Re: [phenixbb] multi-xtal averaging vs twinning

Oh -- the argument being that it's not the phases that are twinned? Peter Zwart wrote:

< snip >

...

Or how *would* one approach this?

Basic MR / refinement, guided by plain phenix.multi_crystal_average phases without anything special I guess ... (Like you indicate basically).

Make sure that indexing between datasets is consistent (try something like phenix.xtriage native.sca reference.data.file=semet.sca). Lowish CC's can be explained by non-isomorphism issues as well as different twin fractions in different xtals.

HTH

P _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb