- phenixbb - phenix-online.org

molprobity vs validation_cryoem
by Roberto Marabini 28 Apr '19

28 Apr '19

Hi guys, We are using phenix version 1.15.2-3472. We have executed molprobity using the command line: phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 /usr/local/phenix-1.15.2-3472/modules/cctbx_project/mmtbx/command_line/molprobity.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb pickle=True nproc=4 We have also executed validation_cryoem (here we have used both the GUI and the command line and both interfaces return the same result) phenix.python_1.15.2-3472 ./phenix/phenix/command_line/validation_cryoem.py "path_to_pdb"/refmac-refined.pdb "path_to_map"/molprobity.mrc resolution=3.2 pickle=True What we do not fully understand is why the two commands return different results for molprobity. Are the default parameters different? For example, validation_cryoem reports as number of outliers "34" in the molprobity tab (model.geometry.angle.outliers) while molprobity reports 21 The test files are available at: 3Dmap: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_i_LJfUN1z7amoyM1B2N1U0Y2VYODB6LWdLY1pwa… pdb file: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5093775/ Thanks for the help

2 3

weak anomalous phasing (magic triangle I3C)
by ChenTiantian 25 Apr '19

25 Apr '19

Dear all, I'm working on a 18kD protein, the secondary structure prediction says most of the structure is beta sheets, trying to solve the structure with SAD. Heavy atom soaking gives several datasets with I, W, Au, range from 2.7~3.7A, however, the anomalous signal is pretty weak, I couldn't find a reasonable solution. We got a co-crystal dataset with the magic triangle I3C, extends to around 2.5A, this is the best data we got so far. shelxc gives me the following result: Resl. Inf. 12.59 7.75 5.84 4.77 4.08 3.59 3.22 2.94 2.70 2.51 2.35 N(data) 79 257 429 635 811 1010 1235 1384 1698 1555 1954 Chi-sq 0.69 0.63 0.60 0.67 0.61 0.88 1.05 1.02 0.80 0.55 0.42 <I/sig> 79.4 34.1 30.3 32.2 31.8 26.6 21.1 14.6 8.3 3.9 2.4 %Complete 94.0 98.1 97.5 99.5 99.4 99.0 99.7 100.0 99.9 85.4 96.1 Multipl. 4.0 4.5 3.9 4.5 4.7 4.2 4.4 4.8 5.0 4.3 4.4 R(pim)% 2.27 1.72 2.29 2.05 2.02 2.62 3.51 4.84 7.90 14.43 22.78 Ranom% 6.49 3.68 5.19 4.29 4.27 6.35 9.50 12.97 20.90 33.58 52.21 <d"/sig> 0.73 0.80 1.08 0.85 0.95 1.03 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.78 0.70 CC(1/2) 5.1 41.7 68.8 38.1 42.7 49.9 49.9 25.5 24.9 13.3 -4.7 then I tried shelxd with different heavy atom sites number and resolution cut, the best CC I got is CC/CCweak: 24.75/7.69, and I can identify a triangle, (length: 6.5/6.5/5.0A), however, both shelxe and autosol didn't end up with a promising result. [image: image.png] It would be great if anyone can give me some suggestions. Thank you in advance! -- Tiantian

1 0

2 positions around XChem-related compound design
by Frank von Delft 24 Apr '19

24 Apr '19

Dear all, I have two open to work on fragment/XChem-related methodology for structure-based compound design. Team Leader (applications close next *Weds 1st May*): full ad here <https://www.thesgc.org/careers/oxford/sgc-oxford-team-leader-xchem>, summary: /We are recruiting an experienced computational chemist or scientific programmer, to head the Fragalysis project for automating fragment hit progression, part of the XChem collaboration between SGC and Diamond... The //Fragalysis <https://fragalysis.diamond.ac.uk/>//project leader will be tasked with converting the existing proof-of-concept tool into a production-level system that is routinely usable for analysing XChem results and designing and acquiring follow-up compounds. This will entail setting the scientific direction and priorities of the project through close and continuous interaction with expert and novice users; coordinating a growing team of scientific programmers and contractors; liaising with and expanding a wide and international set of collaborators and contributors; securing further funding for the project; helping supervise students; and developing specific methodologies of their own./ Postdoc (closing *Weds 15th May*): full advert here <https://www.thesgc.org/careers/oxford/sgc-oxford-postdoctoral-research-scie…>, this is a summary: /This role will be tasked with the design and acquisition of follow-up compounds based on fragment screening hits from the Target Enabling Package (//www.thesgc.org/tep <http://www.thesgc.org/tep>//) and Ultra-DD (//www.ultra-dd.org <http://www.ultra-dd.org>//) programs. The successful candidate will coordinate experimental validation of the newly designed compounds with collaborating scientists in order to progress them towards potent molecules. / Cheers Frank -- Prof Frank von Delft Associate Professor Principal Investigator: Protein Crystallography Structural Genomics Consortium Oxford University +44 1865 617583 (office: W,F) Principal Beamline Scientist: I04-1 Diamond Light Source +44 1235 778997 (office: M,T,T) +44 7471 026103 (mobile)

1 0

HFIR/SNS Advanced Neutron Diffraction and Scattering Workshop - HANDS 2019
by Meilleur, Flora 22 Apr '19

22 Apr '19

First announcement HANDS 2019 HFIR/SNS Advanced Neutron Diffraction and Scattering Workshop Oak Ridge, TN. June 19 - June 14, 2018 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, in conjunction with North Carolina State University, and support from the National Science Foundation and the Shull Wollan Center - a Joint Institute for Neutron Scattering, celebrates a decade of neutron scattering education in structural biology at ORNL with the HFIR/SNS Advanced Neutron Diffraction and Scattering workshop (HANDS 2019). Detailed information can be found on the workshop web page: https://conference.sns.gov/hands2019/ Application deadline: April 29, 2019 Fellowships to support travel and accommodation are available. No registration fee. The workshop aims at enabling structural biologists to fully exploit the latest instrumentation and software development at the SNS and HFIR facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Participants of HANDS 2019 will become familiar with neutron techniques with hands-on experiments in sample preparation, crystallography, small angle scattering, reflectometry and neutron spin echo. The workshop is designed for graduate students, post-doctoral fellows and faculty with limited to no experience with neutron sciences. Flora Meilleur, Ph. D Neutron Scattering Scientist, Neutron Scattering Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Associate Professor, Molecular and Structural Biochemistry North Carolina State University

1 2

Phenix version 1.15 released
by Paul Adams 19 Apr '19

19 Apr '19

The Phenix developers are pleased to announce that version 1.15 of Phenix is now available (build 1.15.2-3472). Binary installers for Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows platforms, and the source installer, are available at the download site: http://phenix-online.org/download/ Highlights for this version: New and improved tools - New algorithm for phenix.map_to_model is faster and builds longer chains - phenix.trace_and_build can build protein into maps at resolutions as low as 4.5 A - phenix.fix_insertions_deletions can build models in places where the map is poor - phenix.refine_ca_model for optimizing C-alpha only models - phenix.comparama for generating Kleywegt-like plots that show how residues moved in the Ramachandran plots before and after refinement - eLBOW can find unique instances of a ligand from the PDB and optionally create Polder OMIT maps - Updated structural library for phenix.structure_search - Updated ligand library for phenix.ligand_identification - Improved reporting of cis-peptides for residues with altloc atoms - Output of mmCIF format files by default by major tools: phenix.refine, phenix.real_space_refine, phenix.pdbtools - Bugfixes in Phaser-2.8.3 Other improvements - Updated mmCIF support (stuct_conn loop, ligand restraints, sequence) - phenix.refine, phenix.real_space_refine, and phenix.pdbtools will also output models in mmCIF format by default - Dependencies are now based on conda packages, which will be more compatible with new operating systems and will improve consistency across all platforms (macOS, linux, Windows) - Bug fixes For a full list of changes see: http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/CHANGES Please note that this publication should be used to cite use of Phenix: PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. P. D. Adams, P. V. Afonine, G. Bunkóczi, V. B. Chen, I. W. Davis, N. Echols, J. J. Headd, L.-W. Hung, G. J. Kapral, R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve, A. J. McCoy, N. W. Moriarty, R. Oeffner, R. J. Read, D. C. Richardson, J. S. Richardson, T. C. Terwilliger and P. H. Zwart. Acta Cryst. D66, 213-221 (2010). Full documentation is available here: http://www.phenix-online.org/documentation/ There is a Phenix bulletin board: http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb/ Please consult the installer README file or online documentation for installation instructions. Direct questions and problem reports to the bulletin board or: help(a)phenix-online.org and bugs(a)phenix-online.org Commercial users interested in obtaining access to Phenix should visit the Phenix website for information about the Phenix Industrial Consortium. The development of Phenix is principally funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH) under grant P01-GM063210. We also acknowledge the generous support of the members of the Phenix Industrial Consortium. -- Paul Adams Division Director, Molecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Division Deputy for Biosciences, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley Lab Adjunct Professor, Department of Bioengineering, U.C. Berkeley Vice President for Technology, the Joint BioEnergy Institute Laboratory Research Manager, ENIGMA Science Focus Area Building 33, Room 347 Building 978, Room 4126 Tel: 1-510-486-4225, Fax: 1-510-486-5909 http://cci.lbl.gov/paul Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Road BLDG 33R0345 Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. Executive Assistant: Louise Benvenue [ LBenvenue(a)lbl.gov ][ 1-510-495-2506 ] --

1 0

NIH/NSF-Funded Post-Doctoral Positions at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC)
by Yury Polikanov 18 Apr '19

18 Apr '19

*NIH/NSF-Funded Post-Doctoral Positions in Structural Biology at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) to Study the Ribosome* [image: Movie_S3_70S-mtRNA_320x240.gif] Prof. Polikanov Laboratory at the University of Illinois at Chicago (IL, USA) is looking for a talented, skillful, and highly motivated researchers to fill the *NIH/NSF-funded Post-Doctoral Scholar *positions to study the structure and function of the bacterial ribosome. The research in the Polikanov Laboratory is focused on understanding the basic principles of protein synthesis in bacteria, the modes of action of ribosome-targeting antibiotics, and the mechanisms of drug resistance at a structural level. More information about Dr. Polikanov research can be obtained from the most recent publications (*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/yury.polikanov.1/bibliography/50395623/public/?sort=date&direction=descending <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/myncbi/yury.polikanov.1/bibliography/503…>*) or found on the web-page ( https://bios.uic.edu/bios/people/faculty/yury-polikanov). The successful candidate will be involved in the determination of high-resolution structures of ribosome functional complexes with various protein translation factors, tRNAs, and antibiotics using macromolecular X-ray crystallography techniques. *Basic qualifications:* - PhD in chemistry, biochemistry , biophysics, or a related field; - Practical skills with the most standard methods currently used in molecular biology, and biochemistry (such as protein expression, purification); - Experience in structural biology (cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography); - Experience in RNA biology field is desired; *The successful candidate is also expected to:* - Drive projects forward; - Act independently in terms of planning and executing the experiments; - Compile, analyze, and prepare data for publications; - Assist with training of graduate and undergraduate students. Review of applications will begin immediately and will continue until the position is filled. Interested candidates should send their CV, cover letter, and contact information for three references directly to Dr. Yury Polikanov at yuryp(a)uic.edu. *Cover letter should be **describing how previous research accomplishments and scientific interest of a candidate fit with the scope of the research in the Polikanov Lab.* -- ------------------------------ Yury Polikanov, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Biological Sciences College of Liberal Arts and Sciences University of Illinois at Chicago 900 South Ashland Avenue, MBRB 4170 Chicago, IL 60607 Tel: 1-312-413-2408 (Office) Tel: 1-312-355-0463 (Laboratory) Fax: 1-312-413-2691 E-mail: yuryp(a)uic.edu Web-Page: *http://bios.uic.edu/bios/people/faculty/yury-polikanov <http://bios.uic.edu/bios/people/faculty/yury-polikanov>* [image: Inline image 1] ------------------------------

1 1

MRage & hhr
by Karolina Michalska 13 Apr '19

13 Apr '19

Hi, I've been trying to run MRage with an hhr file from HHPred, without much success. Phenix claims it does not recognize my hhr file. This is in the latest official release, I've tried older versions with the same outcome. I'll appreciate your help. Karolina

2 1

naive question how to add GTP as a residue to a nucleic acid chain and refine!
by Almudena Ponce Salvatierra 12 Apr '19

12 Apr '19

Dear all, I would like to add a GTP residue to a nucleic acid chain. For so I followed the following steps in coot: add monomer from library, GTP, changed chain ID and residue number accordingly, and then Extensions --> Modelling --> link 2 atoms. I got a dashed line between the 3'O of the GTP and the phosphate of the neighboring nucleotide, and then I used the real space refine tool. Up to here, it all looked promising. In phenix refine I run elbow and readyset and provided cif files, but after phenix.refine I find out that the link between GTP and it's neighbor is gone. How to preserve the bond? Thank you very much in advance!! Best, Almudena

1 0

12th CCP4/APS Crystallographic School in the US
by Xu, Qingping 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

Dear Colleagues, We are pleased to announce the 12th annual CCP4 crystallographic school “From data collection to structure refinement and beyond” will be held on June 17-24, 2019 at Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), near Chicago, Illinois, USA. All details can be found at the school website: http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-2019/index.php. Dates: June 17 through 24, 2019 Location: Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne (Near Chicago), Illinois, USA The school comprises two parts: data collection workshop and crystallographic computing workshop. Data collection workshop includes beamline training, data collection on GM/CA@APS beamlines 23ID-D and 23ID-B equipped with Pilatus3 6M and Eiger 16M detectors respectively, and data processing. For data collection, only the participants' crystals will be used. Crystallographic computation workshop will feature many modern crystallographic software packages taught by authors and other experts. The daily schedule will be organized in three sections – lectures, tutorials, and hands-on (interactive trouble-shooting of the technical difficulties the participants face in their projects). We have had considerable success resolving these problems in past years, attested by resulting publications (see http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-school/publications.php). A sample program, contact info and other details can be found at the School website. Applicants: Graduate students, postdoctoral researchers and early-career faculty, along with commercial/industrial researchers are encouraged to apply. Only 20 applicants will be selected for participation. Participants of the workshop are strongly encouraged to bring their own problem data sets or crystals so the problems can be addressed during data collection and/or computation workshops. Application: Application deadline is April 15th, 2019. To apply, visit https://www.ccp4.ac.uk/schools/APS-2019/application.php. Fees: The registration for application is free but there is $500 participation fee for the selected academic students and $950 for the industrial researchers. The link for the on-line payments and instructions will be provided once the selection process is completed. The students will be responsible for their transportation and lodging. The workshop organizers can assist in making the lodging reservations at the Argonne Guest House. The workshop will cover all other expenses (including meals). We hope to see you at the school. Charles, Garib and Qingping

1 2

Re: [phenixbb] CryoFit run failure
by Kim, Doo Nam 11 Apr '19

11 Apr '19

Hello Joseph, Sorry for late reply, your email was not in my inbox. I just changed my setting so that email to phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org will come to my inbox directly. Thank you for sharing your input file. I just ran your input pdb file, it appears that "SO4, "CD" are not in amber03 forcefield. I just added my comments like this Solution if these residue/atoms are important: Fix wrong names of atoms/residues. Running real_space_refine via phenix GUI will show which atoms need to be removed/fixed If gromacs amber03 force field doesn't have parameters for these residue/atoms, you may need to add parameters. It is rather a sad fact that most MD simulation force fields do not support all kinds of rare residue/atoms. cryo_fit2 is under development to address this issue using phenix.eLBOW Solution if these residue/atoms are not important: Remove these \"wrong\" atoms/residues from user's input pdb file. Run cryo_fit again Solution if your user's pdb file is big: Probably cryo_fit will change conformation just minimally, I would extract out these \"wrong\" atoms/residues from user's input pdb file, then add these extracted lines to cryo_fitted file If you do git pull at your <phenix>/modules/cryo_fit and run again, you will see results at least to the final stage (that I can't run because of lack of map). best regards, Doonam ________________________________ From: Finney, Joseph (NIH/NCI) [C] <joseph.finney(a)nih.gov> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 9:09:23 AM To: Kim, Doo Nam Cc: bugs-from-web(a)phenix-online.org; phenixbb(a)phenix-online.org; Esser, Lothar (NCI) Subject: CryoFit run failure Hey Doonam, As I said before I figured I would have some additional questions. The new version of phenix (1.15-3459-000) fixed my issues last week with the tutorial dataset. However, I am having trouble with our own testing dataset. As before we are testing in GUI version first. I am using the same run conditions for both the tutorial set and out testing set. I am attaching the log of the tutorial set as well as the log of our testing set and the test PDB. The density map is too large for email. The major error I see is “Step 1 didn't run successfully” from the ferrtest run. Looking at the tutorial PDB, it seems as though the header, the terminations, and the nonstandard atoms have been removed prior to use. I tried this and got a different error: “pdb file cleaning is not done, exit now” Do you have any recommendations on how to succeed? Thanks in advance! Joseph Finney [Contractor] Software Developer National Cryo-EM Facility Cancer Research Technology Program Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Leidos Biomedical Research Inc. PO Box B Frederick, MD 21702 Tel: (301) 228-4313 Cell: (615) 512-2053 Joseph.finney(a)nih.gov<mailto:[email protected]>

1 0