- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

SSRL/LCLS User Meeting Registration is Open
by Mooers, Blaine H.M. (HSC) 29 Sep '22

29 Sep '22

Dear phenixbb: The SSRL/LCLS User's Meeting will be September 26-30, 2022. It will be virtual again due to COVID, but the of the sessions will be recorded live. Registration<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://events.bizzabo.com/SLAC-UsersMeeting-20…> is free and open to all. We had about 1600 registrants last year. We will have 27 workshops, 3 poster sessions, and 3 plenary sessions. Distinguished plenary speakers include Drs. John Helliwell and Linda Young. Although the registered attendees will be able to view the videos at a later time, please do attend during the live sessions to participate in the question and answer periods. There will be several poster prizes. The BioXFEL prizes are not limited to work done at LCLS. The deadline<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://events.bizzabo.com/SLAC-UsersMeeting-20…> for the submission of poster abstracts is September 9th. Best regards, Blaine Mooers on behalf of the SSRL/LCLS User's Meeting Organizing Committee and the SSRL User Executive Committee<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/content/abou…> and the LCLS User Executive Committee<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lcls.slac.stanford.edu/lcls-users-organ…>

2 1

Alternative to AlphaFold2?
by Chip Lesburg 22 Sep '22

22 Sep '22

Hi PHENIX users, At this past summer's Diffraction Methods GRC meeting<https://www.grc.org/diffraction-methods-in-structural-biology-conference/20…>, Tom Terwilliger presented the utility of incorporating AlphaFold2 predictions during structure fitting and rebuilding. I wonder if anyone has experience using that or an alternative such as OmegaFold<https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.21.500999v1> or OpenFold<https://github.com/aqlaboratory/openfold>? Are any of these easier or harder to get set up? Chip [cid:153156_edd5022b-de61-48a6-bf68-1a41de35ba89.png] Charles Lesburg Vice President, Structural Biology M 908-265-2064 301 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA 02142 odysseytx.com This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. ODYSSEY THERAPEUTICS, INC. ("ODYSSEY THERAPEUTICS") reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. ODYSSEY THERAPEUTICS cannot be committed by this e-mail or warrant the accuracy or validity of any information presented. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.

2 1

Question about occupancy and 2Fo-Fc and Fo-Fc maps
by Vatsal Purohit 19 Sep '22

19 Sep '22

Hi everyone, I had 2 questions regarding occupancy and maps generated in ligand-bound regions for various ligand models potentially present in the structure: 1. I’ve been working with some 2.0 angstrom structures and trying out refinements with 2 sets of bound ligands at varying occupancies (at the same active site) to get an approximate idea of their relative populations in the structure. For one set of ligands, I observe 2Fo-Fc density in regions uniquely occupied by them even when their occupancy is zero. Could there be a reason why this is the case? 2. Additionally, I observe red Fo-Fc density in the same region when the occupancy is set to 1.0. It disappears at lower occupancies of 0.7 indicating that a lower population of this ligand is present. However, when the occupancy is very low, we don’t see an equivalent green Fo-Fc density popping up in the same region. Could there be a reason for why the red Fo-Fc density at high occupancy doesn’t translate to green Fo-Fc for the same region at low occupancy? Any information or resources that could give me more insight into this question would be really helpful! Regards, Vatsal

2 1

General interest article
by John R Helliwell 09 Sep '22

09 Sep '22

Dear Colleagues, I imagine you will find the article “The 4Rs and crystal structure analysis: reliability, reproducibility, replicability and reusability” of interest. The weblink is https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/2022/05/00/dv5002/index.html The article is open access. It is a Teaching and Education article in J Appl Cryst. Best wishes, John Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell DSc

1 0

Runtime error : Bond distance
by Luca Pellegrini 06 Sep '22

06 Sep '22

Phenix real space refine (dev 4704) crashes with: RuntimeError : Bond distance > max_reasonable_bond_distance: 67.4676 > 50: I’ve found various reports of this error in the bb but no (to me) clear solution, only one suggestion to increase the max_reasonable_bond_distance (Nov 2017). I tried setting excessive_bond_distance_limit (I guess is the same) to 999 but with no success as Phenix stops with the same error. Any help on how to fix this gratefully received. Best wishes, Luca

2 1

Reference model restraints
by Luca Pellegrini 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

Hello, Phenix.real_space_refine keeps pushing a residue out of density so I'd like to restrain it to its current position. Can you please let me know how to implement in the GUI the first example at point 14 at https://phenix-online.org/documentation/reference/real_space_refine.html#us… phenix.real_space_refine model.pdb map.mtz \ reference_coordinate_restraints.enabled=true \ reference_coordinate_restraints.selection="chain A and resseq 12:21" \ reference_coordinate_restraints.sigma=0.05 Best wishes, Luca Luca Pellegrini, PhD Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1GA UK

2 1

Phenix website downtime
by Billy Poon 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

Hi everyone, There was some networking issue which caused the Phenix website to be down for several hours. The site should be back to normal, but please let us know if you have any issues. Thanks! -- Billy K. Poon Research Scientist, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road, M/S 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720 Fax: (510) 486-5909 Web: https://phenix-online.org

1 0

RNA structural biology position (Scientist-Sr.Scientist) at Arrakis Therapeutics
by Elena Menichelli 25 Aug '22

25 Aug '22

Dear all, We have an open position for an RNA structural biologist at Arrakis Therapeutics (Boston, MA area). The ideal candidate will have a background in structural characterization of RNA (X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM or atomic force microscopy) and a passion for developing small molecules that target RNA in a very collaborative environment. Please feel free to visit Arrakis’ website for a more detailed job description and to reach out to me for additional information and informal discussion. https://arrakistx.com/careers/current-openings/ With best regards, Elena ******* Elena Menichelli, PhD | Head of Structural Biology emenichelli(a)arrakistx.com<mailto:[email protected]> | www.arrakistx.com<http://www.arrakistx.com/>

1 0

Launch of IUCrData Raw Data Letters: Editorial
by John R Helliwell 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Dear Colleagues, I imagine you will be interested to know of the launch of IUCrData’s Raw Data Letters. The Main Editor is Dr Loes Kroon Batenburg. See https://forums.iucr.org/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=449&p=729#p729 Greetings, John Emeritus Professor John R Helliwell DSc Chair of IUCr CommDat

1 0

phenix.refine command lane xyz restrains
by Błażej Bagiński 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Dear Phenix community, lately I started toying with the terminal version of our favourite refinement software (on kubuntu linux). I'm refining a structure with a ligand that is not in the refmac database (.cif file needed), and I couldn't find anything on how to implement xyz coordinates restraints for the procedure. In other words, I have a ligand that I built into the polder map and I want to tell the software "do not change the positions in space of these atoms". How can I do that? Also, side question: why there are three different(?) versions of command line phenix.refine for every phenix installation? What is the difference between them? REMARK 6 I followed the online guide for "Refinement at high resolution" on my 1,2~1,3A structure and the results were surprisingly nice, I'd say potentially even better than usually used parameters in GUI (5 cycles both). Kind regards, Blazej

2 1