- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

Bug in phenix.carbo_load in latest nightlies
by Roger Dodd 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

Hi all, I've been using the carbo_load tool to add in GlcNAc residues to Asn side chains and have noticed that in recent nightlies there is a bug that throws up the following error message (this occurs even if carbo_load is just run in "mode 1"): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Applications/phenix-dev-1924/build/../modules/elbow/elbow/command_line/carbo_load.py", line 705, in <module> run(args) File "/Applications/phenix-dev-1924/build/../modules/elbow/elbow/command_line/carbo_load.py", line 417, in run from elbow.saccharide import carbohydrate_classes File "/Applications/phenix-dev-1924/modules/elbow/elbow/saccharide/carbohydrate_classes.py", line 28, in <module> from phenix.ligands.DensityBlobsClassConnectivity import DensityBlobsClassConnectivity ImportError: No module named DensityBlobsClassConnectivity I get this with dev-1894 and dev-1924 but not the last stable 1.9-1692. Cheers, Roger -- Roger B. Dodd, PhD Cambridge Institute for Medical Research University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Cambridge Biomedical Campus Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0XY

2 1

Molecular replacement with fixed solution
by Muhammed bashir Khan 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Hi There; I want to solve the structure with molecular replacement using phaser in phenix GUI. When I get solution from the one, how I can use as it as already solution using phenix in the next run. I use the "ensamble is fixed partial solution" but seems its not working. Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. Thanks Regards -- Muhammad Bashir Khan ************************************************** Department for Structural and Computational Biology Max F. Perutz Laboratories University of Vienna Campus Vienna Biocenter 5 A-1030 Vienna Austria Austria Phone: +43(1)427752224 Fax: +43(1)42779522

2 2

sudden increase of clashscore
by Smith Lee 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

Dear All, In a Phenix refinement, with refinement settings as default in the graphics interface, at 2' rsrl stage the clashscore suddenly increases to more than 50, and then gradually decreases to lower than 20. Will you please tell me why this can occur? And what its effect on the refinement? Smith

1 0

Re: [phenixbb] questions related to Phenix refinement
by Kay Diederichs 18 Jan '15

18 Jan '15

Dear Pavel, Am 18.01.15 um 07:23 schrieb phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org: > Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 20:36:30 -0800 > From: Pavel Afonine <pafonine(a)lbl.gov> > To: Smith Lee <smith_lee123(a)yahoo.com>, "phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org" > <phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org> > Subject: Re: [phenixbb] questions related to Phenix refinement > Message-ID: <54BB384E.30602(a)lbl.gov> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; Format="flowed" > > Hello Smith, > >> > In the X-ray statistics by resolution bin of the Phenix.refine result, >> > there is a column "%complete". For my refinement data, I find the >> > better the resolution (from lower resolution to the higher >> > resolution), the lower the completeness (for example for 40-6 A, >> > %complete is 98, for 3.1-3.0 A, %complete is 60%, for 2.2-2.1 A, >> > %complete is 6%). >> > >> > Will you please tell me what does this "%complete" mean? why it >> > decreases in the better diffraction bin? > Completeness is how many reflections you have compared to theoretically > possible. So the higher completeness the better. Ideally (and it's not > that uncommon these days) you should have 100% complete data set in > d_min-inf resolution. Anything below say 80 in any resolution bin is > bad, and numbers you quote 6-60% mean something is wrong withe the dataset. > Given your standing in the community, the last sentence will lead many unexperienced people to believe that they should cut their data at the resolution where the completeness falls below "say 80"%. But that would be wrong. There is no reason to consider a completeness as "too low in a high-resolution shell" as long as the data in that shell are good. Particularly in refinement any reflection helps to improve the model, and to reduce overfitting. Of course, more complete is better! Nowadays there should be no reason _not_ to get >95% (>99% in high-symmetry spacegroups) completeness in the low resolution shells, unless people stick to the "collect minimum rotation range" paradigm, and get the starting angle (or the point group!) wrong. best, Kay

3 3

FW: question regarding Table1
by SD Y 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

From: ccp4_sc(a)hotmail.com To: phenixbb-request(a)phenix-online.org Subject: question regarding Table1 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 20:30:47 -0600 Hi Everyone, I used phenix refined pdb, mtz and original mtz in the latest version of phenix to generate Table 1 and I felt the following was not right. I am not sure of the reason. R-merge 1.193e-17 (1.036e-17) R-meas 1.688e-17 CC1/2 1 (1) CC* 1 (1) Let me know . I appreciate your comments. Regards,SDY

3 2

questions related to Phenix refinement
by Smith Lee 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

Dear All, In the X-ray statistics by resolution bin of the Phenix.refine result, there is a column "%complete". For my refinement data, I find the better the resolution (from lower resolution to the higher resolution), the lower the completeness (for example for 40-6 A, %complete is 98, for 3.1-3.0 A, %complete is 60%, for 2.2-2.1 A, %complete is 6%). Will you please tell me what does this "%complete" mean? why it decreases in the better diffraction bin? For the Ramachandran restrain in the Phenix.refine, there was a recommendation that for good resolution (I forget how much exactly, maybe 2.5 A), do not use Ramachandran restrain. But for a crystal data with resolution better than 1.5 A, in the X-ray statistics by resolution bin of the Phenix.refine result, there are more rows with resolution poorer than the defined 2.5 A (for example 40-6 A,6-3 A), although the crystal has a resolution better than 1.5 A (for example 1.4 A), can I use Ramachandran restrain in the Phenix.refine in this situation? If I use Ramachandran restrain in the Phenix.refine, I find the R-work and R-free level goes up, can we say the strategy of Ramachandran restrain in my refinement was not appropriate? I am looking forward to getting your reply. Smith

2 1

Xray / neutron joint refinement
by Anna Makal 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Hi, I have just done a joint x-ray / neutron refinement in Phenix using 5PTI structure and data from PDB. The input contains H atoms, with positions as refined against neutron dataset. In the resulting model, all H atoms ended up in 'idealized X-ray' positions (C-H distance of 0.96A), just as they would if I performed refinement against xray data only with riding model for H hydrogen atoms. Is it possible to run joint X-ray neutron refinement in such a manner that final H atoms positions are based on neutron data? Regards, Anna Makal

3 2

Phenix - Research Scientist Position
by Paul Adams 15 Jan '15

15 Jan '15

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Career-track Research Scientist Job ID: 80447 Division: Physical Biosciences Date Opened: 1/14/2015 https://lbl.taleo.net/careersection/2/jobdetail.ftl?lang=en&job=80447 Summary: A research scientist position is available to work on developing new methods for macromolecular structure determination and refinement with the PHENIX software system. To learn more about Phenix visit: http://www.phenix-online.org Duties: This position will develop and maintain a powerful graphical user interface for the PHENIX system, and develop code within the Computational Crystallography Toolbox (cctbx). This position will include the development of new methods for crystallographic structure determination and completion in the context of the PHENIX program. This position also has a significant responsibility for the maintenance of PHENIX automated compilation tools, web-based interfaces for software downloads and coordinating releases of Phenix to the user community. The incumbent will work under the general direction of the Principal Investigator (PI; Paul Adams) for this project. Duties will also include testing, documentation writing, and extensive interaction with users and other developers. Qualifications: Demonstrated expertise with computational methods for protein crystallography. First-author publications in the area of macromolecular crystallography. Familiarity with software development: C++ and the Python scripting language. Advanced knowledge of Python-based or similar graphical user interface development tools. Solid interpersonal skills and the ability to work in a team environment are critical. A Ph.D. in computational crystallography, biophysics, chemistry, computer science, or related field is strongly preferred. Note that this is a multi-year position that is renewed annually on the basis on performance and continued funding. Berkeley Lab addresses the world’s most urgent scientific challenges by advancing sustainable energy, protecting human health, creating new materials, and revealing the origin and fate of the universe. Founded in 1931, Berkeley Lab’s scientific expertise has been recognized with 13 Nobel prizes. The University of California manages Berkeley Lab for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science. Berkeley Lab is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, age or protected veteran status. Learn more at http://www.lbl.gov. -- Paul Adams Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 64, Room 248 Building 80, Room 247 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 64R0121 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

1 0

Reducing R/R-free
by George D 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi Phenix users, I was looking at the phenix-refine manual and it mentions running optimize_mask=true optimize_xyz_weight=true optimize_adp_weight=true I was wondering what else I could try to bring the Rw/Rf down by 1-2% if possible, just wondering if there are any other strategies I could try. Thank you, George

5 11

phenix.pdb_as_cif
by jp d 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

hi,of course, i should have included the versionphenix.version_1.9-1692 the pdb has done more digging and included this comment "Aside from the asym_id, there is another way we use for the mapping, _atom_site_anisotrop.id should map(for ANSIO) to _atom_site.id(for ATOM). This is one-by-one match for each atom. If you look at the file, you see that in the ATOM section, you have ATOM 99999 N3 . U . 367 ? -23.56200 29.36600 106.68800 1.000 135.52000 N ? UC ? 11964 1 ATOM 100000 C4 . U . 367 ? -23.35700 30.62600 106.16100 1.000 133.22000 C ? UC ? 11964 1 But in the ANISO section, you have 99999 N3 . U . 367 ? 2.04230 1.43260 1.67410 -0.19220 -0.28280 -0.16500 A0000 C4 . U . 367 ? 2.00150 1.41600 1.64420 -0.1 8730 -0.28010 -0.16450 i.e. the atom No. after 99999 is inconsistent between the two sections. The ANISO should use 100000. " thanksjpd

2 2