Sacha, No, it won't. I believe Pavel and I agree that assigning zero amplitudes to negative intensity reflections is wrong. The question is should such reflections be excluded from refinement *if* the mistake has already been made. My uneducated guess is that Pavel believes that this will have undetectable effect on a final model. I am, as usual, clueless. Privet, Ed. On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 08:06 +0100, Alexandre OURJOUMTSEV wrote:
Hi, Ed and Pavel,
No, of course. I was just wondering how better (and what is "better" in this case) the refinement results will be if one includes the negative (zero) reflections into the process of refinement, and did anyone clearly demonstrate it.
Can the work below help your discussion?
Best regards,
Sacha
============= Acta Cryst. (1978). A34, 517-525 [ doi:10.1107/S0567739478001114 ]
On the treatment of negative intensity observations S. French and K. Wilson _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
-- Edwin Pozharski, PhD, Assistant Professor University of Maryland, Baltimore ---------------------------------------------- When the Way is forgotten duty and justice appear; Then knowledge and wisdom are born along with hypocrisy. When harmonious relationships dissolve then respect and devotion arise; When a nation falls to chaos then loyalty and patriotism are born. ------------------------------ / Lao Tse /