Hi Jianghai,

could you please send us .log file from your refinement run, so we can analyze what's going on.

In general, "bad" B-factors can be:
- misplaced model;
- inadequate TLS model (= domains chosen for TLS do not correspond to the reality).

If you are using like 2 months old or older version of phenix.refine, you may want to get the latest CCI APPS since we made lots of improvements. Just goto http://www.phenix-online.org/download/cci_apps/

Pavel.


Jianghai Zhu wrote:
The resolution is 2.5 A.  The wilson B is about 50.  I know B factor of the backbone is lower than that of the sidechian.  But a B factor like 4 is definitely wrong.

Jianghai


On Dec 14, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Peter Zwart wrote:


4) The refinement (TLS + ML + B individual) went through, I got  
reasonable R, Rfree, rmsdBOND, rmsdANGLE.  But the B factors are  
pretty low.  The B factor of the backbone is much lower than the side  
chain, some have numbers like 4.  Some metal atoms also have B  
factors around 4.  What did I do wrong?

What is the resolution of your data?

Backbone B-s usually are lower than the main chain.

What is the Wilson B value reported by phenix.refine?
You could re-refine and randomize all B-values and see what happens (I 
have to get back to you to to get the exact command for this). Maybe it 
is useful to obtain a copy of the latest verison of phenix.refine by 
downloading cci_apps from our server http://www.phenix-online.org.


If your B-values still come out lowish, try growing crystals that do not 
diffract very well, that usually does the trick.

HTH

Peter








_______________________________________________
phenixbb mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb


_______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://www.phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb