- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

FYI : autobuild : "refine_pdb_in.mtz is missing" etc.
by Lepore, Bryan 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

here's a google-able post of a *solved problem* for the archive : phenix 1.6.4-486 (latest official release as of 21sep2010) building ends (FINISHED) with error messages (see below). some associated job setup details : phenix.autobuild with CL flag refine_eff_file_list=my_refinement_params.eff cartesian or torsion annealing, or start_temperature work OK in building/refinement. two segid's in .pdb, one chain id etc. SOLUTION : use the latest build. i used phenix-dev-533 GNU/Linux 32-bit. and thanks especially to Tom Terwilliger for the solution. [key error messages]: Failed to carry out AutoBuild_multiple_models: Sorry a subprocess has failed... Failed to carry out AutoBuild_build_cycle: Sorry...the file AutoBuild_run_1_/TEMP0/refine_pdb_in.mtz is missing...

1 0

autobuild : annealing
by Lepore, Bryan 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

[ phenix 1.6.4-486 ] looks like autobuild annealing is Cartesian. are there any (simple) tricks to get torsion, b/c seems there are no flags for it. -bryan

2 1

deleting jobs in phenix
by Sebastiano Pasqualato 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hi all, sorry for the maybe silly question, but I don't seem to find a way to delete jobs from a project in phenix (I'm using ver. 1.6.2-473 on a MacBook Pro). The 'job history' tab on the main window does not allow that, so I was wondering if there's an easy way to do it. Thanks a lot for the great software suite, keep it up guys, ciao s. -- Sebastiano Pasqualato, PhD IFOM-IEO Campus Dipartimento di Oncologia Sperimentale Istituto Europeo di Oncologia via Adamello, 16 20139 - Milano Italy tel +39 02 9437 5094 fax +39 02 9437 5990

2 4

Phenix renewal support
by Paul Adams 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Dear Phenix Users, I hope that Phenix has been helpful in your work. We are in the process of submitting a renewal for funding of the Phenix project and I would be most appreciative of your support for our renewal. If you would be willing to write me a short note, before September 18th, in the form of a signed letter (PDF) that indicates how much Phenix has helped your research, that would be incredibly helpful for our renewal. You can send your letter to me at PDAdams(a)lbl.gov Cheers, Paul -- Paul Adams Deputy Division Director, Physical Biosciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Head, Berkeley Center for Structural Biology Building 64, Room 248 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 64R0121 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Kathleen Moody [ KLMoody(a)lbl.gov ] [ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

2 1

R factor
by zhangh1＠umbc.edu 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hi, I want to calculate Fc based on the PDB file and reproduce the R factor in it. I first tried phenix.model_vs_data. It optimized ksol bsol and b_cart, and the output R factor (0.2143) is close enough to that in PDB (0.215). However, it didn't generate mtz files containing the calculated Fc. Then, I take the optimized ksol bsol and b_cart as the input and tried phenix.fmodel. I wrote my own code to calcuate the R factor. However, I got a lower R factor (0.2078). I think the reason might be my R calculation formula (sigma(fo-fc)/sigma(fo)) is wrong; or model_vs_data did more than just did flat solvent correction and anisotropic scaling. So, I am wondering whether phenix can: (1) Do the similar thing as model_vs_data (hope can be somehow faster:), but generate Fc-containing mtz file; (2) Do a simple R factor calculate to see whether my code is wrong (maybe answered already:) Thanks! Best Regards, Hailiang

2 7

generate Rfree flag for twinned crystals with 3 twin fractions
by Zheng Zhou 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Dear all After reading the informative posts in mailing list, I started to deal with my first twinning dataset. The space group is P3. Xtriage found 3 twin laws. R vs R statistics indicated perfect twinning for two twin laws and one is twin with RPS. I realize that twin-related reflections should be in the same work or free group. Could phenix handle the Rfree flag correctly for me when there are more than one twin fraction identified? By applying one twin law, the Rfree dropped from 37% to 28% using phenix. When I use Refmac, the twin fractions are refined and the Rfree is down to 26%. I copied the Rfree flag from phenix to the ccp4 in this case. When I let ccp4 generate Rfree flag automatically, the Rfree is refined to 26% too. Should I label the Rfree at a higher space group? Thanks for your advice Best, Zheng (Joe) Zhou

2 1

Resolve NCS masks
by Florian Schmitzberger 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Dear All, I would have a question regarding the use of masks in Resolve in Phenix for density modification: Is it possible to output the NCS and/or solvent masks Resolve is using during the Autosol run (similar as the options from the stand alone Resolve version) such as: mask_as_mtz ncs_mask_file mask.mtz protein_mask_file What are the best criteria (other than the final maps of course) within the output from Phenix.resolve to judge if the NCS (and/or solvent) mask was chosen adequately? (NCS_overlap?) I am mostly concerned if the masks chosen do include some of the more peripheral parts of my protein molecule and do not flatten these regions. Secondly, it is possible within Phenix Autosol wizard to supply a pdb file (with dummy atoms) for the mask for Resolve to construct the NCS mask? i.e. similar to set mask_pdb file= dummyatom.pdb Regards, Florian ----------------------------------------------------------- Florian Schmitzberger Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology Harvard Medical School 250 Longwood Avenue, SGM 130 Boston, MA 02115, US Tel: 001 617 432 5602

2 1

Ligand restraints editing with REEL
by Joseph Brock 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hi all, I'm working on a 1.5A structure that contains a novel ligand within the active site, which is an Arsenic derivative of Glutathione, using the Phenix GUI, version 1.6.4-486. I have been using the 'Molinspiration' webpage (http://www.molinspiration.com/docu/webme/) to generate a smiles string, which I then feed into ELBOW. Although the structure/chemical restraints of Glutathione should be unchanged by the covalent linkage to arsenic through the cysteinyl sulfur, the resulting restraints file consistently restricts one of the dihedrals to a value that is incompatible with the (quite clear) electron density. This occurs regardless of wether i use AM1 optimization, and is unresponsive to using native Glutathione (which refines into the corresponding density extremely well) as an input geometry file with any of the available 'Use geometry for' options (final geometry, initial geometry, etc). I then tried opening the output file in REEL and manually changing the corresponding dihedrals to those of glutathione, however after running simple optimization, the resulting restraints file has the same problem, and upon choosing the 'transer geometry and restraints' option (or any option) midway through running the 'eLBOW optimization' or 'AM1 optimization' options, Phenix consistently crashes. Any advice on how to transfer the origional geometry of native Glutathione to my new ligand effectively would be greatly appreciated. I'm a little confused as to the abilities of REEL, and how to affect them. Thanks so much in advance. Cheers, -Joe.

2 1

autobuild : MSE's keep coming back
by Lepore, Bryan 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

i used "semet=False" the .pdb has MET the .seq has M the output models, however, keep getting MSE's in them, complete with selenium. am i missing something? -bryan

5 6

Re: [phenixbb] Something that came up on the CCP4 list...
by Simon Kolstoe 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Just for the record I've had it make a big difference a number of times as well with both refmac & shelx. I was under the impression that phenix.refine was "cleverly" allowing me to use that trick by just starring the add riding hydrogens in the def file however it seems not - something worth knowing! Simon On 16 Sep 2010, at 20:01, Phil Jeffrey wrote: > I've had it make a big difference in certain circumstances. And in > other circumstances not so much. Definitely worth a try. I do not > use the technique routinely. > > Phil Jeffrey > Princeton > > > > On 9/16/10 11:49 AM, Simon Kolstoe wrote: >> So just to clarify further - if i am having problems with the final >> geometry of a model (eg clashscore as reported by molprobity), is >> it an >> appropriate trick to add hydrogens and then refine in phenix.refine >> using the riding hydrogens option, or does this not really change >> anything? >> >> Simon >> >> On 16 Sep 2010, at 14:26, Pavel Afonine wrote: >> >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>>> Could I just seek some clarification? I was under the impression >>>> that >>>> phenix.refine calculated riding hydrogens by default and took these >>>> into account as a restraint on the geometry? >>> >>> if you want hydrogen atoms to be used in refinement (as "riding >>> model" >>> or explicit) your need to make sure the PDB file that you give to >>> phenix.refine contains H atoms. That is you need to add them using >>> programs like phenix.reduce or phenix.ready_set or using >>> corresponding >>> functionality in the GUI. >>> >>> phenix.refine will not add them internally as part of refinement IF >>> hydrogen atoms are NOT present in input PDB file. >>> >>> Adding hydrogen atoms as 'riding model' does not add any refinable >>> parameters, but the scattering contribution from them is included >>> most >>> of the time. This is why we do not use H atoms silently but require >>> them to be in input PDB file - simply to make sure the reported >>> statistics (such as R-factors) is easily reproducible. >>> >>> All the best! >>> Pavel. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> phenixbb mailing list >>> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >>> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >> >> _______________________________________________ >> phenixbb mailing list >> phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org >> http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb >

2 1