Hi,

I recommend polder maps for final stages of model building.

But they are computed quickly, so you can nonetheless try and see what appears in the map.

Best wishes,

Dorothee

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Murpholino Peligro <murpholinox@gmail.com> wrote:

So I got a MR solution and maybe a dozen residues are not clearly defined (most of them in the surface) I used to compute the feature enhanced map but now I can see there are a lot of options in phenix->maps. Which one is better for me? (~130 residues, 1.5 A resolution, ~ 90% complete)
Probably I should try them all, and compare them visually in coot with appropiate sigmas (taken from maps-> map comparison) (is that a good workflow? what you guys do?) ...but some of the maps take a lot of time to compute. So any help will be appreciated.

Thanks

_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org