20 Jan
2017
20 Jan
'17
8:05 a.m.
Dear, at 1.5A resolution you should be fine with the default options, and your maps should be of high quality showing anything you are interested in. Are you looking into anything specific that makes you believe you should try any special features? Best, Tim On Thursday 19 January 2017 04:04:12 PM Murpholino Peligro wrote: > So I got a MR solution and maybe a dozen residues are not clearly defined > (most of them in the surface) I used to compute the feature enhanced map > but now I can see there are a lot of options in phenix->maps. Which one is > better for me? (~130 residues, 1.5 A resolution, ~ 90% complete) > Probably I should try them all, and compare them visually in coot with > appropiate sigmas (taken from maps-> map comparison) (is that a good > workflow? what you guys do?) ...but some of the maps take a lot of time to > compute. So any help will be appreciated. > > Thanks -- -- Paul Scherrer Institut Dr. Tim Gruene - persoenlich - Principal Investigator Biology and Chemistry OFLC/102 CH-5232 Villigen PSI Phone: +41 (0)56 310 5297 GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A