parallel sessions on Wednesday morning, also focusing on MX and x-ray scattering, which will include contributions. If you wish to give a contributed presentation during one of the parallel sessions, please submit an abstract here: http://workshops.ps.bnl.gov/abstracts/default.aspx?w=ABBIXApr2015 The parallel sessions are designed to provide forums to facilitate more detailed discussions about potential first experiments at specific beamlines and the formation of the experiment teams. Specifically, each parallel session group will be charged to accomplish these goals: 1. Identify key research projects and the associated first experiments that may be performed at the suite of ABBIX beamlines, emphasizing those projects that will take advantage of NSLS-II properties and ABBIX beamline capabilities. 2. Facilitate the formation of research teams to generate first experiment proposals for submission. 3. Identify key additional team members in such areas as theory and analysis, ancillary measurements, and specimen preparation, needed to achieve the research goals. Confirmed invited speakers: Karen Allen (Boston Univ), Martin Caffrey (Trinity College Dublin), Seth Darst (Rockefeller Univ), Richard Gillilan (Cornell Univ), Wayne Hendrickson (Columbia Univ), AndrHoelz (California Inst Tech), Huey Huang (Rice Univ), Shenping Liu (Pfizer), Lee Makowski (Northeastern Univ), David Ostrov (Univ of Florida), Rebecca Page (Brown Univ), Anna Marie Pyle (Yale Univ), Christian Riekel (ESRF), Thomas Schneider (EMBL-Hamburg), John Tainer (Scripps Research Inst). We would like two outcomes from this meeting: (a) a concise meeting report outlining how ABBIX beamlines will help to address outstanding problems in life sciences, and (b) a list of potential first experiments along with the corresponding research teams. For more information on the meeting, please contact Sonya Kiss, at skiss(a)bnl.gov. Note: Registration deadline is Tuesday, April 14, 2015. Organizers: Lonny Berman ABBIX Project Manager National Synchrotron Light Source II Brookhaven National Laboratory Sean McSweeney Structural Biology Program Manager Photon Sciences Division Deputy Director National Synchrotron Light Source II

1 0

can mr_rosetta include twin_law?
by Ni, Fengyun 27 Mar '15

27 Mar '15

Hi everyone, When I run phenix.mr_rosetta, I use the following file (twin.eff) to add the twin_law with the keyword: refinement_params=twin.eff. I checked the output that the phenix.refine stage could recognize this file. But the autobuild step can not read this file and give the error information as follows, refinement.twinning { twin_law = "h,-h-k,-l" } Unable to read the parameters file twin.eff. Is there anyway to overcome this issue? Thank you very much in advance! Fengyun

2 1

Refinement
by mohamed noor 25 Mar '15

25 Mar '15

Dear all I have a structure at 1.4 A currently with an Rfactor of 21/26 %. I notice from the plot by cycle that everytime the RMS bonds/angles reduce, the Rfactor increases a few percent. Is there any way of telling phenix.refine to not 'restrain' the model too much? I have already used automatic weighting. Also, RINGER identified a few alternate conformations, so I'm thinking that modeling this might account for a better model. However, as I have an NCS of 4, this can be tedious to do by hand, and AFAIK, phenix.refine does not create new conformations. Is there an alternative? Final question, some residues were flagged as having high B factors but not in all the copies. How do I deal with this? Some background: I initially had problems with refinement being stuck at 30-35 % in SG P 3 2 1 (as suggested by Pointless and Xtriage). However, the beamline scientist suggested that there could've been lattice translocation and that it is actually P 3. Reintegrating seems to have solved the problem. With integrated data up to 1.2 A, I tried cut-off at 1.4, 1.3 and 1.2 A. Together with CC1/2 and refinement results, I chose 1.4 A, but should I cut it a bit lower? Thanks.

2 1

PhD position in Structural Biology in Norway
by Hans-Petter Hersleth 24 Mar '15

24 Mar '15

Dear all, A 3- or 4-year PhD position in Structural Biology / Biophysics / Biochemistry starting August 2015 is available at University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology in the Metalloprotein group. The project is in the field of structural biology, biophysics and biochemistry with an emphasis on protein crystallography and spectroscopy (UV-vis, Raman and EPR) in combination with other biochemical and biophysical methods. The project is dealing with different redox proteins involved in oxygen activation and electron transfer. The focus will be on some enzyme systems like ribonucleotide reductase and nitric oxide synthase, their reaction mechanism and redox activation pathways. More information about the project, position and application procedure is found on the website: http://uio.easycruit.com/vacancy/1352831/96323?iso=no Applicants must hold a Master's degree or equivalent in structural biology, bioinorganic chemistry, biochemistry, biophysics, protein crystallography or related fields. We are seeking a highly motivated candidate that should have skills and experience in working with proteins or bioinorganic molecules. It would be advantageous with hands-on experience within topics like cloning, protein expression, purification, crystallisation, protein crystallography, spectroscopy, bioinorganic chemistry, protein-protein interactions, enzyme kinetics and redox-, radical- and metalloproteins. Candiates without a Master's Degree have until 30 June 2015 to complete the final exam. Application deadline is 13th April 2015 through the website: http://uio.easycruit.com/vacancy/1352831/96323?iso=no For further information please contact: Dr. Hans-Petter Hersleth, (h.p.hersleth(a)ibv.uio.no) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans-Petter Hersleth, PhD Project Leader, Researcher and Senior Lecturer Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo Section for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology P.O.Box 1066 Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 2285 4631 Fax: +47 2285 4726 Mobile: +47 413 33 126 http://www.hersleth.org/ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

on Phenix's "Generate "Table 1" for journal"
by Smith Liu 23 Mar '15

23 Mar '15

Dear All, With the Phenix refine PDB and mtz file, I just prepared a "Table 1" for journal with Phenix. Here I find something special, which I hope I can get your advice. First, for the "Total reflections" and "Multiplicity", they are empty (no data given). Wil you please tell me why? Secondly, it writes, "Statistics for the highest-resolution shell are shown in parentheses". Suppose my crystal resolution is 2.5-45.6, then the the highest-resolution value should be 2.5, rather than 45.6, right? In addition, what is the diffrence between highest-resolution shell in the Table 1 and highest-resolution bin in the "Results" of Phenix refine? What is R-merge, R-meas,CC1/2 and CC*? I can get these data from MOSFLM output mtz file. But is my images were processe by HKL, which I have no experience, then how can I get the R-merge, R-meas,CC1/2 and CC*? I am looking forward to getting your reply. Smith

7 6

question related to phenix produced PDB file
by Dialing Pretty 21 Mar '15

21 Mar '15

Dear All, In my Phenix refine produced PDB file, I find in REMARK 3, there is a sentence "PHASE ERROR (DEGREES, MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD BASED): 42.3. Does 42.3 means 42.3%? Is it too high? I am looking forward to getting your reply. Dialing

3 3

error message in phenix refine
by Almudena Ponce Salvatierra 20 Mar '15

20 Mar '15

Hi everyone, I have merged 3 mtz files into one and done successfully Molecular replacement with it. However when I try to refine, I get the following error message: "cctbx error: merge_equivalents_exact: imcompatible flags for hkl (0, 0, 16) (mismatch between Friedel pairs). How can I fix this? Thank you very much in advance. Best, Almudena -- Almudena Ponce-Salvatierra Macromolecular crystallography and Nucleic acid chemistry Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry Am Fassberg 11 37077 Göttingen Germany

2 1

fixing rotamers with coot
by Benoît Masquida 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Dear all, I am using Coot 0.7.2 and phenix 1.9-1692 on Ubuntu 13.10 and I have the following error message when I try to regularize zone, edit Chi angles or fix rotamer outliers. Error message :"Refinement setup failure. Failed to find restraints for : 'residue list' " Apparently a cif dictionary is missing that should be output by phenix to be used by coot. Does anyone has any idea? Thanks in advance. Benoit --

2 1

on Phenix refine
by Smith Liu 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Dear All, Will you please tell me which strategy of Phenix refine is for reciprocal space refinement? In the log, I often see "XYZ individual (reciprocal space)", will you please let me know whether "XYZ individual (reciprocal space)" is caused by "XYZ coordinates" or by "Optimize X-ray/sterochemistry weight"? Smith

4 3

on the eff file
by Smith Liu 19 Mar '15

19 Mar '15

Dear All, Someone told me from the refine eff file, I can know what is my strategy for my refinement. I have run 2 refines with the same input files, For one refine, in the graphical interface I have checked xyz-coordinates, Real-space, Individual B-factors, Occupanies, Optimize X-ray/sterochemistry weight, Automaticaly orrect N/Q/H erros. For the other refine, I only checked XYZcoordinates, Real-space and Autonomously correct N/Q/H errors. I have checked the eff files from the 2 diffrent refines, but I cannot find any diffrence in the eff file. Thus will you please tell me how to find the diffrence in the 2 eff files? Or my strategies for each refine was recorded in the other files? I am looking forward to getting your reply. Smith

3 2