Hi Sabine,
I believe the comparison should be with same input, not
output of one piped into another.
How different are the geometry? Different programs use
different algorithm and different xray:geometry term by
default. Hence, it might only make sense if the RMSD are almost
exactly the same. Furthermore, is one program detecting NCS or
twining or building waters automatically? Then everything is
blown up anyway.
In any case, refinemt program A vs. B is an interesting
topic! I would not start one.. ;)
MFG,
Partha
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Sabine
Schneider
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
I am refining a structure at 2.1A solved by MR. For curiosity
I'm testing things like 'shaking' coordinates, simulated
annealing, refinement Refmac vs Phenix and so on, to see what
influence that has on stats, maps etc.
For instance after MR I did a bit of shaking the coordinates
with pdbset (noise 0.1), followed by simulated annealing in
Phenix.
Phenix states after SA:
Start R-work = 0.2671, R-free = 0.2992
Final R-work = 0.2312, R-free = 0.2666
When I use the output pdb of phenix directly in Refmac (with
same mtz as input for Phenix)
Refmac tells me:
Initial R factor 0.2392 R free 0.2887
So I am quite puzzled about the discrepancy. Or can someone
tell me if I made an error in reasoning somewhere?
Thanks a lot for the help!
Sabine
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb