Thanks Jack!  Although I’m finding that Coot isn’t writing the refinement info in the output file either… (this is for deposition, so I need the refinement data). Maybe I need to try a newer version.

On 15 Oct 2023, at 3:36 PM, Tanner, John J. <[email protected]> wrote:

External.

Hi Pat,
 
Coot has a tool to shift the residue numbers by a positive or negative increment. See Edit…Renumber Residues.
 
Best Regards,
 
Jack 
 
 

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Patrick Loll <[email protected]>
Date: Sunday, October 15, 2023 at 1:22 PM
To: PHENIX user mailing list <[email protected]>
Subject: [phenixbb] Renumbering while retaining refinement info

WARNING: This message has originated from an External Source. This may be a phishing expedition that can result in unauthorized access to our IT System. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
Hello all, 
 
I've finished refining a handful of related structures, but now I need to renumber the residues to reflect the fact that I’m working with a truncated construct (like a dope I didn’t do this at the outset). However, when I run PDB Tools, it does not write the refinement information into the output CIF. 
 
Is there a way to get around this, other than re-running the final cycle of refinement with the renumbered coordinates (or entering the refinement info by hand? This would be easy in the PDB format, but not so much in mmCIF). 
 
Cheers,
 
Pat
 
__________________________________
 
Patrick J.  Loll, PhD (he, him, his)
Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Drexel University College of Medicine
Room 10-102 New College Building
245 N. 15th St.
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192 USA
 
(267) 359-2653
 
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: [email protected]

Patrick Loll
[email protected]