Hi Francis,
Yes, you can do that. It requires one extra step to do the combination.
You need to make a script like the one below (see
https://solve.lanl.gov/Resolve/html_resolve_manual/resolve_sample_scripts.ht...):
All the best,
Tom T
Merging phase sets with different origins
You can merge phase sets with different origins with this script. It uses
an FFT convolution to find the best allowed offset between the maps
calculated with the two phase sets. Merging the files REQUIRES HL
coefficients (see above for generating them if you do not have them).
Note: the FP and SIGFP in the output file will come from the hklin file
NOT the hklmerge file:
phenix.resolve < Thanks so much!It looks promising.
If I have two or more derivative data and want to combine all these
information. Can I just do MRSAD individually for each dataset, and
combine them? ÒýÓÃ Nathaniel Echols On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Francis E Reyes
wrote: Using the model to find the heavy atom sites and then calculating
phases on
those sites (without model) might help. ( I believe phenix will output
a
phase combined map (model + experimental phases)). Correct, this is the default behavior if you provide a model directly to
AutoSol (or Phaser). There is however a semi-automatic way to use the
model
phases to find sites without biasing the experimental map; see the
documentation here: https://www.phenix-online.org/version_docs/1.6.2-432/autosol.htm#anch126 (The AutoBuild step is optional - you could just look at the
density-modified map after AutoSol is done.) -Nat _______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb