Hi Andrea, hmm, did phenix.refine actually use optimize_mask=true ? If you compare the logfiles of phenix.refine (for the default run with opimize_mask=false, and the new run with optimize_mask=true) side-by-side with xxdiff or vimdiff (yes this needs to be run from a command-line) then there should be a difference. Making peace with the red blobs is somewhat unsatisfactory from a technical viewpoint, but probably not relevant from a biological one. I'd guess that the authors of https://journals.iucr.org/a/issues/2024/02/00/pl5035/index.html would be interested to look at your case ... Best wishes, Kay Am 15.03.24 um 08:27 schrieb Andrea Smith:
Hi Kay,
I tried the mask optimization and there is no change in how the final map looks like.
Should I just make peace with it?
Best, Andrea
On Thursday, March 14, 2024 23:11 CET, Kay Diederichs
wrote: Hi Andrea,
in your case, phenix.refine seems to fill bulk solvent into volumes that are not actually filled by solvent. It might help to optimize the mask, see https://phenix-online.org/documentation/reference/refinement.html#bulk-solve... "6. Mask parameters".
Best, Kay -- Kay Diederichs http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de email: [email protected] Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz
This e-mail is digitally signed. If your e-mail client does not have the necessary capabilities, just ignore the attached signature "smime.p7s". _______________________________________________ phenixbb mailing list [email protected] http://phenix-online.org/mailman/listinfo/phenixbb Unsubscribe: [email protected]
-- Kay Diederichs http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de email: [email protected] Tel +49 7531 88 4049 Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz This e-mail is digitally signed. If your e-mail client does not have the necessary capabilities, just ignore the attached signature "smime.p7s".