Yangqi

@ 3.6Å resolution, you would almost certainly not have enough information to suggest anything but planar geometry. I'm happy to take a look if you send me the model and restraints directly.

Cheers

Nigel

---
Nigel W. Moriarty
Building 33R0349, Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Berkeley, CA 94720-8235
Phone : 510-486-5709     Email : NWMoriarty@LBL.gov
Fax   : 510-486-5909       Web  : CCI.LBL.gov


On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:24 PM Yangqi Gu <yangqi.gu@yale.edu> wrote:
Dear all,
I have a question regarding the heme c geometry restraint. I am aware that heme c could undergo distortion when bound to protein, but I am not sure at what resolution I could claim such distortion (such as ruffling/bending/doming). I have a map at 3.6 A resolution and whenever I did the refinement in phenix with real space refinement, some of the hemes are distorted and I am wondering if it is justified to leave it that way or do I have to impose the flat plane geometry. If so, how should I proceed to impose such geometry? Thank you in advance!
Best,
Yangqi
_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
phenixbb@phenix-online.org
http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb
Unsubscribe: phenixbb-leave@phenix-online.org