Hi Carsten,

I completely agree: every time we have something new, we need to write about it to phenixbb.
Even though it might be in the list of new features that comes with the release, repeating is not bad.

Pavel.

On 11/4/2008 9:53 AM, Schubert, Carsten [PRDUS] wrote: 
Hi Ralf,

for future reference: Could you guys advertise these kind of nuggets a bit more, please? Its great to have this feature in there, but what use is it when only a few people know about it. Did I miss the advert somehow or should I RTFM?

Cheers,

	Carsten

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Ralf W.
Grosse-Kunstleve
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 12:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [phenixbb] refine occupancies for MET/MSE double
conformations


Hi Tassos,

  
However, I want to refine my MET residues in double conformations, one
as MET (AMET) and the other one as MSE (BMSE) with each 0.5 occupancy
to start with.
    

In addition to what Pavel wrote: I just tried out the AMET BMSE mix
without giving any manual atom selections, and it works fine for me.
(P.S.: I'm thrilled to see this use of the
multiple-conformers-with-mixed-residue-names feature,
since it was a lot of work.)

Ralf
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb


_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb