![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/adbcf65bafad29af1bd4904500ca2ca5.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
6 Jun
2016
6 Jun
'16
1:47 p.m.
I have an extremely low resolution data set to 6.5 A. The data were collected on a Pilatus detector, indexed and further processed in XDS, space group P321. Pointless determines spacegroup to P3221 or P3121 and L-test shows no twinning. Phenix X-triage indicates twinning, but the twin fraction varies enormously depending on the method used: Britton analysis 0.337, H-test 0.260, ML 0.022. The UCLA twin server also thinks that data are twinned. How do I evaluate which information is right? Also, I think I found a molecular replacement solution that is correct using these twinned data. Ursula -- Ursula Schulze-Gahmen, Ph.D. Project Scientist UC Berkeley, QB3 360 Stanley Hall #3220 Berkeley, CA 94720-3220 (510) 643 9491